Vote — approved

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

8.SOUTHWEST BARRICADES Case #: Z2018102 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant / Owner: Rod Jarvis, Earl & Curley / Applied Investments 2 LLC Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located 520’ east of the southeast corner of 19th Avenue and Parkview Lane in the Phoenix area Commission Recommendation: On 7/23/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2018102 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance w

Item Text

8. SOUTHWEST BARRICADES Case #: Z2018102 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant / Owner: Rod Jarvis, Earl & Curley / Applied Investments 2 LLC Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located 520’ east of the southeast corner of 19th Avenue and Parkview Lane in the Phoenix area Commission Recommendation: On 7/23/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2018102 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Southwest Barricades”, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated October, 2019, and stamped received May 14, 2020. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Southwest Barricades Narrative Report”, consisting of 6 pages, dated May 11, 2020, and stamped received May 14, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Retention basins must drain within 36 hours. Minimum drywell spacing in the retention basin shall be 50 feet. 2. This site is encumbered by federal patent easements. No new improvements may be constructed within the easements. Certain entities have the right to work within or otherwise use these easements which may cause damage to or removal of the existing perimeter fence and/or material located within the easements. Approval of this application does not constitute permission to interfere with or use the easements in any way. 3. A minimum 25 foot separation is required between retention basins and septic facilities. 4. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only all development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 5. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans indicating that the site will drain towards the retention basin(s) will be required with the submission of building/grading permit application(s). d. The applicant/property owner shall submit a ‘will serve’ letter for fire protection services for the project site. A copy of the ‘will serve’ letter shall be required as part of the initial construction permit submittal. e. The following IND-2 IUPD standards shall apply: 1. Front Yard 5-feet 2. Side Yard, 0-feet 3. Corner Side Yard, 0-feet 4. Rear Yard, 0-feet 5. Enclosure and Screening, existing 6’(h) chain link f. The zone change is applied to restrict the use of the site. Until such time as the site is served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic systems. A public water system and public sewer system shall be required prior to establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-21-028-X-00)

Attachments (1)