Vote: approved

Item Text

10. ALL THINGS METAL – PHASE 2 PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (Supervisorial District: 4) Case #: PD250039 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscape Architecture/Industrial Steel Ranch, LLC Request: Major Amendment to a Plan of Development for fabricated metal production and manufacturing in the Rural-43 MAAMF WHSC zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the SWC of 195th Ave. and Jomax Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 5/7/26, the Commission voted 7-0 (motion by Vice Chair Hernandez D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve PD250039 subject to conditions ‘a’-‘h’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “All Things Metal A1.2“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated January 8, 2026, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Plan of Development Application”, consisting of 6 pages, dated January 9, 2026 except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits 4. The entire site and adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained onsite. If portions of adjacent right-of-way are controlled by other jurisdictions, the adjacent half-streets’ runoff shall be retained unless separately addressed by the other jurisdictions. 5. All historic flows exiting the site shall exit after development in the same location and manner in which they exited before, or with less flow depth, quantity, or velocity than before. 6. Sufficient retention volume shall be provided onsite to retain the required 100- year, 2-hour runoff from all contributing areas. Retention basins with stormwater depths exceeding one foot shall provide one foot of freeboard. 7. Offsite flows crossing Jomax Road will need to be analyzed at final design for conformance to county standards. Additional roadway edge protection may be required at this crossing. 8. All retention basins shall drain within 36 hours per County requirements. d. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The following MCP standards shall apply: 1. Maximum Building Height: 45’. 2. Maximum Height of Building Appurtenances: 1’ for each 1’ setback from the MCP area perimeter, up to 100’. 3. Minimum Setbacks from the MCP area perimeter: 20’. 4. Minimum Setbacks from lot lines and noise contours within the interior of the MCP area: 0’. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30% of the MCP area. 6. Parking Spaces required: 1 per 900 SF of floor area. 7. Screening: minimum 6’ wall with steel panels along perimeter or temporary chain-link fencing along interior phase lines until built out with perimeter screening; otherwise, screening interior to the MCP area is waived. 8. Surfacing for onsite driveways and parking: pavement or stabilized DG. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility (or documentation that the property participates in a fire district). Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. g. The property owners and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered by the Board after recommendation by the Commission at a public hearing for reversion to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-26-111-X-00)

Attachments (1)