Vote — approved

Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

6.STIG LLC TRUCKING Case #: Z2022166 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant & Owners: Edgar Felix, Mesquite Architecture, LLC / Igor and Milos Stojanovic Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural–43 to IND-3 IUPD and a Plan of Development (POD) for a trucking terminal Site Location: Generally located 880’ west of the NWC of Southern Ave. and 67th Ave. in the Laveen area Commission Recommendation: On 7/25/24, the Commission voted 6-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2

Item Text

6. STIG LLC TRUCKING Case #: Z2022166 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant & Owners: Edgar Felix, Mesquite Architecture, LLC / Igor and Milos Stojanovic Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural–43 to IND-3 IUPD and a Plan of Development (POD) for a trucking terminal Site Location: Generally located 880’ west of the NWC of Southern Ave. and 67th Ave. in the Laveen area Commission Recommendation: On 7/25/24, the Commission voted 6-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z2022166 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to site plan entitled “MIST Trucking Terminal” consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated May 20, 2024, and stamped received May 21, 2024. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application pursuant to compliance with Maricopa County zoning regulations. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report entitled “MIST Trucking Terminal”, consisting of 3 pages, dated May 20, 2024, and stamped received May 21, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following IND-3 IUPD standards shall apply: 1. The IUPD overlay shall limit uses on the site to trucking terminal with ancillary uses. d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits 4. Maximum grades for fill slopes shall be 3:1 and 2:1 for cut slopes. Slopes in excess of those specified shall require a geotechnical stability analysis. 5. Minimum Top of berm width is 8-ft. 6. The subject site is located within the County’s Urbanized Area. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County will be required prior to issuance of any construction permits. The SWPP permit review will be completed at the time of the building permit stage. The applicant will need to submit for the SWPP permit separate from the Building permit. e. Prior to issuance of initial building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. Evidence of a recorded SVT easement on the eastern side of the driveway must be provided prior to issuance of any grading or construction permits on site. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for reversion to the zoning that existed on the date of application per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance requirements. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the zone change. The zone change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the zone change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the zone change had never been granted. (C-44-25-011-X-00)

Attachments (1)