Attachment D - Staff Report Addendum B - Z-49-19-8

ADDENDUM B 
Staff Report: Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
South Mountain Village Planning 
Committee Meeting Dates: 
May 12, 2020 
June 9, 2020 
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 
June 4, 2020 
August 6, 2020 
Request From: 
PSC (Planned Shopping Center 
District) (14.16 acres) 
Request To: 
C-2 HGT/WVR DNS/WVR
(Intermediate Commercial, Height 
Waiver, Density Waiver) (14.16 acres) 
Proposed Use: 
Multifamily Residential 
Location: 
Approximately 175 feet north of the 
northwest corner of 19th Avenue and 
Southern Avenue 
Owner: 
South Phoenix Renewal, LLC 
Applicant: 
Representative: 
Phoenix Leased Housing Assoc. II, 
LLLP 
Gammage & Burnham, PLC / Susan 
Demmitt 
Staff Recommendation: 
Approval, subject to stipulations 
The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this rezoning request on May 
12, 2020 and voted 13-0 to continue the case to the June 9, 2020 South Mountain 
Village Planning Committee meeting, in agreement with the applicant. The case was 
also continued at the June 4, 2020 Planning Commission hearing in order to allow the 
applicant to seek a recommendation from the South Mountain Village Planning 
Committee. 
As a result of ongoing discussions with the community, the applicant has provided an 
updated site plan. The updated site plan incorporates changes to the layout of Buildings 
6, 7 and 8 originally presented in Addendum A. Buildings 7 and 8 were merged into one 
building, now shown as Building 7, which resulted in an increased setback to the 
western property line adjacent to the R1-6 Single-Family Zoning District from 90 feet to 
118 feet. Building 6 was extended west with a proposed height of 2 stories and 30 feet 
for a portion to the west and 3 stories and 39 feet on the remaining portion to the east. 
The height of the proposed Building 7 is 3 stories and 39 feet. Other changes that 
Attachment D

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 2 of 7 
 
 
resulted included the layout of vehicular parking along the western property line and the 
addition of a new open space area to the west of Building 7.  
 
Due to these changes, the following stipulations are recommended to be modified: 
 
• Stipulation No. 1 regarding general conformance with the revised site plan; 
• Stipulation No. 2 regarding the maximum allowed building height in feet and 
number of stories reflecting the new building layout; 
• Stipulation No. 4 regarding the maximum allowed density of the proposed 
development; 
• Stipulation No. 5 regarding the minimum setback of buildings to the western 
property line; 
• Stipulation No. 11 regarding general site layout and amenities shown in the revised 
site plan; 
• Stipulation No. 11.h. regarding the size of the open space area adjacent to Building 
5; 
• Stipulation Nos. 12.a., 12.b. and 12.f. to update the reference to the site plan. 
 
Staff has also received additional correspondence from the public regarding this case 
beyond what was included in Addendum A. This additional correspondence has been 
attached to this report. 
 
Staff recommends approval per the modified stipulations in bold font below: 
 
Stipulations 
1. 
The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and elevations date 
stamped JUNE 5, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 April 22, 2020, AND ELEVATIONS DATE 
STAMPED APRIL 22, 2020, except as described below and approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
2. 
Building height shall be limited to three stories and 39 FEET 40 feet, EXCEPT FOR THE 
WESTERN THIRD OF BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 AND THE WESTERN HALF OF 
BUILDING 8 WHICH SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 2 STORIES AND 
30 FEET AS DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED JUNE 5, 2020. 
 
 
3. 
Building elevations adjacent and oriented to public streets shall contain a minimum of 25 
percent masonry, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
4. 
The development shall be limited to a MAXIMUM OF 308 300 DWELLING UNITS density 
of 23 dwelling units per gross acre. 
 
 
5. 
The development shall maintain a minimum building setback, exclusive of carports and 
perimeter walls, of 118 FEET 90 FEET 70 feet from the western site boundary where 
adjacent to R1-6 zoning.

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 3 of 7 
 
 
6. 
All ground floor units adjacent to 19th Avenue or Southern Avenue shall have individual 
porches or patios oriented to the nearest public street. 
 
 
7. 
The primary vehicular entrance to the development from Southern Avenue shall include the 
following elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department: 
 
 
 
a. 
Pedestrian pathways connecting the interior of the development to the public 
sidewalks along both sides of the vehicular driveway. 
 
