Attachment D - VPC Summary - Z-53-22-8.pdf

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8
INFORMATION ONLY 
Date of VPC Meeting 
November 14, 2022 
Request From 
S-1, S-1 (Approved C-2 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD),
S-1 (Approved R-3 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-3A PCD), S-
1 (Approved R1-10 PCD), S-1 (Approved R1-18 PCD),
S-1 (Approved R1-8 PCD), S-1 (Approved RH/R1-10
PCD)
Request To 
PUD
Proposed Use 
PUD to allow single and multifamily residential, 
commercial uses, and some commerce park 
Location 
Approximately 860 feet south of the southwest corner of 
51st Avenue and Carver Road 
VPC DISCUSSION:
Item No. 5 (GPA-LV-3-22-8) and Item No. 5 (Z-53-22-8) are companion cases and 
were heard together. 
19 members of the public registered to speak on these items. Six of these members 
of the public donated time to another individual. 
APPLICANT PRESENTATION 
Wendy Riddell, representing the applicant with Berry Riddell, introduced herself and 
the Gila Foothills PUD project located on approximately 270 acres. Ms. Riddell 
discussed the site location along the Loop 202 freeway and existing zoning. Ms. Riddell 
discussed the Tierra Montana PCD, stating that the current proposal maintains the 
existing entitlement of 1,700 dwelling units already approved on the site. Ms. Riddell 
discussed the Minor General Plan Amendment requested and stated that a 50-foot-wide 
landscape buffer is proposed along portions of the site next to residential uses. Ms. 
Riddell stated that five character areas are proposed as part of the PUD case, including: 
Commercial, Employment, Resort, Resort Residential, and Residential. Ms. Riddell 
discussed each of the character areas, noting that billboards are proposed, in addition 
to agrarian-themed residential design and an electric-vehicle focused auto sales 
campus. Ms. Riddell stated that this would help further the City’s Electric Vehicle 
Roadmap and would have a positive tax benefit for the city. Ms. Riddell discussed a 
proposed trailhead along the southwest portion of the site that would lead into South 
Mountain Regional Park. Ms. Riddell discussed community outreach conducted so far 
ATTACHMENT D

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
November 14, 2022 
Page 2 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
and will be hosting an in-person neighborhood meeting on December 5, 2022 at the 
Estrella Foothills Global Academy starting at 6pm. 
 
PUBLIC COMMENT 
Miguel Angel Meraz lives in the area and is concerned with traffic. Mr. Meraz owns 
horses and feels that this development is not compatible with the area. Mr. Meraz 
added that traffic is horrible now and would get worse with this development. 
 
Steven Ramirez understands the desire of this developer but has many concerns 
including the ongoing water shortage which led to the City asking residents to conserve 
water. Mr. Ramirez also has concerns with car dealerships and traffic potential, in 
addition to public safety. Mr. Ramirez stated that road widening and redoing the 
interchange at Estrella Drive will be needed. Mr. Ramirez stated that building height is 
of concern as it would block the views of the mountains. Mr. Ramirez would accept a 
maximum height of 2 stories and 30 feet, but also has concerns over increased light 
pollution in the area. Mr. Ramirez added that the increased tax revenue will not benefit 
this area of the city. 
 
Timothy Cutright has lived in the area for 25 years and feels that there is an 
opportunity to do something unique with the property on 51st Avenue. Mr. Cutright feels 
that the auto mall use is not appropriate at this location and no development should 
occur until the intersection of Estrella Drive and 51st Avenue is improved due to existing 
traffic issues. Mr. Cutright takes his child to the school near this intersection and traffic 
is a nightmare. 
 
Sabrina Daniels expressed safety concerns with increased crime and homelessness in 
the area. Ms. Daniels is concerned with increased vehicular traffic and worsening safety 
in the area. 
 
Dan Penton discussed a few slides provided to staff ahead of the meeting. Mr. Penton 
stated that an urban-heat island would be created by this development. Mr. Penton 
stated that this area is unique and unlike any other in the Valley. Mr. Penton stated that 
proposing 160 acres of parking lots will cause increased heat and more noise. Mr. 
Penton stated that proposing high-intensity development in an area that is very rural is 
not compatible. Mr. Penton discussed the town of Carmel, Indiana, where pedestrian 
gathering places were developed which encouraged the community to meet. Mr. Penton 
stated that this development should consider more commercial uses like grocery stores, 
an enclosed vehicle testing facility, and other uses to create a destination. Mr. Penton 
discussed the Tierra Montana plan and the trail network in the area. Mr. Penton stated 
that other facilities could be part of the Resort, connecting places in Laveen to shopping 
and recreation to create a destination. 
 
Maria Reagin discussed park and trail networks in the area, noting that she rides 
horses near the project site. Ms. Reagin noted that there is no way to guarantee that no 
gas-powered vehicles will be sold in the proposed auto mall. Ms. Reagin discussed 
rising crime rates in the area due to gas stations and bus stops. Ms. Reagin stated that

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
November 14, 2022 
Page 3 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
a truck stop would lead to more crime in the area. Ms. Reagin stated that there are lots 
of auto dealerships in the area. 
 
Lex Davis opposes these two cases due to incompatibility with the character of the 
area. Ms. Davis stated that the area is natural and rural, and this project would create 
more crime, pollution, and vehicular accidents in the area. Ms. Davis added that the 
Laveen character would change and would no longer be a peaceful place, leading to 
more urbanization and related issues. 
 
Galo Barzola echoes the comments provided. Mr. Barzola described witnessing 
criminal activities taking place in the community, adding that more commercial uses 
lead to rising crime. Mr. Barzola stated that a truck stop and automobile dealership 
proposals are not compatible. Mr. Bazola stated that the community does not need 
more digital signage and wants more trails. Mr. Barzola described this proposal as not 
favoring the community. 
 
Rod Grimes lives in the area and agrees with the comments made. Mr. Grimes stated 
that an auto mall is not compatible as Laveen is a bedroom community that people seek 
to get away from the city and not be next to commercial development. Mr. Grimes 
agrees with the comments made by Lex Davis. 
 
Phil Hertel finds numerous issues with the proposed PUD case. Mr. Hertel stated that 
the applicant needs to break up the approval into various phases, as each phase has 
many pieces that need to be reviewed carefully. Mr. Hertel suggested having an in-
person open house meeting as there is not enough detail provide with this proposal. Mr. 
Hertel wants to understand the proposal in more detail before declaring his stance on 
the cases. Mr. Hertel wants to have in-person meetings, not virtual meetings. 
 
David Garrett has lived in the area for 19 years and discussed existing utility and canal 
easements in the area. Mr. Garrett stated that properties west of 51st Avenue should be 
residential and that a truck stop would not be compatible with the area. Mr. Garrett has 
concerns with increased building or billboard height and lighting impacts from billboards. 
Mr. Garrett is opposed to this project. 
 
Charlie McNeely has lived in the area for many decades, as he moved here to enjoy 
the natural beauty, farming, and the solitude. Mr. McNeely stated that this proposal is 
across his home and discussed existing commercial uses in the area. Mr. McNeely 
stated that there are no auto malls next to residential in other cities. Mr. McNeely stated 
that there are schools in the area and is concerned with student safety. Mr. McNeely 
does not support any heights above 20 feet and does not support billboards either. 
 
Anthony Houston, on behalf of Cassidy Houston, moved to the area to not have to 
worry about some of the uses being proposed by this project such as auto malls or truck 
stops. Mr. Houston stated that the auto mall is not an opportunity for all and that jobs 
will be lost to automation. Mr. Houston has traffic concerns and is not in favor of uses 
that will not preserve the Laveen area or will take away from the Village.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
November 14, 2022 
Page 4 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
COMMITTEE QUESTIONS 
Rebecca Perrera asked for clarification on traffic signal locations. Ms. Riddell 
responded that this is still being looked at. 
 
Carlos Ortega asked the Chair to clarify the role of the Laveen Village Planning 
Committee to the community members present. Chair Glass agreed to do so later in 
the discussion. 
 
Dean Chiarelli asked for clarification on the concept of a Resort use as sometimes 
these uses can be exclusionary. Mr. Chiarelli also asked whether the developer would 
install electric vehicle chargers in each home without being required to do so. Mr. 
Chiarelli appreciated the community input provided regarding the character of the area 
and shares concerns with the effects of asphalt in Laveen. Mr. Riddell responded that 
the resort is envisioned with a housing and hotel element but will be redefined later in 
the process. 
 
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION 
Stephanie Hurd stated that the Village Planning Committee is an advisory board, and 
the applicant took time to explain the project before a recommendation is made in the 
future. Ms. Hurd expressed the importance of multi-use trail alignments in the area. 
 
Vice Chair Abegg stated that this is the start of the project and encouraged the public 
to remain involved. Ms. Abegg stated that this is a situation where the farmer is selling 
his land willingly and VPC members should meet with the applicant. Ms. Abegg would 
like to see a detailed land use list, such as an auto mall only for electric vehicles and not 
gas-powered vehicles. Ms. Abegg agrees with Mr. Chiarelli and wants to see the 
community support uses they want to see in Laveen and the developer work towards 
developing uses to make these an asset for Laveen residents. 
 
Chair Glass stated that community input is necessary and thanked the community for 
their comments. Planned Unit Development or PUD cases incorporate more community 
input, but the PUD process can be cumbersome. Ms. Glass stated that some items are 
out of the VPC’s hands and encouraged the community to attend the community 
meetings and give input. Ms. Glass stated that the applicant and community need to sit 
at the table and discuss details of the project such as land uses, sign locations, 
standards, and do research. Ms. Glass added that the Village Planning Committee is an 
advocate for the community, but the community should also attend the various 
meetings. 
 
Carlos Ortega stated that plainly saying no is not an answer that typically works and 
instead the community should provide more input on the project. Mr. Ortega would also 
like the Council Offices to hear the input from the community and VPC members.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
November 14, 2022 
Page 5 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Chair Glass asked the applicant to continue working with the community on the project. 
Ms. Riddell responded that they would continue to refine uses and encourage the 
public to attend their meetings. 
 
Vice Chair Abegg stated that VPC members were appointed to make 
recommendations and that sometimes the Council District offices will reach out to VPC 
members with questions and to get their input. Ms. Abegg added that the City Council 
receives the recommendations made by the VPC members. Ms. Abegg encouraged 
staff to reach out to the applicant to ensure that there is no quorum of Laveen VPC 
members at the upcoming public meeting on December 5, 2022. 
 
Chair Glass encouraged the community to not give up and not to give in, plus provide 
comments on what they want to see on the project.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
February 12, 2024 
Request From 
S-1, S-1 (Approved C-2 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD), 
S-1 (Approved R-3 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-3A PCD), S-
1 (Approved R1-10 PCD), S-1 (Approved R1-18 PCD), 
S-1 (Approved R1-8 PCD), S-1 (Approved RH/R1-10 
PCD)  
Request To 
PUD 
Proposal 
Planned Unit Development to allow single and 
multifamily residential, commercial uses, and some 
commerce park 
Location 
Approximately 860 feet south of the southwest corner of 
51st Avenue and Carver Road 
VPC Recommendation 
Continuance to March 18, 2024 
VPC Vote  
8-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
  
Item No. 4 (GPA-LV-3-22-8) and Item No. 5 (Z-53-22-8) were heard together.  
14 members of the public registered to speak on this item.  
 
