Attachment B - Staff Report - Z-77-22-8.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
49994 characters
*REVISED
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Laveen Village Planning Committee
Meeting Date:
June 10, 2023
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
August 3, 2023
Request From:
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) (7.68 acres)
Request To:
R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) (7.68
acres)
Proposal:
Single-family residential
Location:
Approximately 40 feet north of the northwest
corner of 27th Avenue and Harvest Groves
Lane
Owner:
27 Southern, LLC
Applicant:
Equity Connect Holdings, LLC
Representative:
Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell LLC
Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map
Designation
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre
Street Map
Classification
27th Avenue
Arterial
33-foot west half street
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The proposal is consistent with other single-family uses in the area. The development
will incorporate open space areas and enhanced landscaping, which will mirror existing
residential properties and respect local conditions.
ATTACHMENT B
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 2 of 12
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CERTAINTY AND CHARACTER; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Create new
development or redevelopment that is sensitive to the scale and character of the
surrounding neighborhoods and incorporates adequate development standards to
prevent negative impact(s) on the residential properties.
As stipulated, the proposed development will incorporate appropriate development
standards that will mitigate impacts to adjacent residential uses. These standards will
include enhanced landscape setbacks and planting standards.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development
and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The development, as stipulated, will provide a large open space buffer internal to the site.
The shade trees, as stipulated, will help encourage walking by providing a thermally
comfortable environment for pedestrians.
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Laveen Southwest Growth Study: Background Item No. 6.
Housing Phoenix Plan: Background Item No. 7.
Tree and Shade Master Plan: Background Item No. 8.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: Background Item No. 9.
Zero Waste PHX: Background Item No. 10.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use
Zoning
On Site
Vacant land
S-1
North
Ranch or farm residence
S-1 and County RU-43
South
Single-family residential, event venue
MUA
East (across 27th
Avenue)
Single-family residential
R1-8
West
Single-family residential
R1-8
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 3 of 12
R1-8 Single-Family Residence District
(Planned Residential Development Option)
Standards
Requirements
Provisions on the
Proposed site Plan
Gross Acreage
-
7.68 acres
Maximum Total Number of
Units
34, 42 with bonus
36 (Met)
Maximum Density (dwelling
unit/acre)
4.5; 5.5 with bonus
4.7 (Met)
Minimum Lot Width
45 feet
45 feet (Met)
Minimum Lot Depth
None, 110 feet adjacent
to a freeway or arterial
110 feet (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage
40%, up to 50% including
attached shade
structures
40% (Met)
Maximum Building Height
2 stories and 30 feet
(3 stories not exceeding
30 feet, when approved
by the design advisor for
demonstrating enhanced
architecture)
2 stories and 26 feet (Met)
MINIMUM PERIMETER BUILDING SETBACKS
North (Rear)
Property line: 15 feet
(1-story), 20 feet (2-story)
+20 feet (Met)
South (Rear)
Property line: 15 feet
(1-story), 20 feet (2-story)
+60 feet (Met)
East (Side)
Street side: 15 feet (in
addition to landscape
setback);
+15 feet (Met)
East (Side)
Property line: 10 feet
(1-story), 15 feet (2-story)
+15 feet (Met)
West (Side)
Property line: 10 feet (1-
story), 20 feet (2-story)
+20 feet (Met)
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 4 of 12
MINIMUM INTERIOR BUILDING SETBACKS
Front
10 feet
22 feet (Met)
Sides
Street side: 10 feet
Other: per building code
Not specified
Rear
Per building code
Not specified
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND OPEN SPACE STANDARDS
Adjacent to street (27th
Avenue)
15 feet average, 10 feet
minimum
+275 feet (Met)
Minimum Common Area
5% of gross site area
14.7% (Met)
*Variance or Site Plan modification needed.
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1.
This request is to rezone 7.68 acres located approximately 40 feet north of the
northwest corner of 27th Avenue and Harvest Groves Lane from S-1 (Ranch or
Farm Residence) to R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) to allow for a single-
family residential development. The subject site is currently vacant and
undeveloped.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2.
The requested R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District) will support additional
housing within the Laveen Village. The proposal is adjacent to 27th Avenue, an
existing arterial road. The properties to the north are zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) and County RU-43 and are developed with large lot single-family
residences. East, across 27th Avenue, and west of the subject site is zoned R1-
8 (Single-Family Residence District) and are developed with single-family
residences. Finally, south of the subject site is zoned MUA (Mixed Use
Agricultural District) and developed with a single-family residence and an event
venue.
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 5 of 12
Existing Zoning Aerial Map
Source: Planning and Development Department
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
3.
The subject site, as well as the surrounding area to the north and south are
designated Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre. The area to the east,
across 27th Avenue, is designated Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre.
Further east, the designation changes to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per
acre.
The area to the west is designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre.
The proposal is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map however, a
General Plan amendment is not required.
General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 6 of 12
PROPOSAL
4.
Site Plan
The conceptual site plan, attached as an exhibit, proposes 36 single-family
detached homes with access from 27th Avenue. The current site plan does not
meet current street design standards required by the Phoenix City Code. As a
result, staff does not recommend stipulating general conformance to the
submitted site plan. To ensure the proposed development is compatible with the
surrounding land uses, staff is recommending a stipulation to allow a maximum
of 36 lots. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 2. The conceptual site plan
depicts a 60-foot-wide open space area located on the south portion of the
subject site. To be compatible with the large lot single-family subdivision to the
south, staff is recommending Stipulation No. 3 to ensure a large open space
buffer as shown on the site plan. Furthermore, the open space buffer shall be
planted with a minimum of 25 percent 2-inch caliper trees and 75 percent 3-inch
caliper trees. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4. Finally, staff is
recommending Stipulation No. 5 to ensure a 22-foot-long garage setback
measured from the back of the sidewalk. This will prevent larger vehicles from
obstructing internal sidewalks and create a safer pedestrian environment.
5.
