Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

6.ROYAL LANDSCAPING (Supervisorial District 2) Case #: Z250021 Applicant and Owner: Jason Sanks, IPlan Consulting / Royal Landscaping, LLC Request: Zone Change from R1-8 and C-3 to C-3 CUPD Site Location: Generally located 335 feet west of the SW Corner of Apache Trl. and Meridian Rd. in the east Mesa / Apache Junction area Commission Recommendation: On 1/22/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Commissioner Rochwalik D3, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom D1) to adopt a motion recommending the

Item Text

6. ROYAL LANDSCAPING (Supervisorial District 2) Case #: Z250021 Applicant and Owner: Jason Sanks, IPlan Consulting / Royal Landscaping, LLC Request: Zone Change from R1-8 and C-3 to C-3 CUPD Site Location: Generally located 335 feet west of the SW Corner of Apache Trl. and Meridian Rd. in the east Mesa / Apache Junction area Commission Recommendation: On 1/22/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Commissioner Rochwalik D3, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250021 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Royal Landscaping”, consisting of one full-size sheet, stamped received December 31, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Royal Landscaping”, consisting of five pages, dated December 2025, and stamped received December 31, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following C-3 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. 25 X 25 Sight Visibility Triangles: None Required d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Payton Street is “public right-of-way” that is has not been accepted by the County; and is therefore not maintained by the County. 3. Apache Trail is maintained by ADOT. The applicant will be responsible for coordinating with the ADOT to review any traffic impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting or roadway improvement requirements. (email redletter@azdot.gov). 4. The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require relocation. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction permit. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from water and septic providers. g. Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the subject site. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. i. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-080-X-00)

Attachments (1)