Attachment B - Staff Report - Z-49-20-3.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
34527 characters
Staff Report Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date:
May 3, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing Date:
June 3, 2021
Request From:
R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District)
(1.11 acres)
Request To:
R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
(1.11 acres)
Proposed Use:
Community Residence Center
Location:
Approximately 970 feet north of the
northeast corner of 34th Street and
Sweetwater Avenue
Owner:
Fedzin Enterprises, LLC
Applicant and Representative:
Matt Ihms
Staff Recommendation:
Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per
acre and Parks/Open Space-Publicly
Owned
Street Map Classification
34th Street
Local Street
30-feet east half street
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CLEAN NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate the
acquisition of vacant, underutilized and blighted parcels for appropriate
redevelopment, compatible with the adjacent neighborhood character and
adopted area plans.
Per historic aerial photography, the subject site has remained vacant since it was
annexed from Maricopa County into the City of Phoenix in 1962. The development
$WWDFKPHQW%
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 2 of 17
would permit a new use in the area at a scale that is compatible with the surrounding
land uses and appropriately located at the end of a local street absent of residential
homes immediately fronting it. Furthermore, this local street, 34th Street, connects to
Sweetwater Avenue, a minor collector street, which will provide easy access to other
parts of the Village.
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of
housing types and densities where appropriate within each village that support
a broad range of lifestyles.
The proposal, a community residence center, is compatible with surrounding land
uses in the area which are residential and quasi-public in nature. This use allows a
new housing type that will serve individuals with disabilities in the community to
support a broad range of lifestyles. As stipulated, the development will incorporate
elements to maintain an appropriate scale with the existing neighborhood.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.
The development provides a reasonable level of intensity that is respectful of local
conditions and surrounding neighborhood, which are predominantly built out and
zoned single-family and multifamily residential. The subject site is located at the end
of a local street that presently serves as primary access to residential uses in the area
and a church south of the site. The subject site is adjacent to non-residential uses,
including a church, freeway and a wash, thus no adverse impacts are anticipated on
adjacent land uses if this rezoning request is approved.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
The proposal, as stipulated, will be required to provide shade along internal
pedestrian paths and the adjacent public street. This will help to encourage walking
and to mitigate the urban heat island effect by shading hard surfaces, thus cooling the
micro-climate around the project vicinity.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 3 of 17
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 7.
Complete Streets Guidelines: See Background Item No. 8.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 9.
Piestewa Peak Freeway Specific Plan: See Background Item No. 10.
State Route 51 & Loop 101 Scenic Corridor Policy: See Background Item No. 11.
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 12.
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 13.
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use
Zoning
On Site
Vacant / Undeveloped
R1-6
North
Vacant / Undeveloped,
Indian Bend Wash
R1-6
South
Single-Family Residential
R1-6
East (across
Indian Bend
Wash)
Phoenix Indian Bend Wash
Park and Single-Family
Residential
R1-6
West
State Route 51
R1-6
R-3 – Multifamily Residential
(Subdivision Development Option)
Standards
R-3 Requirements
Proposed
Gross Acreage
-
1.11 acres
Maximum Number
of Units
16 units
None (Met, community residence
center with 50 beds proposed)
Maximum Density
Maximum 14.5 dwelling units
per acre
None (Met, community residence
center with 50 beds proposed)
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 4 of 17
Standards
R-3 Requirements
Proposed
Maximum Building
Height
2 stories or 30 feet (except
that there shall be a 15-foot
maximum height within ten
feet of a single-family zoned
district, which height may be
increased one foot for each
additional one foot of
building setback to the
maximum permitted height.)
2 stories or 30 feet (Met)
Maximum Lot
Coverage
45 percent
22 percent (Met)
MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS
Front: 34th Street
25 feet
30 feet (Met)
Rear: East
property line
15 feet
21 feet (Met)
Sides: North and
south property
lines
10 feet and 3 feet
15 feet and 127 feet (Met)
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE SETBACKS AND STANDARDS
Front: 34th Street
25 feet
Not specified*
Rear and sides:
North, south and
east property lines
5 feet
Not specified*
Minimum Open
Space
5% of gross area
Not specified*
MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Parking
1 space per two
resident/patient beds
(Community Residence
Center/Nursing Home) and 1
space per 300 square feet
(Office).
