Attachment G - Opposition - GPA-DV-3-22-1.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
37766 characters
From:
Alison McKee
To:
PDD Deer Valley VPC
Subject:
#Z-59-22-1 & #GPA-DV-3-22-1
Date:
Wednesday, April 19, 2023 11:31:03 PM
Attachments:
COP letter home at Happy Valley - 230419.pdf
Deer Valley Village Planning Committee,
I am writing today on behalf of myself, my husband and the Apostolic community living in
our rural neighborhood. Please see the attached opposition letter to cases Z-59-22-1 and GPA-
DV-3-22-1. The letter outlines the many reasons why the zoning adjustment and general plan
amendment should not be considered or recommended to the city council. I constructed this
letter after speaking with our many neighbors who are members of the nearby Apostolic
Church. These Apostolic neighbors do not use computers or the internet outside of their
work. The letter reflects their concerns as well as the concerns of my husband and myself and
was signed with all of our addresses or parcel numbers and phone numbers. Since the meeting
is on a Thursday night, a church night for the Apostolic neighbors, they cannot attend. While
they will not skip a church service, they still want a voice in this important matter, and hope
that the committee will be accommodating and understand that this group signed letter is their
best means of communicating their opposition. Despite their lack of use of
modern technology, their opinions should matter and be heard by the committee and City
of Phoenix staff. We are all happy to accept a phone call to discuss this matter.
Please see the attached letter.
Kind Regards,
Alison McKee
$77$&+0(17*
! "# $$ %
& ' ( $$ %
)
%*') +,
- .
)/
)
0
1
/
+
0 -
+
))
/0
+,
! "# $$ %+, /
234
5 34,
+6 5-
/2'/
34,74
/ )0 )
+, "
- /
1 +0 )
) 2'
3476
89(
)
/ :
) +; )
+, / < =(>/
4 6 %? +
/0
89(+ /
)+, -
)
/+@)
2'/ )0 /
1+ 2A +,
/ 1 - +,
%*') ) ) / ) B +@
//1 $$8 - +
%*')+ +,
- )
-
C!
$99+
6+
-'!D"99(
!" #" "$% $% !
/
< 0+@ /
0 +@ / -+
/
)
) ! "# $$ %+
@
-& & ' ( $$ %
0
/0 & / +@
) /2E 5
$ /
/ +F "0
/
) /// )0 +,
6 % 5 ) 1 < =( +,
)
+4 5 +
. 0)
)0 )
+'
" -5 +@ )/
23 )/ 6 % +@ /
/ %G
/ + ) )
)
2@ @@@
C
:H)
/ )) +H
) ) 5
/+;
0 I +
)
)0 +.0
- /
=99G
+ 0
)
+' -
/
)
:/
) +;
& ' ( $$ % / +
-
/
/ -
& /0
-& )+ ) ! "# $$ %
& ' ( $$ %+ 7
Parcel # 210-09-017F
Parcel # 210-09-006B
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
> ?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
>
?
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
From:
Diane Habener
To:
PDD Deer Valley VPC
Subject:
Zoning #2-59-22-1
Date:
Thursday, April 20, 2023 12:40:16 PM
I am completely appalled that you are even considering approving this project! Please go back and read your
Village Planning Handbook.
“Is the request consistent with the General Plan Map?”
NO
Does the request, “Promote the unique character of each village and strengthen existing neighborhoods?”
Absolutely not. This request destroys our existing
neighborhood.
This proposal has negative impacts that cannot be mitigated on traffic, density, height, environmental, character and
lifestyle.
Please listen to the neighbors and refuse this rezoning proposal.
Sincerely,
Diane Habener
25312 N 16th Ave
Phoenix 85085
Sent from my iPhone
From:
DaveVicki Rockey
To:
Matteo Moric
Subject:
Rezoning at 17th Ave and Happy Valley Rd
Date:
Monday, May 1, 2023 7:47:52 AM
We live in the area and are very much opposed to changing the zoning. We bought the land in 1976 and have lived
there since 1980. We are happy with our zoning now and do not want it to change to have more apartments in our
area.
#Z-59-22-1 and companion case #GPA-DV-22-1.
Vicki and David Rockey
25440 N 11th Ave
Phx, AZ 85085
Sent from my iPhone
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Allyson McLean <allyson.r.mclean@gmail.com>
Sent:
Monday, May 1, 2023 8:48 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission
Subject:
RE: GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
Phoenix,planningcommittee,
IamreachingoutasaconcernedcommunitymemberrequestingapostponementofthesecasesBeingdiscussedatthe
meetingon5/4/23,duetotheDVVPCcanceledmeetingduetonoquorum.Iamrequestingpostponementbeforone
month,whichwouldallowforourcommunitytogatherourvoicesmoreclearly,andallowforadequatetimeto
communicateourconcernswiththispossiblezoningchange.