Staff Presentation (Overall and Hub Character Area):  
 
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an overview of GPA-LV-3-22-8 and Z-53-22-8. 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna discussed the location of the site, the requested zoning 
designation, and the surrounding land uses. Mrs. Sanchez Luna provided an overview 
of the proposed development including the different development units and character 
areas. Mrs. Sanchez Luna summarized the staff findings, correspondence, providing 
the staff recommendation and proposed stipulations. Mrs. Sanchez Luna concluded 
the presentation by providing an overview of the Hub Character area noting the 
allowed uses, height, and design.  
 
Applicant Presentation (Overall and Hub Character Area):  
 
Wendy Riddell, representing the applicant with Berry Riddell, LLC, began the 
presentation by providing the history of the subject site including the Tierra Montana 
PCD. Ms. Riddell summarized the number of acres, proposed uses, and noted the 
allowed number of residential units under the Tierra Montana PCD. Ms. Riddell noted 
similar developments in Gilbert and Scottsdale and summarized the future

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 2 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
development forecast for Laveen. Ms. Riddell summarized the EV focused auto 
campus and added that the subject site was one of the last allowed areas within the 
City to allow numerous automobile dealerships. Ms. Riddell stated that the proposed 
development would generate revenue and employment opportunities for Laveen. Ms. 
Riddell added that the PUD proposes numerous improvements such as a trailhead, 
infrastructure, and water conservation. Ms. Riddell provided statistical information that 
supported a hospital in Laveen and noted the reduction in proposed height and 
setback provisions when adjacent to the existing Tierra Montana development. Ms. 
Riddell noted that any additional units will have to return to the committee for a 
recommendation via the PHO process. Ms. Riddell summarized the proposed 
improvements on Estrella Drive, 47th Avenue, 51st Avenue, and 55th Avenue. Ms. 
Riddell noted the proposed height for auto-mall uses and added the allowed use for 
off-premise signage.  
 
Community Presentation by John Bzdel (Overall and Hub Character Area): 
 
John Bzdel presented the Character Plan for the Laveen Village and noted the rural 
characteristics highlighted in the plan. Mr. Bzdel summarized the stipulations found in 
the existing zoning designation for Tierra Montana that focused on limited height, lot 
widths, preservation of equestrian character, and restrictions for resort uses. Mr. Bzdel 
stated that there were only two development areas which included commercial and 
low density residential/resort uses. Mr. Bzdel summarized compatible communities 
found adjacent to the purposed development which maintain scenic views. Mr. Bzdel 
added that the proposed development is not located within the core. Mr. Bzdel 
provided an overview of the Land Use and Design Principles found in the General 
Plan and reiterated the rural character of Laveen. Mr. Bzdel voiced his opposition for 
the proposed landscaping on 47th Avenue and proposed height. Mr. Bzdel concluded 
his presentation by stating that the current PUD proposal should not be approved until 
modifications are made.  
 
Questions From the Committee (Overall and Hub Character Area): 
 
Chair Linda Abegg noted that the committee follows open meeting laws thus 
discussion on the case has not occurred outside of a public setting. Chair Abegg 
suggested committee members to voice their opinions, questions, and possible 
stipulations so that the applicant could discuss them with staff and a recommendation 
could be made at the next meeting. The committee voiced their agreement. Chair 
Abegg suggested reducing the maximum height to 40 feet, reducing the maximum 
number of units to 1,200, supporting density adjacent to the hospital, limiting 20 
percent of the total subject site for residential uses, prohibiting self-service storage, all 
multifamily development returning to the committee via the PHO process, and 
infrastructure to be completed in Phase I. Chair Abegg added that she would like a 
land use percentage and density tracker. Chair Abegg noted that she would like to see 
numerous changes in the Hub Character Area. Chair Abegg stated that those changes 
included, a setback of 900 feet for any hospital when adjacent to Tierra Montana, if an 
auto-mall is not developed then any development must go through the PHO process.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 3 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Chair Abegg added that she would like the auto-mall to include all sustainability 
features found in the PUD Narrative, and asked staff questions regarding existing 
stipulation language. Chair Abegg stated that she would like the PUD to have one EV 
line or alternative fuel source vehicles.  
 
Patrick Nasser-Taylor voiced his support for all the proposed modifications presented 
by Chair Abegg. Mr. Nasser-Taylor proposed a height limitation of 70-feet for the 
hospital and a 30-foot height restriction for Development Unit 6. Mr. Nasser-Taylor 
asked why the auto-mall needed a maximum height of 56 feet. Mr. Naser-Taylor 
added that the majority of auto dealerships were approximately two stories. Mr. 
Nasser-Taylor asked why the applicant requested an auto dealership use out of the 
hundreds of allowed uses in the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Riddell noted that the 
proposed auto-mall would bring employment to the village and that the subject site is 
one of the few areas in the City that can accommodate an auto-mall. Mr. Nasser-
Taylor stated that he would like to see more than one line of EV or alternative fuel 
vehicles. Ms. Riddell noted that the applicant is proposing an EV brand auto-mall 
where people are encouraged to buy EV vehicles. Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that 
numerous dealerships are not 56 feet. Ms. Riddell stated that the 56 feet is required 
for a parking garage to store vehicles for the auto-mall. Mr. Nasser-Taylor asked 
where west of the Loop 202 and along the I-10 was there a 150-foot structure. Ms. 
Riddell noted that her team could provide that information. Mr. Nasser-Taylor stated 
that a 150-foot structure is not located anywhere in the area. Mr. Nasser-Taylor voiced 
his concerns regarding the proposed 120-foot hospital in a rural environment. Ms. 
Riddell noted that only the tower of the hospital would be allowed a height of 120 feet. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that the applicant is proposing a lot of uses on a small piece 
of land.  
 
Rebecca Perrera stated that the committee should collaborate to modify the PUD to 
better serve the community now and in the future.  
 
Carlos Ortega stated that one of the best things that happened in Laveen was the full 
construction of Baseline Road prior to development. Mr. Ortega noted that the PUD is 
proposing to build all major infrastructure before development. Mr. Ortega voiced his 
support for street development prior to any development.  
 
Francisco Barraza stated that his questions were answered.  
 
JoAnne Jensen requested more information regarding the approval letter presented 
by John Bzdel and the relationship between those stipulations and the ones proposed 
by the PUD. Ms. Jensen voiced her concern with the proposed density, lack of single-
family residential development and requested pawn shops and truck stops to be 
prohibited in the PUD. Ms. Riddell noted that truck stops were prohibited and that 
they would add pawn shops to the prohibited list. Ms. Riddell noted that the approval 
letter is from the Tierra Montana PCD that would have allowed a higher density than 
what is proposed in the PUD. Ms. Riddell added that the freeway has modified the 
proposed land uses in the area.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 4 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Jennifer Rouse noted that the Laveen community has evolved over the years and the 
freeway has contributed to the change. Ms. Rouse voiced her concern regarding the 
proposed multifamily adjacent to single-family residential and possible traffic 
congestion on Estrella Drive and 51st Avenue. Ms. Rouse added that the Level 1 
Trauma Center hospital would likely have a helicopter pad but noted the need for a 
hospital that would serve Laveen and Ahwatukee.  
 
Vice Chair Stephanie Hurd stated that she would like Laveen to be sustainable, so 
individuals didn’t have to leave the village. Vice Chair Hurd added that she has done 
research on the proposed hospital and asked for verification regarding the 52 million 
tax revenue. Christine Mackay, the Community and Economic Development 
Department Director, stated that auto-malls located in other cities have generated a lot 
of revenue for infrastructure. Ms. Mackay understood Laveen’s desire for high-retail 
and restaurants and noted that the proposed PUD would allow for both retail and 
services within the village. Ms. Mackay summarized a restaurant tour that the 
Department had and added that the proposed auto-mall and hospital will attract the 
retail uses. Ms. Mackay noted that the proposed hospital height was to accommodate 
for all services such as emergency, surgery, out-patient services, and pharmacy. Ms. 
Mackay added that different hospitals accept different types of insurances allowing for 
more choices to residents. Ms. Mackay stated that the hospital would also attract more 
retail opportunities which would help create a sustainable Laveen. Vice Chair Hurd 
asked if there was a way to guarantee an upscale resort. Ms. Mackay stated that the 
proposed resort would have numerous amenities and noted that the proposed 
trailhead adjacent to the South Mountain Park would support a high-end resort.  
 
Public Comment (Overall and Hub Character Area):  
 
Dan Penton stated that he would like to see a smaller auto-mall footprint and reduce 
the amount of asphalt utilized for all the dealerships. Mr. Penton asked how the testing 
routes would be enforced and noted that EV vehicles are heavier and asked how 
infrastructure would support the extra weight.  
 
Phil Hertel, representing the LCRD, noted that a traffic study has not been completed, 
as well as an environmental and noise study. Mr. Hertel noted that the proposed high-
density development is not compatible for the area. Mr. Hertel noted that the LCRD 
had concerns with the lack of studies, distance between hospitals, and lack of details 
in the PUD. Mr. Hertel noted that the LCRD requested the case be continued before a 
recommendation is made.  
 
Mr. Hertel stated that the following comments were not a representation of the LCRD. 
Mr. Hertel asked how the applicant would enforce the stipulation requiring one line of 
EV or alternative fuel vehicles. Mr. Hertel asked for more information regarding the 
auto-mall as a funding mechanism. Mr. Hertel asked for clarification if the proposal 
included one hospital or multiple and voiced his concerns with the proposed cul-de-
sac and traffic counts on Estrella Drive. Mr. Hertel noted that more information was 
needed.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 5 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Carmen Terrell voiced her concerns regarding the water shortage. Ms. Terrell asked 
for the rural character be respected and preserved.   
 
Jen Leitch stated that the proposed auto-mall is not for Laveen but for a much larger 
area. Ms. Leitch stated that the auto-mall would attract of people outside of Laveen 
and not serve the village.  
 
Applicant Response (Overall and Hub Character Area):  
 
Ms. Riddell noted that the proposed cul-de-sac would significantly limit the number of 
vehicles on Estrella Drive. Ms. Riddell added that the traffic counts were from the 
traffic study conducted. Mr. Ortega asked for more information. Jamie Blakeman, 
with the applicant’s team, stated that they have received an approval letter for the 
traffic study from the Street Transportation Department. Ms. Blakeman noted that the 
traffic counts are in association with the proposed land uses and the current and 
proposed road infrastructure.  
 
Committee Discussion (Overall and Hub Character Area):  
 
Chair Abegg noted that she would like to continue the discussion and identify the key 
issues within the PUD. Chair Abegg asked if the committee was in supported of the 
proposed 120-foot hospital. Chair Abegg noted that hospitals are important, especially 
a Level 1 Trauma Center. Mr. Barraza voiced his agreement on the hospital. Mr. 
Barraza noted that firefighters spend more time on the road traveling because there 
are no hospitals in the area. Ms. Jensen stated that a hospital is needed. Ms. Jensen 
noted that the hospital should be located closer to the freeway. Chair Abegg asked if 
Committee Member Jensen supported the 900-foot building setback for the hospital. 
Ms. Jensen agreed. Ms. Rouse noted that there should be multiple hospitals to offer 
services, so people don’t need to travel downtown. Vice Chair Hurd stated that she 
was mostly supportive of the proposed setback but would like to allow some leniency. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that he researched numerous hospitals in surrounding cities. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor added that hospital administrators have stated that hospitals are not 
typically 120-feet. Ms. Perrera understood the concerns with the proposed height. Ms. 
Perrera noted that only a portion of the development unit would be for a hospital. Ms. 
Perrera asked for possible revisions to the PUD. Mr. Ortega noted a flooding event 
that occurred in the community and stated that people had to go downtown for a 
hospital. Mr. Ortega added that a hospital is needed in the area. Mr. Ortega asked the 
applicant to review the height of the Mayo hospital.  
 