32 spaces provided (Square
footage of office space not
provided)*
*Site plan revision or variance required.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 5 of 17
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1.
This request is to rezone 1.11 acres located approximately 970 feet north of the
northeast corner of 34th Street and Sweetwater Avenue from R1-6 (Single-
Family Residence District) to R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) for a
community residence center, subject to a use permit process. Community
residence centers are permitted subject to a use permit in multifamily zoning
districts, including the R-3 zoning district, while permitted by right in some of the
commercial zoning districts. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped.
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
2.
The request for R-3
(Multifamily Residence
District) zoning is located in
an area surrounded by single-
family zoning, although
adjacent to non-residential
uses. These non-residential
uses include a vacant
lot/wash area (north), church
(south), State Route 51 (west)
and Phoenix Indian Bend
Wash Park (east).
Multifamily zoning is located
near the northeast corner of
34th Street and Sweetwater
Avenue, developed with a
single-family detached use.
Zoning Aerial Map, Source: Planning and Development
Department
Multifamily uses developed under the R1-6 (Single-Family Residence District)
zoning exists along 34th Street, less than 500 feet south of the subject site.
Access to the subject site is along 34th Street, a local street, which terminates at
the subject site. Overall, the general area has been developed with a variety of
residential uses, including single-family and multifamily, plus non-residential
uses. The proposed multifamily zoning is consistent with existing uses in the
area and will allow a new residential use to be established on the subject site
without impacting nearby residential properties due to its geographic location.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 6 of 17
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS
3.
The General Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential
3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Parks/Open Space -Publicly Owned. The
proposal is not consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use map
designation, as the R-3 zoning district is consistent with Commercial and
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre Land Use Map designations.
However, a Minor General Plan Amendment is not required since the site is
under 10 acres in size.
North and east of the site has been designated as Parks/Open-Space-Publicly
Owned and a small portion as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre. South
of the site has been designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre,
and west of the site has been designated as Transportation along State Route
51.
General Plan Land Use Map, Source: Planning and Development Department
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 7 of 17
PROPOSAL
4.
Site Plan
The development proposes a
community residence center,
subject to a use permit, on
the subject site. The
conceptual site plan shows a
single two-story building
located on the north-half of
the site, with vehicular
surface parking spaces
located on the south-half of
the site. An open space area
is proposed west of the
building, within proximity to
the eastern property line
bordering Indian Bend Wash.
Access to the site is proposed
exclusively along 34th Street,
envisioned to terminate as a
cul-de-sac to be constructed
as part of this development. A
sidewalk connecting to
Sweetwater Avenue presently
exists along most of 34th
Street, located either on the
west or east side of the street.
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: Another Look LLC.
As mentioned previously in this report, no residential uses are adjacent to the
subject site. However, staff recommends Stipulation No. 1 which would limit the
location of buildings on the site away from an adjacent single-family zoned
property to the south, shall this property develop in the future as single-family.
Stipulation No. 1 would require a minimum 50-foot building setback from the
south property line, exclusive of carports or perimeter walls. A church is adjacent
to the site along the south property line, while a freeway and wash bound the
remaining property lines.
General conformance to the conceptual site plan is not proposed since zoning
variances may be requested by the applicant following the rezoning process if
site plan modifications cannot be made. Furthermore, the subject parcel is non-
symmetrical in shape and constrained by topographical features such as a wash
and freeway, thus additional flexibility during the develop review phase for the
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 8 of 17
site could be beneficial. In addition, a community residence center is subject to a
use permit within the R-3 multifamily district. Use permits and variances undergo
a separate review process, subject to the Zoning Adjustment hearing process.
