Vote — approved

Clint Hickman	yes
Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Clint Hickman, Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

21. CAREFREE GARAGE CONDOMINIUMS Case #: Z2023089 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant & Owners: Corey St. Germain, Carefree Condos, LLC / Brookstone Property LLC Request: Zone Change with overlay from Rural–43 to C-2 CUPD to allow for a condominium style garage facility Site Location: Generally located about 800’ west of the SWC of 7th St. and Carefree Hwy. in the Phoenix area Commission Recommendation: On 11/2/23, the Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2023089 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Carefree Condos“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated July 14, 2023, and stamped received July 19, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report entitled “Carefree Garage Condominiums Rezoning”, consisting of 17 pages, dated August 28, 2023 and stamped received August 28, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following planning engineering conditions apply: 1. Any new site improvements will require a plan of development and traffic impact study. 2. Without the submittal of a plan of development, no development approval will be inferred by the engineering review, including, but not limited to drainage design, site access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the county for further review and/or entitlement. 3. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 12056 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for the Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following CUPD standards apply: 1. Maximum height 30’ 2. Allowed uses shall be limited to self-storage and uses ancillary to self-storage. e. All development shall be consistent with the Carefree Highway Scenic Corridor design guidelines. f. Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. g. The following design conditions shall apply: 1. A 120’ landscape setback from the centerline of Carefree Highway. 2. The applicant is to construct a 10 foot wide multi-use trail within an easement for public use along the entire length of the property fronting Carefree Highway. 3. All buildings and parking areas shall maintain a minimum 10 foot landscape setback from all interior lot lines. 4. All lighting shall face away from rural or residential zoning districts. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the zone change. The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. (C-44-24-117-X-00)

Attachments (1)