 
 
 
 
b. 
The pedestrian pathways shall be detached from the vehicular driveway and lined 
with landscape areas on both sides of not less than 5 feet each. The landscape 
area shall be planted with drought-tolerant plant materials providing seasonal 
interest and 75 percent live cover. 
 
 
 
 
c. 
A median island of no less than 5 feet in width shall be accented by a minimum of 
three date palms a minimum of 16 feet in height measured from finished grade to 
the bottom of the crown, excluding fronds; and drought-tolerant, ornamental, 
flowering shrubs to provide a minimum 75 percent live cover. Twenty five percent of 
the required live cover may be ground cover plants. 
 
 
 
 
d. 
The driveway surface shall be constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored 
concrete, or another material, other than those used to pave the parking surfaces, 
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
8. 
Perimeter walls located within 50 feet of the adjacent street right-of-way (non-alley), except 
for the portion of the site adjacent to the future convenience store, shall be a minimum of 50 
percent view fence. 
 
 
9. 
All perimeter walls shall include material and textural differences, such as stucco and/or 
split face block with a decorative element, such as tile or stamped designs, as approved by 
the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
10. A minimum of 10 percent of the gross site area shall be provided as open space. 
 
 
11. The open space areas shall be developed in general conformance to the layout and 
amenities shown in the site plan date stamped JUNE 5, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 April 22, 2020 
and to include the following amenities at a minimum, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department: 
 
 
 
a. 
Swimming pool and spa. 
 
 
 
 
b. 
Two game areas of no less than 800 square feet in area and containing 
outdoor games and turf. 
 
 
 
 
c. 
One picnic area with two barbecue grills, a shade ramada and a picnic 
table.

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 4 of 7 
 
 
 
d. 
Two tot lots of no less than 800 square feet in an area with a combined 
total of five game amenities. 
 
 
 
 
e. 
Turf field of no less than 4,000 square feet in area with a minimum of two 
benches located in shaded areas. 
 
 
 
 
f. 
Play area containing turf and a minimum of one game amenity or art 
feature in addition to a minimum of two benches located in shaded areas. 
 
 
 
 
g. 
Two benches in close proximity to the “parent waiting/receiving plaza” area 
along the northeast portion of the property near the school site pedestrian 
connection. 
 
 
 
 
h. 
One active open space area LOCATED TO THE WEST OF BUILDING 5 of 
no less than 1,500 SQUARE FEET 2,000 SQUARE FEET 600 square feet 
in an area that includes either a fenced dog turf amenity, fenced garden 
area, INCLUDING A COMMUNITY GARDEN, COMMUNITY GATHERING 
SPACE or another active open space amenity. THE ACTIVE OPEN 
SPACE AREA MAY BE FENCED, BUT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO 
PEDESTRIANS ALONG SOUTHERN AVENUE VIA A PEDESTRIAN 
WALKWAY. 
  
 
12. The developer shall provide a system of pedestrian thoroughfares as described below and 
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department: 
 
 
 
a. 
The developer shall provide two separate pedestrian paths shaded to a minimum of 
75 percent, connecting the sidewalk along 19th Avenue at two distinct points with 
the closest common entrance in Buildings 5 and 7 8 per the site plan date stamped 
JUNE 5, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 April 22, 2020. The pedestrian paths shall be routed 
within close proximity to the central amenity area and should avoid overlap as much 
as possible with other shaded pedestrian paths. 
 
 
 
 
b. 
The developer shall provide two separate pedestrian paths shaded to a minimum of 
75 percent, connecting the sidewalk along Southern Avenue at two distinct points 
with the closest common entrance in Buildings 9 and 12 per the site plan date 
stamped JUNE 5, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 April 22, 2020. The pedestrian paths shall 
be routed within close proximity to the central amenity area and should avoid 
overlap as much as possible with other shaded pedestrian paths. 
 
 
 
 
c. 
The pedestrian paths shall be illuminated by pedestrian scale lighting per Section 
1304(H)5. 
 
 
 
 
d. 
Vehicular crossings shall be kept to a minimum. Where crossings exist, the 
pedestrian pathway shall be constructed of decorative pavement that visually 
contrasts with parking and drive aisle surfaces. 
 
 
 
 
e. 
Connections shall be/between:

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 5 of 7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) 
All residential buildings. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2) 
All amenity buildings and facilities. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3) 
The bus stop on Southern Avenue by the most direct route possible. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4) 
The sidewalk along 19th Avenue and the northwest corner of the site. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5) 
The sidewalk along Southern Avenue at the southwest corner of the site. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(6) 
The planned convenience store via an access controlled pedestrian gate. 
 