5.
Elevations
The conceptual building elevations depict various architectural features such as
pitched roofs, windows, a covered patio and four-sided architecture. Building
materials referenced in the conceptual elevations include brick façade, cement
board siding, stucco and tile roofs. The conceptual building elevations proposed
for the site depict a maximum height of two stories and 30 feet to the mid-point of
the roof. Stipulation No. 2 recommends limiting the maximum height of buildings
on site to two stories and 30 feet to help keep the building on this site consistent
with adjacent R1-6 zoning district permitted height standards.
Staff is recommending a stipulation to require building elevations to incorporate a
variety of colors, materials and textural changes. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 3. Stipulation No. 4 also recommends that all building elevations contain
architectural embellishments and detailing, including pitched roofs, and/or
overhang canopies. Stipulation Nos. 3 and 4 will ensure that the site provides
aesthetically pleasing building materials and architecture across from a public
park and adjacent to a single-family zoned property.
A conformance to the conceptual building elevations is not currently proposed as
the building elevations show no colors and since zoning variances may be
requested following the rezoning process if site plan modifications cannot be
made, which could result in a change of layout for the building. However, the
stipulations listed above will help ensure that the proposed buildings will
incorporate pleasing aesthetics, materials that will withstand the weather for
many years and architectural features consistent with those found in the adjacent
residential areas.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 9 of 17
Conceptual Building Elevations, Source: Another Look LLC.
6.
Landscaping, Walls and Walkways
The development features one usable open space area, northeast of the site at
approximately 12,100 square feet in area. This open space area is oriented
towards Indian Bend Wash, east of the site, and will serve to enhance the
viewscape from the wash area towards this adjacent bank. Furthermore, the R-3
zoning district requires that a minimum of 100 square feet of open space is
provided per bed in community residence centers.
In order to buffer the site from adjacent uses, increase shade and to provide an
enhanced landscape treatment along Indian Bend Wash, Stipulation No. 5
recommends enhanced plantings within landscape setbacks that include
minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade trees planted 20 feet on center or
equivalent groupings and five 5-gallon shrubs per tree.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 10 of 17
Stipulation No. 6 recommends that
where a landscaped median is
provided within the ingress or
egress to the site, a landscaped
accent area shall be provided. This
will help to provide a visually unique
character and provide seasonal
interest along the streetscape.
Stipulation No. 7 recommends
several wall enhancements to be
aesthetically pleasing along the
street frontage and Indian Bend
Wash. The wall enhancements
include:
x Finished appearance with
textural differences where
visible from public streets;
x Combination of view fencing
and solid walls along Indian
Bend Wash.
Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9
recommend several pedestrian
enhancements to promote walking
and safety. The enhancements
include:
x Pedestrian pathways that
connect all buildings,
community amenity areas
and public sidewalks via the
most direct route;
x Pathways constructed of
decorative pathways that
visually contrast with parking
and drive aisle surfaces.
Conceptual Site Plan, Source: Another Look LLC.
with Planning and Development Department
annotations
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 11 of 17
STUDIES AND POLICIES
7.
Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan encourages treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure the trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and
development process. Staff is recommending several stipulations designed to
provide trees and enhance shade within the development. Staff is recommending
Stipulation No. 10 to require a minimum of 75 percent shade within pedestrian
walkways, including the public sidewalk, to encourage walking by employees and
residents by providing thermal comfort.
8.
Complete Streets Guidelines
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. This development will help to
pedestrianize the immediate street frontages by shading sidewalks adjacent to
the development, addressed in Stipulation No. 10. A minimum of two inverted u-
bicycle racks located near the main building entrance are recommended in
Stipulation No. 11.
9.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure.
Bicycle lanes have been designed within the Sweetwater Avenue corridor; thus
Stipulation No. 11 recommends a minimum of two inverted u-bicycle racks
located near the main building entrance to promote the use of bicycling as a
means of transportations for future employees and residents of this facility.
