Vote: approved

Item Text

PZ-1. HASSAYAMPA 78 Case # CPA2013011 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant/Owner: Don Cox (Cardno) for Voyager Hassayampa Investors, LLC Request: Modification of Conditions ‘c’ & ‘i’ of CPA200704. CPA case approval is by Resolution Site Location: Approximately at the northwest corner of Thomas Road and 339th Avenue, in the Tonopah area Site Size: Approx. 80 acres Commission Recommendation: By a 6-0 vote, recommended approval subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: Provided the following conditions are met: a. Development shall comply with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment document entitled “Hassayampa 78 Comprehensive Plan Amendment”, a bound document, dated January 5, 2009, and stamped received January 6, 2009, including all exhibits, maps, and appendices, except as modified by the following stipulations. b. Changes to the Hassayampa 78 Comprehensive Plan Amendment with regard to use and intensity, or the stipulations approved by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, shall be processed as a revised application with approval by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of the Commission. Revised applications shall be in accordance with the applicable Comprehensive Plan Amendment Plan Guidelines, zoning ordinance, and subdivision regulations in effect at the time of amendment application. Non-compliance with the approved Hassayampa 78 Comprehensive Plan Amendment, including the narrative report, maps, exhibits, or approved stipulations, constitutes a violation in accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. c. The applicant shall submit a written report every five years from the date of Board of Supervisors approval of CPA2013011 which details the status of this project, including progress on obtaining necessary entitlements, licenses, and permits; compliance with the conditions of approval; compliance with the approved narrative report; compliance with the approved land use plan; and justification as to how the approved land use plan still represents appropriate land use planning for the property and unincorporated Maricopa County in accordance with the goals and policies in its comprehensive and applicable area plan. This report shall be scheduled for public hearing by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (Board), upon recommendation by the Maricopa County Planning and Zoning Commission (Commission), to consider whether the planning justification for this CPA is still present, and whether the land use designations associated with this CPA still represent appropriate and better long-term land use planning in accordance with the goals and policies of the Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan and applicable area plan. If the Board changes the current land use designations back to Rural (0-1 du/ac), all entitlements associated with this project that were conditional pursuant to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance may also be considered by the Board, upon recommendation by the Commission, for reversion to the prior entitlements. In such an event, the comprehensive plan land use map, area plan land use map, and, as applicable, zoning map shall be altered to reflect Board action. d. The property owner and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval of this comprehensive plan amendment due to non-compliance with any of the approved stipulations or other conditions of approval. e. The total number of residential units shall not exceed 219 dwelling units f. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation stipulations shall apply: 1. The Owner/Developer has provided a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). The TIS shall comply with MCDOT requirements and shall address development phasing and the offsite improvements necessary to accommodate the anticipated traffic demands. The TIS must be approved before subsequent approval of any roadway improvement plans. The TIS shall be updated prior to any zoning (rezoning) and/or plat approvals and with each development phase to reflect current conditions and any changes to the development plan. The need for additional lane capacity on offsite alignments will be reviewed with each re-submittal of the TIS. The project must comply with all recommendations in the MCDOT-approved TIS. The Owner/Developer needs to submit an updated TIS prior to any further approvals. 2. The Developer shall make a contribution to regional transportation infrastructure. The contribution shall be $3,281.00 per residential dwelling unit. The Developer shall pay the contribution amount directly to MCDOT at the time individual building permits are issued, or per an alternate agreement as approved by MCDOT. 3. The Owner/Developer shall provide the ultimate half-width of right-of-way for all public roadways as follows: a. 339th Avenue (Parkway) 100 Feet half-width b. Thomas Road (Arterial) 65 Feet half-width c. 341st Avenue (Collector) 30 Feet half-width d. Residential/Local 50 Feet total-width 4. The Developer shall be responsible for the design and construction of the ultimate full-width of all interior roadways, and the ultimate half-width of all perimeter roadways. Where applicable, “half-width” construction must safely convey two directions of traffic until the ultimate roadway is constructed. All roadways must meet all county standards in effect at the time. (This includes, but is not limited to the “MCDOT Roadway Design Manual,” including ITS infrastructure requirements and the “Drainage Policies and Standards for Maricopa County.”) The Developer shall relocate any “obstructions” (well sites, etc.) and/or provide additional right of-way in the event of conflict with any transportation facilities. Roadway improvement plans must be approved and permitted by MCDOT. 5. The Developer is responsible for assuring paved access to the site at the time of the first final plat. 6. The Developer shall provide all-weather access to all parcels and lots. 7. The Developer shall provide and make available a minimum of two access points to each development phase and/or subdivision unit. 8. The Developer shall design the development to promote pedestrian, bicycle and other alternative modes of transportation between uses within and adjacent to the site, by means in addition to the roadway system. 9. If streetlights are provided, installation shall be provided by the Developer. If streetlights are within public rights-of-way, a Street Light Improvement District (SLID) or comparable authority shall be established to provide operation and maintenance. The Developer should contact the Office of the Superintendent of Streets at (602) 506-8797 to initiate the SLID process. 10. The Developer shall design landscaping to comply with all county requirements and to conform to the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual. The Developer (or as assigned to Home Owner’s Association (HOA)) shall be responsible for maintenance of landscaping within public rights-of-way. 11. The Developer shall provide a construction traffic circulation plan. The construction traffic circulation plan must be approved by MCDOT. 12. The Developer shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements. (Dust control, noise mitigation, AZPDES, 404 permitting, etc.) 13. The Owner/Developer shall provide written documentation of ADOT’s review and response. g. That the following Drainage Administration comments shall apply: 1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the Drainage Regulation and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Drainage review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with the Drainage Regulation and design policies and standards. h. That the following Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management stipulation shall apply: • Any areas not covered by the existing Outdoor Warning Siren System used to alert residents within the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in time of emergency shall be required to include additional sirens, at the developer’s cost, in order to provide adequate warning for the residents of that development, using technical information concerning the siren system obtained from the Emergency Planning Department at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. In addition, adequate signage available from the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Department shall be required to be posted on the site to inform the public of the presence of a nuclear generating station in the vicinity and outlining actions to take upon receiving warning notification. (C-44-14-050-M-00)