Attachment D - PHO Application - PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2025-07-02)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 75528 characters
PLEASE RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY TO TERESA GARCIA 2ND FLOOR, 602-262-7399
To: 
Date: March 17, 2025
From: 
Departments Concerned 
Joshua Bednarek
Planning & Development Department Director 
Subject: P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1 – Notice of Pending
Actions  by the Planning Hearing Officer 
1.
Your attention is called to the fact that the Planning Hearing Officer will consider the
following case at a public hearing on April 16, 2025.
2.
Information about this case is available for review at the Zoning Counter in the
Planning and Development Department on the 2nd Floor of Phoenix City Hall,
telephone 602-262-7131, Option 6.
3.
Staff, please indicate your comments and respond electronically to
pdd.pho@phoenix.gov or you may provide hard copies at the Zoning Counter in the
Planning and Development Department on the second floor of Phoenix City Hall by
*March 24, 2025.
DISTRIBUTION
Mayor’s Office (Tony Motola), 11th Floor
City Council (Stephanie Bracken), 11th Floor
Aviation (Jordan D. Feld)
CED (Michelle Pierson), 20th Floor
Fire Prevention (Joel Asirsan), 2nd Floor
Neighborhood Services (Gregory Gonzales, Lisa Huggins), 4th Floor
Parks & Recreation (Todd Shackelford), 16th Floor
Public Transit (Michael Pierce)
Street Transportation Department (Maja Brkovic, Josh Rogers, Alan Hilty, Chris Kowalsky), 
5th Floor 
Street Transportation - Ped. Safety Coordinator (Kurt Miyamoto), 5th Floor
Street Transportation - Floodplain Management (Tina Jensen, Priscilla Motola, Rudy Rangel), 
5th Floor
Water Services (Don Reynolds, Victor Romo), 8th Floor
Planning and Development (Joshua Bednarek, Tricia Gomes), 3rd Floor
Planning and Development/Information Services (Andrew Wickhorst), 4th Floor Planning and
Development/Historic Preservation Office (Kevin Weight), 3rd Floor
Planning Hearing Officer (Byron Easton, Teresa Garcia), 2nd Floor
Village Planner (Adrian Zambrano, Rio Vista Village) 
Village Planning Committee Chair (Dino Cotton, Rio Vista Village) 
*CORRECTION TO DEPARTMENT DUE DATE*
Attachment D

200 W. Washington St., 2nd Floor, Phoenix, AZ  85003 ● 602-626-7131 
 
 
APPLICATION FOR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION 
APPLICATION NO: PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1 
Council District: 1 
 
Request For: Stipulation Modification 
Reason for Request: Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding Planned Residential Development option.;Request to modify 
Stipulation 6 regarding shading along pedestrian pathways and trails.;Request to modify Stipulation 11 regarding bicycle 
infrastructure.;Request to modify Stipulation 12.c regarding the number of pedestrian connections.;Request to modify Stipulation 
13 regarding indoor noise levels.;Request to modify Stipulation 14 regarding the development of noise mitigation walls.;Request 
to modify Stipulation 15 regarding noise wall setbacks.;Request to modify Stipulation 16 regarding perimeter wall 
materials.;Request to modify Stipulation 19 regarding active recreation amenities.;Request to modify Stipulation 23 regarding 
detached sidewalks and landscape strips located between the back of curb and sidewalk.;Request to modify Stipulation 24 
regarding construction of detached sidewalks.;Request to modify Stipulation 25 regarding street improvements.;Request to 
delete Stipulation 27 regarding a 30-foot right-of-way dedication along the southern boundary of the project.;Request to delete 
Stipulation 28 regarding a minimum right-of-way.;Request to delete Stipulation 38 regarding a petition to the Street 
Transportation Department to eliminate required street light infrastructure.;Request to delete Stipulation 42 regarding Phase 1 to 
be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped May 4, 2023.;Request to delete Stipulation 43 regarding Phase 1 to 
be in general conformance with the elevations and design elements date stamped August 29, 2022.;Request to delete Stipulation 
44 regarding the maximum dwelling units for Phase 1.;Request to delete Stipulation 45 regarding Phase 2 to be in general 
conformance with the site plan.;Request to delete Stipulation 46 regarding Phase 2 to be in general conformance with the 
elevations.;Request to delete Stipulation 47 regarding the number of lots for Phase 2.;Request to modify Stipulation 48 regarding 
the review of the conceptual site plans and elevations for Phase 3.;Request to modify Stipulation 49 regarding the landscaping of 
surface parking lots. 
 
Contact Information 
 
 
 
 
 
Name 
Relationship  
Type 
Address 
Phone 
Fax 
Email 
Hannah Bleam, 
Withey Morris 
Baugh, PLC 
Applicant 
2525 E Arizona 
Biltmore Cir, Suite A-
212 
6022300600 
  
hannah@wmbattorneys.com 
Adam Baugh, 
Withey Morris 
Baugh, PLC 
Representative 
2525 East Arizona 
Biltmore Circle, Suite 
A-212 Phoenix AZ 
85016 
6022300600 
  
adam@wmbattorneys.com 
Circle Mountain 
Holdings LLC 
Owner 
1635 North Greenfield 
Road, Suite 115 
Mesa, Arizona 85205 
  
  
  
 
Property Location: Southeast corner of I-17 and Jenny Lin Road 
Acreage: 21.35 
 
Geographic Information 
 
 
Zoning Map 
APN 
Quarter Section 
V6 
202-22-001B 
Q72-19 
V6 
202-22-001D 
Q72-19 
 
Village: 
Rio Vista 
 
An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized 
substantive policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable 
review time frames, please call 602-262-7131 (option 6), email zoning@phoenix.gov or visit our website at 
https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/licensing-time-frames 
 
A Filing Fee had been paid to the City Treasurer to cover the cost of processing this application. The fee will be retained to cover

City of Phoenix 
Planning & Development Department 
 
 
 
 
Page 2 of 2 
 
 
 
the cost whether or not the request is granted 
 
 
I declare that all information submitted is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I acknowledge that any error in 
my application may be cause for changing its normal scheduling. 
 
 
 
Signature: ____________________________________________________     DATE: ___________________ 
 
Fee Information 
 
 
 
Fee 
Fee Waived 
Fee Date 
Purpose 
$1,725.00 
$0.00 
02/27/25 
PHO (3+ stipulations)

March 12, 2025 
 
 
VIA ELCTRONIC DELIVERY  
Byron Easton 
Planning Hearing Officer 
Phoenix Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
Re: 
Stipulation Modification – Z-8-22 – SEC of Jenny Lin Road and I-17 frontage road 
Dear Mr. Easton: 
This firm represents Lincoln Avenue Communities (the “Developer”) regarding its proposal to develop a residential 
community on approximately 19 acres zoned R-3A located at the southeast corner of Jenny Lin Road and the I-17 
frontage road, Phoenix, which included the Maricopa County Assessor Parcel Numbers, APNs 202-22-001B and a 
portion of 202-22-001D (the “Property”).  Please see attached Exhibit A for an aerial view of the Property and 
surrounding area.  As explained herein, the proposed residential development requires modification of stipulations 
for approval, which the Phoenix City Council approved on July 3, 2023, with case Z-8-22-1.  
BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL 
On July 3, 2023, the Phoenix City Council approved the rezoning case that rezoned approximately 79 acres to R-2, 
R-3, and R-3A. Please find the zoning map and approved ordinance at Exhibit B. Since that time the Developer has 
further refined the proposal and intends to develop Phase 3 (zoned R-3A), approximately 21 acres, of the larger 
rezoning area.  
The proposal will provide critical housing needed in the North Phoenix area with a density lower than the maximum 
allowed in the underlying zoning district, R-3A. The development is sensitive to the existing washes and provides 
ample trail and pedestrian connections north and south, as well as through the site. The elevations are complementary 
to the desert landscape and blend with the surrounding proposed developments. A copy of the site plan and elevations 
can be found at Exhibit C and Exhibit D, respectively.  
STIPULATION MODIFICATION 
To allow the proposed development of the Property, we propose the following modification of stipulations approved 
for Z-8-22: 
Overall Site 
 
1. Each phase of The development shall utilize the Planned Residential Development (PRD) option.

March 12, 2025 
Page 2 
 
 
Rationale: This stipulation was modified to remove the reference to the phases of the development, 
which was from the original rezoning case. 
 
