Attachment E - PC Summary - GPA-DSTV-3-23-2.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
7081 characters
REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION November 7, 2024 ITEM NO: 13 DISTRICT NO.: 2 SUBJECT: Application #: GPA-DSTV-3-23-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-2-23-2 and Z-39-23-2) (Continued from January 4, 2024) Request: Specific Plan Location: Southwest corner of Black Mountain Boulevard and Deer Valley Drive Proposal: Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan Section 6.C.5.Superblock 12 to facilitate commercial development Applicant: Ryan Ash, Vestar Owner: Arizona State Land Department Representative: Ashley Z Marsh, Gammage & Burnham ACTIONS: Staff Recommendation: Approval, as shown in the recommended text in Exhibit A Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: Desert View 8/1/2023 Information only. Desert View 10/3/2023 Denial. Vote: 7-2-1. Desert View 10/1/2024 Approval, per the staff recommendation, with modifications. Vote: 10-1. Planning Commission Recommendation: 11/2/2023 Continued to the January 4, 2024 Planning Commission Hearing, without fee. Vote: 9-0. 1/4/2024 Continued to a date uncertain and remanded back to the Desert View Village Planning Committee for reconsideration. Vote: 7-0. 11/7/2024 Approval, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation. Motion Discussion: N/A Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve GPA-DSTV-3-23-2, per the Desert View Village Planning Committee recommendation. Maker: Matthews Second: Read Vote: 8-1 (Busching) Absent: None Opposition Present: Yes Findings: None. Proposed Language: Amend Chapter 6 (Development Parcel Regulations), Section C.5. (Development Regulations by Superblock), Pages 6-45 to 6-46 as follows: ATTACHMENT E SUPERBLOCK 12 Superblock 12 is located west of a possible future connection to the Squaw PIESTEWA Peak Parkway, which separates this superblock from the balance of the Desert Ridge community. BECAUSE OF THIS SEPARATION, THIS SUPERBLOCK CAN SUPPORT LIMITED COMMERCIAL USES WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DESERT RIDGE CORE (DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 5.A). RESIDENTIAL development parcels may vary in size by 30 percent (25 percent for R1-6 and more dense zoning categories without a minor plan amendment). Size: 136 133.41 acres Maximum Number of Dwelling Units: 347 Average Density: 2.55 du/ac 12.L – Development Parcel 12.L Size: 77 55.24 acres Uses Permitted: x Single-family residential Density Range: 2-5 du/ac for the entire parcel Maximum Number of Units: 347 257; 451 334 if parcel increases in size 30 percent Potential Zoning to be Applied: R1-18, R1-10, R1-8, R1-6, R-2 Minimum Lot Size: Zoning controls Special Requirements (Modifying City Regulations): x No attached single-family units; no multifamily units. x Section C.4.B, Chapter 6, Desert Ridge Specific Plan applies. x No more than 25% of the development parcel may be zoned R-2. Recommendations: x Clustering permitted subject to minimum lot size. 12.C – DEVELOPMENT PARCEL 12.C SIZE: 20.52 ACRES USES PERMITTED: x ALL USES ALLOWED UNDER CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING DESIGNATION C-2, INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL, EXCEPT AS PROHIBITED BELOW. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF UNITS: 90 POTENTIAL ZONING TO BE APPLIED: C-2 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS (MODIFYING CITY REGULATIONS): x MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE AREA FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL RETAIL TENANT/USER (E.G. GROCER) SHALL NOT EXCEED 65,000 SQUARE FEET. x AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS ARE PROHIBITED. x ADULT USES ARE PROHIBITED. x RETAIL LIQUOR SALES ARE ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE BUT ARE PROHIBITED AS A PRIMARY USE. x TOBACCO ORIENTED RETAILERS ARE ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE BUT ARE PROHIBITED AS A PRIMARY USE. x RETAIL MARIJUANA SALES (DISPENSARIES) ARE PROHIBITED. x CAR WASHES ARE PROHIBITED. 12.S – Development Parcel 12.S Size: 59 57.65 acres Uses Permitted: x High school Potential Zoning to be Applied: R1-8 This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION January 4, 2024 ITEM NO: 3 DISTRICT NO.: 2 SUBJECT: Application #: GPA-DSTV-3-23-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-2-23-2 and Z-39-23-2) Request: Specific Plan Amendment Location: Southwest corner of Black Mountain Boulevard and Deer Valley Drive Proposal: Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan Section 6.C.5.12.L- Superblock 12 to facilitate commercial development Applicant: Ryan Ash, Vestar Owner: Arizona State Land Department Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham, PLC ACTIONS: Staff Recommendation: Continuance to a date uncertain. Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: Desert View 8/1/2023 Information only. Desert View 10/3/2023 Denial. Vote: 7-2-1. Planning Commission Recommendation: Continued to a date uncertain, without fee; and remand the case back to the Desert View Village Planning Committee for reconsideration. Motion Discussion: N/A Motion details: Commissioner Gorraiz made a MOTION to continue GPA-DSTV-3-23-2, to a date uncertain, without fee; and remand the case back to the Desert View Village Planning Committee for reconsideration. Maker: Gorraiz Second: Vice-Chairperson Busching Vote: 7-0 Absent: Mangum Opposition Present: Yes Findings: The applicant requested a continuance to a date uncertain and to be remanded back to the Desert View Village Planning Committee. This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia Galaviz at 602-291-2559, teleia.galaviz@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION November 2, 2023 ITEM NO: 8 DISTRICT NO.: 2 SUBJECT: Application #: GPA-DSTV-3-23-2 (Companion Cases GPA-DSTV-2-23-2 & Z-39-23-2) Location: Southwest corner of Black Mountain Boulevard and Deer Valley Drive Proposal: Amendment to the Desert Ridge Specific Plan Section 6.C.5.12.L- Superblock 12 to facilitate commercial development. Applicant: Ryan Ash, Vestar Owner: Arizona State Land Department Representative: Stephen Anderson, Gammage & Burnham ACTIONS: Staff Recommendation: Continuance. Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: Desert View 8/1/2023 Information only. Desert View 10/3/2023 Denial. Vote: 7-2-1. Planning Commission Recommendation: Continued to the January 4, 2024 Planning Commission hearing, without fee. Motion Discussion: N/A Motion details: Commissioner Perez made a MOTION to continue GPA-DSTV-3-23-2, to the January 4, 2024 Planning Commission hearing, without fee. Maker: Perez Second: Gorraiz Vote: 9-0 Absent: None Opposition Present: Yes Findings: The applicant requested a continuance to allow more to time to work with the State Land Department and the community. This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact Teleia Galaviz 602-602-291-2559, TTY use 7-1-1