Elevations
The conceptual building elevations, attached as an exhibit, depict one-story and
two-story residential buildings with a maximum height of approximately 26 feet to
the top of the roof pitch. The residential building elevations also depict pitched
shingle roofs, various window sizes, wooden fascia, and stucco exteriors. To be
compatible with the agrarian heritage of the Laveen Village, staff recommends
Stipulation No. 1 which requires that the elevation contain elements of modern
farmhouse architecture.
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 7 of 12
PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITIATIVES
6.
Laveen Southwest Growth Study:
The site is located within the
boundaries of the Laveen Southwest
Growth Study, which was developed
in 1997 to analyze the existing
conditions of the Laveen Village and
provide a land use and design
planning framework to help shale the
growth that Laveen was starting to
experience, while accounting for
newly annexed farmland as well as
the future development of the South
Mountain Freeway Loop, which has
since been completed. This plan
designates the project site as 0 to 1
dwelling units per acre. Although not
consistent with the designation,
recent land use trends in the area,
including the development to the
south and single-family uses to the
east and west, point to a land use
mix that supports single-family
residential.
Laveen Southwest Growth Study Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department
The Laveen Southwest Growth Study also outlines specific design policies and
standards for various types of development that will enhance Laveen’s built
environment while remaining respectful to its agricultural heritage. The study
encourages all new development to use durable, high quality building materials
and to provide enhanced building design that will contribute to the character of
the area. The proposal will incorporate architectural features that reflect a
modern farmhouse design (Stipulation No. 1) and a large open space area
(Stipulation No. 3) to contribute to the character of the area.
7.
Housing Phoenix Plan:
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing.
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 8 of 12
The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will
address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using underutilized land
in a more sustainable fashion.
8.
Tree and Shade Master Plan:
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help create walkable streets and
vibrant pedestrian places. Staff recommends the open space buffer to be planted
with a minimum of 25 percent 2-inch caliper trees and 75 percent 3-inch caliper
trees. This will not only create a buffer between the existing single-family
subdivision to the south but would promote shade and vegetation to reduce the
urban heat island effect. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.
9.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles:
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. To provide a safe pedestrian
environment staff is recommending internal detached sidewalks throughout the
entire development. Furthermore, the detached sidewalks would have a
landscape curb planted with two-inch caliper trees and achieve a minimum 75
percent live coverage groundcover. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.
10.
Zero Waste PHX:
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Recycling service is
provided by the City of Phoenix to single-family residential developments.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
*11.
At the time this staff report was written, staff has received one SEVEN letter
LETTERS of opposition. The stated concerns were traffic congestion,
EMERGENCY SERVICES, SAFETY, traffic noise, and loss of the rural
character.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
12.
Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department commented that the proposed site plan
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 9 of 12
does not meet current street design standards per the Phoenix City Code, so
general conformance of the site plan was not recommended. The Street
Transportation Department also requested that the west half of 27th Avenue be
rededicated and approved by Maricopa County. Furthermore, any street
improvements conducted along 27th Avenue shall be reviewed and approved by
Maricopa County and the approval shall be provided prior to preliminary site plan
approval. Finally, all streets shall be constructed with all required elements and
to ADA requirements as approved by Maricopa County. These are addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 7 through 9.
13.
Aviation Department
The City of Phoenix Aviation Department has indicated that due to the proximity
of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport, the property owner shall record documents
that disclose the existence and operations of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to
any future owners or tenants. The documents shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Attorney. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 10.
OTHER
14.
The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive.
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
Nos. 11 through 13.
15.
Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan
approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 14.
16.
The developer shall provide a hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of offsite storm water
flows, when present, at the time of preliminary site plan submittal for verification
of required infrastructure in regard to lot space and density.
17.
Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 10 of 12
Findings
1.
The proposal will develop vacant property and provide a high quality single-family
residential development adjacent to an arterial street and help alleviate the
housing shortage in Phoenix.
2.
The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result in a
more walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment. The development
will provide increased shade which will help to reduce the urban heat island
effect.
3.
The stipulated landscaping and planting standards are above the required
minimum standards and will make the development compatible with the
surrounding land uses.
Stipulations
1.
All building elevations shall contain architectural features that reflect modern
farmhouse architecture including, but not limited to, detailing such as pitched
roofs, variation in window size, overhang canopies and exterior accent materials
such as board and batten siding, stone, brick veneer, and carriage style garage
doors, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
2.
The project shall not exceed 36 lots.
3.
A minimum 60-foot-wide open space buffer shall be provided along the south
perimeter of the site.
4.
The open space buffer along the south perimeter of the site shall be planted
with minimum 25% 2-inch caliper and minimum 75% 3-inch caliper large
canopy, drought tolerant trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent
groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5.
A minimum 22-foot garage setback for front-loaded garages, measured from the
back of sidewalk, shall be provided for each home in the development, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
6.
A minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and a minimum 5-foot-wide
landscape strip between the back of curb and sidewalk shall be provided within
as obtaining a use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning
district. Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 11 of 12
the development, planted to the following standards and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
a. Minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant, large canopy, single-trunk
shade trees planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings.
b. Drought-tolerant shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers to achieve
a minimum of 75 percent live coverage at maturity.
Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on an alternative design solution consistent with a
pedestrian environment.
7.
A total of 65 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the west half of 27th
Avenue or as approved by Maricopa County.
8.
Street improvements to 27th Avenue are outside of Phoenix City Limits and
shall be reviewed and approved by Maricopa County. Documentation of the
county review and approval shall be provided prior to Preliminary Site Plan
approval.
9.
All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department and Maricopa County. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.
10.
The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or
tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by
the City Attorney.
11.
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.
12.
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.
Staff Report: Z-77-22-8
September 8, 2023
Page 12 of 12
13.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
14.
Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.
