Attachment B - Staff Report - Z-62-18-2.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-06-01)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 154104 characters
Staff Report Z-62-18-2 
Verdin PUD 
March 9, 2022 
North Gateway Village Planning 
Committee Meeting Date: 
March 10, 2022 
Desert View Village Planning 
Committee Meeting Date: 
April 5, 2022 
Planning Commission Hearing Date: 
May 5, 2022 
Request From: 
S-1 DCOD (144.82 acres), S-1 (333.57 acres),
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 acres)
Request To: 
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 acres), 
PUD (333.57 acres) 
Proposed Use: 
Planned Unit Development to allow single-
family residential 
Location: 
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment 
and Sonoran Desert Drive 
Owner: 
MacEwen Ranch, LLC 
Applicant 
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc. 
Representative 
Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC 
Staff Recommendation: 
Approval, subject to stipulations 
General Plan Conformity 
General Plan Land Use Map 
Designation 
Current: Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 dwelling 
units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units 
per acre, Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 
dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, 
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay 
Proposed (GPA-DSTV-1-18-2): Residential 2 to 
3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 
dwelling units per acre, Preserves / Floodplain, 
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay removal 
Attachment B

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 2 of 20 
 
 
Street Map 
Classification 
Sonoran Desert 
Drive 
Major Arterial 
80-foot south half street 
 
CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE 
PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of local 
conditions and surrounding neighborhoods. 
 
The proposed development creates a residential community at a density of 3.0 dwelling 
units per acre.  The site will incorporate open edge treatments, various open space 
areas, and connectivity to the surrounding Sonoran Preserve areas.  The protection of 
native vegetation and character of the area is consistent with the North Land Use Plan 
and the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, which both emphasize preservation of desert 
character. 
 
 
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES & NEIGHBORHOODS CORE VALUE; 
DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Include a mix of housing 
types and densities where appropriate within each village that support a broad 
range of lifestyles. 
 
The proposed General Plan Land Use Map amendment and concurrent rezoning case 
will allow for single-family residential development options adjacent to a major arterial 
street and in close proximity to the North Gateway Core and Cave Creek Road.  The 
various lot sizes and single-family housing products proposed in the development will 
support a range of lifestyles for Phoenix residents. 
 
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES & SHADE; 
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new 
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix. 
 
The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-appropriate vegetation and 
trees strategically located to provide shade and visual enhancement throughout the 
community.  The PUD has also fostered a collaboration with the National Wildlife 
Federation to establish design guidelines to integrate and preserve plantings and 
existing trees in the development.  The landscaping standards in the PUD will provide 
significant shade for pedestrians and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within 
the development and in the greater Desert View area. 
 
Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives 
 
North Land Use Plan: See Background Item No. 4.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 3 of 20 
 
 
 
Tree and Shade Master Plan: See Background Item No. 15.  
 
Complete Streets Guiding Principles: See Background Item No. 16.  
 
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: See Background Item No. 17. 
 
Housing Phoenix: See Background Item No. 18. 
 
Zero Waste PHX: See Background Item No. 19. 
 
 
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning 
 
Land Use 
Zoning 
On Site 
Vacant 
S-1, S-1 DCOD, RE-35 DCOD 
North (Across 
Sonoran Desert 
Drive) 
Phoenix Sonoran 
Preserve 
RE-35 DCOD 
West 
Vacant, Phoenix 
Sonoran Preserve 
RE-35, S-1 
East 
Cave Creek Wash, 
Vacant (State Trust 
Land) 
RE-35 
South  
Phoenix Sonoran 
Preserve 
RE-35

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 4 of 20 
 
 
Background/Issues/Analysis 
 
REQUEST 
1. 
This is a request to rezone 
a 488.63-gross acre site 
located at the southwest 
corner of the 24th Street 
alignment and Sonoran 
Desert Drive from S-1 
DCOD (Ranch or Farm 
Residence, Desert 
Character Overlay District), 
S-1 (Ranch or Farm 
Residence), RE-35 DCOD 
(Single-Family Residence 
District, Desert Character 
Overlay District) to PUD 
(Planned Unit 
Development) to allow a 
single-family residential 
development, not to 
exceed 1,420 units. 
 