Chair Abegg asked if anyone had concerns with adding pawn shops to the prohibited 
list. The committee voiced their agreement.  
 
Chair Abegg mentioned the allowed heights for specific uses in the auto-mall districts 
and additional step back provisions. Chair Abegg proposed a maximum percentage of 
residential uses and density. Ms. Perrera stated that she would share her opinion

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 6 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
during the next section of the meeting.  
 
Chair Abegg reiterated some of the proposed changes including sustainability 
standards, hospital setback, and height restrictions. Mr. Nasser-Taylor asked if they 
could have another meeting to discuss the proposed changes. Chair Abegg noted 
that the committee could not meet but asked members to voice their opinions 
regarding the PUD. Ms. Perrera asked if a member could send an email to a few 
members. Chair Abegg noted that a member could send an email to the entire 
committee.  
 
Chair Abegg noted that a few additional members of the public wished to speak.  
 
Neritza Diaz-Cruz stated that she loved the rural character of Laveen. Ms. Diaz-Cruz 
noted that there was no guarantee that the tax revenue would return to Laveen. Ms. 
Diaz-Cruz added that she was opposed to the off-premises signage. Chair Abegg 
noted that the development agreement would ensure that revenue is kept in Laveen.  
 
Jeanette McDaniel stated that she wasn’t notified of the proposed PUD and asked for 
more information regarding the notification process. Chair Abegg noted that this has 
been proposed since 2022 and added that the developer followed the requirements by 
the rezoning process. Ms. McDaniel stated that she lived in the heart of Laveen and 
never received a notification. Ms. McDaniel asked why the proposed development was 
not relocated on the other side of the freeway. Chair Abegg noted that the other side 
of the freeway was the Gila River Indian School Reservation.  
 
Win Kwok asked how a hospital would keep the certification of a Leven 1 Trauma 
Center. Ms. Kwok stated that all the added asphalt would cause a negative effect in 
the area and add to the urban heat island effect. Ms. Kwok asked regarding water 
conservation and if the existing infrastructure was able to sustain EV vehicles such as 
electricity for charging stations and the proposed hospital.  
 
T.J. Henshau noted that the subject site is located within an existing echo chamber 
and stated that there isn’t any commercial development east of 51st Avenue. Mr. 
Henshau added that these commercial uses will bring noise, light, and traffic 
congestion. Mr. Henshau shared that Laveen could benefit from other types of 
commercial uses.  
 
Staff Presentation (District Character Area): 
 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna displayed the location of the District Character Area and 
summarized the building step back height provisions. Mrs. Sanchez Luna noted the 
landscape buffer, summarized the proposed design guidelines, and key features.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 7 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Applicant Presentation (District Character Area):  
 
Ms. Riddell noted the modern rural character for the District Character Area and 
displayed numerous examples. Ms. Riddell noted the mixture of retail and multifamily 
residential. Ms. Riddell summarized the building step backs when adjacent to the 
existing Tierra Montana neighborhood and 51st Avenue. Ms. Riddell noted that they 
are proposing a cul-de-sac on 55th Avenue to accommodate the concerns heard by 
the Tierra Montana community. Ms. Riddell noted that the Street Transportation 
Department did not support a cul-de-sac on 55th Avenue.  
 
Questions From the Committee (District Character Area):  
 
Chair Abegg stated that she had concerns with the proposed height in Development 
Unit 5 and proposed a larger step back on 51st Avenue. Chair Abegg noted that she 
agreed with the comments received by the Street Transportation Department and 
requested 55th Avenue to connect rather than ending in a cul-de-sac.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor voiced his concerns regarding the Public / Quasi-Public 
designation removal in this area. Ms. Riddell noted that the designation was part of 
the Tierra Montana PCD and originally was going to be a school facility. Ms. Riddell 
added that the school was already built, just in a different location. Ms. Perrera noted 
that this was an issue where the existing land use entitlements didn’t match the 
General Plan Land Use Map.  
 
Ms. Perrera had concerns regarding the proposed three left turns for school drop-off. 
Ms. Riddell noted that the proposed road structure is based on community concerns.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd voiced her agreement with the comments provided by the Street 
Transportation Department.  
 
Public Comment (District Character Area): 
 
Mr. Penton stated that multifamily housing is not being utilized in the City and would 
like to see more retail uses. Mr. Penton noted that he would be supportive of 
restaurants, grocery stores, or a large open space area.  
 
Ms. Terrell voiced her concerns regarding water usage and stated that she would like 
to see development under the existing zoning designations.  
 
Mr. Hertel asked for clarification on modern rural architecture and added that the 
displayed renderings were more modern than rural. Mr. Hertel noted that there should 
be a limitation in multifamily development and that he would like to see more 
townhomes or single-family attached development in this area.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 8 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Committee Discussion (District Character Area):  
 
Chair Abegg asked committee members if they agreed with building out 55th Avenue. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that more discussion was required regarding 55th Avenue 
because of the intensity of the proposed development and the concerns from the 
community. 
 
Mr. Ortega asked how many multifamily housing developments are needed in Laveen. 
Ms. Riddell displayed the population and housing forecast for the City. Ms. Riddell 
noted that Laveen is going to require a significant number of housing to support a 
forecasted growth of 30,000 residents. Mr. Ortega asked what would occur if the 
forecast changes and suggested a stipulation to allow for other uses if housing is no 
longer needed. Ms. Perrera noted that there was a concern of approved multifamily 
housing in Laveen that hasn’t been built.   
 
Ms. Jensen stated that there was approximately 10,000 units that have been 
approved but haven’t been built. Ms. Jensen voiced her support for neighborhood 
retail or single-family residential. Ms. Jensen noted that she was not opposed to 
townhomes or single-family attached development.  
 
Ms. Rouse agreed with Committee Member Jensen’s comment regarding attached 
single-family housing. Ms. Rouse noted her concerns regarding 55th Avenue and the 
agreement with the community.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd noted the loss of commercial land to multifamily development. Vice 
Chair Hurd stated that she was opposed to multifamily and self-storage. Vice Chair 
Hurd added that if Laveen had all the commercial required to support the community, 
then she would support additional housing. Vice Chair Hurd suggested a hotel 
adjacent to the hospital.   
 
Chair Abegg noted that the majority of the committee was in favor of 55th Avenue 
connecting to the proposed development. Chair Abegg suggested reducing the 
maximum height for residential to 40 feet. Chair Abegg noted that she would like to 
add single-family as a permitted use. Ms. Riddell noted that single-family is allowed.  
 
Mr. Ortega requested a stipulation to require all multifamily development to go through 
the PHO process.  
 
Staff Presentation (Foothills Character Area): 
 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna displayed the location of the Foothills Character Area and 
summarized the building step back height provisions and allowed uses. Mrs. Sanchez 
Luna noted the landscape buffer, summarized the proposed design guidelines, and 
key features including the proposed resort and trailhead at South Mountain Park.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 9 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Applicant Presentation (Foothills Character Area):  
 
Ms. Riddell noted the proposed natural character of the area. Ms. Riddell stated the 
allowed uses in each development unit and summarized the requirements of a resort. 
Ms. Riddell displayed examples of proposed resort types and noted that approximately 
50 acres would be preserved for a resort use. Ms. Riddell noted that if anything 
outside of a resort is proposed, then they would be required to return through the PHO 
process. Ms. Riddell summarized the proposed modification to Development Unit 8 
which would limit the density when adjacent to large lot single-family development on 
Estrella Drive and 47th Avenue. Ms. Riddell displayed the proposed modifications to 
47th Avenue to maintain the rural road but noted that the Street Transportation 
Department does not support the modification.  
 
Committee Discussion (Foothills Character Area):  
 
Chair Abegg voiced her concerns regarding Estrella Drive but was unsure of a proper 
solution. Chair Abegg stated that she would like to move the “County Lane” and 
agreed with the applicant’s modification to 47th Avenue. Chair Abegg stated that she 
would like to reduce the density Development Unit 8 to 3 du/acre adjacent to Estrella 
Drive and 47th Avenue and the remainder to 14 du/acre. Chair Abegg suggested 
limiting the office uses to professional offices. Chair Abegg would like the resort time 
stipulation to be modified to five years of the dedication of Gila Foothills Parkway and 
development of the trailhead. Chair Abegg provided an alternative step back provision 
and suggested a stipulation for the last off-premise sign adjacent to the resort.  
 
Mr. Barraza voiced his agreement regarding Estrella Drive and the time stipulation in 
relation to the resort.  
 
Ms. Jensen voiced her agreement. Ms. Jensen noted that Estrella Drive and 47th 
Avenue should be modified to alleviate the community’s concerns.   
 
Vice Chair Hurd agreed with the proposed 3 du/acre along Estrella Drive and 47th 
Avenue. Vice Chair Hurd requested modifying landscaping in the buffer to include 
more cacti rather than trees. Vice Chair Hurd stated more discussion was required for 
Estrella Drive.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor agreed with all the comments proposed by the committee, 
particularly supporting single-family.  
 
Ms. Perrera agreed with the comments regarding single-family residential. Ms. 
Perrera noted the development agreement stipulation and suggested a possible 
shared parking area for the resort and trailhead. Ms. Riddell noted that they are 
encouraging shared parking areas.  
 
Mr. Ortega asked if the trailhead was going to have parking and facilities available to 
individuals prior to the construction of the resort. Ms. Riddell noted that they have had

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 10 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
several conversations regarding the development of the trailhead with the Parks 
Department.  
 
Public Comment (Foothills Character Area):  
 
Mr. Penton voiced his concerns regarding the environmental impacts including wildlife 
and vegetation. Mr. Penton voiced his support for the purposed trailhead.  
 
Mr. Hertel agreed with Mr. Penton’s comments. Mr. Hertel noted that there is a 
housing shortage in Laveen based on the forecast presented by the applicant.  
 
Eugenio Gutierrez voiced his concerns regarding vandalism at the proposed 
trailhead. Mr. Gutierrez voiced his support for 3 du/acre and supported a reduction in 
density when in relation to the resort.  
 
Dave Garrett displayed the existing street infrastructure and noted the safety 
concerns. Mr. Garrett added that 51st Avenue needed to be widened to accommodate 
the proposed development.  
 
Alice Williams noted that there were numerous livestock uses in the area. Ms. 
Williams added that the proposed multifamily development would not be compatible 
with the surrounding uses and that she does not want to receive complaints regarding 
noise and odor.  
 
Mr. Bzdel on behave of Jennifer Spicer stated that she moved to the area specifically 
because of the large open fields. Mr. Bzdel noted that she would have not moved to 
the area if the zoning was going be changed to allow for high intensity commercial.  
 
Maria Reagin noted that an environmental study has not been conducted. Ms. Reagin 
added that the proposed development would add to the urban heat island and that 
there hasn’t been a noise study for the proposed development.  
 
Ms. Terrell reiterated her concerns regarding water conservation. Ms. Terrell 
requested the preservation of the rural character.  
 
Mr. Henshau noted that the General Plan Land Use Map designation supported large 
lot single-family development. Mr. Henshau stated that this should require a Major 
Amendment to the General Plan. Mr. Henshau stated that the case needed to be put 
on hold until all the issues are resolved.  
 
Lauren Grove stated that this was one of the most scenic corridors in the City. Mr. 
Grove referenced the Laveen Character Plan which supported the protection of views. 
Mr. Grove noted that he did not receive any notification regarding the proposed PUD, 
nor did anyone come to his property to discuss.