10. Piestewa Peak Freeway Specific Plan
The Piestewa Peak Freeway Specific Plan was approved in 1991 to help
address the impacts of the State Route 51 (SR-51) freeway on adjacent
neighborhoods. The plan proposes ways to maximize the compatibility of the
freeway with adjacent and nearby land uses, while encouraging neighborhood
cohesion and stability. The subject site is located within Segment 5 of this
Specific Plan and was envisioned as a park within the existing and proposed
land use map, part of a larger linear park along Indian Bend Wash. Thus, the
proposal is consistent with the Piestewa Peak Freeway Specific Plan existing
and proposed land use map. However, the existing freeway noise mitigation wall
and landscape area within the SR-51 freeway portion, in addition to landscape
setbacks adjacent to the SR-51, will help mitigate any potential impacts to this
new proposed development.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 12 of 17
11. State Route 51 & Loop 101 Scenic Corridor Policy
The State Route 51 & Loop 101 Scenic Corridor Policy was approved in 2011 to
help establish and protect this scenic corridor from outdoor uses, such as
outdoor storage and off-premise advertising structures, along portions of the
State Route 51 and Loop 101. The requested R-3 (Multifamily Residence
District) zoning does not allow outdoor uses such as outdoor storage or off-
premise advertising structures, thus the proposal is consistent with this policy
document and will promote the vision for this scenic corridor.
12. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The applicant materials indicate that recycling services
will be part of the development.
13. Housing Phoenix
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.
This Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of
housing with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a
need for over 163,000 new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing.
The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will
address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant land in a
more sustainable fashion.
Although the proposed community residence center is not a traditional residential
use, it will allow for disabled residents to be housed and cared for at this location,
which proposes up to 50 beds as part of this facility. Shall the proposed use not
be developed on this site, the proposed zoning would permit a variety of
residential uses including single-family and multifamily.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
14. As of the writing of this report, staff had not received any letters in support or
opposition to this rezoning application. Staff did receive a letter from an individual
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 13 of 17
in the area that listed concerns regarding the manner in which the virtual
neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
15. The Fire Department indicated there are no problems anticipated with the case
and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the 2018 International Fire
Code with Phoenix Amendments, and the facility will require fire sprinklers and
an alarm system. Further, the Department commented that they do not know the
water supply at this site and noted that additional water supply may be required
to meet the required fire flow per the Phoenix Fire Code.
16. The Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department has
indicated that a sliver of the parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) called Zone AE Floodplain, on panels 1735L of the Flood Insurance Rate
Maps (FIRM) dated December 22, 2017. If the plans show no building and/or
construction encroachment including fill within the sliver, then no floodplain
requirements will be required. If an encroachment does occur, Stipulation No. 14
addresses these floodplain requirements.
17. The Public Transit Department provided comments expressing the importance of
direct, clearly defined accessible, and well shaded pedestrian pathways on the
site. Shaded pathways should connect the public sidewalks with site amenities
and gathering areas. Lastly, that alternative pavement material be used where
pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles. These comments were addressed in
Stipulation Nos. 8, 9 and 10.
18. The Pedestrian Safety Coordinator with the Street Transportation Department
commented that pedestrian accesses to the site from the public sidewalk should
be attractive plus inviting, in addition to providing a shaded plus illuminated
pedestrian circulation on the site. Furthermore, that alternative paving material
be used to delineate pedestrian walkways where vehicle conflicts exist. Also, that
the public sidewalk be detached to help provide shade and thick vegetation to
discourage mid-block pedestrian crossings. Lastly, that pedestrian walkways are
marked where these are located in parking areas, and that buildings with varied
setbacks are located near sidewalks to encourage walking plus create visual
vibrancy.
