Vote — approved

Steve Gallardo	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Chucri	yes

6.ROSE ESTATES Case #: CPA2020004 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Modification of Condition for a previously approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) – to modify or delete condition ‘c’ of CPA2019013 regarding a maximum unit count for an area designed for Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) land uses Site Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (a

Item Text

6. ROSE ESTATES Case #: CPA2020004 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owner: Jordan Rose, Rose Law Group, PC / Larry & Patricia Rose Request: Modification of Condition for a previously approved Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) – to modify or delete condition ‘c’ of CPA2019013 regarding a maximum unit count for an area designed for Small Lot Residential (2-5 du/ac) land uses Site Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of 115th Ave. (alignment) and Williams Dr. (alignment) in the Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 1/28/21, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of CPA2020004 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘d’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA Land Use Exhibit, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of one (1) full sized sheet, dated June 2020, and stamped date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the CPA Narrative Report, entitled “Rose Estates”, consisting of 11 pages, dated June 2020, and stamp date received on June 10, 2020, except as modified by the following conditions. c. DELETED. d. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the uses existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the land use designation that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such change of the land use. The land use enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the land use change is granted and reverting to the prior land use designation results in the same value of the property as if the land use change had never been granted. (C-44-21-194-X-00)

Attachments (2)