Vote — approved

Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

8. THE VILLE Case #: Z2022068 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Ashley Marsh, Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C. / Gregory Living Trust Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural-43 to R1-6 RUPD for a single-family residential subdivision Site Location: Northeast corner of 73rd Ave. and Thunderbird Rd. in the Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 1/11/24, the Commission voted 8-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2022068 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “The Ville (73rd Ave. & Thunderbird Rd.)”, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated September 28, 2023, and stamped received November 1, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “The Ville – Single-Family Residential Neighborhood”, consisting of eight pages, dated November 1, 2023, and stamped received November 1, 2023, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Before the approval of the initial final plat or precise plan of development, the applicant shall provide the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department with an executed pre-annexation service agreement with the City of Peoria that identifies in detail when the proposed project will be annexed and the provision of water and sewer service. In place of a pre-annexation service agreement the developer must provide a ‘will serve’ letter from the certificated water and sewer provider. d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. APNs 200-68-020L, 200-68-020P, and 200-68-020S are located within the jurisdiction of the City of Peoria (strip annexed area) and the City must approve any zone change proposal within their confines. 2. Thunderbird Rd. and 73rd Ave. are within the jurisdiction of the City of Peoria. The applicant is responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting, or roadway improvement requirements. 3. Without the submittal of a Plan of Development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots/units, drainage design, access, and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 4. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction. e. The following R1-6 RUPD development standards shall apply: 1. Minimum front yards of ten feet for any side entry garage or forward living product. 2. Minimum rear yards of fifteen feet. 3. Minimum lot width of 50 feet. 4. Maximum lot coverage of 55 percent. 5. At least 15% of the area of any plat shall be set aside as common open space. 6. Lots with narrow throats containing a driveway extending from either street knuckles or cul-de-sacs shall have actual building envelope delineated on subdivision plats so that excluding the area of the narrowed throat the lot proper will meet a minimum 50-foot width and minimum 6,000 square foot area. Such lots shall have a throat of at least 20 feet wide and shall be no longer than 100 feet along its greatest dimension. f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, it may be considered for revocation by the Board of Supervisors, upon recommendation by the Commission, to the previous Rural-43 zoning category. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-24-168-X-00)

Attachments (1)