Laveen Village Planning Committee 
Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
February 12, 2024 
Page 11 of 11 
 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Community Discussion (Foothills Character Area):  
 
Chair Abegg noted the community’s concerns regarding density and timeline for the 
proposed resort. Chair Abegg stated that the committee agrees to the community’s 
modifications to 47th Avenue and Estrella Drive. Chair Abegg asked if any additional 
items needed to be addressed. Ms. Jensen asked how these modifications would be 
shared with the rest of the committee. Chair Abegg stated that the notes would be 
provided to the applicant and staff in order for all of the issues to be discussed and 
addressed before the next meeting. Chair Abegg suggested having small meetings 
with the applicant and staff. 
 
Ms. Perrera asked when the development agreement would be completed. Ms. 
Mackay stated that the development agreement would depend on the rezoning 
approval and further discussions with the developer.  
 
Motion:  
Jennifer Rouse motioned to continue Z-53-22-8 to the March Laveen Village Planning 
Committee meeting. Francisco Barraza seconded the motion.  
 
Vote:  
8-0, motion to continue Z-53-22-8 passed with Committed Members Barraza, Jensen, 
Nasser-Taylor, Ortega, Perrera, Rouse, Hurd, and Abegg in favor.  
 
Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:  
 
None.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3
rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
 
 
Date of VPC Meeting 
March 18, 2024 
Request From 
S-1, S-1 (Approved C-2 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-2 PCD), 
S-1 (Approved R-3 PCD), S-1 (Approved R-3A PCD), S-
1 (Approved R1-10 PCD), S-1 (Approved R1-18 PCD), 
S-1 (Approved R1-8 PCD), S-1 (Approved RH/R1-10 
PCD)  
Request To 
PUD 
Proposal 
Planned Unit Development to allow single and 
multifamily residential, commercial uses, and some 
commerce park 
Location 
Approximately 860 feet south of the southwest corner of 
51st Avenue and Carver Road 
VPC Recommendation 
Approved per the staff memo with modifications and 
additional stipulations 
VPC Vote  
8-0 
 
VPC DISCUSSION: 
  
Item No. 3 (GPA-LV-3-22-8) and Item No. 4 (Z-53-22-8) were heard together.  
13 members of the public registered to speak on this item.  
 
Staff Presentation: 
 
Nayeli Sanchez Luna, staff, presented an update on the correspondence received for 
GPA-LV-3-22-8 and Z-53-22-8. Mrs. Sanchez Luna summarized the concerns and 
noted that the applicant has worked with the community and requested modifications 
and additional stipulations. Mrs. Sanchez Luna concluded the presentation by stating 
that the memo contained the updated stipulations for Gila Foothills PUD.  
 
Applicant Presentation: 
 
Wendy Riddell, representing the applicant with Berry Riddell, LLC, began the 
presentation by summarizing the proposed changes to the stipulations for Z-53-22-8. 
Ms. Riddell listed the modifications including reducing the height, requiring 
development to return through the Planning Hearing Officer, changes in density, 
improvements for 47th Avenue, and commitment to add Fire and Police Department 
resources. Ms. Riddell concluded the presentation by reiterating their commitment to 
working with the community.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 2 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Questions From the Committee: 
 
Patrick Nasser-Taylor noted that there had been significant changes to the proposal. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor asked for clarification on development units that allowed for a 
maximum height of 56 feet. Ms. Riddell stated that Development Unit 2, 5 and 10 
allowed for a maximum height of 56 feet.  
 
Rebecca Perrera noted that the Laveen Meadows was an example of a development 
that had reserved property for fire and police, but the services were never provided. 
Ms. Perrera asked how they would ensure the development of a fire or police station 
within the PUD. Ms. Riddell stated that any future development of a fire or police 
station would be found in the development agreement. Ms. Riddell noted that they are 
still working on finalizing the development agreement. Chair Linda Abegg 
appreciated the commitment for a development agreement but noted that that would 
not be part of the rezoning case. Ms. Perrera asked if they developer would still be 
required to pay impact fees. Ms. Riddell confirmed.  
 
Carlos Ortega stated that his major concern was street infrastructure and asked for a 
time frame for when the roads would be completed. Ms. Riddell noted that that could 
possibly occur within three years. Mr. Ortega wanted to ensure that all major street 
infrastructure be constructed before development. Ms. Riddell clarified that it would 
be about 10 years for all infrastructure to be developed. Mr. Ortega asked for a time 
frame for 51st Avenue. Ms. Riddell noted that that would be determined at the time of 
construction of development. Mr. Ortega stated that he did not want 51st Avenue to 
have the same issues as Dobbins Road.  
 
Francisco Barraza thanked the applicant for working with the community.  
 
JoAnne Jensen thanked the applicant for working with the community. Ms. Jensen 
asked why Stipulation No. 1.n was modified to delete self-service storage from the 
prohibited use list. Ms. Riddell noted that the proposed stipulations would allow for 
one self-service storage within the Hub Character Area. Ms. Jensen suggested 
adding other items to the prohibited list such as liquor stores, smoke shops, and 
cannabis shops. Ms. Riddell noted that the permitted C-2 zoning already had 
provisions for uses such as alcohol sales and smoke shops and that additional 
entitlements would be required for cannabis sales.  
 
Jennifer Rouse noted that the applicant has worked extensively with the community 
and appreciated all their compromises. Ms. Rouse added that a hospital is needed in 
the community.  
 
Vice Chair Stephanie Hurd voiced her opposition for the proposed multifamily. Vice 
Chair Hurd thanked the applicant, the Chair, the committee, and the departments 
involved in finalizing the stipulations found in the memo provided by staff.  
 
Chair Linda Abegg thanked the applicant, committee, and community for their input.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 3 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Chair Abegg summarized the stipulations in the memo and noted that she had some 
concerns but would address them after public comment.  
 
Public Comment:  
 
John Bzdel stated that he opposed the proposed density in Development Unit 8. Mr. 
Bzdel noted that the applicant promised 90-foot-wide lots and that he expected a lower 
density and a maximum of 37 lots. Ms. Riddell stated that the proposed density 
aligned with R1-18 development standards and that the lots were 90-feet wide with a 
maximum of 39 lots. Mr. Bzdel noted that the density should be lower. Reid Butler, 
with the applicant’s team, noted that all discussion referenced R1-18 development 
standards. Mr. Bzdel wanted to ensure that there was a consensus between the 
community and the developer.  
 
Jeffrey Kling noted that the Laveen village is a pristine place to live. Mr. Kling voiced 
concerns with the proposed development and noted the lack of density variation in the 
PUD. Mr. Kling added that there hasn’t been any mention of an environmental impact 
study, discussions with the Gila Indian Reservation, and noise studies.  
 
Kim Henshaw voiced her appreciation for the progress on 47th Avenue and Estrella 
Drive; however, she had concerns for other existing development adjacent to the site. 
Ms. Henshaw noted that individuals would utilize streets rather than the Loop 202 
Freeway, thus increasing traffic congestion in the area. Ms. Henshaw added that the 
development would disrupt the rural community and that there were no provisions for 
lighting, preserving dark skies, or preserving the rural character.  
 
Jen Leitch voiced her opposition to having such a large development adjacent to 
South Mountain. Ms. Leitch suggested density that would be compatible with the park. 
Ms. Leitch added that the community did not receive the memo and asked for more 
information on Carver Road. Ms. Leitch stated that there were no auto malls located 
near other parks.  
 
Paul Franckowiak stated that the development would cause traffic issues for Laveen. 
Mr. Franckowiak added that the traffic would travel to Carver Road and Estrella Drive. 
Mr. Franckowiak asked why this development was proposed in Laveen and added that 
the explanation he has received is not sufficient to warrant such a large development. 
Mr. Franckowiak stated that a hospital would be best in a location with existing 
residential developments and that there was a lot of missing information.  
 
Dan Loden stated that the Laveen character is rural. Mr. Loden noted that the City 
has experienced a shortage in police officers, even with the recent increase in wages. 
Mr. Loden noted recent crimes in the area including 51st Avenue and Baseline Road. 
Mr. Loden asked how the shortage would be addressed and added that he was 
hesitant that any police or fire services would be provided.  
 
Karen Clark noted that she moved to the area for the rural atmosphere and that the

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 4 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
proposal would cause severe traffic congestion. Ms. Clark agreed with Mr. Loden 
comments regarding police and fire services. Ms. Clark voiced her concerns regarding 
the location of the hospital.  
 
Maria Reagin voiced her approval of the reduction in density for Development Unit 8 
and the proposal for 47th Avenue. Ms. Reagin added that there has been a huge 
compromise on the applicant’s side to address the community’s concerns. Ms. Reagin 
thanked members of the community including the LCRD, applicant, and 
Councilmember Hodge Washington. Ms. Reagin requested to continue working with 
the developer on landscaping for 47th Avenue.  
 
Phil Hertel thanked the community, committee and the applicant on the modifications 
to the stipulations. Mr. Hertel requested roof overhangs to be increased to 18 inches 
and that the maximum number of units be reduced to 1,200. Mr. Hertel requested a 
notification list be added to the stipulations for any development within the PUD. Mr. 
Hertel asked for an explanation regarding Stipulation No. 1.rr.  
 
Michael Miller voiced his concerns regarding the proposed hospital and auto mall. Mr. 
Miller requested 55th Avenue to terminate as previously proposed by the applicant. 
Mr. Miller noted that there would be a significant increase in traffic congestion adjacent 
to the school located on the northeast corner of 55th Avenue and Carver Road. 
 
Charlie McNeely noted that he was not opposed to progress. Mr. McNeely added that 
he had concerns regarding height and noted that he would like to limit the height to 4 
stories. Mr. McNeely thanked the committee for their time and dedication to the 
proposal.  
 
Karson Baird asked if there were any dealerships interested in the proposed auto 
mall. Ms. Riddell confirmed. Ms. Baird voiced her concerns for 51st Avenue south of 
Carver Road, noting that a portion of it was located in the County.  
 
Jon Kimoto noted his support for the proposal but voiced his concerns regarding the 
proposed landscaping along 47th Avenue and Estrella Drive. Mr. Kimoto noted the 
slope change from 42nd Avenue and recommended modifications to retain rainwater 
in the landscape area. Mr. Kimoto added that certain vegetation could be utilized to 
prevent trespassing or encampments. Vice Chair Hurd requested Mr. Kimoto be 
added to the meetings between the applicant and residents to discuss landscaping 
along 47th Avenue and Estella Drive.  
 
Applicant Response: 
 
Ms. Riddell reiterated the commitment to continue working with the residents along 
Estrella Drive and 47th Avenue. Ms. Riddell noted that they had previously 
recommended 55th Avenue to become a dead-end street, but the Street 
Transportation Department didn’t support the modification. Ms. Riddell added that they 
could work with the Street Transportation Department on traffic mitigating measures.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 5 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Ms. Riddell stated that Stipulation No. 1.rr referenced shade pockets when adjacent to 
future auto dealerships. Ms. Riddell noted that if an auto dealership was not 
developed, then 75% shade would still be required for public streets. Ms. Riddell 
recommended a stipulation that would require a group of individuals be notified for any 
development within the PUD. Ms. Riddell requested a modification to Stipulation No. 
1.ll that would require 18 inch overhangs and 90-foot-wide lots. Ms. Riddell noted that 
the PUD would already require numerous design standards to reduce heat and light 
pollution.  
 
