Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes
Debbie Lesko	absent

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Steve Gallardo Absent: Debbie Lesko

Item Text

13. 212 CITRUS RV STORAGE Case #: SU250008 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owner: Octavio Arroyo Request: Special Use Permit for RV and Boat storage uses in the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the northwest corner of Harrison St. & Citrus Rd. in the Goodyear area Commission Recommendation: On 7/24/25, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Chairman Lindblom D1, seconded by Commissioner Whitney D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve SU250008 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Arroyo RV Storage”, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated May 15, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “RV Storage Property Development”, consisting of 5 pages, dated April 21, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. This special use permit is valid for a period of 10 years and shall expire on August 20, 2035, or upon termination of the use for a period of 90 or more days, whichever occurs first. All site improvements associated with the special use permit shall be removed within 90 days of such expiration or termination of use. d. The site will be developed utilizing the following amended Rural-43 SUP development standard: 1. Commercial parking surfaces & internal drivelines - Dust control methods as approved by the Maricopa County Air Quality Dept. e. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure. 3. Applicant is responsible for coordinating with the Roosevelt irrigation district in regard to the grading of the irrigation ditch and placement of the 18 inch culvert. This approval is separate from permits issued by Planning and Development. 4. When submitting the plans for a building permit include the septic facilities on the plans. Maintain a minimum 25-foot separation between septic facilities. 5. Driveway access to County road(s) must be paved and will require a permit from MCDOT issued concurrent with building permit(s) required for site development. Drainage flow along the roadway must be maintained. 6. Storage of materials, walls/fence, parking, wells, septic systems and storm water retention are prohibited in the (future) right-of-way. 7. Drainage Clearance is for fence/wall construction within or along property lines as shown on the approved plans. The drainage clearance does not include verification of property boundaries or easements which is the responsibility of the owner/applicant. Property line and easement disputes that may arise with new wall/fence construction are a civil matter. 8. Retaining walls must be entirely on the property including the retaining wall footing(s). 9. Citrus Road on Site frontage has mixed jurisdiction between MCDOT and the City of Goodyear. Provide a copy of the Traffic Statement for the City of Goodyear review. 10. Approval of Traffic Statement does not constitute approval of other agencies/jurisdictions, R/W limits or geometric layout of Site Plan details. 11. Due to site frontage restrictions, proposed access is acceptable to MCDOT. The driveway must meet the MCDOT design requirements for Commercial driveways. Refer to the latest MCDOT Roadway Design Manual, Section 7.6 12. For sites located within the County’s Urbanized Area, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County will be required prior to issuance of any construction permits. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. f. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-26-016-X-00)