Vote — approved

Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

5.THE PARKING TRAILER AND RV STORAGE Case #: MCP2023005 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Veronica Cervando / Ibuado & Veronica Cervando Request: Military Use Compatibility Permit (MCP) with a plan of development for the outdoor commercial storage of semi-truck trailers and RVs in the AD-2 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located ½ mile northwest of the northwest corner of Northern Ave. and Litchfield Rd. in the west Glendale area Notice: The Commission hearing was delayed

Item Text

5. THE PARKING TRAILER AND RV STORAGE Case #: MCP2023005 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Veronica Cervando / Ibuado & Veronica Cervando Request: Military Use Compatibility Permit (MCP) with a plan of development for the outdoor commercial storage of semi-truck trailers and RVs in the AD-2 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located ½ mile northwest of the northwest corner of Northern Ave. and Litchfield Rd. in the west Glendale area Notice: The Commission hearing was delayed for two weeks due to a public notice error. As of the writing of this report, the Commission hearing has not occurred, and the Commission has not made a recommendation. The Commission recommendation will be presented at the August 21, 2024, Board Hearing. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommendation to the Commission is to approve MCP2023005 subject to Conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “The Parking Trailer & RV Storage“, consisting of five full-size sheets, dated April 21, 2024, and stamped received April 23, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “The ParKing-Semi Trailer & RV Storage”, consisting of four pages, dated April 21, 2024, and stamped received April 23, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. The grading & drainage plan shall illustrate that there shall be one foot of freeboard for any retention basins that are more than one foot in depth. 2. With any building permit submittal the applicant must provide a preliminary hydraulic analysis for the spillway into the retention basins in the drainage report. 3. The grading & drainage plan’s cover sheet shall list 143rd Avenue’s roadway classification and design speed. 4. Any disturbance to a floodplain shall require a floodplain use permit concurrent with any building permit. 5. With the submittal of a building permit the applicant shall provide a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) per the MCDOT Traffic Impact Procedures that are signed and sealed by a civil engineer who is currently registered in Arizona. Any dedication and offsite improvements that are deemed required by MCDOT traffic and permits based on the submittal of a TIA or TIS. However, this does not include the identification of utilities or underground facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require relocation. 6. For sites that are located within the County’s Urbanized Area, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPP) from the County shall be required prior to the issuance of any construction permits. This does not preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. 7. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards, and best practices at the time of application for construction. 8. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 9. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for building permits. 10. The entire site and adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained onsite. If portions of adjacent right-of-way are controlled by other jurisdictions, the adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained unless separately addressed by the other jurisdictions. 11. Sufficient retention volume shall be provided onsite to retain the required 100-year, two-hour runoff from all contributing areas. Retention basins with stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one foot of freeboard. All retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements. d. Buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The sight-visibility triangle located on the southeast corner of the site’s driveway and 143rd Ave. may be eliminated. f. The use of fences and gates without attached screening materials shall be allowed for the outdoor storage facility’s west fence and gate. g. Unless paved, the outdoor storage facility’s driveways and storage areas shall be surfaced with a minimum of four-inch sealed recycled asphalt with a quarter inch of gravel used as dust control for the non-residential parts of the lot that meet AZDAQ standards. h. Any use on the site must abide by the non-assignable clearance easement that affects this site and the lighting height guidance by the FAA, for more information contact: 56fw.cit.communityinitiative@us.af.mil. i. The existing residence that takes up 1.8 acres of the west part of the lot (excluding the facility’s driveway) shall remain residential in nature and shall not be part of the outdoor storage facility. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-25-012-X-00)

Attachments (2)