Attachment C - VPC Summary - Z-71-19-7.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2020-10-07)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 6390 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-71-19-7 
Date of VPC Meeting 
August 3, 2020 
Request From 
C-3 
Request To 
C-3 DNS / WVR 
Proposed Use 
Multifamily Residential 
Location 
Approximately 250 feet east of the southeast corner of 
Grand Avenue and Encanto Boulevard 
VPC Recommendation 
Approve per staff recommendation 
VPC Vote 
11-0; motion passed with members Benjamin, Kleinman, 
George, Matthews, Procaccini, Searles, Rodriguez, Coates, 
Jewett, Cothron, and Adams in favor; none in dissent or 
abstention. 
 VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS: 
No members of the public indicated a desire to speak in support or opposition to 
this item per the emergency policy. 
Z-71-19-7: Presentation, discussion and possible recommendation regarding a 
request to rezone 1.74 acres located approximately 250 feet east of the 
southeast corner of Grand Avenue and Encanto Boulevard from C-3 (General 
Commercial District) to C-3 DNS / WVR (General Commercial District, Density 
Waiver) to allow for multifamily residential. 
STAFF PRESENTATION: 
Nick Klimek, staff, provided an overview of the request noting that Z-22-20-7 is a 
companion case to place a historic preservation overlay. The request to for a 
density waiver to allow for the development of additional multifamily units on the 
site of an existing multifamily complex. The site is approximately 250 feet east of 
the intersection of Grand Avenue and Encanto Boulevard. The proposed use is 
consistent with the Phoenix General Plan Land Use Map designation of 
Commercial. Staff has found that the proposal is appropriate due to its 
compatibility with the surrounding land uses and consistency with the Phoenix 
General Plan and is therefore recommending approval subject to 12 stipulations.  
Attachment C

Encanto Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
May 5, 2020 
Page 2 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
The proposed stipulations pertain to the development standards that will govern 
the site and landscaping, a detached and shaded sidewalk along Encanto 
Boulevard, the parking lot shaded to 25 by trees, clearly defined pedestrian 
pathways on the site and connecting to each of the public sidewalks, a restriction 
of solid walls oriented to Encanto Boulevard to a maximum height of 36 inches, 
enhanced bicycle parking, and the new units being oriented to Encanto 
Boulevard. Additional stipulations pertain to aviation disclosures, site 
improvements, and archaeology. 
 
APPLICANT PRESENTATION: 
 
Mario Mangiamele, of iPlan Consulting and representing the applicant, provided 
an overview of the proposal and the property. The owners purchased the site a 
few years ago and made a significant investments into the site and structures; 
they have committed to renovating the existing units between tenants but that 
turn-over has proven to be infrequent.  
 
The request is for an additional 18 units which would bring the total unit count on 
the 1.74 acre parcel to 35 total units. The request would preserve the historic 
motel buildings on the site and new buildings would be designed in a manner to 
complement the overall site plan. He concluded his presentation by summarizing 
the following: the request is consistent with the General Plan and many of its 
Core Values; the proposal, coupled with the companion case, will maintain the 
historic integrity of the site and enhance the long term livability of the area; and 
the owner is in agreement with the proposed staff stipulations.  
 
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE: 
 
Matthew Jewett stated that he is impressed by the proposal and noted that this 
appears to be affordable housing in a truly mixed use corridor. He asked about 
the unit mix and the price-points. Mario Mangiamele responded that the units 
will be small one-bedroom units between 350 and 400 square feet which is 
consistent with the current units on the site. Regarding price-points, he stated 
that the units will not be income restricted but noted that the market will likely 
position these units as workforce housing. He further noted that there is a wait list 
for the existing units on the site and that most units are occupied by long-term 
tenants.  
 
G.G. George noted that she attended the neighborhood meeting and that she 
supports the project which will preserve several notable historic buildings. She 
asked Chairman Adams for permission to provide a written account of the Grand 
Avenue corridor during the Great Depression (Chairman Adams agreed). The 
account was the story of Mr. Noble Ewing who, due to respiratory illness, was 
looking to relocate his family from Texas for a healthier climate and, of the 
communities he contacted, received only one optimistic response – from the 
Phoenix Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Ewing and his family relocated to The Ideal

Encanto Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
May 5, 2020 
Page 3 of 3 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Court on Grand (similar to the subject property), set up a mattress renovating 
factory in the area and became part of the community on Grant Avenue 
consisting of small businesses, gas stations, bars, and a church.  
 
Steve Procaccini noted that he agrees with George and Jewett in his belief that 
this is a good project. He asked staff whether the applicant will be required to 
shade the Grand Avenue sidewalk. Nick Klimek responded that while staff is not 
stipulating a detached sidewalk at this location due to the location of the existing 
historic buildings, Stipulation No. 1 requires trees be placed in proximity to the 
sidewalk to provide shade over the public walk. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENTS: NONE 
 
APPLICANT RESPONSE: NONE 
 
MOTION: 
 
Motion 
G.G. George motioned to approve the request per the staff recommendation and 
Matthew Jewett seconded.  
 
Vote 
11-0; motion passed with members Benjamin, Kleinman, George, Matthews, 
Procaccini, Searles, Rodriguez, Coates, Jewett, Cothron, and Adams in favor; none 
in dissent or abstention. 
 
VPC RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS & STAFF COMMENTS 
 
None.