Committee Discussion: 
 
Chair Abegg noted additional stipulations and asked for the committee’s opinion. 
Chair Abegg added that building setbacks for internal development should be kept at 
the proposed 10 feet. Mrs. Sanchez Luna noted that the stipulation refenced building 
setback between developments to align with resort uses. Ms. Riddell clarified that 
stipulation 1.e would require a larger setback adjacent to South Mountain and that 
there was discussion to add a stipulation to increase internal setbacks but that they 
would not recommend adding the stipulation.  
 
Chair Abegg asked for clarification on multifamily that is required to return through the 
PHO process. Ms. Riddell noted that it would apply to multifamily development over 
40-feet which is allowed in Development Units 2, 5, and 10.  
 
Chair Abegg asked for the open space in Development Unit 8 to be increased to 15% 
to align with the PUD narrative. Ms. Riddell agreed. Chair Abegg requested 
Stipulation No. 1.ll be modified to include 15% and 90-foot average wide lots.  
 
Chair Abegg requested the Community and Economic Development Department 
Director to provide a statement regarding the commercial development.   
 
Christine Mackay, the Community and Economic Development Department Director 
(CED), stated that a hospital would be a long-term asset for the community. Ms. 
Mackay added that to ensure hospital development, less restrictions would be ideal. 
Ms. Mackay cited other hospitals that didn’t have the same restrictions and allowed for 
a maximum height of over 120-feet. Ms. Mackay added that development thrived on 
density and added that the proposed density would allow for a successful hospital and 
resort.  
 
Ms. Perrera asked for more information regarding the demand for a hospital and a 
resort. Ms. Mackay noted that there has been a demand for health care options in the 
Laveen and South Mountain area. Ms. Mackay stated that the proposed resort would 
be a place for wellness with numerous wellness trails, amenities, and services. Ms. 
Perrera asked about the percentage of multifamily and commercial and if it was 
appropriate. Ms. Mackay noted the change in market and the dramatic change in 
population has resulted in a high demand for commercial and residential. Ms. Mackay 
added that the development would connect people within their community.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 6 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Vice Chair Hurd stated that the community has voiced their opposition for the 
proposed auto mall and asked for the benefits of automobile dealerships. Ms. Mackay 
added that the land use would generate less traffic than the average commercial 
development. Ms. Mackay added that new developments of auto malls include 
extensive landscaping and enhanced development standards. Ms. Mackay noted that 
the auto mall would generate revenue for the Laveen community. Vice Chair Hurd 
asked for more information on what occurs in an auto mall. Ms. Mackay noted that a 
lot of commercial uses stay close to the area. Ms. Mackay added that some 
dealerships have begun integrating cafes or restaurants within their auto malls.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor asked for more information on the hospital and asked staff to bring 
up his portion of the presentation. Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that centrally located 
hospitals are taller than those with more land mass. Mr. Nasser-Taylor wanted 
clarification on the height of the proposed hospital compared to the number of beds. 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that a large number of in-patient beds would be required for a 
ten-story hospital. Ms. Mackay noted that a lot of hospitals begin with a few stories 
and increase over time.  
 
Chair Abegg noticed that there were concerns with density and height and asked the 
committee for their opinion. Chair Abegg stated that Stipulation No. 1.ii has the 
maximum number of units. Chair Abegg noted that during the last meeting there was 
discussion to reduce residential to 20% of the site.  
 
Mr. Barraza noted that it was hard to determine what commercial uses are going to be 
developed.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd stated that she wanted everything to be commercial, but that CED 
has indicated that residential uses would be required to support commercial 
development. Vice Chair Hurd asked why there was a discrepancy between the GPA 
and PUD acreage. Ms. Riddell noted that there was a difference in acreage between 
the GPA and the PUD case because of right-of-way dedications.  
 
Chair Abegg suggested 50% reserved for commercial and 50% for residential. Ms. 
Jensen asked for an explanation on the percentage. Chair Abegg stated that they 
added the acreage for the hospital, resort, and auto mall with a portion for other 
commercial uses. Vice Chair Hurd asked what the committee found appropriate.  
 
Chair Abegg noted that they could also discuss the unit count. Ms. Jensen, Mr. 
Barraza, and Mr. Nasser-Taylor stated that a unit count would be a better way to limit 
residential uses. Chair Abegg noted that the developer could build at a higher density 
or a lower density with a unit maximum. Vice Chair Hurd noted that the PUD 
proposed a maximum of 2,200 units and 50% of the land to be dedicated for 
commercial. Ms. Riddell clarified that it would be a maximum of 1,700 with a 500-unit 
bonus if a hospital was built.  
 
Chair Abegg stated her opinion on the percentage and number of units. Chair Abegg

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 7 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
stated that during the last meeting the committee considered reducing the unit cap to 
1,700 which included the bonus. Mr. Nasser-Taylor suggested reducing the unit cap 
to a total of 1,200 including the bonus. Chair Abegg noted that the City Council will 
make the final decision and that the unit maximum or percentage would be continued 
to be discussed throughout the public hearing process.  
 
Ms. Perrera voiced her concerns with modifying the unit maximum and the 
percentage. Chair Abegg stated that the goal would be to ensure maximum 
commercial development. Ms. Perrera suggested modifying the unit cap for the PUD 
based on community discussion. Vice Chair Hurd noted that she would like to lower 
both. Ms. Perrera noted that this could be a continued discussion.  
 
Ms. Perrera asked Committee Member Rouse to voice her opinion on the unit cap. 
Ms. Rouse noted that the unit cap would be easier to track.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd asked how the unit bonus is addressed with the hospital. Ms. 
Mackay noted that CED would be working with the hospital to discuss demand.  
 
Ms. Jensen asked if the additional 500 units would be reserved for hospital staff. Ms. 
Mackay noted that that would be up to the hospital and if the hospital decided to buy 
land for dorm rooms for employees. Ms. Mackay noted that they would not be 
restrictive. Chair Abegg asked if this would be a private developer. Ms. Riddell noted 
that hospitals partner with private developers.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd suggested 200 acres for commercial, 90 acres for residential and 
1,200 units with a 500-unit bonus. Mr. Nasser-Taylor suggested a 250-unit bonus. 
Ms. Mackay noted that hospitals bring hundreds of jobs to an area and there is a need 
for residential units.  
 
Ms. Perrera stated that the referral program for housing doesn’t mean a lower rental 
rate. Ms. Mackay confirmed. Ms. Perrera asked if the 500 units were needed. Ms. 
Mackay stated that hospitals have a high residential demand to provide services 
quickly. Ms. Mackay noted that some rental units could assist patients that needed to 
be close to a hospital. Ms. Perrera noted that she was inclined to keep the 500-unit 
bonus.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor disagreed and noted that the exchange would yield about 800 
units which would be a maximum of 1,300 units.  
 
Ms. Jensen noted that the unit maximum and height restrictions would meet the goals 
of the community rather than land allocation. Ms. Jensen stated that she supported 
1,200 units with a 500-unit bonus. Ms. Mackay noted that acreage is easier to track 
than percentage.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd noted that the concern is density. Ms. Perrera voiced her concern 
with limiting too much residential which would negatively affect commercial

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 8 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
development.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd asked the committee if they agreed to limiting the number of units. 
The committee voiced their agreement.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd asked the committee if they agree to the 1,200-unit cap with a 500-
unit bonus. Mr. Barraza asked if the height limitation would remain the same. Vice 
Chair Hurd confirmed. Mr. Nasser-Taylor voiced his opposition on the proposed 
maximum number of units.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd asked staff if they have all the modification and additional 
stipulations.  
 
Chair Abegg listed the modifications and additional stipulations. Mrs. Sanchez Luna 
noted that if the committee wanted to reduce the maximum number of units, an 
additional stipulation would be required. Ms. Riddell noted that Mr. Bzdel requested 
an average of 90-foot-wide lots for rectangular lots. Chair Abegg noted a modification 
to Stipulation No. 3 regarding unit tracking. Ms. Sanchez Luna asked for clarification. 
Chair Abegg noted that they would modify the stipulation to remove land use tracking. 
Chair Abegg modified Stipulation No. 12 regarding 55th Avenue and Stipulation No. 19 
regarding the development agreement. Chair Abegg noted that the Tierra Montana 
community has voiced concerns with the height in Development Unit 1. Chair Abegg 
requested a modification to require a percentage of Development Unit 1 to be limited 
to 40-feet. Mrs. Sanchez Luna asked if the committee would like to modify it so 50% 
of it would be 40-feet. Chair Abegg clarified that it would be the area that only allows 
40-feet.  
 
Chair Abegg voiced that the community has requested senior living facilities but 
added that it could not be added to the rezoning case. Ms. Riddell noted that there is 
a commitment to provide senior living projects.  
 
Vice Chair Hurd noted that self-service storage should be added to the prohibited list.  
 
Chair Abegg stated that the notification list should include certain members of the 
community and the current committee.  
 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna noted that a modification would be required to Stipulation No. 3 to 
track the percentage of height for Development Unit 1.  
 
Racelle Escolar, staff, added that Stipulation No. 1.e also needed to be modified to 
address self-storage.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor stated that the memo eliminated the sale of one EV line. Chair 
Abegg confirmed that it was removed due to direction received from the Legal 
Department.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 9 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Chair Abegg asked if the agenda had the modified designations to reflect lower 
density residential. Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that the agenda had the proposed land 
use map designations submitted by the applicant. Chair Abegg requested the land 
use map designations be modified to reflect adding designations that include lower 
density residential designations. Mrs. Sanchez Luna noted that they could add 
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre to all 
the areas that allow residential. Chair Abegg asked if they could add Residential 1 to 
2 dwelling units per acre to Development Unit 8. Mrs. Sanchez Luna stated that the 
designation for Development Unit 8 also covered Development Unit 1. Ms. Escolar 
suggested adding Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per 
acre, and 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre to all the designations that allow residential.  
 
Motion:  
Vice Chair Stephanie Hurd motioned to recommend approval, per the staff memo 
dated March 18, 2024, with modifications to: 
• Stipulation No. 1.e to delete self-service storage from the permitted use list; 
• Stipulation No. 1.n to add self-service storage to the prohibited list;  
• Stipulation No. 1.jj to modify Footnote (1) to reduce the maximum number of 
units from 1,700 to 1,200;  
• Stipulation No. 1.nn to update the development standards for Development 
Unit 8 to add that rectangular lots have an average width of 90 feet, replace 
5% open space with 15%, and replace 12-inch overhangs with 18-inch;  
• Stipulation No. 3 to remove land use tracking from the master tracking matrix 
and add height tracking for Development Unit 1;  
• Stipulation No. 12 to add that the developer work with the Street 
Transportation Department to incorporate traffic mitigation measures; and  
• Stipulation No. 19 to require that the developer investigate entering into a 
development agreement with the City regarding public infrastructure. 
 
And to add stipulations for the following: 
• Add a provision in the PUD Narrative to require that a maximum of 50% of 
Development Unit 1 that allows 40 feet in height can be developed up to the 
maximum height of 40 feet; 
• Update Footnote (5) to replace the maximum 1,700 residential units with 
1,200; and  
• Prior to preliminary site plan approval for any development, the developer 
shall notify the following individuals: Phil Hertel, Jon Kimoto, John Bzdel, 
Maria Reagin, Linda Abegg, Stephanie Hurd, Francisco Barraza, JoAnne 
Jensen, Patrick Nasser-Taylor, Carlos Ortega, Rebecca Perrera, and Jennifer 
Rouse.  
 
Jennifer Rouse seconded the motion.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 10 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Substitute Motion:  
Patrick Nasser-Taylor made a substitute motioned to recommend approval, per the 
staff memo dated March 18, 2024, with same modifications and additions from the 
original motion, except to reduce the maximum number of units from 1,700 to 800.  
 