2. A minimum building setback of 100 feet shall be provided along the west property line, except for the 
northernmost 1,077 feet, which shall have a minimum building setback of 55 feet, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
3. A minimum landscaped setback of 30 feet shall be provided along the west property line, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
4. All perimeter setbacks adjacent to public streets shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by 
the Planning and Development Department. 
 
a) Minimum 50% 2-inch caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees 
planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings with a staggered row of trees for every 20 feet 
of setback. 
 
b) Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 75% live vegetative 
ground coverage at maturity. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
5. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs shall be a milkweed or other native nectar species and shall be 
planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
6. All pedestrian pathways and trails, including sidewalks, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at 
maturity, or a combination of the two to provide minimum75 53% shade, calculated at summer solstice at 
noon as shown on a shading study, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: Based on our shade study and exhibits that was submitted with the PHO application, we 
are able to provide 53% of shade on these pedestrian pathways and sidewalks.  
 
7. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of decorative pavers, 
stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments, that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle 
surfaces, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
8. The primary entry/exit drives into the residential developments shall incorporate decorative pavers, stamped 
or colored concrete, or similar alternative material, as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department.

March 12, 2025 
Page 3 
 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
9. The primary entry/exit drives into the residential developments shall incorporate enhanced landscaping on 
both sides within minimum 250-square-foot landscape areas and shall incorporate a minimum 5-foot-wide 
landscape median, planted with a variety of at least three plant materials, as approved by the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
10. Traffic calming measures shall be provided at all site entries and exits to slow down vehicular speeds as they 
approach sidewalks and trails, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
11. Each phase of The development shall provide bicycle infrastructure as described below, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: Remove the area that is not applicable to the site.  
 
a) Secured bicycle parking shall be provided for units without garages at a rate of 0.25 spaces per 
multifamily residential dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
b) Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05 spaces per dwelling unit, up to a 
maximum of 50 spaces, located in common open space and amenity areas. Bicycle parking spaces 
shall be provided through Inverted U and/or artistic racks located near the community center and/or 
clubhouse and open space areas and installed per the requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix 
Zoning Ordinance. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of 
the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
c) A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained on site within an amenity area 
or near a primary site entrance. The bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided in an area of 
high visibility and separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The repair station shall 
include, but not be limited to standard repair tools affixed to the station, a tire gauge and pump affixed to 
the base of the station or the ground, and a bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin 
freely while making adjustments to the bike. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
12. A Water Master Plan, Wastewater Master Plan, and Trails and Pedestrian Circulation Master Plan for the 
overall development, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD), Section 636 of the 
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, shall be provided and updated with each phase of development to include the 
following elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

March 12, 2025 
Page 4 
 
 
a) A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the west side of the site 
adjacent to the I-17 frontage road and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed 
within the easement, in accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and as approved or modified by 
the Planning and Development department. 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
b) A north-south pedestrian connection shall be provided to connect all phases of the development, 
including the area between Project II and Project III.  
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
c) Four ONE pedestrian connections shall be provided from the site leading to the adjacent trails directly 
east or west of the site. 
 
Rationale: This development will provide one of pedestrian connections that will lead to the trails 
to the east or west of the site. The total number for the previous rezoning case was four 
connections across the four phases, and therefore one is appropriate for this singular phase 
property.  
 
d) Pedestrian access shall be provided to future development to the east for each phase of development. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
13. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE DEVELOPER SHALL INCLUDE WITH THE BUILDING 
PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PHOENIX BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW 
CERTIFICATION BY AN ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT DEMONSTRATING THE AVERAGE The indoor 
noise levels of residential units shall not exceed a decibel day nightlevel (DNL) of 45 decibels, as approved 
by the Planning and Development Department. A sealed and signed analysis by an engineer licensed in 
Arizona with a proficiency in residential sound mitigation or noise control shall be included with the building 
plans submitted for Phoenix Building Construction Code compliance review to the Planning and 
Development Department. The engineer shall note in the analysis that the building design is capable of 
achieving the required Noise Level Reduction. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been modified to maintain consistency with the other PHO approvals 
that occurred on other phases of the development.  As a reminder from the prior PHO approvals, 
there is no such thing as an acoustical engineer and therefore these cannot be signed by an engineer. 
It is more appropriate to include the term acoustical consultant who does these noise studies. 
 
14. Noise mitigation walls shall be provided along the west perimeter of the site. The wall height shall be A 
MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OR AS determined through a noise analysis prepared by a registered professional 
engineer AN ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANT. The wall shall be constructed of minimum 8-inch-thick concrete 
masonry units (CMU) or of cast-in-place concrete and contain no openings unless they are above the 
minimum height required for adequate noise mitigation or for drainage. Noise walls shall be constructed to 
wrap around corner lots and areas near intersections. Wrap around walls, upon turning a corner, shall 
continue for at least 120 feet (approximately two lot widths), as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department.

March 12, 2025 
Page 5 
 
 
Rationale: Additional language has been noted regarding the wall height, which is the common height 
of the sound wall for similar projects, as approved in the prior PHO approvals. 
 
15. Perimeter walls, noise walls, and other walls ADJACENT TO PERIMETER STREETS shall vary by a 
minimum of four feet every 400 lineal feet to visually reflect a meandering or staggered setback, as approved 
by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: As written, it would only require the additional visual interest to those areas adjacent to 
the perimeter streets as approved in the prior PHO approvals. 
 
16. Perimeter walls, including the noise wall ALONG THE WEST AND NORTH PERIMETER, shall incorporate 
stone veneer, stonework, or integral color CMU block, as approved by the Planning and Development 
Department.  
 
Rationale: We believe it is the Staff’s intent for the decorative features to be in locations visible to the 
public not on shared boundary walls.  
 
17. Interior walls and privacy fencing, excluding walls located between lots, shall use materials and colors that 
blend with the natural desert environment, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
18. A minimum of 15% of each phase shall be retained as open space, including washes and hillside areas, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
19. Each phase of tThe development shall contain a minimum of four shaded active recreation amenities, such 
as a tot lot, picnic areas, seating features, garden amenities, or similar amenities, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: Clarifying that it only applies to this development.   
 
20. A combination of view walls/fencing and partial view walls/fencing shall be incorporated property lines 
adjacent to dedicated public or private open space areas natural and/or improved drainageways or 
recreational areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.  
Rationale: No change. 
 
21. Drainage channels shall be designed to look natural in the desert setting through color, texture, landscaping, 
or other means, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
22. A minimum of 2% of the required parking spaces, including garages, shall include Electric Vehicle (EV) 
Installed infrastructure and 5% of the required parking spaces shall include EV Capable infrastructure, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

March 12, 2025 
Page 6 
 
 
Rationale: No change.  
 
23. Minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks and minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strips located between the 
back of curb and sidewalk ALONG PUBLIC STREETS within the development shall be constructed and 
planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
a) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on center 
or in equivalent groupings. 
 
b) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 75% live 
vegetative ground coverage at maturity.  
 
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on an 
alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment. 
 
Rationale: Added clarification to this stipulation that it is intended for only public streets. 
 
24. Minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks, or wider to meet Maricopa County Department of Transportation 
(MCDOT) minimum standards, and minimum 5-foot-wide landscape strips located between the back of curb 
and sidewalk, or wider to meet MCDOT minimum standards shall be constructed along the south side of 
Jenny Lin Road, the east side of the I-17 frontage road, and the north side of Circle Mountain Road, planted 
to the following standards. The developer shall record a landscaping maintenance agreement with the 
Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) requiring the landowner and/or property 
management to maintain the installed landscaping within MCDOT right-of-way to the following planting 
standards, as approved by MCDOT and the Planning and Development Department. 
 
a) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought-tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on 
center or in equivalent groupings. 
 
b) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 75% live 
vegetative ground coverage at maturity.  
 
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the MCDOT and the Planning and Development 
Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment. 
 
Rationale: Removing the Jenny Lin Road from this stipulation as it conflicts with the County Rural 
Residential Cross Section.  
 
25. All right-of-way dedications and street improvements for Circle Mountain Road, the I-17 frontage road, and 
Jenny Lin Road shall comply with Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) requirements, 
as approved by MCDOT. Where possible the County Rural Residential Cross Section shall be utilized for 
Jenny Lin Road. 
 
Rationale: The stipulation has been modified to remove improvements to Circle Mountain Road as it 
is not adjacent to the property.

March 12, 2025 
Page 7 
 
 
26. A minimum 65-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated, and the east half of the I-17 frontage road shall be 
constructed per the Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) Rural Minor Arterial cross 
section, as required and approved by MCDOT. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
27. A minimum of 30 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the north side of the minor 
collector street along the southern boundary of Project III. The improvements shall be consistent with Minor 
Collector Cross Section F and include a minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk separated by a minimum 
8-foot-wide landscape strip located between the back of curb and sidewalk, planted to the following 
standards, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
a) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on 
center or in equivalent groupings. 
 
b) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 75% live 
vegetative ground coverage at maturity. 
 
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the MCDOT and the Planning and Development 
Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment. 
 
Rationale: Per conversations with the Streets Department, this stipulation has been removed as it is 
not applicable to the Property. 
 
28. A minimum of 60 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the full width of the minor collector 
street along the northern boundary of Project II. The improvements shall be consistent with Minor Collector 
Cross Section F and include minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalks separated by minimum 5-foot-wide 
landscape strips located between the back of curb and sidewalk, planted to the following standards, as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
a) Minimum 2-inch caliper single-trunk large canopy drought tolerant shade trees planted 20 feet on center 
or in equivalent groupings. 
 
b) Drought tolerant shrubs, accents, and vegetative groundcovers to achieve a minimum of 75% live 
vegetative ground coverage at maturity.  
 
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the MCDOT and the Planning and Development 
Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a pedestrian environment. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been removed as it is not applicable to the Property. 
 
29. Enhanced pedestrian connections shall be designed and constructed at all public street crossing locations to 
interconnect the pedestrian trails throughout the entirety of the site, as approved by the Street Transportation 
Department and the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change.

March 12, 2025 
Page 8 
 
 
30. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with paving, curb, gutter, 
sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping, and other incidentals, as per plans approved 
by the Planning and Development Department and MCDOT (where applicable). All improvements shall 
comply with all ADA accessibility standards. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
31. A Red Border Letter shall be submitted to the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) for this 
development. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
32. The developer shall record documents that disclose to prospective purchasers and renters of property within 
the development the existence of noise from the I-17 Freeway. The form and content of such documents 
shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to recordation. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
33. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archeology Office, the applicant shall conduct Phase I data testing 
and submit an archaeological survey report of the development area for review and approval by the City 
Archeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
34. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from Phase I data testing, the City 
Archeologist, in consultation with a qualified archeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are 
necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II archeological data recovery excavations. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
35. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer shall immediately 
cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and 
allow time for the Archeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
36. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. 
The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and delivered to the City to be 
included in the rezoning application file for record. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
37. Prior to the construction of any residences, all existing wells within the development shall be capped and 
abandoned, as required by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). 
 
Rationale: No change.

March 12, 2025 
Page 9 
 
 
38. The development shall petition the Street Transportation Department to eliminate the requirement for street 
light infrastructure for the development where possible in an effort to protect dark skies. ALL STREET, SITE, 
AND BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE DARK SKY COMPLIANT, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been modified to provide additional clarity regarding how the dark 
skies would be protected with the proposed development.  
 
39. Primary construction access shall be from Circle Mountain Road, or the frontage road, and ancillary 
construction activity and access may occur on Jenny Lin Road during parts of Project III, as approved by the 
City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
40. The developer shall promptly repair any roadway damage that may occur on Jenny Lin Road during 
construction. 
 
Rationale: No change. 
 
41. The developer shall include disclosure language in future leases requiring all residents of Project III to 
acknowledge that a portion of Jenny Lin Road is private property, and no trespass is permitted.  
 
Rationale: No change.   
 
Phase 1 (R-3 Zoned Area) 
 
42. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped May 4, 2023, as modified 
by these stipulations and as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: This has been removed and it is not applicable to the site.   
 
43. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped August 29, 2022, with 
specific regard to the following elements, as modified by these stipulations and as approved by the Planning 
and Development Department. 
 
a. Spanish Colonial architectural style 
b. Windows and glass doors with muntins and mullions 
c. Decorative lighting fixtures at building entrances/exits and by garage doors 
d. Covered front porches 
e. Window and door treatment 
f. Decorative doors 
g. Architectural embellishments including, but not limited to, corbels and terracotta gable vent tubes 
 
Rationale: This has been removed and it is not applicable to the site.   
 
44. Phase 1 of the development shall be limited to a maximum of 288 dwelling units. 
 
Rationale: This has been removed and it is not applicable to the site.

March 12, 2025 
Page 10 
 
 
 
Phase 2 (R-2 Zoned Area) 
 
45. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped April 13, 2023, as modified 
by these stipulations and as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been removed as it is not applicable to the Property. 
 
46. The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped August 29, 2022, with 
specific regard to the following elements, as modified by these stipulations and as approved by the Planning 
and Development Department. 
 
a. Variety of architectural styles 
b. Windows and glass doors with muntins and mullions 
c. Decorative lighting fixtures at building entrances/exits and by garage doors 
d. Covered front porches and covered rear patios 
e. Garage, window and door treatment 
f. Decorative doors 
g. Architectural embellishments including, but not limited to, corbels, terracotta gable vent tubes, and 
window shutters 
h. Gable end treatment with varied materials and colors 
i. 
Breaking of massing and with varied materials and colors 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been removed as it is not applicable to the Property. 
 
47. Phase 2 of the development shall be limited to a maximum of 172 lots. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been removed as it is not applicable to the Property. 
 
Phase 3 (R-3A Zoned Area) 
 
48. Conceptual site plans and elevations for Phase 3 shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Hearing 
Officer through the public hearing process for stipulation modification prior to preliminary site plan approval 
with specific regard to the inclusion of the below elements. This is a legislative review for conceptual 
purposes only. Specific development standards and requirements will be determined by the Planning 
Hearing Officer and the Planning and Development Department. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN 
GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED ________ AS MODIFIED BY 
THESE STIPULATIONS AND AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 
DEPARTMENT.   
 
THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE ELEVATIONS DATE 
STAMPED _________, WITH SPECIFIC REGARD TO THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS, AS MODIFIED BY 
THESE STIPULATIONS AND AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 
DEPARTMENT. 
a. All building facades shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing such as, but not limited 
to, textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, window fenestration, shadowboxes, and canopies.  
b. Building and wall colors shall be muted and blend with, rather than contrast, with the surrounding 
desert environment. Accent colors may be appropriate but used judiciously and with restraint.

March 12, 2025 
Page 11 
 
 
c. An architectural theme shall convey a sense of continuity through all phases. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been updated and modified with general conformance language for 
site plan and elevations. 
 
49. A minimum of 10% of surface parking lot areas, exclusive of perimeter landscape setbacks, shall be 
landscaped. The surface parking lot areas shall be landscaped or WITH A minimum 2-inch caliper large 
canopy drought-tolerant shade trees, STRUCTURES, OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH, and shall be 
dispersed throughout the parking area to achieve a minimum 25% shade at maturity, as approved by the 
Planning and Development Department. 
 
Rationale: This stipulation has been updated to include shading from solar structures as well as trees 
for the parking areas.  
 
 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
WITHEY MORRIS P.L.C. 
 
By  
 
Adam Baugh 
Attachments

EXHIBIT A

SEC Jenny Lin and I-17 Frontage Road
Aerial Map

EXHIBIT B

To: 
City of Phoenix 
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
Alan Stephenson 
Deputy City Manager 
Date: 
June 23, 2023 
From: 
Joshua Bednarek 
Planning and Development Director 
Subject: ITEM NO.97 ON THE JULY 3, 2023 FORMAL AGENDA - PUBLIC HEARING 
AND ORDINANCE ADOPTION - REZONING APPLICATION Z-8-22-1 -
NORTHEAST CORNER OF 1-17 AND CIRCLE MOUNTAIN ROAD AND THE 
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 1-17 AND JENNY LIN ROAD (ORDINANCE G-
) 
Item No. 97, Rezoning Application Z-8-22-1, is a request to rezone 79.29 acres located at 
the northeast corner of 1-17 and Circle Mountain Road and the southeast corner of 1-17 
and Jenny Lin Road from C-2 (Intermediate Commercial), C-3 (General Commercial), S-1 
(Ranch or Farm Residence), County RU-43 (One Acre Per Dwelling Unit) (Pending 
Annexation), and Pending S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to R-2 (Multifamily Residence 
District), R-3 (Multifamily Residence District), and R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) to 
allow single-family and multifamily residential. 
The Rio Vista Village Planning Committee heard this request on May 9, 2023, and 
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with additional stipulations, by a 
5-1 vote.
The Planning Commission heard this request on June 1, 2023, and recommended 
approval, per the staff memo dated June 1, 2023 with an additional stipulation, by a 8-0 
vote. 
The purpose of this is memo is to recommend modifications to Stipulation Nos. 27 and 
28 to add landscape planting standards within the right-of-way. 
The revised stipulations are listed below with updates in BOLD AND CAPITAL letters. 
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following stipulations: 
Overall Site 
1.
Each phase of the development shall utilize the Planned Residential
Development (PRO) option.
2.
A minimum building setback of 100 feet shall be provided along the west property
line, except for the northern most 1,077 feet, which shall have a minimum
building setback of 55 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
Page 534

Page 535

Page 536

Page 537

Page 538

Page 539

Page 540

Page 541

Page 542

Page 543

Page 415

EXHIBIT C

95.48'
28.63'
50.00'
12.19'
32.52'
269.49'
UP
UP
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
FH DISTANCE=481
FH DISTANCE=481
FH DISTANCE=375
S 00°00'36" W 590.00'
N 89°51'43" W 926.01'
N 08°32'36" E 596.41'
S 89°51'43" E
837.52'
(S 00°09' E 590.00')
(S 89°59' W 926.01')
(N 08°23' E 596.42')
(S 89°59' E 837.50')
(S 00°05'60" W 590.00')
N 14°22'52" E 754.31'
(N 14°17'28" E 754.66')
(N 14°17'43" E 755.96')
S 89°51'43" E 693.05'
(S 89°58'46" E 692.56')
SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 1
NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 2
T
T
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
T
EV
EV
12
8
12
11
10
11
12
12
12
6
12
6
9
12
10
12
10
12
7
4
12
10
12
6
4
3
4
4
12
12
12
3
12
10
6
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
6
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
4
8
12
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
40' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
W. JENNY LIN ROAD
FRONTAGE ROAD
FRONTAGE ROAD
INTERSTATE ROUTE 17
INTERSTATE ROUTE 17
OWNER: STATE OF
ARIZONA
N 14°22'52" E 1116.78'
S 89°51'43" E 616.81'
S 00°00'36" W 2240.02'
N 03°17'12" W 239.04'
CMP
TOP=1976.03'
INV = 1973.48'
CMP
TOP=1970.53'
INV = 1967.72'
CMP
TOP=1969.95'
INV = 1967.22'
BOX CULVERT
TOP=1969.22'
INV = 1965.24'
P.O.B.
PARCEL 1
P.O.C.
PARCEL 2
FOUND
IRON PIPE
02
06
R
.
.
N
C
O
R
E
N
C
T
I
O
E
.
T
R
E
S
N
3
3
FOUND
IRON ROD
P.O.B.
PARCEL 2
CATTLE GUARD
BM 1
BM 2
END OF
FENCE LIES
9.98' E
504.00'
PROPOSED
ROW
= FIRE HYDRANT
= FIRE TRUCK TURNING 
RADII (35' INSIDE AND 55' 
OUTSIDE TURNING RADIUS)
SITE PLAN LEGEND
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NOTH, RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER 
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING MARKED BY A GLO CAP WITH 
SECTIONAL MARKINGS FROM WHICH THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING MARKED BY A GLO CAP 
WITH SECTIONAL MARKING BEARS SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 2,638.76 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 33 
SECONDS EAST, 2,008.27 FEET POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 631.32 FEET TO THE 
NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 
962.87 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 32.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 12.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 50.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 28.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 95.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, 
CONCAVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 231.50 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 46 SECONDS, AND AN ARC 
LENGTH OF 139.78 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 2 SECONDS WEST, 269.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, 45.17 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES  48 MINUTES 48 SECONDS WEST, 279.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 8.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 754.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 592.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PORTION OF LAND CONTAINING 844, 490 SQUARE FEET, OR 19.3868 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING SUBJECT TO 
ANY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS OF RECORD OR OTHERWISE. 
THIS DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS NOT TO BE USED TO VIOLATE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE STATE, COUNTY 
AND/OR MUNICIPALITY, OR ANY OTHER LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS. 
1
GATE
2
5' SIDEWALK, TYP.
3
10' x 20' SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
4
PLAYGROUND - SEE LANDSCAPE
5
RECREATION & PICNIC AREA - SEE
LANDSCAPE
6
PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN
7
BIKE RACKS, TYP.
9
TRASH ENCLOSURE
SITE PLAN KEY
10 POOL
11 TRANSFORMER (POSSIBLE LOCATION)
12 SES CABINETS (POSSIBLE LOCATION)
13 CMU SCREEN WALL, TYP.
14 RETAINING WALL
15 EMERGENCY ACCESS
16 PROPOSED BUILDING MOUNTED FDC
17 LOCATION OF SITE DIRECTORY
18 PROPOSED CONDENSING UNIT LOCS. -
SCREEN W/ FENCE AND/OR LANDSCAPING,
TYP.
19 PROPERTY LINE
20 PARKING CANOPY, TYP.
21 R.O.W. - SEE CIVIL
22 FIRE LANE
23 DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS,
TYP.
24 LOADING SPACE
8
COMMON AMENITY SPACE
25 GUEST PARKING STALLS
26 DRIVE GATE
27 MAIN SITE ENTRY
28 SECONDARY SITE ENTRY
PROJECT TEAM
DEVELOPER:
LINCOLN AVENUE COMMUNITIES
401 WILSHIRE BLVD
11TH FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CA N90401
CONTACT: MATT KLEIN
EMAIL: mklein@lincolnavenue.com
PHONE: 602-708-0227
ARCHITECT:
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
2821 S 35TH ST
SUITE D-3
PHOENIX, AZ 85034
CONTACT: LORI KNUDSON
EMAIL: lorik@kaaswilson.com
PHONE: 701-367-9287
JENNY LIN RD
35TH AVE (ALIGN)
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN RD (ALIGN)
43RD AVE (ALIGN)
I-17
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
13
13
13
2
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
15
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
23'-9"
21'-2"
28'-5"
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
9
9
9
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
17
12
11
11
11
7
10
8
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
4
5
5
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
15'-0" SETBACK
55'-0" EASEMENT
88'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
15'-0" SETBACK
55'-0" EASEMENT
88'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
BUILDING SETBACK
25'-0"
BUILDING SETBACK
25'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
24
24
24
BLDG. 8
TYPE B
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 1
TYPE A
4 STORY
BLDG. 2
TYPE E
4 STORY
BLDG. 3
TYPE E
4 STORY
BLDG. 4
TYPE C
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 5
TYPE C
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 6
TYPE E
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 7
TYPE B
3/4 STORY
158'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
25
26
26
26
27
28
22
3
3
3
16
16
16
16
16
16
7
16
7
7
16
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
SINGLE-FAMILY 
RESIDENTIAL 
(MARICOPA 
COUNTY)
ADJACENT PROPERTY
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 
(MARICOPA COUNTY)
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
UNINCORPORATED/
UNDEVELOPED 
(MARICOPA 
COUNTY)
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL
(CITY OF PHOENIX)
18
SOUND WALL =  120'-0"
GROSS AREA (APPROX.)
                      
