Vote — approved

Kate Brophy McGee	yes
Debbie Lesko	yes
Mark Stewart	yes
Thomas Galvin	yes
Steve Gallardo	yes

5.201 S. CRISMON PARK MODELS (Supervisorial District: 2) Case #: SU250033 Applicant and Owner: Ashley Marsh, Gammage & Burnham / 201 South Crismon, LLC Request: Modification of Conditions to a Special Use Permit (SUP) for an RV park in the R1-8 zoning district to allow park models Site Location: Generally located approx. ¼ mile north of the NEC of Crismon Rd. & Broadway Rd. in the east Mesa area Commission Recommendation: On 3/5/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Vice Chair Hernandez, D5, s

Item Text

5. 201 S. CRISMON PARK MODELS (Supervisorial District: 2) Case #: SU250033 Applicant and Owner: Ashley Marsh, Gammage & Burnham / 201 South Crismon, LLC Request: Modification of Conditions to a Special Use Permit (SUP) for an RV park in the R1-8 zoning district to allow park models Site Location: Generally located approx. ¼ mile north of the NEC of Crismon Rd. & Broadway Rd. in the east Mesa area Commission Recommendation: On 3/5/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Vice Chair Hernandez, D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik, D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve SU250033 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘i’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Plan of Development entitled “Desert Village South RV Park,” consisting of four sheets, dated February 1, 1996, and stamped received May 22, 1996; and with the modified Site Plan entitled “201 S. Crismon Road SU250033 SUP Modification of Conditions – Site Plan,” consisting of three sheets, dated January 15, 2026, and stamped received January 15, 2026; except as further modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Desert Village South RV Park,” dated May 22, 1996; and with the modified Narrative Report entitled “201 S. Crismon Road Special Use Permit Modification of Conditions Application Narrative,” consisting of 9 pages, dated February 24, 2026, and stamped received February 24, 2026; except as further modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering Conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans will be required with the submission of building permit(s). Any existing retention must be preserved. The Grading and Drainage Plans must be prepared by a Civil Engineer licensed in the State of Arizona. d. “No parking” signs shall be installed on the interior streets according to MCDOT standards. e. The applicant or property owner(s) shall dedicate additional right-of-way via map of dedication or separate instrument to provide a total half width of 55 feet for Crismon Road within one (1) year of the approval of the modified conditions by the Board of Supervisors, or as required by MCDOT Planning (MCDOTPlanning@maricopa.gov). f. The following SUP development standards shall apply: 1. Travel trailer or RV spaces shall be no closer than 10 feet to perimeter streets. 2. Solid screening shall not be required along the north and east lot lines. g. The applicant shall obtain the necessary permit(s) from MCDOT for the encroachment of an existing sign in the right-of-way within one (1) year of the approval of the modified conditions by the Board of Supervisors, or as required by MCDOT Planning (MCDOTPlanning@maricopa.gov). h. Major changes to this Special Use with regard to use and intensity must be processed as a revised application with approval by the Board of Supervisors upon recommendation of the Commission. Minor changes to the Special Use may be administratively approved by the Planning Division of the Department of Planning and Development. i. Noncompliance with the conditions of approval will be treated as a violation in accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. Further, noncompliance of the conditions of approval may be grounds for the Commission to take action in accordance with the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. (C-44-26-085-X-00)

Attachments (1)