Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	abstain

7.CALVARY CHAPEL ARISE Case #: Z250018 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Randy L. Barnes, RBA Architecture / Calvary Chapel Arise Request: Zone change from Rural–43 to C-2 Site Location: Generally located approx. 355’ SE of the SEC of 203rd Ave. & U.S. Hwy 60. in the Wittman area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250018 s

Item Text

7. CALVARY CHAPEL ARISE Case #: Z250018 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Randy L. Barnes, RBA Architecture / Calvary Chapel Arise Request: Zone change from Rural–43 to C-2 Site Location: Generally located approx. 355’ SE of the SEC of 203rd Ave. & U.S. Hwy 60. in the Wittman area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250018 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Calvary Chapel Arise”, consisting of one full-size sheet, stamped received September 17, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Calvary Chapel Arise”, consisting of four pages, dated August 15, 2025, and stamped received September 17, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Any amendments to the Plan of Development shall be processed administratively through a new Plan of Development application with Maricopa County Planning & Development. d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Plans submitted for building permit issuance must show that a minimum 25-foot separation between septic facilities (including reserve area) and the retention basin(s) is maintained. 2. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized; and thus will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. 3. A Traffic Study must be approved by MCDOT prior to Application for Building Permit. Any stipulations of approval of the Traffic Study must be incorporated into plans prior to Building Permit Issuance. 4. If any additional right-of-way dedication is required, applicant, at their own expense, must provide Maricopa County with Owner’s ALTA Title Insurance for ROW dedication prior to Building Permit approval. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction permit. 6. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans and Final Drainage Report must be submitted with the application for Final Building Permits. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-072-X-00)

Attachments (1)