 
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS 
2. 
The site has General Plan Land Use Map designations of Preserves / 
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per 
acre (138.83 acres), Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / 
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre (312.30 acres), Preserves / 
Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (474.37 acres).  The 
proposal is not consistent with these designations and, as the site exceeds 10 
acres in size, the applicant has filed a General Plan Amendment, GPA-DSTV-1-
18-2, as a companion case to this rezoning request.  The GPA request is for 
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units 
per acre (451.13 acres), Preserves / Floodplain (23.24 acres), Infrastructure 
Phasing Overlay removal (474.37 acres).  Staff is recommending approval as 
the designation will allow development at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per 
acre. 
 
Zoning Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix 
Planning and Development Department 
Proposed 
PUD

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 5 of 20 
 
 
 
 
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is designated Future 
Parks/Open Space or 1 dwelling unit per acre. 
 
The area directly east of the subject site is designated Preserves/Floodplain.   
 
South of the subject site is designated Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling 
units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Publicly Owned 
Parks/Open Space. 
 
West of the subject site is designated Publicly Owned Parks/Open Space and 
open space owned by the ASLD designated Future Parks/Open Space or 1 
dwelling unit per acre. 
 
 
 
 
Existing and Proposed General Land Use Designation Maps, Source: City of Phoenix 
Planning and Development Department 
EXISTING 
PROPOSED

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 6 of 20 
 
 
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING 
3. 
The subject site is currently vacant and zoned S-1 DCOD (Ranch or Farm 
Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), 
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert Character Overlay 
District).  The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: 
 
 
NORTH 
North of the northern boundary of the subject site is Sonoran Desert Drive and 
the Sonoran Preserve.  Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a major arterial 
roadway and is an important east-west alignment between Interstate 17 and 
northeast Phoenix.  This roadway alignment is proposed to have a total of six 
lanes, three in each direction.  The Sonoran Preserve consists of over 9,600 
acres of relatively undisturbed natural areas in North Phoenix with various trail 
connectivity throughout.  Additionally, this area is owned by the Arizona State 
Land Department (ASLD). 
 
EAST 
East of the subject site is Cave Creek Wash and its associated floodplain.  The 
floodplain also encroaches onto the southeast portion of the subject site. 
Aerial Sketch Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 7 of 20 
 
 
SOUTH 
South of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve and Cave Buttes Recreation 
Area.  The Cave Buttes Recreation Area is a park that overseen by the 
Maricopa County Flood Control District.  This area contains a number of dams 
that control flooding from washes in the general area. 
 
WEST 
West of the subject site is the Sonoran Preserve owned by the City of Phoenix 
and vacant land owned by the ASLD. 
 
 
AREA PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES 
4. 
North Land Use Plan 
The project site is 
located within the 
boundaries of the North 
Land Use Plan.  The 
North Land Use Plan 
was created in 1997 with 
the purpose of 
establishing growth 
patterns while 
preserving the desert 
landscape and character 
of the area.  The plan 
recognizes the 
importance that the rural 
character and lifestyle 
play in determining 
appropriate land use 
densities.   
The northern portion of 
the site is within the 
North Land Use Plan  
 
 
 
and the plan designates that area as 0 to 1.2 dwelling units per acre.  The 
proposed site will have a maximum of 1,420 units across the approximately 488-
acre site to ensure compatibility with the character of the North Land Use Plan. 
 
The development also supports concepts in the North Land Use Plan by 
preserving Cave Creek Wash’s natural flow and leaving that portion of the site 
as natural open space.  Additionally, the development will provide open edge 
treatments adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and blend the development edges 
with the surrounding desert environment. 
 
