Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

11. LAKE PLEASANT STORAGE Case #: Z2022134 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owners: Richard Starr, Garrett Development Corporation / Branden Orr and Savannah Orr Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) for RV/Boat Parking Site Location: Generally located 2,100’ north of the NEC of W. Pinnacle Peak Road & N. Lake Pleasant Parkway in the Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 12/8/22, the Commission voted 9-0, to recommend approval of Z2022134 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘f’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Lake Pleasant Parkway Storage”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated October 31, 2022, and stamped received November 2, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Lake Pleasant Parkway Storage”, consisting of 7 pages, dated October 2022, and stamped received November 2, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Patent easements must be abandoned prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. Lake Pleasant Parkway is within the jurisdiction of the City of Peoria. The applicant will be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement requirements. 3. Mariposa Grande has not been accepted by the county; and therefore not maintained by the County. This alignment is classified as “Other R/W” 4. Based on the TIS submitted to the County for review, County estimates that there will be no significant traffic impacts on the County facilities surrounding the project Site. County has no further comments. 5. Retention basin(s)\ Underground storage must drain within 36 hours. 6. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. All onsite flows must be routed to the underground retention storage. 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. All onsite flows must be routed to the underground retention storage. 8. Offsite flows contributing to the 2-18” pipe culverts must be provided in the building permit. 9. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development. See: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 10. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. This Special Use Permit is valid for a period of 20 years and shall expire on January 25, 2043, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the Special Use Permit shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. e. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Special Use Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. f. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, or at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-23-173-X-00)

Attachments (2)