Vote — approved

Jack Sellers	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Bill Gates	yes
Clint Hickman	yes
Steve Gallardo	absent

Ayes: Jack Sellers, Thomas Galvin, Bill Gates, Clint Hickman Absent: Steve Gallardo

Item Text

7. KRIKORIAN WAREHOUSES Case #: MCP2023010 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owners: Taz Khatri, Taz Khatri Studios / Krikor and Guadalupe Krikorian Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) for warehousing of wedding materials in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district. Per Arizona Revised Statutes the proposed land use has been deemed to be compatible and consistent with the high noise or accident potential zone of a Military Airport or Ancillary Military Facility. Site Location: Generally located 330’ northwest of the NWC of Thomas Rd. and Perryville Rd. in the Buckeye area Commission Recommendation: On 10/24/24, the Commission voted 7-0 to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP2023010 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Krikorian Storage Buildings”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated October 17, 2024, or otherwise within 30 days of approval the applicant will provide staff an amended site plan to show 55’ of R/W, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Krikorian Storage Buildings”, consisting of 4 pages, dated May 22, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Rural-43 MAAMF MCP standards shall apply: 1. Front yard (east): 20’ 2. Rear yard (west): 30’ 3. Side yard (north): 25’ d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. e. The following Planning Engineering conditions will apply: 1. Dedication of 55 feet of Right-of-Way along Perryville Road (0 existing) must be dedicated to MCDOT prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. For dedication, the applicant is required to provide, at its expense, an American Land Title Association (ALTA) Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance showing title vested in Maricopa County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. 3. The gate on Perryville Road must be removed and replaced with a CMU wall. This must be identified on plans submitted for building permits and completed prior to Final Drainage Inspection for any building permits. Direct access to Perryville Road is prohibited. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans must clearly show how water is routed into the provided retention basins, and how the required retention is provided. 5. The ultimate outfall for the site must be the historic location (to the south, near the center of the site, adjacent to Basin E). This must be shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 6. The site must provide a minimum of 8,831.3 cubic feet of retention. Plans submitted for building permits must show how this volume is retained on-site. 7. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and appears as though it will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development (unless less than 1 acre of disturbance is shown on the plans submitted for building permit). See: https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6577 8. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 9. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure. 10. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. f. All outdoor lighting shall conform to the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. All facility lighting shall be completely turned off, except for security light, at the closing hours of the facility. g. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Zone Change by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. i. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-25-040-X-00)

Attachments (2)