Vote — approved

Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

12. SURPRISE RV STORAGE PHASE 2 Case #: MCP2023007 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Gary McCoskey / X9 SRVS LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with a precise Plan of Development for a long-term storage facility in the Rural-43 MAAMF and AD-2 MAAMF zoning districts. Site Location: Generally located 1,300’ south of the SEC of Olive Ave. and 143rd Ave. in the Waddell area. Commission Recommendation: On 10/5/23, the Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP2023007 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Surprise RV Storage 2“, consisting of 9 full-size sheets, dated 6/23/2023, and stamped received 8/25/2023, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Expansion of Surprise RV Storage LLC”, consisting of 5 pages, dated 4/10/2023 and stamped received 8/25/2023, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering condition shall apply: 1. Parcels APN 501-42-976D & APN 501-42-967 must be combined prior to issuance of any building permits or drainage easements will be required to route stormwater to adjacent parcel (APN 501-42-976D). 2. At the property boundaries/screen wall - any grade differential greater 8 inches between the finished grade and the adjacent existing grade will require retaining walls. 3. Retention basin(s)\ Underground storage must drain within 36 hours. 4. For underground retention, please refer to https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist (select commercial and check underground retention) for requirements specific to underground retention, including maintenance plan, soil borings indicating depth to groundwater, 75-year certification and 3rd party inspections. 5. Based on the TIS submitted the County for review, County estimates that there will be no significant traffic impacts on the County facilities surrounding the project Site. County has no further comments. 6. Site is in a Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) and will require a flood use permit when submitting for a building permit. 7. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 8. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure. 9. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized Area and thus will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. d. Development of the site shall not include any habitable structures. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. g. Development of the site is restricted to the following compatible uses as determined by Luke AFB Community Initiatives identified in the UCCD determination memo dated 5/12/23: single mobile office structure (subject to noise attenuation requirements per A.R.S § 28-8481), shade structures for covered parking, solar panels subject to further DoD analysis, lighting & security cameras and commercial waste disposal system. (C-44-24-081-X-00)

Attachments (1)