21.35 ACRES 
NET AREA
                          
19.3868 ACRES
REQUIRED PARKING
1.5 SPACES PER UNIT (1.5 x 388 UNITS )
                               582 SPACES             
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 
582 SPACES
PROPOSED PARKING
STANDARD PARKING SPACES
521
ADA PARKING SPACES
30 ADA
FUTURE EV STALLS 
40 EV
TOTAL PROVDED 
591 SPACES
REQUIRED ADA PARKING
591 P.S. X % = 29.45 REQUIRED 
30 PROVIDED
TYPICAL PARKING STALL SIZE: 8'-6" x 18'-0"
PARKING RATIO
591 SPACES / 388 UNITS = 1.523
BICYCLE PARKING
0.25 SPACES FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 50 SPACES
TOTAL REQUIRED/PROVIDED
50 SPACES
PROJECT DATA
APN NUMBER                    
202-22-001B / 202-22-001D (REPLAT PENDING)
PROPERTY ADDRESS
45402 N BLACK CANYON HWY, NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
ZONING (EXISTING)
R-3A
ZONING CASES
Z-8-22-1 (APPROVED W/ STIPULATIONS 06/23/23)
SETBACKS
20'-0"  NORTH / 15'-0" SOUTH/ 
30'-0" EAST / 55'-0" WEST 
DWELLING UNIT RATIO
388 UNITS/ 19.39 AC = 20.0 UNITS/ACRE
APARTMENT TYPE A - 4 STORIES (W/COMMONS)
APT A. (1) = 44 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 30 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
  TOTAL = 44 UNITS PER BLDG.
15,831.00 SQFT PER FLOOR
63,324.00 SQ FT PER BUILDING
48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APARTMENT TYPE B - 3/4 SPLIT
APT. B. (2) = 56 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 7 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 21 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
  TOTAL = 28 UNITS PER BLDG.
15533.81 SQFT PER FLOOR
54368.36 SQ FT PER BUILDING
40' 3 STORY / 48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APARTMENT TYPE C - 3/4 SPLIT
APT. C. (3) = 168 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 28 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
  TOTAL = 56 UNITS PER BLDG.
20851.08 SQFT PER FLOOR
72978.78 SQFT PER BUILDING
40' 3 STORY / 48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APT BUILDING TOTALS
(1) APARTMENT A
(2) APARTMENT B
(3) APARTMENT C
(2) APARTMENT E
8 APT BUILDINGS
388 TOTAL UNITS
BUILDING METRICS
OCCUPANCY TYPE APARTMENTS:
R-2 
OCCUPANCY TYPE CLUBHOUSE:
A3, B
OCCUPANCY TYPE FITNESS/LAUNDRY:
A3, B
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
VB
8 APT BUILDINGS
8 TOTAL BUILDINGS
APARTMENT TYPE E - 4 STORIES
APT E. (2) = 120 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 32 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 28 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
  TOTAL = 60 UNITS PER BLDG.
19,427.00 SQFT PER FLOOR
77,708.00 SQ FT PER BUILDING
48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
TOTAL UNITS: 388 
2BR/2BA = 176 UNITS (45%)
3BR/2BA = 170 UNITS (44%)
4BR/2BA = 42 UNITS (11%)
N
0
kaas wilson architects
60'
120'
2/26/2025 5:46:47 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Site Plan
2.0
45402 N Black Canyon Hwy, New River, AZ 85087      24255
1/64" = 1'-0"
1
SD Site Plan
4
5
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL

EXHIBIT D

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
8.1
7.5
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.5
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.2
8.1
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.1
8.1
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.4
8.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
8.1
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.1 7.5
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 4:56:57 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type A - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
3
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
East Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.3
8.1
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
37'-10 7/8"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.3
7.4
7.2
8.1
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:02:13 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type B - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
East Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
37'-10 7/8"
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
?
MATCHLINE
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.3
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.2
7.1
8.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
MATCHLINE
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:05:52 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type C - Exterior Elevations
 
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
West Elevation - Color 02
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color 01
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.4
7.2
7.3
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.3
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.3
?
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:05:54 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type C - Exterior Elevations
 
6.2
1" = 10'-0"
1
East Elevation - Color - Dependent 1
1" = 10'-0"
2
East Elevation - Color - Dependent 2
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
8.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.5
8.1
7.3
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
8.1
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:12:00 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type E - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
East Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6

Zoning Division • 200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003 • 602-262-7131, Option #6 
July 28, 2023 
 
 
 
Adam Baugh 
Withey Morris Baugh, PLC 
2525 East Arizona Biltmore Circle, Suite A-212 
Phoenix, Arizona 85016 
 
Dear Applicant: 
 
RE: Z-8-22-1– Northeast corner of I-17 and Circle Mountain Road and the southeast 
corner of I-17 and Jenny Lin Road 
 
Please be advised that the Phoenix City Council, in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 601 of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, has on July 3, 2023, approved 
Zoning Ordinance # G-7140. 
 