Writer
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
September 8, 2023
Team Leader
Racelle Escolar
Exhibits
Sketch map
Aerial map
Conceptual site plan date stamped March 20, 2023
Elevations date stamped October 10, 2022 (6 pages)
Correspondence (2 13 pages)
Z-133-01
Z-50-99
Z-49-99
ANX 211
ANX 413
Z-30-09
Z-19-01
Z-16-15
ANX 242
Z-21-01
Z-53-08
*
*
*
*
*
*
R1-10
S-1
S-1
S-1
MARICOPA COUNTY
R1-8
S-1
MARICOPA
COUNTY
S-1
R1-8
MARICOPA
COUNTY
MUA
26TH LN
29TH DR
27TH AVE
CARSON RD
VINEYARD RD
HARVEST GROVES LN
75TH AVE
67TH AVE
59TH AVE
51ST AVE
43RD AVE
35TH AVE
27TH AVE
BROADWAY RD
BASELINE RD
SOUTHERN AVE
DOBBINS RD
ELLIOT RD
ESTRELLA DR
LAVEEN VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-77-22
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
7.68 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*
Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
S-1
R1-8
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
7
33
*
UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
N/A
42
Equity Connect Holdings LLC
DATE:
4/3/2023
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 1-22
ZONING MAP
D-7
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: S-1 ( 7.68 a.c.)
TO:
R1-8 ( 7.68 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-77-22.mxd
Z-77-22
0.045
0
0.045
0.0225
Miles
Z-19-01
Z-53-08
Z-133-01
Z-50-99
Z-49-99
ANX 242
Z-21-01
Z-30-09
ANX 211
Z-16-15
ANX 413*
*
*
*
*
*
R1-10
S-1
S-1
S-1
MUA
MARICOPA COUNTY
R1-8
S-1
MARICOPA
COUNTY
S-1
R1-8
MARICOPA
COUNTY
26TH LN
29TH DR
27TH AVE
CARSON RD
VINEYARD RD
HARVEST GROVES LN
Maricopa County Assessor's
75TH AVE
67TH AVE
59TH AVE
51ST AVE
43RD AVE
35TH AVE
27TH AVE
BROADWAY RD
BASELINE RD
SOUTHERN AVE
DOBBINS RD
ELLIOT RD
ESTRELLA DR
LAVEEN VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-77-22
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
7.68 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
S-1
R1-8
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
7
33
* UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
N/A
42
Equity Connect Holdings LLC
DATE:
4/3/2023
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 1-22
ZONING MAP
D-7
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: S-1 ( 7.68 a.c.)
TO:
R1-8 ( 7.68 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2022\Z-77-22.mxd
Z-77-22
0.045
0
0.045
0.0225
Miles
JSR/SWR
LJR/SWR
12/09/21
21-105-50
SHEET NO.
CHECKED BY:
REVISIONS:
DRAWN BY:
PROJECT NO.
DATE:
DRAWING NO.
00000
FOR
phoenix, az 85048
16815 S. DESERT FOOTHILLS PKWY
480.598.0270
480.598.0273 FAX
SUITE 138
RCC
DESIGN
GROUP, LLC
"...WHATEVER IT TAKES."
41809
STUART W.
RAYBURN
20'
20'
60'
20'
1
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
From:
Clifford Mattice <matticegroup@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 8, 2022 2:41 PM
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Jennifer Hall; Clifford Mattice
Subject:
Lot 4 2810 W Harvest Groves Lane Zoning Protest Against Rezoning Application Case Z-77-22 and
Public Records Request
PlanningDepartment:
PleaseinsertthiszoningprotestopposingtherezoningappliedforinCaseNo.ZͲ77Ͳ22tochangethedesignationfromSͲ
1toR1Ͳ8PRDinallpackets,attachments,writtencommunicationsprovidedtoCitystaff,committeemembers,
commissionmembersandmembersoftheCityCouncilaspartofthepublicrecord/applicationfornotonlythe
currentlyscheduledneighborhoodmeeting,butalsoanyplanningorlegislativemeetingsand/orhearingsforthis
application/case.
Weareopposedtotheapplicationforrezoning,requestthatarecommendationofdenialbeassertedbytheCity's
professionalstaff,andrequesttheapplicationbedenied.
Ourfamilyhouseisonanoversizedresidentialplotaspartof10oversizedlotsthatcontainsubstantial,preservedopen
spaceoccupiedbyhundredsofmaturepecantreeswhichinturnarehometoavarietyofspecies,includingowls,hawks,
amultitudeofbirdspeciesandcoyotes.Theproposeduse/application/rezoning("RezoningUse"),wouldallowa
substantialincreaseindensityanduseimmediatelyadjacenttoourbackyardandthebackfenceofsevenofour
neighbors'properties,andourHOAcommunityproperty.Thepreviousranchoperationsonthesubjectpropertyofthe
RezoningUsewasconsistentwiththeCity'scurrentzoningdesignation,planningdocuments,andthedensitiesanduses
ofourLaveenVillageneighborhood,includingthesurroundingsingleͲfamilyproperties,ranchproperties,bridalpathon
27thAvenueandneighborhoodschools.TheRezoningUseessentiallyproposesamultiͲfamilydensityandusethatis
completelyoutofcharacterfortheneighborhoodwhichcontainstheArizonaLutheranschoolandextremelypopular
VenueattheGroveweddingsiteestablishedin2009(whichownsthepropertynearandadjacenttothisRezoningUse).
OursmallcommunityinthepecanorchardnotonlyfitsintothehistoricranchandequestriancharacterofLaveen,but
alsoenjoysinverycloseproximity:SouthMountain,CoronaRanch,theVenueattheGrove,ArizonaLutheranAcademy,
operatinghorseranches,cottonfieldsandextensivebridalpaths.TheRezoningUseisnotconsistentwiththeuses,
densitiesorcharacterofthisagrarian,ruralvillagewithitslongͲstandingidentitydefinedbyfarming,ranchingandopen
space.
TheRezoningUseisincompatiblewiththeusesandzoningofitsadjacentandneighboringproperty,theCity'splanning
andzoningpoliciesandtheCity'scapacitytoservedenserusesinagrowingpopulation.TheRezoningUsewill
detrimentallyimpactourproperty,ourneighbors'propertyintheHarvestGrovesandsurroundingpropertiesby
creating:
DensitiesandUsescontrarytotheneighborhood'sexpectationthatthepoliciesandguidelinesoftheLaveenVillage
CharacterPlanwillcontrolfuturegrowthintheneighborhood.