 
North Land Use Plan Map, Source: City of Phoenix 
Planning and Development Department 
Subject Site

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 8 of 20 
 
 
Conceptual Land Use Plan, Source: Gammage & 
Burnham 
Master Development Parcel Exhibit, Source: 
Gammage & Burnham 
PUD PROPOSAL 
5. 
The proposal was developed utilizing the Planned Unit Development zoning 
district.  The PUD is intended to create a built environment that is superior to 
what is produced through conventional zoning districts and design guidelines.  
Using a collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and 
proposes standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a 
case by case basis.  Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a 
requirement, the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied. 
 
 
6. 
Land Use Plan: The PUD will 
be a master-planned residential 
community with a maximum of 
1,420 dwelling units at an 
overall density of 3.0 dwelling 
units per acre.  The 
development will be a collection 
of single-family neighborhoods 
with various amenities, open 
spaces, and a pedestrian 
network connected to the 
Sonoran Preserve and 
surrounding desert environment. 
 
The development will be divided 
into three Master Development 
Parcels ranging from 
approximately 130 to 180 acres.  
Each development parcel 
represents an anticipated 
development phase.  The 
development parcels will then 
be divided into individual 
residential neighborhood units, 
which will range from 20 to 40 
acres in size.  Each 
neighborhood unit will include a 
mix of lot sizes, densities, and 
home product types.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 9 of 20 
 
 
7. 
Permitted Uses: The PUD proposes to allow single-family detached dwellings, 
single-family attached dwellings, guesthouses, a community center, and model 
homes by right.  The primary uses for the community center are a place of 
meeting, social activities, active or passive indoor and outdoor recreation and 
entertainment, indoor and outdoor cooking areas and facilities, and a business 
center.  Accessory uses to the community center include alcoholic beverage or 
food sales, convenience market, and snack bar/restaurant.  Temporary uses to 
the community center are community or special events, promotional events, 
farmers markets, and mobile food vending and vendors, subject to Section 708 
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.  Accessory uses and structures are to comply 
with its respective section in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.   
 
 
8. 
Development Standards: The PUD sets forth several development standards 
that only apply to the non-hillside areas of the PUD.  All other areas of the PUD 
will be subject to all Hillside Development Standards of the Zoning Ordinance, 
which would override any of the PUD standards where conflicts arise. 
 
Below is a summary of the development standards proposed in the PUD 
development narrative for development parcel allocation and single-family land 
use districts, which can be found on pages 28, 35, and 36 of the PUD 
Development Narrative. 
 
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ALLOCATION 
Master 
Development 
Parcel 
Master 
Development 
Parcel 
Acreage 
Maximum 
Unit Count 
Allowed Land Use Districts 
Maximum 
Allowed 
Percentage 
A 
154 +/- 
550 
Small Lot (SFR-3) 
Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 
25% 
75% 
50% 
B 
168 +/- 
600 
Small Lot (SFR-3) 
Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 
25% 
75% 
50% 
C 
166 +/- 
600 
Small Lot (SFR-3) 
Traditional (SFR-5, SFR-7) 
Estate (SFR-9, SFR-14) 
25% 
75% 
50% 
Total Gross 
Acreage 
488 +/- 
 
 
 
Maximum Overall Unit Count 
1,420 
 
 
Maximum Overall Density 
3.0 du/ac

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 10 of 20 
 
 
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 
Development 
Standard 
SFR-3 
SFR-5 
SFR-7 
SFR-9 
SFR-14 
Minimum Lot 
Area (square 
feet) 
3,000 
5,000 
7,000 
9,000 
14,000 
Minimum Lot 
Width 
40 feet 
45 feet 
55 feet 
65 feet 
90 feet 
Minimum Lot 
Depth 
None 
Minimum Perimeter Building Setbacks 
 
Sonoran 
Desert 
Drive 
15 feet 
 
Collector 
ROW 
15 feet 
Minimum Interior Building Setbacks 
 
Front 
10 feet 
 
Garage 
18 feet, from back of sidewalk 
 
Rear 
5 feet 
15 feet 
20 feet 
 
Street Side 
5 feet 
10 feet 
 
Non-Street 
Side 
0 feet, 10 
foot 
building 
separation  
5 feet 
Maximum 
Building Height  
2 stories, 30 feet 
 
The proposed development standards allow for various types of residential 
development throughout the community to ensure diversity and a variety of 
lifestyle choices for residents. 
 
