Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

6. 191ST AND JOMAX Case #: PD240004 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Mike Prefling, P.E. / Curt Lyon Request: Plan of Development for an RV/boat storage facility within the Rural-43 MAAMF WHSC and Rural–43 WHSC zoning districts Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Jomax Rd. and 191st Ave. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/23/25, the Commission voted 4-0 (motion by Commissioner Montoya D5, seconded by Commissioner Curley D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve PD240004 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “26631 N 191st Ave – RV Resort“, consisting of 2 full-size sheets, dated December 9, 2024 and stamped received December 9, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “191st and Jomax RV Storage”, consisting of 3 pages, dated October 3, 2024 and stamped received October 3, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions. c. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). d. Overnight occupation of RVs or other vehicles on site is prohibited. e. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Ultimate half-width improvements along 191st Avenue including curb, gutter and sidewalk must be constructed with site building permit per RDM Figure 5.11 2. 37-feet of pavement (centerline to face of curb) shall be provided along Jomax Road. 3. Proposed driveways shall meet commercial and industrial driveway standards per the latest MCDOT Roadway Design Manual (RDM) Section 7.6.3. 4. Gated access shall provide adequate turn around area so that vehicles will not back onto public roads. 5. Plans submitted for Building Permits must clearly show how all runoff is routed to the retention basins. Retention basins must de-water within 36-hours. 6. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 7. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure. 8. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits f. As per Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance Article 1010.7.22 the PD is valid for two years after approval. Prior to expiration, a one-time extension may be requested via a minor amendment for one additional year. Upon expiration a new PD will be required to be submitted. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Plan of Development. The Plan of Development enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Plan of Development is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Plan of Development had never been granted. (C-44-25-082-X-00)

Attachments (1)