Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

6.0 (Administrative Change Orders). FY2023: $100,000 Expenditures Supervisor District: 5(C-22-23-003-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Clint Hickman, seconded by Supervisor Steve Gallardo Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

6. CROWN 826829 MINSHALL Case #: Z2022047 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Crown Castle by Campbell A&Z, LLC / Minshall Family Trust Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for existing Wireless Communication Facility in the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located approx. 808’ northwest of the NWC of Citrus Rd. & Harrison St. in the Goodyear Area Commission Recommendation: On 6/16/22, the Commission voted 7-0, to recommend approval of Z2022047 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘ i ’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled, “R and J Minshall (826869)” consisting of ten full-size sheets dated May 9, 2022, and stamped received May 16, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled, “CROWN CASTLE # 826869 MINSHALL”, consisting of nine pages, dated May 9, 2022, and stamped received May 16, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering condition shall apply: 1. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following SUP standards shall apply: 1. Max. WCF Tower Height – 66’ 2. Min. WCF Setback from Rural/Residential Zoning – 64’ except for federal eligible colocation facilities 3. Max. Diameter of Antenna Arrays – 12’ except for federal eligible colocation facilities 4. Parking – 1 space required 5. Pavement – ABC pavement or other acceptable pavement required for access easement and parking space with a dust-control plan approved by Maricopa County Air Quality Control 6. Screening – 8’ chain-link fencing with privacy slats is permitted All other development standards per Rural 43 zoning shall apply e. The wireless communication tower shall retain the monopole properties as originally designed. Any damaged or missing fronds or branches shall be replaced within 60 days of such damage occurring. f. The special use permit is valid for a period of 25 years and shall expire 25 years from the date of BOS approval or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. g. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. i . The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-23-011-X-00)

Attachments (1)