Vote — approved

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

5.1 Deliverable One (1) Disease Investigations and Surveillance, Sub-Section 5.1.4. Conduct surveillance of valley fever, including monitoring and assessing trends and performing analyses, as identified in Amendment Three (3), is hereby removed. 1.2 The Agreement Price Sheet is revised and replaced with the Price Sheet of this Amendment Five (5). The Amendment 5 Price Sheet for the budget period May 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021. Funding for this period is carryover from previous budget years a

Item Text

5. PERRYVILLE AND I-10 Case #: MCP2020005 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owners: William E. Lally, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A./ Jose Cabrera & Lourdes Rojas Request: Modification of Conditions to Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) #MCP2019001 for wholesale trade in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located approximately 180’ south of the SEC of Perryville Rd. and Interstate-10 in the Goodyear area Commission Recommendation: On 9/24/20, the Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of MCP2020005 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’: a. Development of the site shall comply with the Site Plan entitled “Plan of Development – 1142 N. 186th Dr.”, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, stamped received September 16, 2019, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Within 30 days of Board of Supervisors approval, a revised site plan shall be provided to correct the following: billboard setbacks (add rear yard and fix side yard), property setbacks (fix side yard), and fix lot coverage/existing buildings percentages. c. Development of the site shall be in general conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “I-10 & Perryville Rd – Application for Military Compatibility Permit”, consisting of 22 pages, stamped received June 10, 2019, except as modified by the following conditions. d. This Plan of Development (POD) shall only apply to the billboard land use. Any future land uses (including wholesale trade) shall require a new POD to be approved by the Board of Supervisors. e. No access other than for single-family residential uses, indoor storage service, or for the construction and maintenance of outdoor advertising shall be off of 186th Drive. f. The following standards shall apply for the offsite (billboard) sign: 1. Maximum height: 66’ 2. Maximum sign area: 672 sq. ft. 3. Side yard setback: 0’ (north) 4. Rear yard setback: 0’ (west) 5. Setback to Rural-43 zoning: 0’ 6. Setback to Rural-43 zoning for illuminated sign: 0’ 7. Minimum distance from another offsite sign: 650’ The following standards shall apply to the freestanding sign for indoor storage service: 8. There shall only be one non-illuminated freestanding sign allowed on the subject site 9. Maximum height: 5’ and maximum sign area of 13 sq. ft. g. The following Engineering condition shall apply: 1. A separate Plan of Development must be submitted to include the wholesale trade use on the subject premises. The Plan of Development application must include an engineered grading and drainage plan and a signed and sealed Traffic Statement. h. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). i . The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-21-094-X-00)

Attachments (1)