Vote — approved

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

6.PERRYVILLE AND I-10 Case #: Z2020003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owners: William E. Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A./ Jose Cabrera & Lourdes Rojas Request: Plan of Development (POD) within the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district for storage units as part of the wholesale trade use Site Location: Generally located approximately 180’ south of the SEC of Perryville Rd. and Interstate-10 in the Goodyear area Commission Recommendation: On 9/24/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z20

Item Text

6. PERRYVILLE AND I-10 Case #: Z2020003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owners: William E. Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A./ Jose Cabrera & Lourdes Rojas Request: Plan of Development (POD) within the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district for storage units as part of the wholesale trade use Site Location: Generally located approximately 180’ south of the SEC of Perryville Rd. and Interstate-10 in the Goodyear area Commission Recommendation: On 9/24/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of Z2020003 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘f’: a. Development of the site shall comply with the Site Plan entitled “Plan of Development – 1142 N. 186TH Dr.”, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, stamped received August 14, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in general conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Perryville Storage POD”, consisting of 5 pages, stamped received September 1, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. A grading and drainage plan must be submitted for any required building permit(s). 2. Runoff from the POD area must be directed to the proposed retention basin. 3. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. f. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Plan of Development. The Plan of Development enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Plan of Development is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Plan of Development had never been granted. (C-44-21-093-X-00)

Attachments (1)