Development and use of the site are subject to compliance with all applicable codes and 
ordinances. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Joshua Bednarek 
Planning and Development Director 
 
Attachment: Signed Ordinance 
 
c:  Circle Mountain Holdings, LLC, 1635 N. Greenfield Rd., #115., Mesa, AZ 85205 
 
Tricia Gomes, PDD–Planning–Deputy Director (Electronically) 
Racelle Escolar, PDD–Planning–Principal Planner (Electronically) 
 
Adrian Zambrano, PDD–Planning–Village Planner (Electronically)  
 
Ben Kim, PDD–GIS (Electronically)

Mod

Mod
Mod

Mod
Mod

Mod
Mod
Mod
Mod

Mod
Mod
Mod

Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Del

Del
Del
Del
Del

Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Del
Mod
Del
Del
Del

Mod
Mod
Mod
Mod

!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Z-104-07
Z-103-07
ANX 401
ANX 401
Z-103-07
Z-67-03
Z-60-04
Z-33-05
Z-90-18
ANX 149
Z-66-96
ANX 401
Z-103-07
ANX 180
Z-103-07
Z-103-07
ANX 402
ANX 485
Z-90-18
ANX 401
Z-32-13
ANX 401
ANX 401
ANX 332
Z-103-07
*
*
MARICOPA
COUNTY
*
*
*
*
MARICOPA
COUNTY
*
*
*
*
*
*
MARICOPA
COUNTY
S-1
C-3
Pending S-1
MARICOPA
COUNTY
C-2
R1-6
S-1
C-2
C-2
R1-6
C-3
S-1
R1-6
PCD
RE-35
PCD
C-2
S-1
C-2
MARICOPA
COUNTY
S-1
SONORAN ARROYO LN
44TH LN
44TH AVE
41ST DR
43RD DR
RIVERA DR
43RD AVE
44TH DR
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN RD
§¨¦
17
DESERT HILLS DR
I-17
NE
W
RIVER RD
PY
R
AMI
D P
E
A
K
PK
W
Y
RIO VISTA VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-8-22
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
79.29 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
C-2, C-3, S-1, RU-43 (County),
Pending S-1
R-2, R-3, R-3A
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
642, 173, 9, 8, 5
291, 461, 404
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
770, 208, N/A, N/A, N/A
349, 553, 485
Withey Morris PLC / Adam Baugh
DATE:
3/15/2022
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 72-19
ZONING MAP
V-6
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: C-2 ( 44.29 a.c.)
C-3 ( 11.96 a.c.)
S-1 ( 9.06 a.c.)
RU-43 (County) ( 8.03 a.c.)
Pending S-1 ( 5.95 a.c.)
TO:
R-2 ( 29.14 a.c.)
R-3 ( 31.78 a.c.)
R-3A ( 18.37 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-8-22.mxd
Z-8-22
0.2
0
0.2
0.1
Miles
1/18/2023
4/20/2023

C-2*
R-3A*
Planning & Development Department
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Property Location: Southeast corner of I-17 and Jenny Lin Road
0
275
550
137.5
Feet ´

C-2*
R-3A*
mapservices@phoenix.gov
Planning & Development Department
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Property Location: Southeast corner of I-17 and Jenny Lin Road
0
275
550
137.5
Feet ´