 
 
 
f. 
Direct connection to the sidewalk along Southern Avenue between Buildings 4 and 
5, A DIRECT CONNECTION TO THE SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTHERN AVENUE 
FROM THE OPEN SPACE AREA WEST OF BUILDING 5, in addition to a direct 
connection to the sidewalk along 19th Avenue between Buildings 13 and 14 per the 
site plan date stamped JUNE 5, 2020 MAY 26, 2020 April 22, 2020. 
 
 
13. The required landscape setback areas along 19th Avenue, Southern Avenue, and the alley 
along the west property line shall be planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, 
with shade trees including 40 percent 2-inch caliper, 40 percent 3-inch caliper, and 20 
percent 4-inch caliper sizes, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
14. A minimum of one bench in each perimeter landscape setback along 19th Avenue and 
Southern Avenue, accessible by pedestrians along the street side detached sidewalks shall 
be provided. The bench along Southern Avenue shall be located within proximity to the bus 
stop pad, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The bench located 
along 19th Avenue shall be located within close proximity to the pedestrian walkway that 
connects the development to the school site to the north, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. The developer shall locate trees in close proximity to each of the 
benches to shade each bench to a minimum of 75 percent, as approved the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
15. The developer shall locate trees in close proximity to the bus stop along Southern Avenue 
to shade the bus stop area to a minimum of 75 percent, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
16. All sidewalks ALONG 19TH AVENUE AND SOUTHERN AVENUE shall be detached with a 
minimum five-foot wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of curb and 
planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and 
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian 
environment.

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 6 of 7 
 
 
 
a. 
Minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees placed a minimum 
of 25 feet on center or equivalent groupings to provide shade to a minimum 75 
percent. 
 
 
 
 
b. 
Drought tolerant vegetation designed to grow to a maximum mature height of 24 
inches and achieve 75 percent live coverage. 
 
 
17. The developer shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and as approved 
by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
 
a. 
Resident bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.25 spaces per dwelling 
unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces. These spaces may be provided through a 
combination of “Secure/Covered Facilities” and “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” as 
defined in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan. 
“Outdoor/Covered Facilities” shall comprise no more than 60 percent of required 
resident bicycle parking. 
 
 
 
 
b. 
Guest bicycle parking shall be provided through the provision of a minimum of four 
inverted U-bicycle racks, artistic style racks or “Outdoor/Covered Facilities” for 
guests located near building entrance of each residential building. All racks shall 
adhere to Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan. 
 
 
 
 
c. 
A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided within close proximity to 
each of the two vehicular entryways into the multifamily development. Each bicycle 
repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of high visibility and 
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas. The repair station shall include: 
standard repair tools affixed to the station; a tire gauge and pump affixed to the 
base of the station or the ground; and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals 
and wheels to spin freely while making adjustments to the bike. 
 
 
18. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures at all vehicular points of ingress / 
egress to slow vehicles departing the development and crossing the public sidewalks, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
19. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with 
paving, curb, gutter sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and 
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All 
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards. 
 
 
20. The developer shall record a Notice of Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in 
order to disclose the existence and operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor 
International Airport (PHX) to future owners or tenants of the property. 
 
21. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to construction permit approval 
that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that the development received a 
“No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If temporary equipment used during construction 
exceeds the height of the permanent structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to

Addendum B to the Staff Report Z-49-19-8 
June 8, 2020 
Page 7 of 7 
 
 
the FAA and a “No Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date. 
 
 
22. The developer shall retain the bus stop right-of-way and bus pad along westbound 
Southern Avenue west of 19th Avenue. The bus stop pad shall be compliant with City of 
Phoenix Standard Detail P1262 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be 
spaced from the intersection of 20th Avenue and Southern Avenue as per City of Phoenix 
Standard Detail P1258. The preceding shall be as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
23. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall conduct 
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development area 
for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape 
salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
 
24. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data 
testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines 
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II 
archaeological data recovery excavations. 
 
 
25. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer 
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the 
discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to 
properly assess the materials. 
 