DensitiesandUsesincompatiblewiththedensityanduseofadjacentandsurroundingpropertyintheneighborhood.
DensitiesandUsesthatwilldiminishthevalueanddesirabilityofadjacentandsurroundingpropertyͲresidentialand
commercial.
DensitiesandUsesthatareinconsistentwiththeplanningandzoningguidelinesfortheLaveenVillageCharacterPlan.
Increasedtrafficon27thAvenue,BaselineRoad,SouthernRoad,DobbinsRoadandcongestionontheseroadsduring
peakandoffͲpeaktimes.
DensitiesandUsesthatarecontrarytoLaveen's"smalltown"characterandrural,agriculturalheritageandcurrentuses.
IncreasednoisethatisnotagriculturalinnatureandinconsistentwiththenatureoftheLaveenVillage.
2
LimitstotherangeofhousingtypesanddensitiesbyeliminatinglargelotresidentialhousingoptionsintheLaveen
Villageandeliminatingranchand/oragriculturaluses.
DetractingfromfuturedevelopmentinLaveenbycreatingdensitiesandusesthatdegrade,devalueandeliminatethe
rural,agriculturalusesandcharacterofadjacentandareaproperties.
StrainsonthelimitedandreducedresourcesoftheCityandCountyfiredepartment,policedepartmentandutilities
department.
AdditionalburdensontheavailabilityofwaterresourcesforCityresidentsandtheCityofPhoenixbeyondthecurrent
levelsplannedfortheLaveenVillage.
AlackofcurrentdevelopmentforranchandagriculturalusesintheneighborhoodandLaveenVillage.
AccordingtotheCity'sLaveenVillageCharacterPlan,thisneighborhoodis61%0Ͳ5du/acre(instarkcontrasttothe
RezoningUse);17%Parks/OpenSpaceandcontains69milesofmultiͲusepathsforhorses,hikesandcyclists.Infact
therural,agriculturalcharacteroftheneighborhoodisalsorecognizedintheCity'splanningdocumentasapproximately
5,778acresor30%ofLaveenVillageascountyjurisdiction.TheCity'splanningrulesrequireprojectstobecompatible
with:"Rural,equestrianandagriculturallifestyle";the"longhistoryasanagriculturalcommunity";"adoptedrural
developmentguidelines:;"ruralcharacter";"ruralcharacterblendedwithnewdevelopment";establishmentof
"BaselineRoadandDobbinsRoadScenicdrives";"multiͲusetrailsandcanals".TheRezoningUseiscontrarytoallof
theseelements.
TheRezoningUseisincompatiblewiththeCity'sSouthwestGrowthStudycreatedin1998whichguideslanduse
decisionswithinLaveenVillagewithobjectivesdemandingnewlandusesthat:
1."Preparedesignguidelinesanddevelopmentstandardsthatencouragedevelopmentthatisbothsympatheticand
respondstothearea'scultural,historicalandagriculturalassets."TheRezoningUseiscontrarytothearea'scultural,
historicalandagriculturalassetssuchasranchuses,horseriding,horsetraining,sheepherding,cottonfarming,and
orchardoperations.
2."Identifyneedsandmethodsforprovidingpublicservicesandfacilities."TheRezoningUsefurtherstrainsthealready
overwhelmedfireandpolicedepartmentassetsintheneighborhood.
3."Establishanappropriateandbalancedhousingmixthatalsoencouragesdevelopmentthatprotectsexisting
residentiallifestylesandnaturalresources".ThecommonareasoftheGrovesAssociationpropertywhichcontains
multipleacresofamatureandproducingpecantreeshasalreadysufferedtheencroachmentofhighdensityhousing
alongitssouthernfencelinebyCityorCountyapprovalsanddevelopmentofhigh,densityhousingwithoutbufferingto
ourproperty.ThathousingdevelopmentreceivesthebenefitoftheGroves'orchardwithouthavingtopayforits
maintenance.OurGrovescommunityalreadyessentiallyhasanotheradjacentsubdivisionontheentiresouthfenceline
utilizingourpropertyasopenspacefortheirbackyards.TheRezoningUsewouldresultinyetanotheradjacenthousing
developmentonthenorthfencelineencroachingcloselytoourpropertywithincompatibleusesanddensitiesdevaluing
ourpropertyandrenderingitlessdesirabletolivein.TheRezoningUseisalsoincompatiblewiththeagriculturaland
singlefamilyresidentialuseofourproperty.
TheRezoningUseisfurtherinconsistentwiththeCity'sexpresseddevelopmentobjectives:toprotectresidentialareas
fromconcentrationsofincompatiblelandusesthatcouldchangetheircharacteranddestabilizelandvalues;promote
sitedevelopmentandlandusewhichprotectsthenaturalenvironmentbypreservingvegetationandsurfacewater,
minimizesdisturbancestotheexistingterrain;requiringhousingdevelopmentthatpromoteslargelotsize;anddesign
thatmitigatestrafficimpactsandnoiseimpacts.TheRezoningUsealsofailsto"promoteneighborhoodidentitythrough
planningthatreinforcestheexistinglandscapingandcharacterofthearea."Smallhouseswithshareddrivewayspacked
intotinylotsservedbyabottleͲneckedentrywayonto27thAvenueisnotrepresentativeofthecharacterofour
neighborhood.
Andfinally,theRezoningUsefailstosatisfytheCity'sobjectivethat"Eachnewdevelopmentshouldcontributetothe
characteridentifiedforthevillage."
3
Becausetheproposedrezoningwouldcausemultipledetrimentalimpacts(basedonuses,densities,design)toour
property,otheradjacentproperty,theneighborhoodandtheLaveenVillage,weopposeandprotesttheapplicationin
itsentiretyandrequestthattheapplicationbedeniedatallstagesofreview.Wefurtherrespectfullyrequestthatthe
City'sofficials,includingtheplanningprofessionals,utilityprofessionals,fireandpoliceprofessionalsallrecommend
denialforthisapplication.
