Vote — approved

Thomas Galvin	yes
Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

7.RANCHERO LIVESTOCK & SUPPLIES PROJECT Case #: SU250021 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Chad H. Dixion, Tangent Point Architecture, LLC / Nereida Castro Primero Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) Cottage industry for a home-based hay distribution business in the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the NWC of Patton Rd. & 224th Avenue in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 12/10/25, the Commission voted 5-3 (motion by Commissioner Toma D4, seconded

Item Text

7. RANCHERO LIVESTOCK & SUPPLIES PROJECT Case #: SU250021 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Chad H. Dixion, Tangent Point Architecture, LLC / Nereida Castro Primero Request: Special Use Permit (SUP) Cottage industry for a home-based hay distribution business in the Rural-43 zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the NWC of Patton Rd. & 224th Avenue in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 12/10/25, the Commission voted 5-3 (motion by Commissioner Toma D4, seconded by Commissioner Leighton D4) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve SU250021 subject to conditions ‘a’ to ‘h’ (with modified condition ‘c’): a. Development of the site with regard to the special use shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled Ranchero Livestock & Supplies Project SU250021, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated September 14, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site with regard to the special use shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled Narrative Report, consisting of 4 pages, dated September 14, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. This special use permit is valid for a period of two years and shall expire on January 28, 2028, or upon abandonment of the use. d. The following engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site s drainage infrastructure. 3. Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services. It is the applicant/owners responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and sewer services for this site. e. The applicant shall maintain or enter into an maintenance agreement for the easement access along 224th Ave. from the subject parcels northern border to the pavement along Patton Rd. for the life of the SUP. This must include dust control, regular maintenance and repair of road surfacing. f. Use of the hay squeeze is limited to on-site between the two haybale storage areas, weekdays only between 8AM 4PM. g. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Special Use Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, and at the time of expiration of the Special Use Permit, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, or the expiration of the Special Use Permit, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation or expiration of the Special Use Permit. The Special Use Permit enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Special Use Permit is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Special Use Permit had never been granted. (C-44-26-067-X-00)

Attachments (1)