Exhibits 
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped June 5, 2020 (1 page) 
Public comments/correspondence (15 pages)

RATIO
NET SITE AREA:
+/- 12.72 AC
11.0%
100.0%
EXISTING ZONING
PSC
PROPOSED ZONING
C-2 W/ HEIGHT AND DENSITY WAIVERS
SITE DATA
ALONG SOUTHERN AVE
PERIMETER SETBACK STANDARDS
NORTH PROPERTY LINE
CARPORTS - 15' MIN. PROVIDED
RES. BLDGS - 20' MIN. PROVIDED
UNIT TYPE
#DU
P.S. REQ.
2BR/2BA
130
TOTAL
 PARKING REQUIRED
36
1BR/1BA
195
533
54
P.S. RATIO
UNRESERVED PARKING PROVIDED
225
BUILDING HEIGHT MAX. 2 STORIES (*4 STORIES) 30' FOR FIRST 150'
*1' IN 5' INCREASE TO 48' (4 STORY MAX.)
ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE
15' MIN. REQUIRED
DENSITY ALLOWED
15.23 DU/AC
1.5 P.S./DU
1.5 P.S./DU
UNIT TYPE
#DU
2BR/2BA
TOTAL
1BR/1BA
A1
B1
APARTMENTS - UNIT MIX DATA
3BR/2BA
142
284
2.0 P.S./DU
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
105-66-036B
20' MIN. REQUIRED
22'  MIN. PROVIDED
43.0%
46.0%
3BR/2BA
C1
308
130
308
36
142
GROSS SITE AREA:
+/- 14.16 AC
DENSITY PROPOSED
+/- 21.75 DU/AC
DOMINIUM
PROPOSED DEVELOPER/SPONSER:
11001 W. 120th AVENUE  #400
BROOMFIELD, CO.  80021
CONTACT - RUSS CONDAS
(763) 354-5637
TODD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL:
4019 NORTH 44th STREET
PHOENIX, AZ.  85018
CONTACT - BRENT FIKE
(602) 952-8280
COMMUNITY / LEASING & FITNESS BUILDINGS
APARTMENT BUILDINGS (12 BUILDINGS)
MAINTENANCE BUILDING
± 450 S.F.
± 7,623 S.F.
BUILDING AREAS (GROSS)
± 381,507 S.F.
TOTAL BUILDING
± 436,704 S.F.
CARPORTS (308 SPACES)
± 47,124 S.F.
PARKING -CARPORT (1.0 COVERED P.S. / D.U.)
308
UNIT TYPE
#DU
3BR
142
TOTAL
UNRESERVED PARKING REQUIRED
166
1BR & 2 BR
142
225
83
O.5 P.S./DU
1.0 P.S./DU
308
P.S. REQ.
P.S. RATIO
15' WITHIN 10' & 1' INCREASE IN HGHT. FOR EA. 1' OF SETBACK ]
[MAX. ALLOWED ADJACENT TO R1-6 DISTRICT:
20' MIN. REQUIRED
25' MIN. PROVIDED
COMMON AREA STANDARDS
COMMON AREAS REQUIRED
5%   [+/-0.7 AC]
COMMON AREAS PROVIDED
.
PROPOSED DEV. OPTION
R3-PRD
ALONG 19TH AVE
WEST PROPERTY LINE
CARPORTS - 15' MIN. PROVIDED
RES. BLDGS - 40' MIN. PROVIDED
LOT COVERAGE:
ALLOWED-         45%
PROVIDED-         28.4%
PROPOSED MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT
[+/-
.
AC]
PHOENIX LEASED HOUSING
ASSOCIATES II, LLLP
PROPOSED OWNER:
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
QUARTER SECTION NO.
ZONING MAP
VARIANCE NO.
DSD KIVA NO. / PAPP NO.
MDEV / SDEV NO.
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED -  (1.73 P.S./D.U.)
533
PARAPET TOP 38'-6"
THREE STORY:
PARAPET TOP 30'-0"
TWO STORY (BLDG. #7 & WESTERN PORTION #8):
84
22
957
1
%

VISION  
Every Arizonan has a safe, affordable place to call home.  
MISSION  
The Arizona Housing Coalition (AZHC) is a collaborative association  
that leads in the efforts to end homelessness and advocates for safe,  
affordable homes for all Arizonans.   
 
