Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	abstain

8.ALL THINGS METAL 15-ACRE EXPANSION Case #: MCP250010 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscape Architecture / Industrial Steel Ranch, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) for steel fabrication and storage of structural steel components in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located approximately 400’ west of the SWC of 195th Ave. & Jomax Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission

Item Text

8. ALL THINGS METAL 15-ACRE EXPANSION Case #: MCP250010 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscape Architecture / Industrial Steel Ranch, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) for steel fabrication and storage of structural steel components in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located approximately 400’ west of the SWC of 195th Ave. & Jomax Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP250010 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “All Things Metal: Master Land Use Plan,” consisting of two pages, dated October 30, 2025, and stamped received November 3, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Application for a Military Compatibility Permit for All Things Metal 15 Acre Expansion,” consisting of 12 pages, dated October 30, 2025, and stamped received November 3, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Sealed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and a sealed drainage report must be submitted with further entitlements. Design must address the floodplain that traverses throughout the site and other offsite flows, onsite retention requirements, retention percolation, and finish floor elevations of any structure in a floodplain. 3. This site did not include a plan of development nor did it include any details of the potential layout of expansion therefore, based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 4. Further entitlements will require the submittal of a traffic impact study and specific use of site. 5. Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services. It is the applicant/owner’s responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and sewer services for this site. d. All buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The following MCP standards shall apply: 1. Maximum Building Height: 45’. 2. Maximum Height of Building Appurtenances: 1’ for each 1’ setback from the MCP area perimeter, up to 100’. 3. Minimum Setbacks from the MCP area perimeter: 20’. 4. Minimum Setbacks from lot lines and noise contours within the interior of the MCP area: 0’. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30% of the MCP area. 6. Minimum Parking Spaces required: 1 per 900 SF of floor area. 7. Minimum Screening: minimum 6’ wall with steel panels along perimeter or temporary chain-link fencing along interior phase lines until built out with perimeter screening; otherwise, screening interior to the MCP area is waived. 8. Minimum Surfacing for onsite driveways and parking: pavement or stabilized DG. f. Approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. The Plan of Development shall incorporate the risk and hazard mitigation actions recommended by Luke Air Force Base in the Use Compatibility and Consistency Determination (UC250009) dated August 4, 2025, or in any subsequent communications from Luke Air Force Base to the applicant, developer, or property owner. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-26-073-X-00)

Attachments (1)