Thatbeingsaid,shouldpostponementnotbegranted,Iwouldliketomakeitclearhowthispossiblezoningwould
effectmycommunity.Thiszoningchangewouldallowforalargeapartmentcomplexofapproximately243unitstobe
builtwithnoplanchangesontrafficdirecting.TrafficaloneonhappyValleyfrommycommunityisagreatchallenge.It
willbeexponentiallyincreasedwiththisapartmentcomplex.OurcommunityiszonedasSͲ1“whichisranchorfarm.
Residentdistrictdesignedtoprovideforverylowdensity,farmorresidentialusestoprotectandpreservelowdensity
areasintheirpresentordesiredcharacter.ItisintendedthattheS1districtwillafireareaswhereisSemiͲrural
residentialandagriculturalusescanbemaintainedwithoutimpairmentfromindustrial,commercial,orhigherdensity
residentialdevelopment”.Redistrictingthis8acreplotwillhaveamassiveaffectonourlowdensityneighborhoodby
grosslyincreasingthedensitygoingagainstwiththeS1districtstandsfor.Beyondinconvenienceoftheseredistrictingis
agreatconcernforsafetyregardingmychildrenandtheincreaseoftrafficwithoutplansonnewsafetyimplementation.
Ihopethatmyconcernscanbevoicedclearlyandunderstood.Changingacommunityinsuchadrasticwaywithouta
planonsafetyandtrafficlogisticsisaskingforsignificantproblemsifnotpossibleinjuries.InadditiontotheseconcernsI
amalsoconcernedaboutthestressofthesenewapartmentswillputonthecurrentschoolsasamountofgrowthinthe
areahasbeenexponentialwithoutredistrictingoftheschoolsorplansfornewschoolsintheverynearfuture.
AllysonandMichaelMcLean
1607wParsonsrd
Phoenix,AZ85085
303Ͳ242Ͳ1871
SentfrommyiPhone
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Alison McKee <alisonsmckee@gmail.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 10:43 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission; Racelle Escolar
Subject:
GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
Attachments:
PlanningCommissionLetterHomeatHappyValley 230502.pdf
PlanningCommission,
Iamwritingtodayonbehalfofmyself,myhusbandandtheApostoliccommunitylivinginourrural
neighborhood.PleaseseetheattachedoppositionlettertocasesZͲ59Ͳ22Ͳ1andGPAͲDVͲ3Ͳ22Ͳ1.Inthisletterweare
askingforapostponementofthePlanningCommissionhearingonthiscaseandoutliningthemanyreasonswhy
thezoningadjustmentandgeneralplanamendmentshouldnotbeconsideredorrecommendedtothecitycouncil.I
constructedthisletterafterspeakingwithourmanyneighborswhoaremembersofthenearbyApostolicChurch.These
Apostolicneighborsdonotusecomputersortheinternetoutsideoftheirwork.Theletterreflectstheirconcernsas
wellastheconcernsofmyhusbandandmyselfandwassignedwithallofouraddressesorparcelnumbersandphone
numbers.SincethemeetingisonaThursdaynight,achurchnightfortheApostolicneighbors,theycannot
attend.Whiletheywillnotskipachurchservice,theystillwantavoiceinthisimportantmatter,andhopethatthe
committeewillbeaccommodatingandunderstandthatthisgroupsignedletteristheirbestmeansofcommunicating
theiropposition.Despitetheirlackofuseofmoderntechnology,theiropinionsshouldmatterandbeheardbythe
committeeandCityofPhoenixstaff.Weareallhappytoacceptaphonecalltodiscussthismatter.
Pleaseseetheattachedletter.
KindRegards,
AlisonMcKee
!" ## $
%& ' ( ## $ )
$*&) +
,
-
+.
)
/
)
+0 - ) -) - !
1 ,+0 /
+
2
) 3 ) 4 4$
+& /
+.
!5 $ ) ) - +
6 ,4 4 )
+ )
+
2 4 4$
+7-
)
+6 4 0895'&: ,
)
+0
)
-
)
+& )
)- , 1 )
+; )
+
0 14 )- )
,
2
-
+
,
1
+0
!" ## $+0 -
+0
)
/1 - +5 -
) ,) +0
!