 
 
 
Arizona Housing Coalition | Proud Home of the Arizona Veterans StandDown Alliance 
1495 E Osborn Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85014.  Ph: 602.340.9393  Email: info@azhousingcoalition.org 
501(c)(3) Non-Profit Tax ID #: 86-0909029 / Qualified Charity Org # 20111 
AZHousingCoalition.org | facebook.com/AZHousingCoalition | twitter.com/SpeakUp4Homes | Instagram.com/AZHousingCoalition 
 
 
 
June 5, 2020 
 
 
 
The Arizona Housing Coalition is the largest housing stability advocacy organization in the State, 
with over 200 member organizations.  We represent thousands of individuals, non-profits, and 
organizations of all sizes who want to bring more affordable housing and an end to homelessness in 
Arizona.  We work to create an Arizona where housing stability is universal, and every man, woman, 
child and veteran has a safe affordable place to call home. 
 
With our mission and vision in mind, we would like to voice our support for the re-zoning and 
development of the proposed affordable housing opportunity known as Vista Ridge Apartments at 
the Northwest corner of W. Southern and S. 19th Avenues, in Phoenix.  We believe that Dominium’s 
goal to provide quality, stable and long term affordable housing to South Phoenix directly aligns 
with the goals of the Arizona Housing Coalition, and encourage all involved to help to be an 
advocate for affordable housing, rather than an obstacle. 
 
 As such, please accept this letter of support on behalf of the Arizona Housing Coalition. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
 
Joan Serviss, Executive Director 
Arizona Housing Coalition

TigerMountain Foundation   |   3146 E Wier Avenue, Suite 31   |   Phoenix, AZ 85040 
June 4, 2020 
 
TO:  Dominium Inc. 
 
RE:  Letter of Support for the Vista Ridge Apartmetns at 19th avenue and Southern 
 
TigerMountain Foundation, a South Phoenix-based nonprofit corporation, is pleased to submit this letter of 
support for Dominium’s proposed 300+ unit affordable housing multi-family residential project to be located at 
19th Avenue and Southern Avenue within the South Mountain Village. 
 
TigerMountain Foundation seeks to empower the people of South Phoenix by building flourishing community 
gardens and through our multi-ethnic and inter-generational Garden and Landscape/Agriscaping Initiatives we 
mentor participants through an active and healthy eating lifestyle, a Personal Strategy Roadmap that encourages 
goal completion and transitions folks into workforce development skills that prepare them to earn a living wage. 
  
In partnership with several local and national partners, we have implemented two (2) community gardens within 
the South Mountain Village; (i) Spaces of Opportunity located at Vineyard Road and 15th Avenue; and, (ii) 
Garden of Tomorrow located at 18th Place and Broadway Road. Among other objectives, these gardens seek to 
provide healthy, affordable, accessible food and promote the diverse South Mountain Village culture. 
 
We have had an opportunity to meet with the applicant and to learn about the proposed project, which will 
include a community garden. In addition to all of the objectives that our organization would seek to achieve (i.e. 
access to healthy food), the proposed community garden amenity is a unique opportunity.  This will provide the 
project residents with a central and meaningful gathering place that encourages a sense of community and pride. 
Through our joint partnership and unique private development meets nonprofit organization concept, we know 
this can be a “Best practice” model for other future development to follow as well. 
 
In summary, the proposed community garden provides a unique opportunity to instill a sense of place, create 
meaningful access to healthy food and promote active lifestyles. The goals for the Dominium community 
garden are well aligned with our goals and objectives for the larger South Phoenix community. We believe that 
this project will not only be a great addition to the South Mountain Village but that there is a great opportunity 
for other partnerships to join and align and strengthen the overall community. 
 
For these reasons, we strongly support the project. Thank you for your time and consideration of this letter and 
please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Darren J. Chapman, CEO - Founder - TigerMountain Foundation 
darren.chapman@TigerMountainFoundation.org  Cell | (213) 300-8846

1
Racelle Escolar
From:
A N <maricopaaln@gmail.com>
Sent:
Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:45 AM
To:
PDD Planning Commission
Subject:
Case Number Z-49-19-8
Hello Planning Committee Members: 
 
 
My name is Audria Nunley,  My question is: 
 
I have done my research on The Parent Company being Dominium Development practices they they don't seem to 
adhere of staying  in the parameters of the  
HUD Grant.  
It is evidence upon research is contrary rent hikes practices after tenants signs there lease agreements.  From research 
Practices EXHIBIT at other locations do what you say your statements is not consistent by the information I have found. 
 
WHAT GUARANTEE WE WILL NOT HAVE THESE PRACTICES? 
 
I appreciate the committee giving me opportunity to submit my comments. Thank you. 
 
