Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

10.THE ENCLAVE AT ANTHEM Case #: Z2022027 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant & Owners: Cassandra Ayres, Berry-Riddell, LLC / Spectrum Acquisition Anthem, LLC Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) Major Amendment to develop 10 additional rowhome casitas and parking in the C-O SUP zoning district Site Location: Generally located approx. 1,322' southwest of the intersection of Anthem Way & Venture Dr. Commission Recommendation: On 6/16/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval of Z2022027 subje

Item Text

10. THE ENCLAVE AT ANTHEM Case #: Z2022027 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant & Owners: Cassandra Ayres, Berry-Riddell, LLC / Spectrum Acquisition Anthem, LLC Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) Major Amendment to develop 10 additional rowhome casitas and parking in the C-O SUP zoning district Site Location: Generally located approx. 1,322' southwest of the intersection of Anthem Way & Venture Dr. Commission Recommendation: On 6/16/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval of Z2022027 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled, “The Enclave at Anthem Senior Living Casitas” consisting of nine pages dated May 10, 2022, and stamped received May 13, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled, “Enclave at Anthem”, consisting of 7 pages, dated, revised May 2, 2022, and stamped received May 2, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The Owner or Developer shall address and respond to all recommendations of the Daisy Mountain Fire District (DMFD) included in the correspondence dated March 7, 2022 at the time of construction permitting. A ‘will serve’ letter shall be required prior to approval of construction permits. d. Prior to final approval of construction permits, the Owner or Developer shall process a lot combination or record a cross-access easement between APN 203-04-481 and APN 203-04-549. Recordation of a cross-access easement may alter required setbacks on the site and require a SUP Modification of Conditions. e. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Off-site Hydrology – The grading plans submitted for building permit acquisition shall identify the peak run-off flow rate for the wash adjacent to the site. 2. Onsite Hydrology – The onsite hydrology calculations shall utilize County values as indicated in Table 6.3 of the Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards Manual. A value of 0.95 shall be used for commercial/industrial areas. For first flush, a coefficient of 1.0 shall be used for the entire site. 3. Onsite Retention – The required retention volume for the site shall be the first flush volume or the pre vs post runoff volume, whichever is greater. 4. Retention Disposal – All retention must drain within 36 hours. Bleed-off to the existing drainage channel along the southeast side of the site may be used in lieu of drywells to drain the underground retention. Drywells are required to drain the first flush volume of runoff unless a storm water quality device if provided on the bleed-off. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 6. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Improvement) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. 8. Work within N Venture Drive (sidewalk, utility connections, and landscaping) will require a MCDOT ROW permit issued concurrent with the building permit. Any landscaping with the MCDOT right-of-way must meet the applicable standards listed in the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual. 9. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development. 10. If the entitlement is approved, existing building permits B202105759 & B201905761 will need to be terminated and new building permits will need to be applied for the construction of the improvements contemplated with this submittal. Review fees must be paid prior to termination. f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-23-007-X-00)

Attachments (1)