Additionally,werequestacopyofallrecords,includingbutnotlimitedtotheapplicationandemailcorrespondence
relatedtothiscase,includingreports,memorandaandcommunicationsby,fromorthroughallCitystaffandelected,
eappointedofficials.
CliffandMelissaMattice
2810WestHarvestGrovesLane
From:
Edward Olaya
To:
Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola; Jennifer Hall
Subject:
Zoning Protest Against Rezoning Application Case Z-77-22
Date:
Saturday, November 19, 2022 1:28:06 AM
Planning Department:
Please insert this zoning protest opposing the rezoning applied for in Case No. Z-77-
22 (6844 S. 27th Ave) to change the designation from S-1 to R1-8 PRD in all packets,
attachments, written communications provided to City staff, committee members,
commission members and members of the City Council as part of the public record/
application for any planning or legislative meetings and/or hearings for this
application/case.
I own the following residential and commercial property adjacent and near the
property requesting the rezoning:
1) 6848 South 27th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85041 (Residential)
2) 7010 South 27th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85041 (Commercial)
3) 7032 South 27th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85041 (Residential)
4) 7110 South 27th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85041 (Vacant Land)
Below are the reasons for opposition.
Density
The “townhome” layout of 40 homes on 7.8 acres is out of reason for the surrounding
area. Many homes in the area are larger than the proposed lot sizes (2,600 sq ft) of
this community. The parking of any additional vehicles in the community is going to
spill over on the only road in the community causing a danger to any need of City of
Phoenix emergency vehicles entering the community. I have personally seen the
decline in brand new neighborhoods due to similar layouts. In these highly dense
communities the road is constantly filled with additional vehicles parked in streets
because the lack of driveways/garages aren’t big enough to withstand multiple
vehicles from the home and their visitors.
Noise
There is a 250-foot stretch of roadway that is sandwiched between two residential
homes that will need to be driven through before even getting into the proposed
community of homes. According to the traffic study, it is estimated that there will be
72 vehicles entering and exiting that 250-foot stretch of road each day. This 250-foot
stretch covers the complete length of my home that sits on 1 acre. All the bedrooms
of my home are on the side adjacent to this road, therefore I will have constant traffic
surrounding my home from the north (community road) and the east (27th
Avenue). This would be a large increase in traffic noise.
Also, there will be an increase of general noise coming from 40 homes being packed
in a small area.
Character of Area
The Rezoning Use is inconsistent with the character of the surrounding irrigated, rural
area with its long-standing identity defined by open space and farming/ranching. The
proposed rezoning and layout will devalue the adjacent Harvest Groves community
by putting “townhome” like homes adjacent to their custom homes and surrounding
acreage homes.
I understand the progression of development and am for working together to create a
community that elevates and enhances this unique area. The way this development
is proposed is far from it. I strongly oppose the application and request that it be
denied before moving any further in the rezoning process.
Sincerely,
Edward Olaya
--
photo
Edward Olaya
Owner, Olaya Events & Company
Explore Our Collection:
Ensemble Catering [ensemblecatering.com], Venue at the Grove
[venueatthegrove.com], and Olaya Consulting [olayaconsulting.com]
602.799.9859 | edward@olayaevents.com
www.olayaevents.com [olayaevents.com]
7010 South 27th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85041
[linkedin.com]
From:
JorgeLiAna Enriquez
To:
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Cc:
JorgeLiAna Enriquez; PDD Long Range Planning
Subject:
Re: case #Z-77-22
Date:
Monday, July 10, 2023 6:22:33 PM
Good afternoon,
This is LiAna and Jorge Enriquez. We reside within Harvest Groves (2826). And I, Jorge am the President of the
HOA, I am also a Battalion Chief for Phoenix Fire in charge of all of South District which includes the area of this
proposed development.
We are writing as a follow-up to a voicemail left with Nayeli. We would like it noted as part of public record (and if
possible read during tonight’s meeting) that we are vehemently opposed to the current proposed project and
rezoning application (Z-77-22) mainly due to high density.
Personally- we are against it because of safety concerns, the amount of high traffic, and the fact that this may
substantially impact our property values. We live within 8-acres (as well) with only 10 home sites designated.
Parking and traffic flow proves difficult at times even with this low density. This developer wants to jam 36 homes
onto the same acreage—this will have a substantial negative impact to not only our community, our safety, traffic
flow, noise, and public safety services. There is a one way in and one way out layout that will make it extremely
difficult for Public safety (fire trucks & PD), garbage and utility vehicles to safely enter and exit, especially with
anticipated cars parked in the street, there will be no room.
Additionally, our community, as well as the community south of Harvest Groves is a gated community, currently
this planned development does not include a gate for the community which creates major safety concerns. We’d like
to see reduced density and a gate.
Professionally, as a Battalion Chief for this area and a 33-year veteran in the fire service, in my experience these
types of communities, with such high density and this type of layout, have proven extremely challenging to properly
enter and exit during an emergency.
In the event of a fire, the fire department dispatches a minimum of of Seven (7) fire department vehicles to the
scene, this layout makes it nearly impossible to safely enter and navigate.
Also, with such high density, in the event of a fire to one home the possibility of extending to another home
substantially increases.
As a Command Officer, my job is to mitigate risk at all times for the citizens, the city, for the Fire Department and
for our members. A development of this type—high density and narrow paths creates a major risk for all
stakeholders involved.
Additionally, there just doesn’t seem to be adequate public services, especially police force to keep up with adding
such high density of homes in the area. Safety, congestion, and noise is a major concern for us and will negatively
impact our quality of life.
Also, 27th Avenue is not suited to sustain a large volume of traffic flow, there are two schools within the vicinity
(just north of this proposed development) that creates traffic jams during the school year (it appears the traffic
survey was done during the time school was not in session).