Best Regards, 
Audria

From:
A N
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; PDD South Mountain VPC
Cc:
Samantha Keating
Subject:
Fwd: lindo park letter of opposition to Z-49-19-8.doc
Date:
Tuesday, June 2, 2020 12:16:23 AM
Attachments:
lindo park letter of opposition to Z-49-19-8.doc
Greetings, I am forwarding The Lindo Park letter of opposition; this letter should have been
attached to the Page 1 Petition Sheet I sent earlier today. Sorry, for any convenience.   Thank
you.
Best Regards,
Audria
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: A N <maricopaaln@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 1, 2020, 9:49 PM
Subject: lindo park letter of opposition to Z-49-19-8.doc
To: A N <maricopaaln@gmail.com>

May 15, 2020 
To:  
City of Phoenix Planning and Development Dept. 
 
South Mountain Village Committee 
Re: Application Case No. Z-49-19-8 
 
This letter is in response to concerns realized after the meeting on May 12, 2020 of the South Mountain Village 
Committee. We are still in OPPOSITION to the building of a 312 unit 3 story Apartment complex at the Northwest corner 
of 19th Avenue and southern by Dominium. This property defined as an affordable multifamily residential community is 
not a welcome addition to this already established community. 
It is very apparent from the information shared in the meeting that the developer is on a time schedule and is more 
concerned about the profits to be lost if the deal is not completed soon. Also, it is apparent that there is little flexibility 
for Dominium in making the project more conducive to fitting into our community by making the builds one or two 
story. He said, it doesn’t meet their profitability model.  
We do not believe that Dominium has made a true and sincere effort to interact with the residents and to truly act upon 
the issues the residents have with the project. The idea of making one building two stories tall out of the other 10 to 12 
units is ridiculous. When you take into account the sheer size of the project it just does not mesh into the continuity of 
this community. This is neighborhood and the surrounding neighborhoods are single family homes. We like the feel of 
the openness of our community. There have got to be better options for the use of this property that would more ideally 
fit the nature of this area. Nothing in the area from Central avenue on the east to 35th avenue on the west, Baseline road 
on the south and Broadway road on the north, reflect this type of proposed property at all. 
Additionally, the community has some concerns that we would like to have addressed. 
The Developer also should provide a crime report for the area (1 to 5mile radius)? 
 
What businesses in the area have they spoke with and gotten support from? Please provide letters. 
 
Developer stated he spoke with the community going door to door; please provide dates and number of residents they 
had DIRECT contact with. 
 
Research by our neighbor suggests Dominium has Characteristics not appropriate for our neighborhood. 
  
●Discriminatory Practices 
● Civil Right infringements  
● Rent Hikes contrary to stated agreements 
●Landlord/Slumlord Practices 
● Employee discriminatory Practices 
● Unseemly Federal, State and County Tax Practices 
 
South Mountain Village Committee, we would really appreciate looking into this information and getting to know more 
about Dominium. However, the OPPOSITION to this project still stands. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Lindo Park community

From:
A N
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject:
Case Number Z-49-19-8
Date:
Sunday, June 7, 2020 2:52:38 PM
Enriquez,
I hope all is well in this challenging time. I am submitting to you my questions for South Mtn
Village Planning Committee meeting on June 9, 2020 for Case Number: Z-49-19-8;
Dominium Development.
Here's my following questions:
1. I have been doing research and pulling information about Dominium
Development/Management they have these practices that have come across there properties
across the nation.
"DOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR OUR
NEIGHBORHOOD. HERE'S SOME ITEMS OF CONCERNS":
● Discrimination Practices
● Civil Rights Practices
● Maintenance Practices
● Rent Hike Practices
● Employee Practices
● Landlord Practices
● Community Practices
● Zoning Practices
● Disabilities Practices
● Tax Payer Practices
2. I have done my research on the Parent Company being Dominium Development Practices
they don't seem to adhere of staying in the parameters of the HUD Grant.
● It's evidence upon research is contrary Rent Hikes Practices after tenants SIGNS there lease
agreements. From research Practices exhibit at other locations do what you day yours
statements is not consistent the information have found. This is not acceptable!!!
What Guarantee We Will Not Have Theses Practices?
I appreciate you giving me an opportunity to submit my concerns and questions. Thank you.
Best Regards,
Audria