Francisco Barraza seconded the motion.  
 
Mr. Nasser-Taylor noted that with a 47% reduction for residential development results 
in 800 units and that the 500 bonus was required for the hospital.  
 
Mrs. Sanchez Luna asked for clarification if the maximum would be 800 with a 500 
bonus. Mr. Nasser-Taylor confirmed.  
 
Chair Abegg noted that after discussion, she felt comfortable with the 1,200 unit 
maximum with a 500-unit bonus.  
 
Substitute Motion Vote:  
2-6, motion to recommend approval of Z-53-22-8 per the staff memo dated March 18, 
2024, with modifications and additional stipulations fails with Committee Members 
Barraza and Nasser-Taylor in favor and Committee Members Jensen, Ortega, 
Perrera, Rouse, Hurd, and Abegg in opposition.  
 
Vote:  
8-0, motion to recommend approval of Z-53-22-8 per the staff memo dated March 18, 
2024, with modifications and additional stipulations passed with Committee Members 
Barraza, Jensen, Nasser-Taylor, Ortega, Perrera, Rouse, Hurd, and Abegg in favor.  
 
Recommended Stipulations:  
 
1. 
An updated Development Narrative for the Gila Foothills PUD reflecting the 
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning 
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The 
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with Development 
Narrative date stamped February 1, 2024, as modified by the following 
stipulations. 
 
 
 
a.  
Front Cover, add “City Council adopted: [Insert Adoption date]” 
 
 
 
 
b. 
Page 16, Section 3.2 Land Uses Per Development Unit, Permitted 
Land Uses: Add a paragraph under the heading as follows: 
 
All temporary uses shall comply with Section 708 of the Phoenix 
Zoning Ordinance. 
 
 
 
 
c.  
Page 16, Section 3.2 Land Uses Per Development Unit, Permitted 
Land Uses: Add a paragraph under the heading as follows:

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 11 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
The permitted land uses depicted below are restricted to the maximum 
square footage of the land use assumptions established in Appendix 
A2. Land Use Assumptions for Street Master Plan. Each developer 
shall be required to provide an updated land use matrix illustrating 
maximum land use square footages in compliance with Appendix A2. 
Land Use Assumptions for Street Master Plan. Amendments to 
increase these established land use assumptions may be administered 
through a PUD Minor Amendment and shall require an updated Traffic 
Impact Analysis incorporating the increased assumptions. 
 
 
 
 
D.  
PAGE 16, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 1: ADD “SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.” 
 
 
 
 
E. 
PAGE 16, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNITS 2, 3, AND 4A: 
DELETE MODIFY “SELF SERVICE STORAGE (LIMITED TO A 
MAXIMUM TOTAL OF TWO ONE (2 1) ACROSS THE ENTIRE PUD 
SITE WITHIN THE HUB CHARACTER AREA)”. 
 
 
 
 
d. 
F.  
 
Page 16, Section 3.2 Land Uses Per Development Unit, Permitted 
Land Uses, Development Units 2, 3, 4A: Add the following bullet point: 
 
• Hospitals 
o Minimum 100 inpatient beds required TO ACHIEVE THE 
ADDITIONAL 500 UNITS REFERENCED IN THE 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 6: 
MISCELLANEOUS. 
 
 
 
 
G. 
PAGE 20, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 5 AND 6: ADD 
THE FOLLOWING: 
 
• SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IS ALLOWED IN 
DEVELOPMENT UNIT 5. 
 
 
 
 
H. 
PAGE 20, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNITS 8: DELETE “ALL 
TYPES OF OFFICE.” 
 
 
 
 
I.  
PAGE 20, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 8: ADD THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 
• SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 12 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
 
 
J. 
PAGE 20, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNITS 8: ADD THE 
FOLLOWING:  
 
PROFESSIONAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE 
OFFICE USE INCLUDING CLERICAL OR SALES 
REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES. NO COMMODITY OR TANGIBLE 
PERSONAL PROPERTY, EITHER BY WAY OF INVENTORY OR 
SAMPLE, SHALL BE STORED, KEPT, OR EXHIBITED IN ANY SAID 
OFFICE OR ON THE PREMISES WHEREIN THE SAID OFFICE IS 
LOCATED EXCEPT MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH 
PROFESSIONAL OR MEDICAL PRACTICE. SUCH OFFICE USE 
SHALL NOT INCLUDE: 
 
A. BRANCH OFFICES FOR THE FOLLOWING: BANKS, 
BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS, BROKAGE HOUSES, 
SAVINGS AND LOAD ASSOCIATIONS, FINANCE 
COMPANIES, TITLE INSURANCE COMPANIES, TITLE 
INSURANCE COMPANIES AND TRUST COMPANIES.  
 
B. VETERINARY OFFICES.  
 
 
 
 
K. 
PAGE 21, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PERMITTED LAND USES, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 9A: ADD THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 
• SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. 
 
 
 
 
f. 
L.  
Page 21, Section 3.2 Land Uses Per Development Unit, Permitted 
Land Uses, Development Unit 9B: Modify the third bullet point to 
“Alcohol sales as an accessory use.” 
 
 
 
 
e. 
M. 
Page 21, Section 3.2 Land Uses Per Development Unit, Permitted 
Land Uses, Development Units 9A, 9B, and 10: Add a sub-bullet point 
under “Multifamily” as follows: 
 
Only permitted if building permits for a resort have not been issued 
within three FIVE years of the dedication of Gila Foothills Parkway and 
no sooner than five years after the adoption of the PUD. 
 
 
 
 
N. 
PAGE 23, SECTION 3.2 LAND USES PER DEVELOPMENT UNIT, 
PROHIBITED LAND USES, ALL DEVELOPMENT UNITS: ADD 
“SELF SERVICE STORAGE” AND “PAWN SHOPS”.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 13 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
g. 
O. 
Page 25, Section 3.3 Roadway Circulation, 51st Avenue: Remove all 
reference to “half-street improvements” and modify to “full limits” of 
51st Avenue. 
 
 
 
 
h. 
P. 
Page 28, Section 3.3 Roadway Circulation, Exhibit 11 – Conceptual 
Trail Plan: Modify to show the MUT on the south and west sides of Gila 
Foothills Parkway. 
 
 
 
 
i. 
Q. 
Page 28, Section 3.3 Roadway Circulation, Exhibit 11 – Conceptual 
Trail Plan: Remove “or Planned” from the legend heading. 
 
 
 
 
R. 
PAGE 32, EXHIBIT 14, UPDATE TO REFLECT THE UPDATED 
MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED. 
 
 
 
 
S.  
PAGE 39, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 1: BUILDING SETBACKS: 
UPDATE THE SETBACKS FOR DEVELOPMENT UNIT 10 ALONG 
GILA FOOTHILLS PARKWAY TO 25 FEET. 
 
 
 
 
j. 
T. 
Page 39, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 1: Building Setbacks: Add a row to the end of the table for the 
Property Line shared with South Mountain Park; and require a 25 50-
foot setback for Development Units 9A, 9B, and 10. 
 
 
 
 
k. 
U. 
Page 41, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 3: Landscape Buffers, 47th Avenue: Switch the provisions for 
Development Units 9A and 9B. 
 
 
 
 
l. 
V 
Page 41, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 3: Landscape Buffers: Add a row to the end of the table for the 
Property Line shared with South Mountain Park, and require a 25 50-
foot buffer for Development Units 9A, 9B, and 10. Also add a footnote 
to see the South Mountain Perimeter Zone provisions on pages 64 and 
95. 
 
 
 
 
W. 
PAGE 41, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 4: 
BUILDING HEIGHT, UPDATE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 
FOR DEVELOPMENT UNITS 3, 4A, 4B, AND 6 TO ALLOW A 
MAXIMUM OF 40 FEET. 
 
 
 
 
X. 
PAGE 41, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: 
MODIFY FOOTNOTE (1) AS FOLLOWS:  
 
HOSPITAL USES MAY BE UP TO 120 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR UP TO 
20% OF THE AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 14 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
 
 
Y. 
PAGE 41, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ADD 
FOOTNOTE (3) TO APPLY TO DEVELOPMENT UNITS 2, 3, 4A, 4B 
THAT STATES THE FOLLOWING:  
 
PARKING GARAGES ACCESSORY TO AN AUTOMOBILE 
DEALERSHIP MAY BE UP TO 56 FEET IN HEIGHT. 
 
 
 
 
Z. 
PAGE 41, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ADD 
FOOTNOTE (4) TO APPLY TO DEVELOPMENT UNITS 9A, 9B, AND 
10 THAT STATES THE FOLLOWING:  
 
RESORT USES MAY BE UP TO 48 FEET IN HEIGHT, SUBJECT TO 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 5: BUILDING STEP BACK. 
 
 
 
 
AA. 
PAGE 41, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 4: BUILDING HEIGHT: ADD 
A FOOTNOTE TO APPLY TO DEVELOPMENT UNIT 1 THAT 
STATES THE FOLLOWING:  
 
A MAXIMUM OF 50% OF THE AREA THAT ALLOWS 40 FEET IN 
HEIGHT CAN BE DEVELOPED UP TO THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 
40 FEET.  
 
 
 
 
AA. 
BB. 
 
PAGE 42, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 5: BUILDING STEP BACK: 
UPDATE THE FIRST COLUMN REFERENCING THE PROPERTY 
LINE SHARED WITHIN TIERRA MONTANA AS FOLLOWS:  
 
PROPERTY LINE SHARED WITH (OR MEASURED FROM) TIERRA 
MONTANA NEIGHBORHOOD 
 
 
 
 
m. 
BB. 
CC. 
Page 42, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 5: Building Step Backs, Gila Foothills Parkway and 51st Ave: 
Switch the provisions for Development Unit 6. 
 
 
 
 
n. 
CC. 
DD. 
Page 42, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 5: Building Step Backs: Add the following to the end of Footnote 
(3): 
 
An additional foot of height will be allowed for every two additional feet 
of setback. 
 
 
 
 
DD. 
PAGE 42, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 15 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
EE. 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 5: BUILDING STEP BACK: 
ADD FOOTNOTE (7) TO DEVELOPMENT UNIT 2 THAT STATES 
THE FOLLOWING WITHIN THE “PROPERTY LINE SHARED WITH 
(OR MEASURED FROM) TIERRA MONTANA NEIGHBORHOOD” 
ROW IN THE TABLE:  
 
56-FOOT MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WITHIN 900 FEET OF THE 
TIERRA MONTANA NEIGHBORHOOD. 
 
 
 
 
EE. 
FF. 
PAGE 43, SECTION 4, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 6: MISCELLANEOUS, 
MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, DEVELOPMENT UNIT 8: 
UPDATE THE DENSITY TO 14 DU/AC; AND 2.34 DU/ACRE FOR 
THE FIRST 500 FEET; AND A FOOTNOTE THAT STATES THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 
THE FIRST 500 FEET IS MEASURED FROM BOTH ESTRELLA 
DRIVE AND 47TH AVENUE TO CREATE AN “L” SHAPED 
DEVELOPMENT AREA. SEE DEVELOPMENT UNIT 8 DENSITY 
EXHIBIT AND TABLE 7 FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 
STANDARDS.   
 
 
 
 
p. 
FF. 
GG. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 6: Miscellaneous: Delete the row for Maximum Number of Units. 
 
 
 
 
q. 
GG. 
HH. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, DEVELOPMENT 
STANDARDS TABLE 6: Miscellaneous Table, Parking Standards, first 
bullet: Add “model” to the end. DELETE THE FIRST BULLET 
REGARDING THE SALE OF EV OR HYBRID AUTOMOBILES. 
 
