Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

5. LUKE FIELD WAREHOUSE COMPLEX Case #: MCP2022007 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Jay Irvin, Butler Design Group / Lincoln Property Company dba Northern Parkway Owner, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit for a warehouse complex in the IND-2 MAAMF & AD-2 MAAMF Zoning Districts Site Location: Generally located at the SEC of Litchfield Rd & Northern Ave. Commission Recommendation: On 1/12/23, the Commission voted 8-0 , to recommend approval of MCP2022007. If the Board finds that the proposal is compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential of the military airport or ancillary military facility, then the Commission recommends approval subject to co nditions ‘a’ – ‘m’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Luke Field”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated 10/10/22, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refin ements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substanti al conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Luke Field Project Narrative”, consisting of 3 pages, received 11/10/22 except as modified by the following conditions. c. Major amendments to the site plan will require a new UCCD and MCP application to be filed prior to any permit approvals. The incorporation of any other parcels into this project will require a lot combination, new UCCD, and new MCP prior to any additional permit approvals. d. No permits can be approved until a lot combi nation of APN 501-52-005J and APN 501-52-005H is complete. e. A revised site plan addressing all outstanding Planning concerns shall be submitted within 30 calendar days of approval of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors. f. The following Military Airport and Ancillary Military Facility Overlay Zoning District standards shall apply: i . Max. Building Height: 55’ ii. Parking spaces required: 0.4 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for warehouse. Accessible spaces shall be provided in accordance with ordinance and ADA requirements. iii. Front/Rear Setback between LDN 80-84 to LDN 75-79(minimum): 0’/0’ iv. Front/Rear Setback between LDN 75-79 to LDN 70-74 (minimum): 0’/0’ v. Front/Rear Setback between AD-2 and IND-2 zoning: 0’/0’ vi. 6’ solid wall screening required for all outdoor industrial uses All other development standards of the underlying zoning shall remain g. The following Planning Engineering condition(s) shall apply: i . Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. ii. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering des ign of the site’s drainage infrastructure. iii. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits iv. MCDOT ROW permits to be obtained during building permit phase. v. Upon TIS approval fr om the City of Glendale (COG) and Luke Air Force Base (LAFB), provide a copy of the authorization to MCDOT. vi. It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure annexation and right of way dedication to COG on Litchfield Road. vii. The future classification of Northern Avenue along the site frontage is recorded as Principal Arterial. MCDOT reduced the classification upon the first TIS review to the Urban Minor Arterial with no sidewalk. Half-street improvements shall be as per RDM Figure 5.9 h. The following Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) condition(s) shall apply: i . ATC for water and sewer improvements must be obtained prior to construction permit approval. i . Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confi rmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility . Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. j. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Military Compatibility Permit as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. k. All new buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). l. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to r escind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. m. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in e xcess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore , stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value o f the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-23-182-X-00)

Attachments (3)