Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

6. DHAMI GROUP LLC Case #: MCP2024001 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owner: Kashif Masih, Arktent, LLC / Dhami Group, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with a Plan of Development (POD) in the IND-2 MAAMF zoning district for a semi-truck parking and storage yard Site Location: Generally located approx. 350’ south and 1,650’ east of the SEC of McDowell Rd. & Perryville Rd. in the Goodyear area. Commission Recommendation: On 9/11/25, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Whitney D3, seconded by Commissioner Danzeisen D5) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP2024001 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘g’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Dhami Group LLC,” consisting of one full-size sheet, dated June 2025, and stamped received July 15, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. A revised site plan that features an MCP Development Standards table consistent with the narrative referenced in condition ‘b’ shall be submitted within 30 days of Board approval. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Narrative – McDowell Trucking Yard Utility Improvements,” consisting of three pages, stamped received August 27, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. A drainage easement covering the retention basin must be in place prior to building permit issuance. The easement should note that the retention basin provides retention for parcel APN 502-37-064Q. 2. Any exterior screen wall must not obstruct flow onto the property. 3. Prior to building permit Final Drainage Inspection, as-builts will be required to show the site has been constructed in accordance with approved plans including the retention basin. Testing data for the drywells must be provided for the drywells showing the retention basin will drain within 36-hours. 4. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 5. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. d. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The following MCP standards shall apply: 1. Screening along east and west lot lines: minimum 6’-high chain-link fence. 2. Sight visibility triangles: none required east of the driveway. 3. All outdoor lighting shall be limited to a maximum height of 35’ and shall be fully shielded to direct illumination downward at least 20 degrees below the horizontal plane at the bottom of the fixture. Furthermore, any lighting installed onsite shall not illuminate adjacent properties. Lighting shall be shut off nightly no later than 9:00 p.m. but may be motion activated during all nighttime hours. The owner, applicant, or developer shall submit a site photometric lighting plan and elevation drawings with the building permit to ensure conformance to this condition. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-26-035-X-00)