Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

11.NWC 202 & APACHE BILLBOARD Case #: Z2022075 Supervisor District: 2 Applicant & Owner: Jacob Zonn, Becker Boards / 8946 Apache Trail LLC Request: Zone Change from R-5 and C-3 to C-3 CUPD to accommodate the relocation and upgrade of a static billboard to digital Site Location: Generally located at the NWC of Apache Blvd. and the Loop 202 Freeway in the Mesa Area Commission Recommendation: On 9/22/22, the Commission voted 8-0, to recommend approval of Z2022075 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a.

Item Text

11. NWC 202 & APACHE BILLBOARD Case #: Z2022075 Supervisor District: 2 Applicant & Owner: Jacob Zonn , Becker Boards / 8946 Apache Trail LLC Request: Zone Change from R-5 and C-3 to C-3 CUPD to accommodate the relocation and upgrade of a static billboard to digital Site Location: Generally located at the NWC of Apache Blvd. and the Loop 202 Freeway in the Mesa Area Commission Recommendation: On 9/22/22, the Commission voted 8-0, to recommend approval of Z2022075 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “SITE-PLAN-2”, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated June 20, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “NARR-RPTS-2”, consisting of 4 full sized sheets, dates July 7, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. d. The following C-3 CUPD standards shall apply: a. Min. Distance from Another Billboard to the west: 200' e. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this zone Change as set fourth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. f. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or posses the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change and never been granted. (C-44-23-103-X-00)

Attachments (1)