Stipulation No. 6 requires a landscaped accent area where a median is provided
along the main entrance to the site to create visual vibrancy. Stipulation No. 8
addresses pedestrian pathways that connect the site to adjacent sidewalks,
while Stipulation No. 9 requires decorative pavement to be utilized in order to
visually contrast the parking surfaces. Lastly, Stipulation No. 10 requires the
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 14 of 17
shading of pedestrian walkways to encourage walking. Variation in building
setbacks was not stipulated due to the unique shape of the parcel, which
constraints development on the site.
19. The Street Transportation Department requires the construction of a cul-de-sac
at the terminus of 34th Street. Furthermore, that the developer construct all
streets within and adjacent to the development with all required elements. These
are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 12 and 13.
OTHER
20. The site is not located in an area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. In
the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 15.
21. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements such
as obtaining a use permit to conduct the proposed outdoor use in this zoning
district. Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.
Findings
1.
This proposed development provides a new non-traditional housing option that is
consistent with surrounding developments and serves a need in the community
for disabled individuals.
2.
The development, as stipulated, will maintain an appropriate scale to ensure that
it remains compatible with the area.
3.
This development proposes to develop an asymmetrical parcel that is bounded
by a wash and freeway with a use that is consistent with the goals of the State
Route 51 & Loop 101 Scenic Corridor Policy plan.
Stipulations
1.
The development shall maintain a minimum 50-foot building setback, exclusive of carports and
perimeter walls, from the southern site boundary where adjacent to R1-6 zoning.
2.
The maximum building height shall be limited to 2 stories and 30 feet.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 15 of 17
3.
Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and textural
changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored textured concrete or
stucco, to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.
4.
All elevations of the building(s) shall contain architectural embellishments and detailing
such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
pitched roofs and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
5.
The required landscape setbacks shall include minimum 2-inch caliper large canopy shade
trees, planted 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, and five 5-gallon shrubs per
tree, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. Where utility conflicts
exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and Development Department on
alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment.
6.
Where a landscaped median is provided within the ingress or egress to the site, a
landscaped accent area shall provide a visually unique character with drought-tolerant plant
materials providing seasonal interest and 75 percent live cover, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
7.
Perimeter walls shall be constructed to the following standards, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
a. Perimeter walls visible from public streets shall have a finished appearance
compatible with primary structures that includes material and textural differences,
such as stucco and/or split face block with a decorative element, such as tile or
stamped designs.
b. A combination of solid masonry wall not exceeding 4 feet in height, and wrought iron
view fencing or similar material shall be utilized along the eastern property lines
where open space is adjacent to the drainage channel/floodway (Indian Bend Wash)
east of the site.
8.
Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided connecting all building
entrances and exits, community amenity areas, and all public sidewalks utilizing the
minimum possible distance and providing the most direct route, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 16 of 17
9.
The developer shall provide clearly defined, accessible pathways, constructed of decorative
pavement that visually contrasts with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
10. Pedestrian walkways, including adjacent public sidewalks, shall be shaded to a minimum of
75 percent, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
11. A minimum of two inverted U-bicycle racks or artistic style racks shall be provided, located
near the main building entrance. All bicycle racks shall adhere to Appendix K,
“Outdoor/Open Facilities”, of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, and as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
12. The developer shall construct a minimum 45-foot radius cul-de-sac at the terminus of 34th
Street, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
13. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and
other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.
14. A portion of this parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone AE
Floodplain, on panels 1735L of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) revised December
22, 2017. If the plans show no building and/or construction encroachment including fill
within this portion of the site in the SFHA, then no floodplain requirements will be required.
If encroachment does occur, then the following requirements must be met, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department:
a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the special flood hazard area boundary
limits on plans and ensure that impacts to the proposed facilities and surrounding
properties have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but not limited to
provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City
Code.
b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan needs to be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of Public Works Department for review and approval of
Floodplain requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit.
15. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to
properly assess the materials.
