Attachment D - PC Memo - GPA-2-25-Y.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2025-07-02)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 3932 characters
To: 
City of Phoenix Planning Commission 
Date: June 5, 2025 
From: 
Tricia Gomes 
Planning and Development Deputy Director 
Subject: BACK UP TO ITEM NO. 2 – GPA-2-25-Y – DATA CENTERS GENERAL PLAN 
AMENDMENT 
General Plan Amendment No. GPA-2-25-Y is a request to amend the General Plan to 
incorporate design and location criteria for data centers.  
The Village Planning Committees considered the request throughout May and beginning 
of June. Seven VPCs recommended approval, per the staff recommendation; three VPCs 
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, with direction; two VPCs 
recommended denial; two VPCs recommended denial, with direction; and one VPC did not 
have quorum. 
Three stakeholder meetings were held with individuals representing a wide range of 
interests in data center development such as land use attorneys, real estate and 
construction professionals, data center operators, and utility companies.  
The language in this proposed general plan amendment has been modified to address 
some of the primary concerns as recommended by the Village Planning Committees and 
shared at the stakeholder meetings including the following concerns: obtaining a will-
service letter and removing the Phoenix Green Construction Code reference. These 
modifications will also ensure the General Plan policies align with the modifications in      
Z-TA-2-25-Y.
Staff recommends approval, per the modified language in bold font below: 
ATTACHMENT D

GPA-2-25-Y Backup Memo  
June 5, 2025 
Page 2  
 
 
 
DATA CENTERS 
 
WITH CONTINUAL ADVANCEMENTS IN TECHNOLOGY, SUCH AS ARTIFICIAL 
INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND THE DIGITAL “CLOUD”, THERE HAS BEEN A GROWING 
DEMAND TO CONSTRUCT DATA CENTERS IN ORDER TO SUPPORT THE 
DIGITAL WORLD. DATA CENTERS HOUSE A LARGE COLLECTION OF 
TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT DESIGNED TO STORE, PROCESS, AND 
MANAGE VAST AMOUNTS OF DIGITAL INFORMATION. ALTHOUGH DATA 
CENTERS ARE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR ADVANCING TECHNOLOGY THAT 
MANY COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS NOW RELY ON, THEY ALSO COME 
WITH POTENTIAL CHALLENGES, INCLUDING A LOSS OF LAND FOR JOBS AND 
HOUSING, NOISE POLLUTION, SIGNIFICANT ENERGY DEMAND, INACTIVE 
FRONTAGES ALONG PUBLIC STREETS, AND CONFLICTS WITH THE CITY’S 
APPROACH OF MAXIMIZING TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS WITH 
WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO IDENTIFY 
AREAS THAT ARE MOST APPROPRIATE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND TO 
ADDRESS THE NOISE, ENERGY, AND DESIGN ISSUES THAT THEY COME WITH. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
LOCATION CRITERIA POLICY 
 
1. LOCATE AWAY FROM IDENTIFIED CORES, CENTERS, AND CORRIDORS 
WHERE HIGHER-INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT IS ENCOURAGED FOR 
MIXED-USE, WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. 
2. LOCATE IN IDENTIFIED REDEVELOPMENT AREAS WHERE 
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS ARE NEEDED. 
 
DESIGN POLICY 
 
1. PROVIDE ENHANCED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS WITH A GREATER 
DENSITY OF TREES AND SHRUBS.  
2. PROVIDE DETACHED SIDEWALKS WITH PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES AND 
SHADE. 
3. PROVIDE ART IN PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT. 
4. UTILIZE DARK SKY LIGHTING.  
5. MINIMIZE NOISE POLLUTION TO NEARBY RESIDENTIAL THROUGH USE 
OF LARGE SETBACKS, STRUCTURAL SCREENING ELEMENTS, 
ARCHITECTURALLY INTEGRATED STRUCTURES, AND/OR 
LANDSCAPING. 
6. PROVIDE VISUAL INTEREST TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND RIGHTS-
OF-WAY WITH ENHANCED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN THAT INCLUDES A 
VARIATION IN COLORS, MATERIALS, ARTICULATION, FENESTRATION, 
AND BREAKING OF MASSING, RATHER THAN A CONCRETE BOX THAT 
HAS A NEGATIVE VISUAL APPEARANCE TO THE SURROUNDING 
COMMUNITY.

GPA-2-25-Y Backup Memo  
June 5, 2025 
Page 3  
 
 
 
ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY 
 
1. PROVIDE AN WILL-SERVE LETTER AGREEMENT FROM THE LOCAL 
UTILITY COMPANY TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAPACITY 
IN THE POWER GRID TO SUPPLY THE DATA CENTER WITH ITS 
REQUIRED ENERGY DEMAND. 
2. ENCOURAGE USE OF THE PHOENIX GREEN CONSTRUCTION CODE TO 
MAXIMIZE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF DATA CENTER BUILDINGS.