95.48'
28.63'
50.00'
12.19'
32.52'
269.49'
UP
UP
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
UP
UP
60'-4"
55'-4"
FH DISTANCE=481
FH DISTANCE=481
FH DISTANCE=375
S 00°00'36" W 590.00'
N 89°51'43" W 926.01'
N 08°32'36" E 596.41'
S 89°51'43" E
837.52'
(S 00°09' E 590.00')
(S 89°59' W 926.01')
(N 08°23' E 596.42')
(S 89°59' E 837.50')
(S 00°05'60" W 590.00')
N 14°22'52" E 754.31'
(N 14°17'28" E 754.66')
(N 14°17'43" E 755.96')
S 89°51'43" E 693.05'
(S 89°58'46" E 692.56')
SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 1
NORTH LINE OF PARCEL 2
T
T
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
T
EV
EV
12
8
12
11
10
11
12
12
12
6
12
6
9
12
10
12
10
12
7
4
12
10
12
6
4
3
4
4
12
12
12
3
12
10
6
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
6
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
4
8
12
BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
40' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
W. JENNY LIN ROAD
FRONTAGE ROAD
FRONTAGE ROAD
INTERSTATE ROUTE 17
INTERSTATE ROUTE 17
OWNER: STATE OF
ARIZONA
N 14°22'52" E 1116.78'
S 89°51'43" E 616.81'
S 00°00'36" W 2240.02'
N 03°17'12" W 239.04'
CMP
TOP=1976.03'
INV = 1973.48'
CMP
TOP=1970.53'
INV = 1967.72'
CMP
TOP=1969.95'
INV = 1967.22'
BOX CULVERT
TOP=1969.22'
INV = 1965.24'
P.O.B.
PARCEL 1
P.O.C.
PARCEL 2
FOUND
IRON PIPE
02
06
R
.
.
N
C
O
R
E
N
C
T
I
O
E
.
T
R
E
S
N
3
3
FOUND
IRON ROD
P.O.B.
PARCEL 2
CATTLE GUARD
BM 1
BM 2
END OF
FENCE LIES
9.98' E
504.00'
PROPOSED
ROW
= FIRE HYDRANT
= FIRE TRUCK TURNING 
RADII (35' INSIDE AND 55' 
OUTSIDE TURNING RADIUS)
SITE PLAN LEGEND
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6 NOTH, RANGE 2 EAST, GILA AND SALT RIVER 
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; 
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING MARKED BY A GLO CAP WITH 
SECTIONAL MARKINGS FROM WHICH THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3, BEING MARKED BY A GLO CAP 
WITH SECTIONAL MARKING BEARS SOUTH 00 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 2,638.76 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3, NORTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 33 
SECONDS EAST, 2,008.27 FEET POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 631.32 FEET TO THE 
NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 00 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 
962.87 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 32.52 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 12.19 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 50.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 13 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 28.63 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 76 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, 95.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, 
CONCAVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 231.50 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 46 SECONDS, AND AN ARC 
LENGTH OF 139.78 FEET TO A TANGENT LINE;
THENCE SOUTH 42 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 2 SECONDS WEST, 269.47 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, 45.17 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES  48 MINUTES 48 SECONDS WEST, 279.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 8.79 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, 754.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 06 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 592.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PORTION OF LAND CONTAINING 844, 490 SQUARE FEET, OR 19.3868 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, AND BEING SUBJECT TO 
ANY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS OF RECORD OR OTHERWISE. 
THIS DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS NOT TO BE USED TO VIOLATE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE STATE, COUNTY 
AND/OR MUNICIPALITY, OR ANY OTHER LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS. 
1
GATE
2
5' SIDEWALK, TYP.
3
10' x 20' SITE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
4
PLAYGROUND - SEE LANDSCAPE
5
RECREATION & PICNIC AREA - SEE
LANDSCAPE
6
PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN
7
BIKE RACKS, TYP.
9
TRASH ENCLOSURE
SITE PLAN KEY
10 POOL
11 TRANSFORMER (POSSIBLE LOCATION)
12 SES CABINETS (POSSIBLE LOCATION)
13 CMU SCREEN WALL, TYP.
14 RETAINING WALL
15 EMERGENCY ACCESS
16 PROPOSED BUILDING MOUNTED FDC
17 LOCATION OF SITE DIRECTORY
18 PROPOSED CONDENSING UNIT LOCS. -
SCREEN W/ FENCE AND/OR LANDSCAPING,
TYP.
19 PROPERTY LINE
20 PARKING CANOPY, TYP.
21 R.O.W. - SEE CIVIL
22 FIRE LANE
23 DECORATIVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS,
TYP.
24 LOADING SPACE
8
COMMON AMENITY SPACE
25 GUEST PARKING STALLS
26 DRIVE GATE
27 MAIN SITE ENTRY
28 SECONDARY SITE ENTRY
PROJECT TEAM
DEVELOPER:
LINCOLN AVENUE COMMUNITIES
401 WILSHIRE BLVD
11TH FLOOR
SANTA MONICA, CA N90401
CONTACT: MATT KLEIN
EMAIL: mklein@lincolnavenue.com
PHONE: 602-708-0227
ARCHITECT:
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
2821 S 35TH ST
SUITE D-3
PHOENIX, AZ 85034
CONTACT: LORI KNUDSON
EMAIL: lorik@kaaswilson.com
PHONE: 701-367-9287
JENNY LIN RD
35TH AVE (ALIGN)
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN RD (ALIGN)
43RD AVE (ALIGN)
I-17
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
13
13
13
2
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
15
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
23'-9"
21'-2"
28'-5"
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
9
9
9
9
9
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
17
12
11
11
11
7
10
8
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
11'-0"
18'-0"
11'-0"
5'-0"
4
5
5
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
TYP.
18'-0"
8'-6" TYP.
8'-6" TYP.
18'-0"
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
27'-0"
15'-0" SETBACK
55'-0" EASEMENT
88'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
15'-0" SETBACK
55'-0" EASEMENT
88'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
BUILDING SETBACK
25'-0"
BUILDING SETBACK
25'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
10'-0"
30'-0"
24
24
24
BLDG. 8
TYPE B
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 1
TYPE A
4 STORY
BLDG. 2
TYPE E
4 STORY
BLDG. 3
TYPE E
4 STORY
BLDG. 4
TYPE C
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 5
TYPE C
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 6
TYPE E
3/4 STORY
BLDG. 7
TYPE B
3/4 STORY
158'-0" BUILDING SETBACK
25
26
26
26
27
28
22
3
3
3
16
16
16
16
16
16
7
16
7
7
16
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
SINGLE-FAMILY 
RESIDENTIAL 
(MARICOPA 
COUNTY)
ADJACENT PROPERTY
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 
(MARICOPA COUNTY)
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
UNINCORPORATED/
UNDEVELOPED 
(MARICOPA 
COUNTY)
ADJACENT 
PROPERTY
COMMERCIAL
(CITY OF PHOENIX)
18
SOUND WALL =  120'-0"
GROSS AREA (APPROX.)
21.35 ACRES 
NET AREA
19.3868 ACRES
REQUIRED PARKING
1.5 SPACES PER UNIT (1.5 x 388 UNITS )
582 SPACES 
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 
582 SPACES
PROPOSED PARKING
STANDARD PARKING SPACES
521
ADA PARKING SPACES
30 ADA
FUTURE EV STALLS 
40 EV
TOTAL PROVDED 
591 SPACES
REQUIRED ADA PARKING
591 P.S. X % = 29.45 REQUIRED 
30 PROVIDED
TYPICAL PARKING STALL SIZE: 8'-6" x 18'-0"
PARKING RATIO
591 SPACES / 388 UNITS = 1.523
BICYCLE PARKING
0.25 SPACES FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT, WITH A MAXIMUM OF 50 SPACES
TOTAL REQUIRED/PROVIDED
50 SPACES
PROJECT DATA
APN NUMBER 
202-22-001B / 202-22-001D (REPLAT PENDING)
PROPERTY ADDRESS
45402 N BLACK CANYON HWY, NEW RIVER, AZ 85087
ZONING (EXISTING)
R-3A
ZONING CASES
Z-8-22-1 (APPROVED W/ STIPULATIONS 06/23/23)
SETBACKS
20'-0"  NORTH / 15'-0" SOUTH/ 
30'-0" EAST / 55'-0" WEST 
DWELLING UNIT RATIO
388 UNITS/ 19.39 AC = 20.0 UNITS/ACRE
APARTMENT TYPE A - 4 STORIES (W/COMMONS)
APT A. (1) = 44 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 30 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
 TOTAL = 44 UNITS PER BLDG.
15,831.00 SQFT PER FLOOR
63,324.00 SQ FT PER BUILDING
48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APARTMENT TYPE B - 3/4 SPLIT
APT. B. (2) = 56 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 7 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 21 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
 TOTAL = 28 UNITS PER BLDG.
15533.81 SQFT PER FLOOR
54368.36 SQ FT PER BUILDING
40' 3 STORY / 48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APARTMENT TYPE C - 3/4 SPLIT
APT. C. (3) = 168 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 28 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 14 UNITS
 TOTAL = 56 UNITS PER BLDG.
20851.08 SQFT PER FLOOR
72978.78 SQFT PER BUILDING
40' 3 STORY / 48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
APT BUILDING TOTALS
(1) APARTMENT A
(2) APARTMENT B
(3) APARTMENT C
(2) APARTMENT E
8 APT BUILDINGS
388 TOTAL UNITS
BUILDING METRICS
OCCUPANCY TYPE APARTMENTS:
R-2
OCCUPANCY TYPE CLUBHOUSE:
A3, B
OCCUPANCY TYPE FITNESS/LAUNDRY:
A3, B
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
VB
8 APT BUILDINGS
8 TOTAL BUILDINGS
APARTMENT TYPE E - 4 STORIES
APT E. (2) = 120 TOTAL UNITS
2BR/2BA = 32 UNITS
3BR/2BA = 28 UNITS
4BR/2BA = 0 UNITS
 TOTAL = 60 UNITS PER BLDG.
19,427.00 SQFT PER FLOOR
77,708.00 SQ FT PER BUILDING
48' 4 STORY PROPOSED HEIGHT (TO ROOF)
TOTAL UNITS: 388 
2BR/2BA = 176 UNITS (45%)
3BR/2BA = 170 UNITS (44%)
4BR/2BA = 42 UNITS (11%)
N
0
kaas wilson architects
60'
120'
2/26/2025 5:46:47 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Site Plan
2.0
45402 N Black Canyon Hwy, New River, AZ 85087      24255
1/64" = 1'-0"
1
SD Site Plan
4
5
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Site Plan
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL
SOUND
WALL

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
8.1
7.5
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.5
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.2
8.1
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.1
8.1
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.4
8.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
8.1
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.1 7.5
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 4:56:57 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type A - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
3
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
East Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.3
8.1
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
37'-10 7/8"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.3
7.4
7.2
8.1
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:02:13 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type B - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
East Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
37'-10 7/8"
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.4
8.1
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.4
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
?
MATCHLINE
7.3
7.1
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.3
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level -1
89'-4 1/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
48'-6 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.2
7.1
8.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
MATCHLINE
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:05:52 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type C - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
West Elevation - Color 02
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color 01
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.2
7.3
7.5
7.4
7.2
7.3
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
130'-4 7/8"
37'-10 7/8"
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.3
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.3
8.1
7.2
7.1
7.4
7.3
?
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:05:54 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type C - Exterior Elevations
 
6.2
1" = 10'-0"
1
East Elevation - Color - Dependent 1
1" = 10'-0"
2
East Elevation - Color - Dependent 2
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
8.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.4
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.5
8.1
7.3
7.3
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
Level 1
100'-0"
Level 2
110'-7 7/8"
Level 3
121'-3 3/4"
Truss Brg.
141'-0 3/4"
Level 4
131'-11 5/8"
49'-0 3/4"
7.3
7.5
7.4
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.2
8.1
7.4
7.3
7.5
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.3
0
kaas wilson architects
8'
16'
2/26/2025 5:12:00 PM
LAC - Phoenix - Daisy Peak Multifamily
PHO Submittal - Building Type E - Exterior Elevations
6.1
1" = 10'-0"
1
West Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
2
North Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
3
South Elevation - Color
1" = 10'-0"
4
East Elevation - Color
EXTERIOR MATERIALS1
Material
Mark
Description
7.1
Painted Stucco, Color 1
7.2
Painted Stucco, Color 2
7.3
Painted Stucco, Color 3
7.4
Painted Stucco, Color 4
7.5
Adhered Concrete Masonry Veneer,
Color 5
8.1
Vinyl Window, Color 6
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Conceptual Elevations
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

