Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

9.23-acre University Drive Basin project for District operations and maintenance. This Agenda Item Impacts Supervisorial District 2(C-69-23-012-X-00) Motion to approve by Director Steve Gallardo, seconded by Director Thomas Galvin Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

9. SR 24 RV-BOAT STORAGE Case #: Z2021163 Supervisor District: 2 Applicant & Owner: Ralph Pew, Pew & Lake, PLC / SR24 Storage LLC Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for RV & Boat storage in the Rural-43 district Site Location: Generally located approx. ½ mile to the southeast of the intersection of 222nd St. & Williams Field Rd. and directly north of the future State Route 24 (SR 24) – Gateway Freeway in the Mesa area Commission Recommendation: On 9/22/22, the Commission voted 8-0, to recommend approval of Z2021163 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “SR24 Storage”, consisting of 1 full-size sheets, dated June 7, 2022, and stamped received June 20, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Special Use Permit (SUP) Project Narrative for SR24 RV & Boat Storage”, consisting of 8 pages, dated revised July 14, 2022 and stamped received July 14, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Sign Package entitled “Sign Package SR24 RV Boat Storage”, consisting of 5 pages, dated July 11, 2022 and stamped received July 14, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. d. This special use permit is valid for a period of (10 years) and shall expire on August 31, 2032, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. e. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. At the time of application for building permit, verification of (no) offsite flow must be provided. 2. At the time of application for building permit, there must be details on the plans for the grates over the manholes. The MAG Standard Details do not have grates for manhole covers. 3. The applicant should be aware that 222nd St. is MCDOT operated and maintained. Any work in the MCDOT right-of-way will require a MCDOT right-of-way permit. 4. The applicant should be aware that Fry Road/SR24 is ADOT operated and maintained. Any work in the ADOT right-of-way will require a ADOT right-of-way permit. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction. 6. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 7. Design conforming to Maricopa County Drainage Policies and Standards DPS 6.10.9. Item required, but not limited to: a. Certification from system manufacturer for a minimum 75-year service life. b. Maintenance Plan. c. Geotechnical Report (soil borings indicating depth to groundwater) and corrosivity (soil pH) testing for metal (CMP,CAP) systems. d. Soil percolation testing in accordance with DPS 6.10.12. e. Construction details of all system components. f. Calculations for the required 100-year, 2 hour storm volume. g. Basin drain down time calculations. Design rate for drywells shall be 0.1 cfs /drywell. As-built percolation tests may result in an increase or reduction in the number of drywells required. Calculations showing retention basins will drain within 36 hours. h. Third party inspections will be required for the underground retention systems. f. The following Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority conditions shall apply: 1. Any permanent development or temporary structures, such as cranes are subject to a CFR Title 14 Part 77 (Form 7460) review to determine any impacts to navigable airspace and air navigation facilities. An FAA determination notice of no hazard to air navigation shall be provided, if requested. Maximum building height should include the height of all structures on top the building and not to the top of the parapet. 2. Any buildings, uses design or features which may obscure a pilot’s vision in any way resulting in glare, or flash blindness should not be permitted. 3. Lighting placement or systems that direct lighting upward or toward the approach paths of aircraft, or that could be confused with airport identification or navigational lighting should not be permitted. 4. Sources of potential electromagnetic interference shall be considered through CFR Title 14 Part 77 (Form 7460) review. 5. Ensure that landscape features and lush plant/tree varieties attractive to hazardous wildlife are not used. Trash or debris collection containers shall close or be enclosed. g. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-23-105-X-00)

Attachments (3)