1
-
2 +0
)
) )
+5 <=(
)
1
>
#==
+
5+
1& ?!==(
!" #" "$% $% !
-
@
)
+AB
1)
- +0
-
2 1 +0 @
A
/
+&
) - )
$*&)+ ) - 1 ) $* &)+
0C1 $*&))2
+0
$*&) ) )
-)
C +;
- -2
##<
1
)
) +0 1
) -
8 ,+
$*&)+ +;
-
,
-
1+
-
) )
!" ## $+
; 1% %& ' ( ## $%
-
+0 )-+B / #
- -
+D
! ,- ) -- -)
,
+0 5 $ /) 28 E(
+0
)
+B
/
+4 ,) ) ,)
+&
!
1/
+0 ))
+;;;;
> @9)-
)
) +9 )
)
/
- +A,
3
+
) ) ,
+4,
1- E==F
+
,
) +&
1)
)
@-)
+A
%& ' ( ## $ -+
1
- -
1 1
1% ) + ) !" ## $
%& ' ( ## $+
G
HHH
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
tryitonjewels@aol.com
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 2:46 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission; Racelle Escolar
Cc:
laurel@clearskies.com; alisonsmckee@gmail.com
Subject:
GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
May 2, 2023
To Whom It May Concern;
RE: GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
As a community we are requesting to POSTPONE the meeting May 4th. Our community are large horse properties and
the 600 ft outreach requirement did not let our community know about these changes to zoning and another HUGE
apartment development in our landlocked community.
We are asking for more time to allow others in the neighbor to know and properly address these developments.
For the record, we are OPPOSED to yet another HUGE apartment development. First of all, there has been no
consideration for the horse properties owners nor our livestock lifestyle with all the rentals being approved. Short-term
apartment culture is in complete contrast to our livestock culture.
The other MAJOR impact that is not being considered is how all these huge apartment developments are placed at our
community’s entrances and exists. These developments do not show any concessions for our community and it is
landlocking us. We are already feeling the increase of traffic without the completion of the thousands of people you have
already approved that outnumber our small community. It will make it very difficult and dangerous to be pulling horse
trailers in and out of our community.
Unfortunately, this feels like another unheard request for our community but we feel we need to make yet another attempt
to voice our concerns.
In closing,
Alan and Melissa Crawford
Owners of two properties on W Parsons Rd.
623 606 7248
Margaret Langley
1607 W Parsons Road
Phoenix AZ 85085
(970)217-2791
Margaret.a.langley@gmail.com
May 2, 2023
Phoenix Planning Commission
RE: GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
Dear Commissioners,
I am writing to request a postponement of this rezoning request and submit
my objections to this zoning change. Please consider postponement due to
the cancellation of the DVVPC meeting as there wasn't a quorum.
I am opposed to this zoning change. Two large apartment complexes are
already on the way that will not only disrupt our way of life and the character of
our neighborhood, but dangerously increase traffic. Please do not add
another. Please do not recommend zoning changes and general plan
amendment to the City of Phoenix council to make way for Home at Happy
Valley.
Home at Happy Valley, a multi-family housing development, is different from
the other developments in that it DOES NOT border a major road. It is on 17th
Avenue which is surrounded by Maricopa County RU-43 properties. This will
make traffic on our rural, PRIVATE, dirt roads a nightmare. The developer
claim residents from these apartments won't use our roads. How are they
going to stop them? There is a median at 17th which means traffic must access
Happy Valley to go east to the 101, by going north on 17th to Parsons and
going west to 19th or east to 15th. Both ways are through our neighborhood
on private roads. Happy Valley and 19th Avenues are already congested
because the city has not adequately improved them for the traffic created by
the neighboring community of Union Park. We already have drivers using our
rural area as a cut through when westbound traffic on single lane Happy Valley
is bumper to bumper. This problem will only be compounded by the building of
the 2 other apartment complexes. We simply cannot handle more traffic that
will be caused by a third.
