Vote: held

Item Text

11. GLENGALL LOGISTIC (Supervisorial District: 4) Case #: MCP260002 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning and Landscape Architecture / Glengall Logistic LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) with a Plan of Development (POD) for a truck freight and logistics operation in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district. Site Location: Generally located 825’ east of the NEC of Alsup Ave. and Myrtle Ave. in the west Glendale area Commission Recommendation: On 8/6/26, the Commission voted 7-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma D4, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors deny MCP260002. In the event the Board motions for approval of MCP260002, staff suggests conditions ‘a’ – ‘m’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Glengall Logistic“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated May 21, 2026, and stamped received May 22, 2026 except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Glengall Logistic”, consisting of 23 pages, dated May 22, 2026 and stamped received May 22, 2026 except as modified by the following conditions. c. Site access shall be restricted from 10:00 PM to 5:00 AM. No overnight sleeping shall be permitted on-site. No refrigerated trailer units (reefers units which are built-in climate control systems) shall be allowed on site. d. There shall be a minimum 8’ high CMU wall around the entire perimeter of the property. The perimeter shall be landscaped with drought tolerate plantings in compliance with Arizona Department of Water Resources plant list. e. The following Rural-43 MAAMF MCP standards shall apply: 1. Min. Side Setback: 10’ 2. Min. Paving: Asphalt millings will be utilized for the truck parking spaces. f. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Myrtle Avenue is within the jurisdiction of the City of Glendale. The applicant will be responsible for coordinating with the City to review any traffic impact, right-of-way dedication, permitting, or roadway improvement requirements. Approval by the City of Glendale for any roadway improvements will be required prior to Building Permit issuance. 2. Underground retention will be required to drain within 36 hours. 3. The subject premises is located within the County’s Urbanized Area and will disturb more than one (1) acre. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP), issued by the County (PND), will be required prior to issuance of any building permits required for site development. 4. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 905 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 5. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure. 6. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Final Building Permits. i. The following Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) conditions shall apply: 1. Notice of Intent to Discharge application for a septic system is required for any construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD Onsite Wastewater Program. • Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system. • If conducting food service in unincorporated Maricopa, a grease trap will be required by Onsite Wastewater program. • Setback requirements must be maintained per Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 312, C (Features Requiring Setbacks). 2. An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system infrastructure. 3. A Water Service Agreement signed by the Utility is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development will be provided with water and/or reclaimed water by a Utility. A Capacity Assurance Form issued by the Utility is required to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development wastewater service is being provided by a Utility. j. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) conditions shall apply: 1. Applicant to contact the City of Glendale regarding access, Right-of-Way, and required improvements to Myrtle Avenue. 2. Any work connecting to or which may impact Maricopa County Right-of-Way may require submittal of a TIA/TIS and/or a MCDOT Right-of-Way Permit to determine any applicable requirements. • TIA/TIS to be submitted to MCDOT via Permit Center at https://maricopacountyazenergovweb.tylerhost.net/apps/selfservice#/home. • If a TIA/TIS has been previously submitted, approval is valid for one year. If review for construction is not underway within this time period, MCDOT may request an updated traffic report to assess any changes in condition. k. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Military Compatibility Permit by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. l. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. m. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-27-021-X-00)

Attachments (2)