Vote — approved

Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

9. VILLAGES AT PLEASANT RIVER Cas e #: Z2022188 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo , P.A./ Village At Pleasant River LLC Request: Modification of Condition (Case Z2021067, condition ‘f’) of the R-5 RUPD zoning district Site Location: East of the SEC of Happy Valley Rd & 115th Ave in the Peoria Area Commission Recommendation: On 1/12/23, the Commission voted 8-0, to recommend app roval of Z2022188 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Villages at Pleasant River”, consisting of five full-size sheets, dated September 27, 2021, and stamped received September 30, 2021, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Villages at Pleasant River”, consisting of ten pages, dated September 10, 2021, and sta mped received September 13, 2021, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engin eering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans with a Final Drainage Report must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. d. The access easement inside of the roadway easement along the east boundar y of the site shall be surfaced with decomposed granite from the paved driveway to the north to the site’s southern boundary to minimize dust pollution. e. The existing five parcels of the site shall be combined into one parcel prior to submission of any building permits. f. The proposed development is located in a Federal Patent Easement Area. Applicant will be required to go through Federal Patent Easement Abandonment Process prior to building permit approval. No encroachments allowed within the patent easements unless abandoned or otherwise approved by MCDOT Planning. g. The following R-5 RUPD development standards shall apply: 1. Minimum front yard of three feet. 2. Minimum rear yard of three feet. 3. Minimum interior side yard of three feet. 4. Minimum street side yard of three feet. 5. Required guest parking of zero percent. 6. Maximum height for residential perimeter wall signs of eight feet. h. A Plan of Development is approved subject to site plan entitled “Villages at Pleasant Village” cons isting of five full-size sheets, dated September 27, 2021, and stamped received September 30, 2021. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established RUPD development s tandards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. i . Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this zone change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. j. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. k. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of t he landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shal l revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divi de, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-23-183-X-00)

Attachments (1)