Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

10. LAKE PLEASANT STORAGE Case #: Z2022133 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant / Owners: Richard Starr, Garrett Development Corporation / Branden Orr and Savannah Orr Request: Zone Change with Overlay from Rural-43 to C-2 CUPD Site Location: Generally located 2,100’ north of the NEC of W. Pinnacle Peak Road & N. Lake Pleasant Parkway in the Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 12/8/22, the Commission voted 9-0, to recommend approval of Z2022133 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to the Site Plan entitled “Lake Pleasant Parkway Storage”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated October 31, 2022, and stamped received November 2, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under a separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Lake Pleasant Parkway Storage”, consisting of 7 pages, dated October 2022, and stamped received November 2, 2022, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Patent easements must be abandoned prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. Lake Pleasant Parkway is within the jurisdiction of the City of Peoria. The applicant will be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement requirements. 3. Mariposa Grande has not been accepted by the county; and therefore not maintained by the County. This alignment is classified as “Other R/W” 4. Based on the TIS submitted to the County for review, County estimates that there will be no significant traffic impacts on the County facilities surrounding the project Site. County has no further comments. 5. Retention basin(s)\ Underground storage must drain within 36 hours. 6. Maintain a minimum 25 foot separation between septic facilities and the retention basins. 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. All onsite flows must be routed to the underground retention storage. 8. Offsite flows contributing to the 2-18” pipe culverts must be provided in the building permit. 9. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development. See: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 10. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following C-2 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. Buildings shall be limited to one story with a maximum height of 20’. 2. There shall be a minimum of 26 parking spaces provided. 3. There shall be a minimum of 1 loading space provided. 4. The use of the site shall be limited to indoor self-storage. e. Signage along Lake Pleasant Parkway shall be limited to static elements. Digital signage or message centers are prohibited. f. To the extent practical, the building façade along Lake Pleasant Parkway shall be designed in such a manner as to mimic the appearance of a professional office building, which is compatible with the scale and character of the area. This may be achieved through façade alteration, building fenestration, and the application of colors and materials. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i . The property owners and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-23-174-X-00)

Attachments (2)