Also this plan just doesn’t fit within the Laveen Villages Plan. For all these reasons we are requesting a substantial
reduction of density, as well as to make this a gated community.
Respectfully,
Jorge & LiAna Enriquez
(480) 285-5092
Harvest Groves resident
dŽ͗ ŽƵŶĐŝůǁŽŵĂŶtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ
ZĞ͗ ZĞͲnjŽŶŝŶŐĂƐĞͲϳϳͲϮϮͲϴ
/ĂŵƚŚĞŽǁŶĞƌŽĨϲϴϮϴ^ϮϳƚŚǀĞ͕ ƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƚŽƚŚĞϳ͘ ϲϴĂĐƌĞƐŽĨůĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƚƌLJŝŶŐƚŽƌĞnjŽŶĞ
ĨƌŽŵ^Ͳϭ;ZĂŶĐŚŽƌ&ĂƌŵZĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞͿƚŽZϭͲϴ͘ dŚŝƐƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶϯϴƐŝŶŐůĞͲĨĂŵŝůLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞ͕ ĂŶĚ/ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůLJ
ǁŽƵůĚƐŚĂƌĞĂǁĂůůǁŝƚŚϭϳŽĨƚŚŽƐĞŚŽŵĞƐ͘ dŚĞǁĂůůŽĨŚŽŵĞƐƚŚĂƚƐŚĂƌĞƐŽƵƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĂƌĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚƚŽďĞĂůůƚǁŽͲƐƚŽƌLJ
ŚŽŵĞƐƚŽŵĂŬĞŵĂƚƚĞƌƐǁŽƌƐĞ͘ /ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĞƐƐŝŽŶŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞ>ĂǀĞĞŶĂƌĞĂĂŶĚĂŵĨŽƌǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ
ƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƚŚĂƚĞůĞǀĂƚĞƐĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐƚŚŝƐƵŶŝƋƵĞĂƌĞĂďƵƚŚĂǀĞƐĞƌŝŽƵƐĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ
ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘
ŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨƌĞĂ
>ĂǀĞĞŶŚĂƐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚĞdžƉůŽƐŝǀĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŐƌŽǁƚŚǁŚŝĐŚŚĞůƉƐĨƵĞůŽƵƌůŽĐĂůĞĐŽŶŽŵLJďƵƚĂůƐŽƐƚĂƌƚƐƚŽĚŝŵŝŶŝƐŚǁŚĂƚ
ǁĂƐŽŶĐĞĐŽǀĞƚĞĚĂƐĂĨĂƌŵŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ KƵƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐĂůŽŶŐϮϳƚŚĂƌĞůŽŶŐ͕ ŶĂƌƌŽǁůŽƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞŐƌĂŶĚĨĂƚŚĞƌĞĚ
ĨůŽŽĚŝƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƚĞƌƌŝŐŚƚƐĂŶĚĂůůŽǁƵƐƚŽĨĂƌŵĂŶĚƌĂŝƐĞĂŶŝŵĂůƐĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞƐŽŵĞŽĨŽƵƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁŝůĚůŝĨĞ͘ dŚĞ
ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐŝƐǀĞƌLJĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƚŚĂŶƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĂƚƚĞŵƉƚƐƚŽďƵŝůĚϯϴŚŽŵĞƐŝŶƚŽůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϴĂĐƌĞƐ
ŽĨŶĂƌƌŽǁůĂŶĚ͘ dŚĞLJĂůƌĞĂĚLJŚĂǀĞƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽďƵŝůĚϴŚŽŵĞƐŽŶƚŚĂƚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚďĞŝŶůŝŶĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ
ƌĂŶĐŚŚŽŵĞƐ͘
tĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞĚŽƵƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJƚŽďĞĂŶŽĂƐŝƐŽĨĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞĨŽƌŽƵƌŐƌŽǁŝŶŐĨĂŵŝůLJǁŝƚŚĨƵƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶƐƚŽŐƌŽǁĨŽƌĂĨĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛
ŵĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚĨƵĞůƚŚĞĞĐŽŶŽŵLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĞͲĂƉŝĞĐĞŽĨ͛ ƐŚŝƐƚŽƌLJƚŚĂƚŝƐƋƵŝĐŬůLJďĞĐŽŵŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŝŶƚŽ
ŚŽƵƐĞƐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƌĞĂůĞƐƚĂƚĞ͘ KƵƌϰ͘ ϱĂĐƌĞƐŽĨůĂŶĚƚŚĂƚǁĞŚĂǀĞƚŚŽƵŐŚƚĨƵůůLJƉůĂŶŶĞĚƚŽďĞŽƌĐŚĂƌĚƐ͕ ŐĂƌĚĞŶƐ
ĂŶĚůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĂƌĞĂĨŽƌůŽĐĂůƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚŽƵƌŽǁŶĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ͕ ǁŝůůďĞŶĞdžƚĚŽŽƌƚŽƚǁŽƐƚŽƌLJŚŽŵĞƐůŝŶŝŶŐŽƵƌĞŶƚŝƌĞǁĂůů͘ tĞ
ǁŝůůŐŽĨƌŽŵŚĂǀŝŶŐĂƋƵŝĞƚ͕ ĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůLJƌŝĐŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƚŽϯϴďƵƐƚůŝŶŐŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚĂůůŽĨƚŚĞŶŽŝƐĞ͕ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚǀŝƐƵĂů
ĚŝƐƚƵƌďĂŶĐĞƚŚĂƚŐŽĞƐĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƚŚĂƚ͘ dŚŝƐǁŝůůĚĞǀĂůƵĞŽƵƌƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJǁŚŝĐŚǁĞŶĞǀĞƌƉůĂŶƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶƚŽĂ
ĐŽŶŐůŽŵĞƌĂƚĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚƚĂŬĞĂǁĂLJƚŚĞĂƵƚŚĞŶƚŝĐŝƚLJŽĨƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂ͘
dƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚŽŶŐĞƐƚŝŽŶ
tĞĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽĨĨĂďƵƐLJ͕ ŵĂŝŶƚŚŽƌŽƵŐŚĨĂƌĞŽŶϮϳƚŚǀĞĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶLJĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁŝůů
ŝŶĞǀŝƚĂďůLJƐƉŝůůŽǀĞƌŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƌŽĂĚ͘ dŚŝƐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐĂĚĂŶŐĞƌƚŽĂŶLJŝƚLJŽĨWŚŽĞŶŝdžĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐĞŶƚĞƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚͬ ŽƌĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĚŽǁŶϮϳƚŚǀĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐǁĂůŬŝŶŐŽƌƌŝĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌďŝŬĞƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƌŽĂĚ͘
EŽŝƐĞ
dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƚŚƌĞĞƚŝŵĞƐĂƐŵĂŶLJŚŽŵĞƐƚŚĞLJĂƌĞƚƌLJŝŶŐƚŽďƵŝůĚĂƐƚŚĞŚŽŵĞƐĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚŝƐƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚƚŚĞLJǁŝůůďĞ
ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐůLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŶŽŝƐĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐŽŶƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞŶŽŝƐĞƚŚĂƚǁŝůůƌĞĂĐŚƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ /Ŷ
ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂLJŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽŐĞƚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚϳϮнǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐƉĞƌĚĂLJĞŶƚĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚĞdžŝƚŝŶŐ
;ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐƚƵĚLJͿĐĂƵƐŝŶŐĂĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂďůĞĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚƐƵďƐĞƋƵĞŶƚŶŽŝƐĞ͘
^ĂĨĞƚLJ
tĞŚĂǀĞŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƐĐŚŽŽůƐŝŶĐůŽƐĞƉƌŽdžŝŵŝƚLJƚŽƚŚŝƐďƵŝůĚ;ĞƌŶĂƌĚůĂĐŬůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ͕ ƌŝnjŽŶĂ>ƵƚŚĞƌĂŶĐĂĚĞŵLJĂŶĚ
^ƵŶsĂůůĞLJĐĂĚĞŵLJͿĂŶĚŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂŶĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐϮϳƚŚĂƌĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐͬ ƉĂƌĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͘ dŚŝƐ
ƐƚƌĞĞƚĂůƌĞĂĚLJŚĂƐĂŶŝƐƐƵĞǁŝƚŚƉĞŽƉůĞƐƉĞĞĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŶŽƚƐůŽǁŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŚŽŽůnjŽŶĞ͕ ƐŽ/ĐĂŶŽŶůLJŝŵĂŐŝŶĞǁŚĂƚϳϬн
ŵŽƌĞǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐǁŝůůďƌŝŶŐ͘
KƵƌĨŝƌĞĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐĞƐƚĂĨĨŝŶŐŝŶŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϴŝƐĂůƌĞĂĚLJĐŽŵƉƌŽŵŝƐĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝŶŽƵƌĂƌĞĂĂŶĚƚŚŝƐǁŝůůƉƵƚ
ŝŵŵĞŶƐĞƐƚƌĞƐƐŽŶŽƵƌƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽŚĞůƉƉĞŽƉůĞŝŶŶĞĞĚ͘ ϯϲŚŽŵĞƐŝŶĐůŽƐĞƉƌŽdžŝŵŝƚLJƚŽŽŶĞĂŶŽƚŚĞƌĂŶĚƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚĞĚ
ďLJĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůĂŶĚĐŽƵůĚĐƌĞĂƚĞĂĚĂŶŐĞƌŽƵƐƐŝƚƵĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌĂůůŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂ͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůLJ͕ ƚŚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂLJĨŽƌĂĨŝƌĞƚƌƵĐŬƚŽŐĞƚ
ŝŶĂŶĚŽƵƚŝŶƚŽƚŚŝƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŝĨĐĂƌƐĂƌĞƉĂƌŬĞĚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚŝƐǀĞƌLJŶĂƌƌŽǁĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĂƐƐĞƐƐĞĚĨŽƌ
ƐĂĨĞƚLJ͘
/ƐƚƌŽŶŐůLJŽƉƉŽƐĞƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞƋƵĞƐƚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐƌĞƋƵĞƐƚďĞĚĞŶŝĞĚ͘ /ĨĂĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽĨŚŽŵĞƐŵƵƐƚďĞ
ďƵŝůƚŝŶƚŚŝƐƐƉĂĐĞ͕ /ĂŵƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐŝƚďĞŬĞƉƚĂƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚnjŽŶŝŶŐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƵƉŚŽůĚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŐƌŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůŚŝƐƚŽƌLJ
ŝŶƚŚŝƐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽƌĂƚŵŽƐƚZϭͲϭϴ͘
>ĂƐƚůLJ͕ /ǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞƚŽŵĂŬĞŵĞŶƚŝŽŶƚŚĂƚǁĞŚĂǀĞŚĂĚĚŽnjĞŶƐŽĨŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐǁƌŝƚĞůĞƚƚĞƌƐŝŶŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚŝƐďƵƚǁĞŽŶůLJ
ƐĞĞŽŶĞƚŚĂƚŝƐĨŝůĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĂůĨŽƌƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ /ďĞůŝĞǀĞŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞůĞƚƚĞƌƐŵĂLJŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌ
ůĂǁƚĞĂŵďƵƚ/ĐĂŶ͛ ƚďĞĐĞƌƚĂŝŶ͘ dŚĞƌĞŝƐƐĞƌŝŽƵƐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽƉƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚŽŶĞůĞƚƚĞƌŝƐŶŽƚŐŝǀŝŶŐƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ
ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƌĞnjŽŶŝŶŐƉƌŽƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝƐŚĂǀŝŶŐ͘ /ŚĂǀĞĂƐŬĞĚŽƵƌŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐƚŽƌĞƐĞŶĚďƵƚǁĂŶƚĞĚLJŽƵƚŽďĞĂǁĂƌĞ͘
^ŝŶĐĞƌĞůLJ͕
ƌŝĚŐĞƚĂŶĚDĂƚƚĂůĞLJ
1
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
From:
Margie Colio <margiecolio@gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, September 6, 2023 1:03 PM
To:
PDD Laveen VPC; council.district8@phoenix.gov; council.district7@phoenix.gov; Racelle Escolar;
Nayeli Sanchez Luna
Subject:
opposing the rezoning for in Case No. Z-77-22 (6844 S. 27th Ave)
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
PlanningDepartmentandCouncilPeople,
PleaseinsertthiszoningprotestopposingtherezoningappliedforinCaseNo.ZͲ77Ͳ22(6844S.27thAve)tochangethe
designationfromSͲ1toR1Ͳ8PRDinallpackets,attachments,writtencommunicationsprovidedtoCitystaff,committee
members,commissionmembersandmembersoftheCityCouncilaspartofthepublicrecord/applicationforany
planningorlegislativemeetingsand/orhearingsforthisapplication/case.
