Vote: approved

Item Text

7. HVRV 115TH AVE. STORAGE (Supervisorial District: 4) Case #: Z250020 Applicant and Owner: Shaine T. Alleman, Tiffany & Bosco / Cornerstone Church Request: Zone Change from Rural-43 to C-3 CUPD Site Location: Generally located approx. 1,100’ south of the SEC of 115th Ave. & Happy Valley Pkwy. in the Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 5/7/26, the Commission voted 6-0 (motion by Vice Chair Hernandez D5, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250020 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’: a. A Plan of Development is approved subject to the site plan entitled “HVRV – 115th Ave. Storage,” consisting of one full-size sheet, dated April 28, 2026, and stamped received April 28, 2026. The Plan of Development may be amended administratively under a separate application as long as the amendment complies with the established CUPD development standards approved by the Board of Supervisors. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the narrative report entitled “HVRV 115th Ave Storage,” consisting of 11 pages, dated April 28, 2026, and stamped received April 28, 2026, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 905 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage Plans must be submitted with the application for Building Permits. 4. When submitting the plans for a building permit include the septic facilities on the plans. Maintain a minimum 25 foot separation between septic facilities. 5. The site is encumbered by Federal Patent easements (west side). Unless abandoned, these easements must remain intact for their intended use. 6. Driveway access to County road(s) must be paved and will require a permit from MCDOT issued concurrent with building permit(s) required for site development. Drainage flow along the roadway must be maintained. 7. All adjacent roadway improvements required by MCDOT in the Traffic Study approval shall be permitted with building permits and in accordance with the current RDM standards. 8. Retaining walls must be entirely on the property including the retaining wall footing(s). 9. Approval of Traffic Statement does not constitute approval of other agencies/jurisdictions, R/W limits or geometric layout of Site Plan details. 10. For underground retention, please refer to https://apps.pnd.maricopa.gov/plansubmittalchecklist (select commercial and check underground retention) for requirements specific to underground retention, including maintenance plan, soil brings indicating depth to groundwater and 75- year certification. 11. The owner or owner’s agent is required to provide Special Inspections for the excavation, bedding, placement, backfill, and overall construction of the underground retention system. A completed Special Inspection form must be submitted to the County as an addendum to the permit. FINAL DRAINAGE inspection will not be scheduled until the completed Special Inspection form has been submitted. 12. Underground storage overflow pipe will be evaluated at time of final engineering design. Bleed-off pipes onto adjacent properties are not allowed. 13. Must maintain historic drainage patterns. 14. All retention basin(s)\Underground storage must drain within 36 hours per County requirements. d. The following C-3 CUPD standards shall apply: 1. Permitted uses: Unless effective annexation into the City of Peoria, uses shall be limited to indoor storage facilities (including mini-storage, self-storage, and RV & boat storage). Other indoor uses may be permitted at the discretion of the Planning & Development Department and Environmental Services Department if sewer service is available to the site and with administrative approval of a Plan of Development. 2. Minimum rear yard setback: none required. 3. Screening required along or generally parallel to any side or rear lot line abutting a rural or residential zoning district boundary: minimum 6’-high solid walls, including building walls. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Zone Change by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The property owners and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property, and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-113-X-00)

Attachments (1)