Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

11.RV STORAGE-DYSART Case #: MCP2022001 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley / DBRV, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with Plan of Development (POD) for an RV and boat storage facility in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district with existing SUP Site Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Olive Ave. and Dysart Rd. (APN#501-47-015A) Commission Recommendation: On 6/16/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval of MCP2022001 subje

Item Text

11. RV STORAGE-DYSART Case #: MCP2022001 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Taylor Earl, Earl & Curley / DBRV, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with Plan of Development (POD) for an RV and boat storage facility in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district with existing SUP Site Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Olive Ave. and Dysart Rd. (APN#501-47-015A) Commission Recommendation: On 6/16/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval of MCP2022001 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled, “RV Storage - Dysart” consisting of eight full-size sheets dated April 29, 2022, and stamped received May 13, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled, “RV & Boat Storage - Dysart”, consisting of ten pages, dated May 31, 2022, and stamped received June 1, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The Military Compatibility Permit shall be limited to the following uses: 1. Recreational vehicle and boat storage facility with canopies 2. Existing caretaker residence and office d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. 4. The south half of Olive Avenue along the project frontage shall be developed to the ultimate street cross-section to meet the City of El Mirage requirements, including any required right-of-way dedication at the time of initial phase construction permitting. 5. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 6. The entire site and adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained onsite. If portions of adjacent right-of-way are controlled by other jurisdictions, the adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained unless separately addressed by the other jurisdictions. 7. Sufficient retention volume shall be provided onsite to retain the required 100-year, 2-hour runoff from all contributing areas. Retention basins with stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one foot of freeboard. 8. All retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements. e. Prior to initial phase construction permitting, the owner/developer shall submit a traffic study to the City of Glendale for approval and incorporate any City of Glendale requirements, including any required right-of-way dedication. f. All new buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). g. The following Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District standards shall apply: 1. Max. Lot Coverage – 55% 2. Signage – Chapter 14, Section 1401 and 1403 regulations apply 3. Pavement – Pavement may consist of rolled and compacted decomposed granite with a dust control plan approved by Maricopa County Air Quality Control or asphalt. All other development standards of the underlying zoning shall remain. h. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Military Compatibility Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i . The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Military Compatibility Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Military Compatibility Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Military Compatibility Permit. The Military Compatibility Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Military Compatibility Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Military Compatibility Permit had never been granted. (C-44-23-006-X-00)

Attachments (1)