BelowarethereasonsIstronglyopposethisrezoning:
1. Density
The33singleͲfamilyresidencesproposedon7.8acresisoutofreasonforthesurroundingarea.Therezoning
ordinanceifgrantedcreatesdensitymuchhigherthantheexistingresidentialRanchpropertyandranchuses
immediatelytothenorthandsouthofthelot.Allsurroundinghomeson27thAvearelargerlotsthatpreservethe
richagriculturehistoryofthisarea.
2. Noise
Therearethreetimesasmanyhomesasthehomesadjacenttothisspaceandtheywillbeseriouslyimpactedbythe
noiseoftheseresidencesontopofthenoisethatwillreachtheadjacentcommunity.Inaddition,theroadway
neededtogetintotheresidenceswillhaveanestimated72+vehiclesperdayenteringandexiting(accordingtothe
trafficstudy)causingaconsiderableamountoftrafficandsubsequentnoise.
3. Safety
Therearenumeroussafetyconcernswith36newhomesinasmallpieceoflandcomingtoourLaveen
neighborhood.
AdjacentSchools(BernardBlackElementary&ArizonaLutheranAcademy)
Wehavetwoschoolsoffof27thAve,whichisalreadybecominganincreasinglybusythoroughfare,oftenwithpeople
speedingthrougha15MPHschoolzone.Adding70+vehiclesperdaytothisroadwillcausesafetyconcernsfor
pedestriansandtheseschoolsthathavechildrencomingandgoing.Thereisnowidewalkwayalong27thAveadding
totheconcernsforsafety.
FireandPoliceSupport
OurfireandpolicestaffinginDistrict8isalreadycompromisedwiththenewdevelopmentsinourareaandthiswill
putimmensestressonourresourcestohelppeopleinneed.PhoenixFireDepartmentis44%belowresponsetime
goalandresponsetimesforEMSis83%lowerthangoal.36homesincloseproximitytooneanotherand
surroundedbyagriculturallandcouldcreateadangeroussituationforallinthearea.Additionally,theroadwayfor
afiretrucktogetinandoutintothiscommunity,especiallyifcarsareparkedalongthestreetwillcreateahuge
risk.
VehicleTraffic
2
Wearelocatedoffabusy,mainthoroughfareon27thAveandparkinganyadditionalvehiclesinthecommunitywill
inevitablyspilloverontotheroad.ThispresentsadangertoanyCityofPhoenixemergencyvehiclesenteringthe
community.Therearealreadyanumberofcarsswipedbyfiretruckson27thastheyrushtoemergenciesandthe
CityofPhoenixistheonethatfootsthatbill.
4. LossofFarmingandAgriculture
ItisnosecretinArizonathatagricultureisinalosingbattlewithurbandevelopmentandthisplotoflandisnotonly
zonedforagricultureandfarming,buthaspreciouswaterrightswithfloodirrigation.Thispropertywillforeverlose
itsabilitytogivebacktothecommunityinameaningfulwayanditsmanyresidenceswilltakemoreresourcesthat
Arizonacontinuestostruggletoprovideitscommunities(localfoodandwatertogrow).Additionally,thisproperty
has,fordecades,beenhometowildlifeandpacksofcoyotes.Nomattertheoutcomeornumberofhomes,
assessmentsonwildlifesuchasburrowingowlsandcoyotesmustbetakenintoconsiderationandplanstomitigate
thelossofhabitattakenintoaccount.Weunderstandthatadeveloperisseekingtobuildasmanyhomesas
possibleonthisland,howeverit’spossibletostillpreserveagriculturallandifthelotsarelargerwithfewerhomes.
5. CharacterofArea
TheRezoningUseisinconsistentwiththecharacterofthesurroundingfloodirrigated,ruralareawithitslongͲ
standingidentitydefinedbyopenspaceandfarming/ranching.Theproposedrezoningandlayoutwilldevalue
theadjacentHarvestGrovescommunityaswellasthetwopropertiestotheNorth(6828S27thAveand6832S
27thAve)byputtingthiscommunityadjacenttotheircustomhomesandsurroundingacreagehomes.I
understandtheprogressionofdevelopmentandamforworkingtogethertocreateacommunitythatelevates
andenhancesthisuniquearea.Thewaythisdevelopmentisproposedisfarfromit.
Whatweproposeinstead:IstronglyopposetheapplicationandseektohavethisreͲevaluatedandkeptatthecurrent
zoning.Thiswouldensuretheintegrityoftheareaupheld,withhomesonanacreofpropertyaswellasensurethe
burdenonthecommunityandlocalPDandFireislessened.
Sincerely,
MargieColio
2818WHarvestGrovesLN
Phoenix,AZ85041