 
 
 
r. 
HH. 
II. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, DEVELOPMENT 
STANDARDS TABLE 6: Miscellaneous Table, Parking Standards, 
fourth bullet: Remove “not to exceed 10 chargers.” 
 
 
 
 
s. 
II. 
JJ. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 6: Miscellaneous, Footnotes: Modify the end of Footnote (1) to 
add the following AS FOLLOWS: 
 
THE ENTIRE OVERALL PUD SITE MAY BE DEVELOPED WITH A 
MAXIMUM OF 1,700 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. HOTEL GUEST 
ROOMS DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS THE MAXIMUM 1,700 1,200 
DWELLING UNITS FOR THE OVERALL PUD SITE. UPON 
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OF A LEVEL 1 TRAUMA CENTER 
HOSPITAL, AS DEFINED BY THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF 
HEALTH SERVICES, IN DEVELOPMENT UNIT 2 AN ADDITIONAL

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 16 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
500 DWELLING UNITS ABOVE THE 1,700 1,200 CAP ARE 
PERMITTED WITH DEVELOPMENT UNITS 2 AND 5. Additional 
review and approval is required for the additional 500 units ANY 
MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPMENT UNITS 2, 5 AND 
10 THAT EXCEEDS 40 FEET IN HEIGHT, per Z-53-22-8 stipulation. 
 
 
 
 
KK. 
PAGE 43, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 6: MISCELLANEOUS, 
FOOTNOTE (5): UPDATE TO REPLACE MAXIMUM 1,700 
RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH 1,200.  
 
 
 
 
o. 
JJ. 
LL. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 6: Miscellaneous, Maximum Residential Density: Add Footnote 
(2) to Development Unit 2. 
 
 
 
 
t. 
Page 43, Section 4. Development Standards, Development Standards 
Table 6: Miscellaneous, Footnotes, add Footnote (6) that states the 
following and apply it to Development Units 9A, 9B, and 10: 
 
Additional review and approval is required for any multifamily 
development that is not associated with a resort per Z-53-22-8 
stipulation. 
 
 
 
 
KK. 
MM. 
PAGE 43, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 6: MISCELLANEOUS, 
FOOTNOTES: ADD A FOOTNOTE THAT STATES THE FOLLOWING 
AND APPLY IT TO DEVELOPMENT UNITS 9A, 9B AND 10: 
 
FOR ANY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH 
A RESORT ON DEVELOPMENT UNITS 9A, 9B AND 10, 
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND LANDSCAPE 
PLANS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE 
PLANNING HEARING OFFICER THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING 
PROCESS, INCLUDING REVIEW BY THE LAVEEN VILLAGE 
PLANNING COMMITTEE PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 
APPROVAL. THIS IS A LEGISLATIVE REVIEW FOR CONCEPTUAL 
PURPOSES ONLY. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND 
REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING 
HEARING OFFICER AND THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 
DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
 
 
LL. 
NN. 
PAGE 43, SECTION 4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ADD 
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 7: DEVELOPMENT 
STANDARDS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THIS TABLE 
WILL ADDRESS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 
STANDARDS TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 17 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
• SELECT R1-18 LOT STANDARDS 
• RESTRICTED TO 1-STORY AND 22 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR 
THE LOTS ALONG ESTRELLA DRIVE AND 47TH AVENUE. 
ALL THE INTERIOR LOTS ARE ALLOWED TO BE 2-STORIES 
WITH UP TO 30 FEET IN HEIGHT. 
• RECTANGULAR LOTS SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE LOT 
WIDTH OF 90 FEET. 
• MINIMUM 22-FOOT-LONG DRIVEWAYS 
• MINIMUM 5 15% OPEN SPACE.   
• MINIMUM ROOF OVERHANG OF 12 18 INCHES.  
 
 
 
 
MM. 
OO. 
PAGE 43-44, SECTION 4, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ADD 
DEVELOPMENT UNIT 8 DENSITY EXHIBIT TO VISUALLY 
DEMONSTRATE THE “L” SHAPED AREA MEASURED 500 FEET 
FROM BOTH ESTRELLA DRIVE AND 47TH AVENUE. 
 
 
 
 
u. 
NN. 
PP. 
Page 45, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards, 
Landscape Standards Table 1: Landscape Setbacks: Update title to  
Landscape Standards Table 1: Landscape Plant Types. 
 
 
 
 
v. 
OO. 
QQ. 
Page 46, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards, 
Landscape Standards Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W 
Planting: Modify the title to “Landscape Standards Table 2: Enhanced 
Streetscape R.O.W. Planting and Public Shade Standards”. 
 
 
 
 
w. 
PP. 
RR. 
Page 46, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards 
Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W Planting: Revise sidewalk 
shading to show all sidewalk shading in the Hub Character Area to no 
less than 50%. 
 
 
 
 
x.  
QQ. 
SS. 
Page 46, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards 
Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W Planting, Notes, fifth bullet 
(Shade Pockets): Add the following as a sub-bullet point: 
 
All public sidewalks adjacent to Automobile Dealership, Automobile 
Retail Sales, and Automobile Rental: A minimum 25% shade is 
required along sidewalk areas located between shade pockets. Overall 
shade coverage shall equal a total of 50% inclusive of shade pockets 
and the intermittent areas between shade pockets. All other uses 
within the HUB character area shall require a minimum 75% shade of 
public sidewalks. 
 
 
 
 
y. 
RR. 
Page 46, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards 
Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W Planting: Add a note as

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 18 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
TT. 
follows: 
 
Upon redevelopment of a site formerly used for Automobile 
Dealership, Automobile Retail Sales, or Automobile Rental into Non-
Automobile Dealership, Automobile Retail Sales, or Automobile Rental, 
right-of-way landscaping and shade requirements shall meet the 75% 
shade standard. 
 
 
 
 
z. 
SS. 
UU. 
Page 46-47, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape 
Standards Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W Planting: Add a 
footnote to apply to all provisions for medians as follows: 
 
All modified median landscaping deviating from City of Phoenix 
standard landscape requirements shall be privately maintained and 
identified on the approved master street plan and associated plats. 
 
 
 
 
aa. 
TT. 
VV. 
Page 47, Section 4. Development Standards, Landscape Standards 
Table 2: Enhanced Streetscape R.O.W Planting: Add a footnote to 
apply to Development Units 3, 6, and 4A as follows: 
 
51st Avenue, SOUTH OF ESTRELLA DRIVE, is located within 
Maricopa County jurisdiction. Any street improvements or landscaping 
on 51st Avenue are subject to the review and approval of Maricopa 
County. 
 
 
 
 
bb. 
UU. 
WW. 
Page 50, Section 5. Signage, Off Premise Signage: Update the end of 
the second bullet point as follows: 
 
…design to be presented for review and comment to the Laveen 
Village Planning Committee. 
 
 
 
 
cc. 
VV. 
XX. 
Page 52, Section 6. Sustainability: Add a provision for recycling as the 
last bullet point. 
 
 
 
 
WW. 
YY. 
PAGE 52, SECTION 6, SUSTAINABILITY: 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) 
UPDATE THE LAST SENTENCE IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH 
AS FOLLOWS:  
 
DEVELOPMENT PARCELS MUST INCORPORATE ALL THE 
FOLLOWING SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2) 
ADD BULLET POINTS 2, 6, 9, AND 14 UNDER THE 
REQUIRED SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 19 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(3) 
AFTER THE REQUIRED SUSTAINABILITY ITEMS, ADD THE 
FOLLOWING:  
 
A MINIMUM OF THREE OPTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY 
PRINCIPLES SHALL BE SELECTED FROM THE OPTIONS 
BELOW, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND 
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4) 
ADD THE REMAINING SUSTAINABILITY ITEMS (BULLET 
POINTS 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16) UNDER THE 
OPTIONAL SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES, AND INCLUDE 
UPGRADED HVAC UNITS AT 15 SEER OR HIGHER. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5) 
UPDATE BULLET POINT 14 AS FOLLOWS: 
 
THE DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE SAFE, RELIABLE, AND 
EFFICIENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THAT 
PROTECT BOTH HUMAN HEALTH AND THE NATURAL 
ENVIRONMENT.  
 
 
 
 
 
dd. 
XX. 
ZZ. 
Page 57, Section 7. Complete Streets, Design for Safety: Remove the 
second and third paragraphs. 
 
 
 
 
YY. 
AAA. 
PAGE 69, PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, FOOTHILLS 
CHARACTER AREA, 2.1 SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN, C. 
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND CHARACTER: ADD A BULLET TO 
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 
 
BUILDING FAÇADES ON ALL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 
FACING PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT EXCEEDS 
75 FEET IN LENGTH, SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF ONE 
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENT AND DETAILING SUCH AS 
TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS, RECESSES, 
WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND 
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES EVERY 75 LINEAR FEET. 
 
 
 
 
ZZ. 
BBB. 
PAGE 86 PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, FOOTHILLS 
CHARACTER AREA, 2.3 LANDSCAPING, B. SITE WALLS, 
SCREENS, AND FENCES: UPDATE THIS SECTION TO REQUIRE 
THE FOLLOWING ALONG ESTRELLA DRIVE AND 47TH AVENUE: 
6-FOOT PAINTED CMU PERIMETER WALLS AND TUBULAR MILD 
STEEL OR PIPE FENCING (ALLOWED TO TARNISH/RUST 
NATURALLY), IMPLEMENTED IN SEGMENTS THAT CONFORM TO 
INDUSTRY STANDARD LENGTHS.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 20 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
 
 
AAA. 
CCC. 
PAGE 92, PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, FOOTHILLS 
CHARACTER AREA, 2.3 LANDSCAPING, G. GENERAL 
LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: ADD THE FOLLOWING: 
 
LOWER-LEVEL LANDSCAPING IS PREFERRED BETWEEN ANY 
PERIMETER WALLS AND A POSSIBLE BRIDLEPATH ALONG 47TH 
AVENUE. 
 
 
 
 
BBB. 
DDD. 
PAGE 93, PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, FOOTHILLS 
CHARACTER AREA, 2.3 LANDSCAPING, I. SITE LIGHTING: ADD 
THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH: 
 
IF PRIVATE STREETS ARE PROPOSED IN SINGLE-FAMILY 
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS, MINIMAL STREET LIGHTING SHALL 
BE CONSIDERED. 
 
 
 
 
ee. 
CCC. 
EEE. 
 
Page 95, Foothills Character Area, 2.3 Landscaping, j. Perimeter 
Treatments, South Mountain Perimeter Treatment: Delete the last 
paragraph. 
 
 
 
 
DDD. 
FFF. 
PAGE 99, PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, DISTRICT CHARACTER 
AREA, 3.1 SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN, C. ARCHITECTURAL 
STYLE AND CHARACTER: ADD A BULLET TO INCLUDE THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 
BUILDING FAÇADES ON ALL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 
FACING PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT EXCEEDS 
75 FEET IN LENGTH, SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF ONE 
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENT AND DETAILING SUCH AS 
TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS, RECESSES, 
WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND 
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES EVERY 75 LINEAR FEET. 
 
 
 
 
ff. 
EEE. 
GGG. 
Page 103, The District Character Area, 3.1 Site and Building Design, 
2. Circulation: Remove Section 2.b. 
 
