Vote — approved

Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	absent
Steve Gallardo	absent

Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin Absent: Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

17. MORELAND Case #: Z2022176 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Jessica Sarkisian, Upfront Planning / Michael Paddock Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural-43 to C-3 CUPD with a plan of development for a digital billboard Site Location: Generally located at the NWC of 183rd Ave. and Moreland St. in the Goodyear area Commission Recommendation: On 6/8/23, the Commission voted 7-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2022176 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. A plan of development is approved subject to site plan entitled “POD for Billboard” consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated April 13, 2023, and stamped received April 13, 2023. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report entitled “Rezone with Overlay at Moreland RC Track”, consisting of 8 pages, dated April 13, 2023, and stamped received April 13, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Application for an amendment to the plan of development to include the RC racetrack is required within six months of BOS approval. d. All unpermitted structures associated with the RC Racetrack must obtain construction permits. e. The following-3 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. Sight Screening: Chain link fence east and north, 6’ block wall west and south 2. Digital Billboard setback to residential use: 39.7’ 3. Parking surface material: decomposed granite 4. Allowed uses: 1. Billboards 2. Hobby shop 3. Medical or dental laboratory 4. Office 5. Wireless communication facility 6. Single family residential 7. Outdoor amusement f. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; drainage policies and standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed grading and drainage (site infrastructure) plans must be submitted with the application for building permits g. Administrative approval of a plan of development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the zone change. The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. (C-44-24-012-X-00)

Attachments (1)