Staff Report: Z-49-20-3
April 20, 2021
Page 17 of 17
Writer
Enrique Bojórquez-Gaxiola
April 20, 2021
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped September 17, 2020 (1 page)
Conceptual Elevations date stamped September 17, 2020 (2 pages)
Community Correspondence (1 page)
Z-164-04
Z-SP-28-69
Z-129-96
Z-SP-7-84
Z-67-97
36TH STREET
*
*
*
*
R1-6
R-2 PRD
C-2
R-2
C-O
R-5
R-5
R1-6
C-2
5
34TH ST
36TH ST
SWEETWATER AVE
PRESIDIO RD
35TH ST
EMILE ZOLA AVE
WILLOW AVE
ROVEEN AVE
35TH PL
36TH PL
ANDORA DR
33RD PL
34TH PL
33RD ST
32ND ST
SUTTON DR
SURREY AVE
DELCOA DR
PERSHING AVE
CAPTAIN DREYFUS AVE
R1-6 SP
Z-SP-13-87
Squaw
Peak Freeway
Specific Plan
£
¤
51
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
SHEA BLVD
S
Q
U
A
W PEAK PKWY (SR 51)
16TH ST
24TH ST
32ND ST
40TH ST
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-49-20
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
1.11 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R1-6
R-3
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
6
16
* UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
7
19
Matt Ihms
DATE:
12/09/2020
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 32-35
ZONING MAP
L-10
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R1-6 ( 1.11 a.c.)
TO:
R-3 ( 1.11 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-49-20.mxd
Z-49-20
0.07
0
0.07
0.035
Miles
Z-164-04
Z-SP-28-69
Z-129-96
Z-SP-7-84
Z-67-97
36TH STREET
*
*
*
*
R1-6
R-2 PRD
C-2
R-2
C-O
R-5
R-5
R1-6
C-2
5
34TH ST
36TH ST
SWEETWATER AVE
PRESIDIO RD
35TH ST
EMILE ZOLA AVE
WILLOW AVE
ROVEEN AVE
35TH PL
36TH PL
ANDORA DR
33RD PL
34TH PL
33RD ST
32ND ST
SUTTON DR
SURREY AVE
DELCOA DR
PERSHING AVE
CAPTAIN DREYFUS AVE
R1-6 SP
Z-SP-13-87
Squaw
Peak Freeway
Specific Plan
£
¤
51
Maricopa County Assessor's Office
DEER VALLEY DR
SR 101
UNION HILLS DR
BELL RD
GREENWAY RD
THUNDERBIRD RD
CACTUS RD
SHEA BLVD
S
Q
U
A
W PEAK PKWY (SR 51)
16TH ST
24TH ST
32ND ST
40TH ST
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-49-20
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
1.11 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R1-6
R-3
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
6
16
* UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
7
19
Matt Ihms
DATE:
12/09/2020
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 32-35
ZONING MAP
L-10
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R1-6 ( 1.11 a.c.)
TO:
R-3 ( 1.11 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-49-20.mxd
Z-49-20
0.07
0
0.07
0.035
Miles
From:
Emad Zaki
To:
matt.ihms@gmail.com
Cc:
David O Simmons; Enrique A Bojorquez-Gaxiola
Subject:
Case Z-49-20-3
Date:
Monday, February 22, 2021 12:39:10 PM
Attachments:
Rezoning Letter .pdf
Dear Mr. Ihms,
I am attaching a copy of the letter you mailed regarding the above-mentioned case. I have few
concerns that I would like to address:
1. The meeting is scheduled on a work day at 9AM, this is going to prevent a lot of
the neighborhood members from attending. My experience with these meeting that it is
usually scheduled after regular work hours.
2. The way this is set does not give the members an access to the meeting until they
request it from you, this is another concern as members should have a direct link to
access the meeting same as in-person meeting works.
Please consider the above concerns as it interferes with the main purpose of this meetings to
allow the neighbors to voice their opinions and address their concerns. It would be great if you
can reschedule this meeting for another day after 5PM and to have a direct link for anyone
who would like to attend.
Please also let me know if you can provide me with the mailing list to make sure that our
neighbors all got the letter, and if they share the same concerns we have.
Best Regards,
Emad Zaki