C-number: C-44-23-111-X
Vote — approved
| Bill Gates | yes |
| Clint Hickman | yes |
| Jack Sellers | yes |
| Thomas Galvin | yes |
| Steve Gallardo | yes |
6.VIP 2 (VIRGIN INDUSTRIAL PARK, PHASE 2) Case #: MCP2022003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicants / Owners: William Lally and Greg Loper, Tiffany & Bosco PA / TCG Investments LLC and Lateral 20 LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit with Plan of Development for industrial/warehouse in the Rural – 43 MAAMF zoning district. Per Arizona Revised Statutes the proposed land use has been deemed to be compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential zone of a Military Airport or Anci
Item Text
6. VIP 2 (VIRGIN INDUSTRIAL PARK, PHASE 2) Case #: MCP2022003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicants / Owners: William Lally and Greg Loper, Tiffany & Bosco PA / TCG Investments LLC and Lateral 20 LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit with Plan of Development for industrial/warehouse in the Rural – 43 MAAMF zoning district. Per Arizona Revised Statutes the proposed land use has been deemed to be compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential zone of a Military Airport or Ancillary Military Facility. Site Location: Generally located about 230’ west of the NWC of Olive Ave. and Reems Rd. in the Glendale Area. Commission Recommendation: On 10/6/22, the Commission voted 8-0, to recommend approval of MCP2022003 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Phase 2 Virgin Industrial Park“, consisting of 7 full-size sheets, dated July 21, 2022, and stamped received August 16, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “VIP Phase II (IndiCap)”, consisting of 12 pages, dated July 21, 2022, and stamped received July 25, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering Comments shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Bases on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. At the time of application for building permits, detailed grading and drainage plans will be required to demonstrate how flow from each respective drainage area will be directed to its designated retention basin. This shall include the requirement to provide calculations to substantiate the storm drain design. The use of bubble-up structures in retention basins is discouraged and must be re-evaluated with the final design. 4. Drainage (private) easements will be required for any drainage improvement that extends to Phase 1 of this project unless the Phase 1 and 2 parcels are combined. 5. Retention basins with a design depth greater than 3 feet (to HWE) must be fenced (pool barrier compliant). Surface retention basins deeper than one (1) foot must contain one (1) foot of freeboard. 6. Work in the floodplain will require a floodplain use permit issued concurrent with building permits for site development. In the event the owner/applicant pursues a FEMA CLOMR/LOMR, said application must be approved by the Flood Control District prior to issuance building permits required for site development. 7. Access(es) to/from Reems Road; and the south drainage channel discharge contain Special Flood Hazard Areas (FEMA Zone A); and also contain lands owned or encumbered by the Flood Control District (FCD). In addition to floodplain use permitting, ROW permitting will be required by the FCD for work and discharges within FCD encumbered properties. Applicant shall refer to Permit | Maricopa County, AZ for more information. The FCD ROW permit(s) must be procured prior to issuance of any building permit(s). 8. The owner/applicant’s traffic analysis must demonstrate that the second (southern) access to Reems Road is warranted prior to issuance of an FCD Right-of-Way Permit for encroachment through FCD owned or encumbered properties. 9. Owner/Applicant must coordinate with the City of Glendale regarding any street improvements required along Reems Road. 10. Turn lane designs in Reems Road at both (if warranted) access shall be in accordance with the MCDOT approved Traffic Impact Study. d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. e. The subject parcels, APNs 501-41-006K, 501-41-006T, 501-41-006U, and 501-41-006X, shall be consolidated in conformance to the parcel shown and the legal description provided on the POD prior to issuance of building permits. f. All internal roadway easements not a part of the final site must be abandoned and recorded documentation of such must be provided to staff prior to issuance of building permits. g. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation conditions shall apply: 1. In the revised 2nd submittal, a new access point is proposed for this Phase 2 development. The new proposed full access (Access B) as provided in the Study is acceptable to MCDOT. Developer must also seek R/W permits from MCDOT Flood Control District (for vehicle crossing via Access B) as necessary. 2. Developer must provide turn lane lengths at proposed Access B as per the recommendations in the Study. 3. Revised turn lane lengths at the Reems Road / Hatcher Road (Access A), as presented in the Study, are acceptable to MCDOT. Developer must provide turn lane lengths at proposed Access A as per the recommendations in the Study. 4. Developer must coordinate with the City of Glendale with regards to any half-street improvements required along the site frontage on Reems Road. h. Memorialization of the following MCP district standards: 1. Height – 55’ 2. Min. Front Yard – 15’ 3. Min. side Yard – 25’ 4. Min. Rear Yard - 25' (abutting rural or residential) 5. Min. Lot Area - 6,000 sq. ft 6. Min. Lot Width - 60’ 7. Max. Lot Coverage -60% 8. No shielding or screening wall is require along the property’s northern, eastern, western and southern perimeter boundaries 9. Outdoor industrial uses or enclosures can encroach into any required setback adjacent to any street 10. Outdoor lighting – Maximum 25’ in height i . The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-23-111-X-00)
Attachments (2)
1 item(s) sharing C-number base C-44-23-111-X