 
9. 
Connectivity to the Sonoran Preserve: The Verdin development will provide 
proximity and access to significant desert amenities, such as the Sonoran 
Preserve, through trail connections, paseos, edge open space areas, and view 
corridors.  The PUD also provides various design guidelines and development 
standards ensuring the project will integrate naturally with the surrounding 
desert environment. 
 
The property is adjacent to properties that are part of or targeted for acquisition 
as part of the Sonoran Preserve.  The developer and the City of Phoenix’s 
Parks and Recreation Department intend to ensure opportunities for public 
access to the Preserve.  The development will provide public walk-in trailheads 
and connections at various locations along the Preserve edge and Verdin’s 
property boundaries.  The final locations will be determined by the Parks and 
Recreation Department.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 11 of 20 
 
 
 
Additionally, a public trail will be 
developed along the Mesquite Wash 
Corridor, linking the north and south 
halves of the Sonoran Preserve.  At 
the north and south ends of the 
Mesquite Wash Corridor, the PUD 
will provide public trailheads at 
defined points of entry.  The 
Mesquite Wash Corridor trail will 
include a 12-foot-wide natural 
surface multi-use trail within a 20-
foot-wide public multi-use trail 
easement.   
Internal to the development there 
will be minimum 40-foot-wide 
landscaped pedestrian paseo corridors with 6 to 8 foot wide paths located 
between neighborhood units.  The Paseo Corridors will extend from the internal 
pedestrian circulation system to the aforestated trailheads. 
 
Trails will be provided in limited areas near the property perimeter where future 
connections to the Sonoran Preserve are anticipated.  These trails will be 
comprised of a natural surface no greater than 4 feet in width.  The final 
locations of the connection points will be determined in coordination with the 
Parks and Recreation Department. 
 
 
Per the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, 
the development intends to integrate 
into the larger desert character by 
having open edges along the perimeter 
of the community.  The open edge plan 
will promote visual and physical 
connectivity to and from the property, 
maintain washes and other significant 
landforms, and protect flora and fauna 
in the area.  A minimum of 60% of the 
open edge treatment will be provided 
along the preserve edge.  
Edge Openness Plan, Source: Gammage & 
Burnham 
Conceptual Trailhead Example, Source: 
Gammage & Burnham

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 12 of 20 
10.
Landscape Standards: The PUD outlines landscaping standards that exceed
the requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance.  Below is a summary of
the landscape standards proposed in the PUD development narrative for the
single-family land use districts, which can be found on pages 35 and 36 of the
PUD Development Narrative.
SINGLE-FAMILY LAND USE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 
Development 
Standard 
SFR-3 
SFR-5 
SFR-7 
SFR-9 
SFR-14 
Minimum Common Landscape Setbacks 
Sonoran 
Desert Drive 
ROW 
30 feet average, 15 feet minimum 
Arterial/ 
Collector 
ROW 
15 feet average, 10 feet minimum 
All Other 
Perimeter 
Property 
Lines 
No requirement 
Common Area 
(per Master 
Development 
Parcel) 
20% gross 
Common Area 
(per 
Neighbirhood 
Unit) 
10% gross 
Landscape 
Standars 
Adjacent to 
Sonoran Desert 
Drive 
Perimeter common: Trees spaces a maximum of 20 to 30 feet 
on center or in equivalent groupings 
Neighborhood Entry Units will provide a detached 6-foot-wide public sidewalk 
with enhanced landscaping and shade trees planted at an interval of 1 tree per 
25 feet or in equivalent groupings.  A minimum of three 3-inch caliper shade 
trees will be planted on either side of the Neighborhood Entry Unit.  Any 
additional trees shall be a combination of 1-inch caliper (maximum 25%) and 2-
inch caliper (maximum 75%) trees. 
Local street sidewalks will be 5 feet in width and attached on both sides of 
local streets, except in locations where adjacent to common open space areas.  
To encourage shading of sidewalks, shade trees shall be planted with the front 
yard of all residential lots.  Each shade tree shall be a minimum 24 inch box 
tree.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 13 of 20 
 