Dave & Suze Schroder 
2521 W. Apollo Road 
Phoenix, AZ 85041 
 
 
June 6, 2020 
 
Attn: Enrique Bojorquesz-Gaxiola 
Phoenix Planning & Development Department 
200 W. Washington Street 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
 
RE: Three-story low-income apartment at 19th Ave and Southern 
 
Mr. Bojorquez-Gaxiola: 
 
I am a retired Arizona State Trooper, after serving forty years protecting the citizens of Arizona.  Suze is retired 
from Wells Fargo bank.  My wife and I had our forever home built in south Phoenix, which we have lived in 
since 2004.  I am sending you this correspondence asking that you vote against approving another low-income 
building in our neighborhood.  Each time one of the aforementioned dwellings are approved/built it results in 
decreased property values of single family housing in the area.  Many of us living in our community are 
attempting to preserve our quality of life here. 
 
Thank you for taking the time to read this correspondence, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dave Schroder

1
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
To:
Fred Jones
Cc:
PDD South Mountain VPC
Subject:
RE: Case Number Z-49-19-8
 
 
From: Fred Jones <fjones2064@gmail.com>  
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 7:19 AM 
To: Enrique A Bojorquez‐Gaxiola <enrique.bojorquez‐gaxiola@phoenix.gov> 
Cc: PDD South Mountain VPC <southmountainvpc@phoenix.gov> 
Subject: Re: Case Number Z‐49‐19‐8 
 
 
I hope all is well in this challenging time. I am submitting to you my questions for the South Mountain Village Planning 
Committee meeting on June 9, 2020 for Case Number: Z‐49‐19‐8; Dominium Development.   
 
My question is: 
 
I would like to hear from each of the board members of how they arrived at a decision to approve this project. Would 
you approve this project if it was proposed to be in your backyard, considering its size and being a lone structure of its 
type in this community? 
 
I still stand in opposition to this project after having reviewed the changes they are proposing. A two story complex may 
be acceptable. but three stories is a deal breaker for me completely. 
 
I hope and pray you are having a great day and look forward to seeing you all tomorrow and hearing your answers. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Fred Jones, III 
2113 W Hidalgo Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85041

From:
JOHNNY CHAMBERS
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Cc:
Council District 8 PCC
Subject:
Low Income Apartments at 19th & Southern Ave.
Date:
Saturday, June 6, 2020 2:24:41 PM
Hello Enrique Bojorquez- Gaxiola. My name is John Chambers and I am a native Phoenician. I
have lived near 23rd Ave and Vineyard Rd for almost 18 years. I Love the area and the
mountain views. However, I am very disappointed with so many of the building projects that
the city has allowed in our area, which are not for the good of our community. If you haven't
noticed, there are far too many Liquor Stores, Junkyards and many Industrial and Commercial
businesses, from Buckeye Rd to Broadway. I was hoping that eventually some of that would go
away and work to Beautify our Community, would begin. Just look near Tempe Town lake. It
looks like another World.  We are going to lose some of the established businesses on south
Central Ave, due to the reduction of Traffic Lanes from 4 to 2, just accommodate the Light
Rail. I Voted for this project, until they decided on that bad idea, of only 2-Lanes.
It seems the City of Phoenix is giving Building Permits to almost any group that wants one. We
have an Over Abundance of Charter Schools. (Enough Already! ) Too many Family Dollar &
General Dollar, Circle K & Quik Trip Stores, Storage Facilities, Carwashes and Fast Food
Restaurants are in our area. There are still No Costco, Sam's Club, Smart & Final, Red Lobster,
Olive Garden, Texas Road House, !st Watch, Cracker Barrel or Denny's. There's No IHOP, US
Post Office, a Fry's Grocery Store and Medical Center in my zip code 85041. 
Things that we certainly Need. That's where the city has failed us. There are a sufficient
number of Pharmacies. Yet there is not One Regional Hospital or Medical Center, East of
51stAve and west of 48th St, south of the Maricopa County Hospital, on Roosevelt St. That is
approximately 100 square miles and some 200,000 people, who cannot get to a Hospital,
without going thru downtown traffic. This is not safe!  With all of the businesses, Light Rail and
car traffic in the downtown area. How many Lives have been lost because there are not any
Medical Centers with a Trauma Unit, in the South Mountain Community? These things are far
more Important and a real need. Low Income Apartment Units are not an essential thing in
our area. We need the City of Phoenix to help Build us up and not continue to take us in the
wrong direction. We Deserve Better.
Thank You,
John Chambers