My family has been in this valley for five generations. When I moved with my
daughter's family back to Arizona, to live self-sufficiently and become
beekeepers, we purchased this land, believing the general plan, which
showed commercial, medical/dental office space as the buffer between our
county island and a growing city. Now we're faced with three large apartment
complexes! Please vote no on the general plan amendment and help us
maintain the certainty that it promises and honor the statement to, "Ensure that
development, redevelopment and infrastructure supports and reinforces the
character and identity of each unique community and neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Margaret Langley
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Laurel Brodie <laurel@clearskies.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:29 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission; Racelle Escolar
Cc:
Alison McKee; Melissa Crawford
Subject:
Fw: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for Postponement
of the Planning Committee meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
Subject: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for Postponement of the Planning Committee
meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
I am writing a separate appeal to request that the May 4, 2023 meeting for this case be postponed due to
what we feel are extenuating circumstances. We would appreciate your consideration of this request ASAP, as
if you agree that these items constitute enough of a reason to postpone and you could let us know that, many
of us would not have to make a 50 mile drive (round trip) partly during rush hour, which would also require
some of us to leave our work places early (if we are able to) just to attend a meeting you might decide to
postpone once we are there. Yes I understand we can attend virtually but those types of meetings truly are
not effective if you want to be heard. And if you do not postpone, we want to be heard. Please consider the
following circumstances;
1. Most of us have been talking wondering how we ended up so late to this game. Obviously the majority
of the residents within our small County Island were not notified by the developer (not required, I
understand that) but we try to keep an eye out for indications of things that might be occuring and the
posted sign issue has been gnawing at my brain wondering why none of us picked up on that the
minute it was posted. At 4 am I realized why that was. The posted sign referencing these requested
changes and meetings was posted 270 ' away from the SE corner of the 5 acre parcel (210-10-
003) among the piles of dirt that exist on the 3 acre parcel (210-10-019D & 210-10-019H) - There is
NO signage of ANY kind on the 5 acre S1 zoned parcel. Most of us when driving that way on
17th Avenue paid that sign no attention as the assumption was it involved the C2 zoned properties
which didn't concern us a whole lot as those fights were long over. When I finally made a point of
stopping and getting out of my vehicle it then became known what we are up against. I will send
pictures in a follow up email which show how easily we could all make this assumption due to the sign
placement. We are talking 2 separate cases and 3 separate parcels owned by 2 separate entities, we
find it extremely unfair if the placement of the one and only sign was placed as far away as possible
from the S-1 5 acre parcel. At a minimum it should have been centered between the 5 acre and 3 acre
parcels. And even though these are companion cases they are currently differently zoned parcels and I
would expect that should require 2 separate signs, or at least multiple signs due to the size and
configuration of the area as your Step 9 states. We feel that the intent of the below requirements was
NOT MET and that alone should get us a postponement.
2
Step 9: Posting Sign on Property The following shall be submitted as part of the Citizen Participation Report:
The applicant is required to post a double-sided sign (Pages 27-28), 4-foot by 8-foot, at a prominent location
on the site a minimum of 15 calendar days prior to the first Village Planning Committee meeting. Multiple
signs may be required depending on the size of the site and location of street frontages. As in the case of the
written notices, the applicant shall submit a notarized affidavit of posting (Pages 29-30) stating the sign has
been posted and a photograph showing the sign on the site to the assigned staff planner two weeks prior to
the first public meeting/hearing, 2nd Floor, Phoenix City Hall, 200 West Washington Street. Signs shall be
updated as needed. Continued cases shall be posted a minimum of seven calendar days prior to continuance
date or immediately after the request is granted. An additional affidavit of posting (Page 30) is required. Signs
must be removed by the applicant within seven calendar days of City Council action
B) The first meeting (which we admit to be unaware of) with the DVVCP which was to be held virtually
evidently resulted in a No Quorum, so no recommendation resulted. The second meeting, (April 20)
which many of us made a point to attend, which included a peaceful style protest and with local news on site,
also resulted in a No Quorum, so we were denied
our first known opportunity to make our concerns known. Therefore, we will never know whether we
would have had the support of the DVVCP in our endeavors, and if we did, how
that might have affected your outlook.
Step 11: Village Planning Committee Meeting Prior to any public hearing, the application will be reviewed at a
regularly scheduled Village Planning Committee monthly meeting (Pages 53-54). Staff will provide the
committee and the applicant a copy of the staff report prior to this meeting. The Village Planning Committee
will make a recommendation. The recommendation from the Village Planning Committee will be forwarded to
the Planning Commission on a Village Planning Committee recommendation form. A copy of the form will be
provided to the applicant, upon request.
C) Since that Non-meeting on April 20th the Developers finally reached out directly to residents beyond their
required 600'. That "open house" was held May 1, which many made the point of attending. The results of
that only made us more concerned that serious concerns involving traffic and density are not being properly
addressed.
