Vote: held

Item Text

PZ-1. T-MOBILE PIERCE PROPERTY Case #: Z2014094 Supervisor District: 1 Applicant/Owner: Dave Ullrich/Shawn and Trena Pierce Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) – 68’ monopole stealth designed as a palm tree in the RU-43 zoning district - T-Mobile Pierce Property. Site Location: Located approximately 270 ft. south of the southwest corner of Ocotillo Rd. and 132nd St. (in the Chandler area) Site Size: Approximately 400 sq. ft. of an approximate 1 acre parcel County Island Status: Class 1 (City of Chandler) Additional Comments: N/A Commission Recommendation: On 5/7/15, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2014094 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall comply with the Site Plan entitled “T-Mobile Pierce Raw Land”, consisting of four (4) full-size sheets, dated received on February 13, 2015, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “T-Mobile Site – PH10539B Pierce Property”, consisting of four (4) pages, dated received February 13, 2015, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The height of the wireless communication facility shall be limited to 68’. d. The wireless communication tower shall retain the stealth properties as originally designed. Any damaged or missing fronds or branches shall be replaced within 60 days of such damage occurring. e. This Special Use Permit shall expire 30 years from the date of approval by the Board of Supervisors, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 days. All of the site improvements shall be removed within 60 days of such termination or expiration. f. The following Drainage Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only and does not represent final design approval nor shall it entitle applicants to future designs that are not in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; and the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-15-089-M-00)