 
 
 
FFF. 
HHH. 
PAGE 123, PART 2 - DESIGN GUIDELINES, HUB CHARACTER 
AREA, 1. SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN, B. ARCHITECTURAL 
STYLE AND CHARACTER: ADD A BULLET TO INCLUDE THE 
FOLLOWING: 
 
BUILDING FAÇADES ON ALL MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, 
FACING PUBLICLY DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT EXCEEDS

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 21 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
75 FEET IN LENGTH, SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF ONE 
ARCHITECTURAL EMBELLISHMENT AND DETAILING SUCH AS 
TEXTURAL CHANGES, PILASTERS, OFFSETS, RECESSES, 
WINDOW FENESTRATION, SHADOW BOXES AND 
OVERHEAD/CANOPIES EVERY 75 LINEAR FEET. 
 
 
 
 
gg. 
GGG. 
III. 
 
Page 142, The Hub Character Area, 2. Circulation, C. Street Design 
and Landscape Character, Shade Pockets: Update Exhibit H9 to 
reflect the minimum 25% shade along sidewalk areas between shade 
pockets and overall shade coverage to total 50% and all uses within 
the HUB to a minimum 75% shade as required by Stipulation No. 1.y 
SS. 
 
 
 
 
hh. 
HHH. 
JJJ. 
 
Page 143, The Hub Character Area, 2. Circulation, C. Street Design 
and Landscape Character, Shade Pockets, Conceptual Shade Pocket 
Detail A, B1, and B2: Update Detail A, B1, and B2 to reflect the 
required shading requirements per Stipulation No. 1.y SS. 
 
 
 
 
ii. 
III. 
KKK. 
Update all exhibits to include the 55th Avenue connection from the 
existing northern stub to Estrella Avenue. 
 
 
 
 
jj. 
JJJ. 
LLL. 
Submit legal descriptions for all development units as an appendix to 
the PUD narrative. 
 
 
 
 
KKK. 
MMM. 
UPDATE ANY TYPOGRAPHICAL OR SCRIVENER’S ERRORS 
THROUGHOUT. 
 
 
 
2.  
Where additional review and approval is required in the PUD narrative related 
to the additional 500 residential dwelling units granted with the construction of 
a hospital and ANY MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPMENT 
UNITS 2, 5 and 10 THAT EXCEEDS 40 FEET IN HEIGHT any multifamily 
development in Development Units 9A, 9B, and 10, that is not associated with 
a resort, SHALL HAVE conceptual site plans, elevations, and landscape plans 
shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Hearing Officer through the 
public hearing process, including review by Laveen Village Planning 
Committee prior to preliminary site plan approval. This is a legislative review for 
conceptual purposes only. Specific development standards and requirements 
will be determined by the Planning Hearing Officer and the Planning and 
Development Department. 
 
 
3.  
A Master LAND USE HEIGHT AND Density Tracking Matrix shall be provided 
and updated on all site plan submittals, REGARDLESS OF USE, to track the 
number of units AND PERCENTAGE OF LAND USE within the PUD area 
AND THE BUILDING HEIGHT WITHIN DEVELOPMENT UNIT 1.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 22 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE PUD SITE AREA (288.63 ACRES) SHALL BE 
DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL USES. ANY RESORT DEVELOPMENT 
SHALL BE CONSIDERED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. UPON 
RESUBMITTAL OF A POST-COUNCIL HEARING DRAFT OF THE PUD 
NARRATIVE, A MASTER LAND USE HEIGHT AND DENSITY TRACKING 
MATRIX FORMAT SHALL BE ADDED AS AN APPENDIX. 
 
 
4. 
 
The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) to the City for this 
development and update the existing Tierra Montana Master Street Plans 
associated with the Segment Two development area. The TIA shall be 
submitted to ADOT and MCDOT for interagency review. No preliminary 
approval of plans shall be granted until the study is reviewed and approved by 
the City. 
 
 
5. 
 
The developer shall update the existing Tierra Montana Master Street Plan for 
inclusion of Segment Two network. Phasing sheet to be updated to include 
roadway networks to be completed by Segment Two development within 
existing Segment One as per the required updated Traffic Impact Analysis. 
Roadways located within Segment two that are not under the jurisdiction of the 
City of Phoenix shall require review and approval with the corresponding 
jurisdiction. 
 
 
6. 
 
The developer shall design and install, at their expense, traffic signals and or 
roundabouts at locations approved by the TIA and updated Master Street Plan. 
The developer shall be responsible for the construction and/or escrow 
contribution, as approved by the TIA and Master Street Plans. Stipulation 
subject to change based on TIA comments for signal location evaluation and 
funding responsibility.    
 
 
7. 
 
The developer shall dedicate and construct roadway, paving, curb, gutter, 
detached sidewalk, traffic signal infrastructure, and other necessary incidentals 
for all arterial and collector roadways as per the approved TIA and Master 
Street Plan. 
 
 
8. 
 
The developer shall provide access control at locations in accordance with the 
City’s Design Standards Manual and/or as approved per the Master Street 
Plan. 
 
 
9. 
 
The full limits of 51st Avenue shall be dedicated and constructed north of 
Estrella Drive to Carver Road, per the cross-section approved in the master 
street plan. 
 
 
10. 
 
The full limits of 51st Avenue shall be dedicated and constructed south of 
Estrella Drive, as approved by Maricopa County. Should 51st Avenue be 
annexed into the City of Phoenix, right-of-way dedications and improvements 
shall be required to meet City of Phoenix standards.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 23 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
11. 
 
Right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the west side of 47th 
Avenue, as required by the approved master street plans. SHOULD A 
REQUEST BE SUBMITTED TO ABANDON 47TH AVE, IT SHALL BE 
CONSIDERED THROUGH A FORMAL HEARING PROCESS PRIOR TO OR 
CONCURRENT WITH THE TIA AND APPROVED MASTER STREET PLAN. 
 
 
12. 
 
A minimum 60-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for the 
full limits of 55th Avenue. THE DEVELOPER SHALL WORK WITH THE 
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TO INCORPORATE TRAFFIC 
MITIGATION MEASURES.  
 
 
13. 
 
All modified median landscaping deviating from City of Phoenix standard 
landscape requirements shall be privately maintained and identified on the 
approved master street plan and associated plats. 
 
 
14. 
 
A minimum 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated 
on the east side of 51st Avenue, south of Estrella Drive. Construction of the 
multi-use trail shall be to City standards. 
 
 
15. 
 
A minimum 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated 
on the north side of Estrella Drive, WEST OF 51ST AVENUE. Construction of 
the multi-use trail shall be to City standards. 
 
 
16. 
 
A minimum 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated 
on the south and west sides of Gila Foothills Parkway, as depicted on Exhibit 
11 – Conceptual Trail Plan. Construction of the multi-use trail shall be to City 
standards. 
 
 
17. 
 
A minimum 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated 
on the north side of 55th Avenue, connecting to 51st Avenue. Construction of 
the multi-use trail shall be to City standards. 
 
 
18. 
 
The developer shall convey land, if necessary, located at the end of Gila 
Foothills Parkway as a trailhead to South Mountain Preserve, as modified and 
approved by the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and 
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property 
to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed 
upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and Planning 
and Development Department.  
 
 
19. 
 
The developer shall INVESTIGATE enterING into a development agreement 
with the City regarding the location and construction of a parking lot for the 
trailhead at the end of Gila Foothills Parkway, as approved or modified by 
the Parks and Recreation Department and Planning and Development 
Department PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 24 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
 
 
20. 
 
The developer shall underground existing electrical utilities within the public 
right-of-way that are impacted or require relocation, excluding 69kv or larger, 
as part of this project. The developer shall coordinate with the affected utility 
companies for their review and permitting. 
 
 
21. 
 
Existing irrigation facilities along all public streets are to be undergrounded and 
relocated outside of City right-of-way, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY 
THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. Contact SRP to identify 
existing land rights and establish the appropriate process to relocate the 
facility. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer require 
completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval, or as 
approved by the Planning and Development Department. 
 
 
22. 
ALL MAJOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS 
PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION, SUBJECT TO A 
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PHOENIX AND AN 
UPDATED STREETS MASTER PLAN, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: 51ST 
AVENUE FROM THE LOOP 202 FREEWAY ON THE SOUTH TO CARVER 
ROAD; GILA FOOTHILLS PARKWAY; ESTRELLA DRIVE FROM THE LOOP 
202 FREEWAY ON THE WEST TO 47TH AVENUE; 47THE AVENUE 
ADJACENT TO THE SITE (UNLESS ABANDONED); AND 55TH AVENUE AS 
REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX. THIS WILL ALSO INCLUDE ANY 
REQUIRED WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE. 
 
 
23. 
THE PROPOSED “COUNTY LANE” SHALL BE SHIFTED SO AS NOT TO 
DIRECTLY ALIGN WITH THE FRONT ENTRY OF ANY EXISTING 
RESIDENTIAL HOMES. THE FINAL LOCATION SHALL BE DETERMINED AT 
THE TIME OF MASTER STREET PLAN, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING 
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND THE STREET 
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT. 
 
 
22. 
24. 
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the 
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, 
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by 
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply 
with all ADA accessibility standards. 
 
 
23. 
25. 
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
 
24. 
26. 
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the 
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified 
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 25 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations. 
 
 
25. 
27. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
 
26. 
28. 
Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County 
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning 
application file for record. 
 
 
29. 
THE PROPERTY OWNER, OR DESIGNEE, SHALL PROVIDE ANNUAL 
LAND DEVELOPMENT UPDATES ON THE STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT 
WITHIN THE PUD TO THE LAVEEN VILLAGE PLANNING COMMITTEE 
UNTIL ALL LAND IN THE HUB CHARACTER AREA AND DEVELOPMENT 
UNITS 9A AND 9B HAVE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL.   
 
 
30. 
PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY 
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PUD, THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE 
FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS: 
 
PHIL HERTEL 
2845 W. BROADWAY ROAD 
PHOENIX, AZ 85041 
 
JON KIMOTO  
3216 W. ANSELL ROAD  
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
JOHN BZDEL 
12120 S. 39TH AVENUE  
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
MARIA REAGIN  
4131 W. CALLE POCO 
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
LINDA ABEGG  
5407 W. WINSTON DRIVE  
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
STEPHANIE HURD  
10207 S. 47TH AVENUE 
LAVEEN, AZ 85339

Laveen Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-53-22-8 
March 18, 2024 
Page 26 of 26 
 
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
FRANCISCO BARRAZA  
4152 W. ALLEN STREET 
LAVEEN, AZ  85339 
 
JOANNE JENSEN  
8303 S. 17TH DRIVE 
PHOENIX, AZ 85041 
 
PATRICK NASSER-TAYLOR  
11024 S. 56TH LANE 
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
CARLOS ORTEGA  
7006 S. 40TH LANE 
PHOENIX, AZ 85041 
 
REBECCA PERRERA  
7914 S. 73RD LANE 
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
JENNIFER ROUSE  
4821 W. ELLIS STREET 
LAVEEN, AZ 85339 
 
Staff comments regarding VPC Recommendation:  
 
Staff recommends that Stipulation No. 1.AA be clarified that 50% of the area within 
Development Unit 1 which permits 40 feet in height be permitted 40 feet, and the 
remaining 50% be limited to a maximum of 30 feet in height.  
 
Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1.Z be modified to remove Development Unit 10, 
which already has a maximum height of 56 feet.  
 
Staff recommends that Stipulation No. 1.JJ and 2 be modified to remove the first 
reference to Development Unit 10, as any multifamily development not associated with 
the resort, regardless of height, is subject to additional review and approval per 
Stipulation No. 1.MM.