Vote — continued

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

17.ROSE ESTATES Case #: Z2019112 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD Site Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area. Commission Recommendation: On 8/6/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2019112 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’ with modification to condition ‘c.2’: a. Development of the site 

Item Text

17. ROSE ESTATES Case #: Z2019112 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD Site Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area. Commission Recommendation: On 8/6/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2019112 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’ with modification to condition ‘c.2’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full size sheet, dated June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zone Change Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 10 pages, dated June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. c.The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots, drainage design, access, roadway widths and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on progression of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which includes extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to provide access to the site. 3. A Traffic Impact Study must be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat application. 4. Any new development on the subject premises must provide for at least two (2) paved accesses from the site to an improved public roadway. 5. Encroachment into FEMA Zone AE and FW floodplains/floodways is extremely restrictive. The applicant must address development requirements (e.g. CLOMR/LOMR) required to develop the site in the manner proposed as plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 6. The applicant must address how public improvements, residences and other improvements necessary for development of the site (e.g. retention basins) will be protected from scour along the Agua Fria River (33,000 CFS) as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. A significant portion of the site outside of the regulatory floodplains is contained within a mapped lateral migration erosion zone. 7. Engineering review of re-zone cases are conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following R1-6 RUPD standards shall apply: 1. Minimum Front Setback of 10 feet 2. Minimum Rear Setback of 15 feet 3. Minimum Lot Area of 5,175 square feet 4. Minimum Lot Width of 45 feet 5. Maximum Lot Coverage of 55% e. Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall obtain a Certificate of 100-Year Assured Water Supply from the Arizona Department of Water Resources. f. Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall abandon all Patent Easements on the site. g. All outdoor lighting shall conform to Section 1112 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The property owner(s) and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. i . Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting if this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions. Does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change never been granted. (C-44-21-043-X-00)

Attachments (1)

Vote — approved

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

6.ROSE ESTATES Case #: Z2019112 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD Site Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area. Commission Recommendation: On 8/6/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2019112 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’ with modification to condition ‘c.2’: a. Development of the site s

Item Text

6. ROSE ESTATES Case #: Z2019112 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Zone change from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD Site Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area. Commission Recommendation: On 8/6/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2019112 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’ with modification to condition ‘c.2’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full size sheet, dated June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zone Change Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 10 pages, dated June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots, drainage design, access, roadway widths and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Any approval and progression in the entitlement process is contingent on progression of MCDOT TIP TT0248 which includes extension of Williams Drive across the Agua Fria River to Deer Valley Road which is intended to provide access to the site. 3. A Traffic Impact Study must be submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat application. 4. Any new development on the subject premises must provide for at least two (2) paved accesses from the site to an improved public roadway. 5. Encroachment into FEMA Zone AE and FW floodplains/floodways is extremely restrictive. The applicant must address development requirements (e.g. CLOMR/LOMR) required to develop the site in the manner proposed as plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 6. The applicant must address how public improvements, residences and other improvements necessary for development of the site (e.g. retention basins) will be protected from scour along the Agua Fria River (33,000 CFS) as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. A significant portion of the site outside of the regulatory floodplains is contained within a mapped lateral migration erosion zone. 7. Engineering review of re-zone cases are conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following R1-6 RUPD standards shall apply: 1. Minimum Front Setback of 10 feet 2. Minimum Rear Setback of 15 feet 3. Minimum Lot Area of 5,175 square feet 4. Minimum Lot Width of 45 feet 5. Maximum Lot Coverage of 55% e. Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall obtain a Certificate of 100-Year Assured Water Supply from the Arizona Department of Water Resources. f. Prior to the approval of any Final Plat, the developer shall abandon all Patent Easements on the site. g. All outdoor lighting shall conform to Section 1112 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The property owner(s) and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. i . Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting if this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions. Does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change never been granted. This agenda item was continued from the September 2, 2020 Board of Supervisors Formal Meeting. (C-44-21-043-X-00)

Attachments (2)