← Back

C-number: C-44-22-164-X

C-number: C-44-22-164-X-00
Item: #14
Revision: 00
Vote — approved
Bill Gates yes
Clint Hickman yes
Jack Sellers yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes
$14.08 per SF plus rental tax with an annual increase of 2.5%. The Lease is subject to termination pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. 38-511. Either Lessor or Lessee may terminate the Lease by giving three hundred sixty-five (365) days prior written notice of termination to the other Party. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement and previously approved Amendment remain the same and full force and effect.Supervisory District 2) (C-22-10-044-1-10 Motion to approve by Supervisor Jack Sel
Item Text
14. 4202 & 4150 W. SUNLAND AVE. Case #: Z2021123 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant & Owner: Peter Batshelet / IV Bat Holdings, LLC Request: Rezone from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located 670’ east of the NEC of Sunland Ave. and 43rd Ave. in the Phoenix area Commission Recommendation: On 3/10/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval Z2021123 subject to the following conditions ‘a’ – ‘f’: a. The IUPD Overlay is applied to restrict the use of the site. Until such time as the site is served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by sep tic systems. A public water system and public sewer system shall be required prior to establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. b. Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accorda nce with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. c. Subjec t to the following Planning Engineering conditions: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no approval is implied by this review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addres sed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Any development must ensure that historic drainage patterns are maintained at the up and downstream limits of development. 3. A traffic impact stu dy must be submitted with any future entitlement application ( i.e. plan of development). 4. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodpla in Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiati ng a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. e. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. f. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the app licant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with a ny condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-22-164-X-00)
Attachments (1)

1 item(s) sharing C-number base C-44-22-164-X