6751 North Sunset Boulevard, Suite 325, Glendale, Arizona 85305 
P: 623.299.8980 
bowman.com 
February 26, 2025 
City of Phoenix 
Planning Hearing Officer 
200 W Washington Street 
Phoenix, AZ 85003 
RE: Z-8-22 Stipulation #6 
Dear Planning Hearing Officer, 
The above-referenced stipulation of the zoning case states that: 
All pedestrian pathways and trails, including sidewalks, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a 
combination of the two to provide minimum 75% shade, calculated at summer solstice at noon as shown on a 
shading study, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
After studying how to achieve 75% shade, we have noted the following: 
•
In this affordable garden style apartment project, we are shading with trees and with solar canopies.
•
Solar canopies require a buffer around them where no trees can be planted to avoid shading the solar
panels which prevents solar electricity production.
•
The solar canopies need to be located at least 10 feet from buildings, and must be in locations where they
receive sun.  Where the solar canopy can be extended to shade the adjacent sidewalk, it can cover up to
60% of the sidewalk with shade.
•
Many sidewalks are adjacent to paved parking, leaving one side for tree planting which eliminates the
overlapping and alternating pattern that is used to achieve the 75% shading.
•
Tree spacing between buildings and sidewalks that are adjacent to parking is dictated by the need to
avoid necessary ground mounted features such as A/C condensers, bike racks, and undulations in the
building architecture.  This reduces the effectiveness of shading with trees from one side.
•
In this community, the tall buildings will provide shade much of the day, but we acknowledge that the
shading requirement is for noon on summer solstice.
We have attached a Sidewalk Shading Exhibit to represent the percentage of shade for each sidewalk in the 
various areas on the site.  Using this, we calculated the overall project shading percentage for sidewalks (see 
attached Sidewalk Shading Calculations).  Based on our findings, we are requesting a modification to utilize and 
achievable percentage of shading for the sidewalks that will still meet the needs and health of the community. 
Requested modification: 
All pedestrian pathways and trails, including sidewalks, shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping at maturity, or a 
combination of the two to provide minimum 53% shade, calculated at summer solstice at noon as shown on a 
shading study, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
Sincerely, 
Joseph E Cable, PE 
Principal 
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Shade Study Exhibit
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

NO BUILDINGS
OBSERVED
PARCEL 1
PIN: 202-22-001B
PARCEL 2
OWNER: STATE OF
ARIZONA
JENNY LIN ROAD
BLACK CANYON HWY
INTERSTATE 17
T
T
T
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
T
T
T
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd
1600 N. Desert Drive  Ste 210
Tempe, Arizona 85288
c   2024 Bowman Consulting Group Ltd
Phone: (480) 629-8830
www.bowman.com
SIDEWALK SHADING EXHIBIT
Z-8-22 STIPULATION #6
PHOENIX, AZ
MARICOPA COUNTY
DB
VA
JC
1" = 60'
051924-01-001
02/26/25
1
1
DAISY PEAK
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Shade Study Exhibit
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

Daisy Peak
Sidewalk Shading Calculations
PHO Stipulation #6
Achievable shading %
Length (LF)
Width (ft)
Area (SF)
Area shaded (SF)
0%
434
5
2170
0
0%
18
8
144
0
20%
2130
5
10650
2130
20%
238
8
1904
380.8
40%
921
5
4605
1842
40%
22
5.5
121
48.4
40%
31
8
248
99.2
60%
2843
5
14215
8529
60%
1439
6
8634
5180.4
60%
39
8
312
187.2
60%
18
10
180
108
80%
962
6
5772
4617.6
80%
1241
10
12410
9928
Total
61365
33050.6
Project achievable shading %
53.86%
See "Sidewalk Shading Exhibit" for locations of each achievable shading % for sidewalks and trails.
Prepared by Bowman
2/26/2025
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Proposed Shade Study Exhibit
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

40.0818 AC
250
0
250
500
scale: 1" = 250'
feet
APNs: 
202-22-001B, 202-22-001D, 202-22-001C, 202-22-003H,
202-22-003G, 202-22-003F, 202-22-003J, 202-22-003K,
202-22-003D, 202-22-003L, 202-22-003M, 202-22-002B,
202-22-002C & 202-22-002A
EXISTING ZONING: 
RU-43, C-2
PROPOSED ZONING:
PHASE 1:
R-3 PRD
PHASE 2: 
R-2 PRD
PHASE 3: 
R-2 PRD
PHASE 4: 
R-3A
GROSS AREA:
PHASE 1:
32.07 AC
PHASE 2:
26.43 AC
PHASE 3: 
40.08 AC
PHASE 4: 
20.50 AC
TOTAL
119.08 AC
NO. OF UNITS
PHASE
UNITS
MAX DENSITY
PHASE 1:
370 UNITS
13.0 DU/AC
PHASE 2:
195 UNITS
8.5 DU/AC
PHASE 3:
176 UNITS
6.5 DU/AC
PHASE 4:
568 UNITS
23.1 DU/AC
TOTAL
1,309 UNITS
11.0 DU/AC
MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS
PHASE 1:
MULTI-FAMILY
PHASE 2: 
50' X 85' / 60' X 85'
PHASE 3: 
45' X 70'
PHASE 4: 
MULTI-FAMILY
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PARK
INTERSTATE 17
BLACK CANYON HIGHWAY
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN ROAD
PROJECT TEAM
OWNER/DEVELOPER:
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS LLC
BELA FLOR
1635 N GREENFIELD ROAD, SUITE 115
MESA, AZ 85205
TEL:  (480) 553-7236
CONTACT: HUDD HASSELL
hudd@belaflor.com
CIVIL ENGINEER & PLANNER:
EPS GROUP, INC.
1130 N. ALMA SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 120
MESA, ARIZONA 85201
TEL:  (480)-503-2250
CONTACT:  JOSH HANNON
josh.hannon@epsgroupinc.com
Designer:
Drawn by:
Project:
Sheet No.
Job No.
Call at least two full working days
before you begin excavation.
Dial 8-1-1 or 1-800-STAKE-IT (782-5348)
In Maricopa County: (602)263-1100
T:480.503.2250
F:480.503.2258
1130 N. Alma School, Suite 120
|
M e s a , A Z 8 5 2 1 0
w w w . e p s g r o u p i n c . c o m
20-1099
ANTHEM 114
Anthem, AZ
LFT
20-1099
of 1
1
1
PROJECT DATA
PHASING EXHIBIT
FOR
ANTHEM 114
A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 6
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA
N.T.S.
VICINITY MAP
W. CIRCLE MOUNTAIN RD
SITE
SEC. 3
I-17 HIGHWAY
LEGEND
Or
Preliminary
Construction
Not For
Recording
Or
Preliminary
Construction
Not For
Recording
01
PH01
Phasing Plan
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Stipulated Phasing Plan
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-COMMUNITY CENTER AND CLUBHOUSE CONCEPT
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-COMMUNITY CENTER AND CLUBHOUSE CONCEPT
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025

1635 N. Greenfield Road, Ste. 115
Mesa, Arizona  85205
CIRCLE MOUNTAIN-PHASE 1
PHO-3-25--Z-8-22-1
Original Stipulated Renderings
Hearing Date: April 16, 2025