Step 12: Planning Commission Action – Public Hearing This public hearing occurs approximately three to five
weeks after the Village Planning Committee meeting. During this public hearing, your rezoning application will
be reviewed and either approved, approved with stipulations, denied, denied as filed and approved differently
than requested, or continued. • Public hearing – legally advertised and posted a minimum of 15 calendar days
prior to hearing (by the applicant). Appeals • Action taken by the Planning Commission can be appealed by the
applicant or interested parties within seven calendar days. Appeals will be forwarded to the City Council for a
public hearing. • Written protests to require a 3/4 vote submitted no later than seven calendar days following
the Planning Commission hearing may require 3/4 vote, rather than a majority vote, for the City Council to
approve the application. • If no appeal is received, ratification occurs at the scheduled City Council hearing. •
The City Council may, by a majority vote; 1) request a public hearing on a Planning Commission
recommendation request that has not been appealed or, 2) send the case back to the Planning Commission
for further consideration. If a hearing is requested, it must first be re-advertised and posted.
We are respectfully requesting that you POSTPONE the Planning Committee meeting so that we can, as a
neighborhood, have the time to gather together and fully discuss the concerns that will have extreme impact
on our small, essentially landlocked (due to the CAP) triangular County Island, so that we can present those
concerns to you for your careful consideration.
3
History has shown us that past cases that make it past your Department are essentially done deals and we
have no chance at a City Council meeting of being heard to the extent that it would make any difference, so
WE IMPLORE YOU TO HEAR OUR VOICES NOW and postpone the May 4th hearing on these cases for at least a
month.
I am also following this email request with pictures of the Installed Notification signage.
Respectfully,
Laurel Brodie (representing many voices from our neighborhood Community)
25657 N. 17th Avenue
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Laurel Brodie <laurel@clearskies.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:30 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission; Racelle Escolar
Cc:
Alison McKee; Melissa Crawford
Subject:
Pictures RE: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for
Postponement of the Planning Committee meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
Attachments:
IMG_3230.jpg; IMG_3234.jpg; IMG_3231.jpg; IMG_3235.jpg
Subject: Pictures RE: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for Postponement of the Planning
Committee meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
1st picture is of the Completely fenced 5 acre S-1 parcel
2ndpicture show footage from that corner to sign
3rd picture is the view of the sign standing on the SE corner of that parcel looking south
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Laurel Brodie <laurel@clearskies.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:32 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission; Racelle Escolar
Cc:
Alison McKee; Melissa Crawford
Subject:
Pictures RE: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for
Postponement of the Planning Committee meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
Attachments:
IMG_3239.jpg; IMG_3256.jpg; IMG_3240.jpg; IMG_3259.jpg; IMG_3260.jpg
Subject: Pictures RE: Urgent - GPA-DV-3-22-1 (Companion Case Z-59-22-1) Request for Postponement of the Planning
Committee meeting scheduled May 4, 6 PM
1st picture is at the sign looking North towards the 5 acre fenced S! parcel
2ndpicture looking west on 17th Ave (notice the debris piles)
3rd picture is the view of the sign looking North
4th picture just emphasizing the amount of obstructions
5th picture shows the corner of the 5 acre lot looking south
Get Outlook for iOS [aka.ms]
1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Diane Habener <diane@tarescue.com>
Sent:
Thursday, May 4, 2023 2:55 PM
To:
PDD Planning Commission
Subject:
Fwd: GPA-DV-3-22-1 & Z-59-22-1
SentfrommyiPhone
Beginforwardedmessage:
From:DianeHabener<diane@tarescue.com>
Date:May4,2023at2:37:22PMMST
To:pdf.planningcomm@phoenix.gov
Subject:GPAͲDVͲ3Ͳ22Ͳ1&ZͲ59Ͳ22Ͳ1
PleasepostponeanyvoteonthisprojectastheDeerValleyVillagePlanningCommissionwerenotable
tolistentoneighborhoodinputorvoteastherewasnoquorumandweneighborswerenotheard.
Regardingthisproposedhighdensity4and5storyapartmentsnexttominimum1.25+acrerural
homes,whywasthisevenallowedtobeproposed?Highdensitynexttorural?Youdon’thavetobe
RayCharlestoseethatthatispoorplanning!Iliveon2.5acresoneparcelawayfromthisandam
1000%againstit.Pleasekeeptheexistingcommercialonthesouth3acresandLOWdensityresidential
ontheother5acreswithnomorethan2storiesallowed.Thankyou.
Sincerely,
DianeHabener
25312N16thAve
Phoenix85085
(925)209Ͳ6480cell
SentfrommyiPhone