Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

Ayes: Thomas Galvin, Kate Brophy McGee, Mark Stewart, Debbie Lesko, Steve Gallardo

Item Text

8. GRAVY HOLDINGS, LLC Case #: Z240001 Supervisor District: 3 Applicant and Owner: Brian Greathouse & Madison Leake Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A./ Gravy Holdings, LLC Request: Zone change with overlay from C-2 & Rural-43 to C-3 CUPD Site Location: NEC of Black Canyon Hwy. and New River Rd. in the New River area Commission Recommendation: On 9/25/25, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Hernadez D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z240001 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘m’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Gravy Holdings – Roadrunner Restaurant“, consisting of two full-size sheets, dated July 15, 2025, and stamped received July 21, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Gravy Holdings, LLC”, consisting of 11 pages, dated July 21, 2025, and stamped received July 21, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. A Plan of Development is approved subject to site plan entitled “Gravy Holdings – Roadrunner Restaurant” consisting of two full-size sheets, dated July 15, 2025, and stamped received July 21, 2025. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards as approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. d. Any existing building or structure that are over 200 sq. ft. in size, over 8’ in height, or has utilities that lack an existing building permit must submit as-built permits for these structures. e. Prior to the issuance of any building permit on this site all Federal Patent Easements which impact this site must be abandoned. f. Use of adjacent land for overflow parking shall require a BLM lease agreement. g. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. 4. Prior to any building permit issuance on this site, Drainage Waiver DRB250003 must be approved. 5. At the building permitting stage the berm around the retention basins must have a minimum width of 8’ and this shall be indicated on the grading and drainage plan. 6. At the building permitting stage the upstream invert of the existing culverts across the driveway in the New River Rd. right-of-way must be at or above the Retention Basin B’s stormwater elevation, which shall be indicated on the grading and drainage plan. 7. At the building permitting stage the grading and drainage plans submitted with the permit shall illustrate multiple spot elevations at the property line to show that the stormwater retention will stay on the property and shall not encroach into the right-of-way or public street. 8. At the building permitting stage, the culverts in the MCDOT Right-of-Way must be surfaced with concrete (RCP or RGRCP) which must be indicated on the grading and drainage plan. h. The following Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MSESD) shall apply: 1. Per the Safe Drinking Water Act, any water system that supplies more than 25 people or 15 service connections per day for at least 60 days per year shall be classifies as a Public Water System (PWS). If this is a case on this site then a Public Water System application with a New Source Approval application shall be required and must be submitted to the MCESD’s Drinking Water Program. Moreover, a water quality analysis report shall be required with this submittal which is good within one-year of testing. 2. A Minor Plan Review application must be submitted for any existing system(s) if being utilized and if the applicant believes the existing system(s) are adequate in size to support the new use, otherwise, a new septic permit / installation may be required. 3. For any food service operations occurring on site, where food is offered, sold, or prepared from a fixed/permanent location the submittal of a Permanent/Fixed Food Establishment Permit application shall be required. i. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. j. The following C-3 CUPD development standards shall apply: 1. There shall be minimum rear setbacks of 10’ regardless of adjacent zoning districts. 2. There shall be minimum side setbacks of 0’ regardless of the adjacent zoning districts. 3. There shall be a minimum 64 parking spaces for the existing uses on this site, 5% of which shall be reserved as ADA accessible parking spaces. 4. Driveways and parking areas shall be surfaced with alternative dust control methods, such as a quarter inch of decomposed granite or quarter inch of asphalt millings, or other methods deemed acceptable with the County Air Quality Department. ADA accessible parking spaces must be paved. 5. There shall be no required sight visibility triangles but clear sight-lines must be maintained in accordance with Maricopa County Department of Transportation requirements. 6. There shall be no required screening. 7. Maximum height for commercial freestanding signs shall be 25’. 8. Minimum distance between commercial freestanding signs on the same street frontage shall be 3’ between the existing south signs and 190’ between the existing north sign and existing south signs. 9. Any outdoor lighting on this site shall be in conformance with the provisions of Section 1112 of the County Zoning Ordinance. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded and placed to reflect light away from any adjoining rural or residential zoning district. k. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Zone Change by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. l. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. m. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-038-X-00)

Attachments (1)