 
11. 
Open Space: Verdin has partnered with the National Wildlife Federation to 
establish guidelines to maintain natural habitats and native species within the 
community.  The collaboration will use a minimum of 80% native plants, develop 
habitat management plans for Verdin’s Homeowner’s Association(s), support 
monarch butterfly recovery efforts, and design and build Early Childhood Health 
Outdoors playscapes. 
The use of native plants creates an environment that is familiar to wildlife 
species and consistent with what is found in the natural desert environment.  
Natural open space areas will be designated for the purposed of maintaining 
sensitive habitat and natural desert character.  These open areas will be marked 
with signage and fencing to reduce human impact and promote property edges 
that blend seamlessly with the adjacent desert environment.  Verdin has 
identified unique area types that will promote the above principles. 
 
Type A, Preserved Habitat, areas will emphasize the preservation of existing 
natural, undisturbed desert. Type B, Natural Revegetated, areas are those that 
require disturbances, but are revegetated with the intent to match the plant 
densities and character of the natural desert.  Salvaged and nursery-grown 
native plant materials will be utilized for the revegetation and temporary 
irrigation of these materials will be allowed to support the re-establishment.  
Type C, Maintained, areas will be common open space for recreational uses 
and/or may require ongoing aesthetic maintenance. 
 
 
Certified Area Open Space Types, Source: Gammage & Burnham

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 14 of 20 
 
 
12. 
Design Guidelines: The PUD sets forth an extensive list of design 
requirements for neighborhood units, streets, pedestrian connectivity, open 
space, amenities, grading and drainage, and utilities.  The PUD also integrates 
a number of design considerations based on the Desert Character Overlay 
District standards, including a sensitive transituon from open space to 
developed areas, conservation of washes and wildlife habitats, and use of 
native plants.  There are also architectural standards for elevations, windows, 
doors, and roofs.  These standards and design features ensure that a high-
quality development is provided on site with a diversity in elevation 
combinations.  Architectural standards includes a variety in traditional roof 
forms, outdoor living spaces, signature design elements, articulation, pop-outs, 
and recesses.  The complete language regarding design guidelines can be 
found on pages 47 through 122. 
 
 
13. 
Amenities: The PUD proposes two 
community amenity areas and parks 
and common open spaces equitably 
distributed throughout the community.  
A primary community amenity area will 
include a private community center and 
outdoor recreation facilities.  Other 
primary community resident amenities 
may include a pool, play area, even and 
gathering lawn, patio with fire pit, yoga, 
meditation area, and outdoor lounge 
area/kitchen. A secondary community 
open space is proposed to include a 
ramada, play area, demonstration 
garden, and lawn seating area. 
Verdin will also include neighborhood parks that can provide a combination of 
active and passive uses at a smaller scale.  The neighborhood parks will be 
located centrally to each neighborhood unit. 
 
 
14. 
Signage: Signs within the PUD will comply with Section 705 of the Zoning 
Ordinance with some modifications regarding ground and combination signs.  
The Primary Ornamental Entry Signs will be provided near the primary entrance 
and/or along the primary collector. A maximum of two primary ornamental entry 
signs are permitted in the development.  These signs will be 12-feet maximum 
in height, but non-supporting structures such as towers, columns, and trims may 
be up to a maximum of 30 feet in height.  The maximum sign lettering area is 
100 square feet per sign. 
The Neighborhood Unit Signs and Secondary Ornamental Entry Signs are 
freestanding ground mounted signs located on or incorporated into a solid base, 
or wall mounted signs.  There will be a maximum of two single-faced 
Conceptual Community Area, Source: 
Gammage & Burnham

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 15 of 20 
 
 
neighborhood unit identification signs or one double-faced neighborhood unit 
identification sign allowed per entrance to a neighborhood unit.  The maximum 
height for these signs is 8 feet, including embellishments, architecture, walls, or 
other similar features.  The maximum sign lettering is 44 square feet per sign. 
 
 
CITYWIDE STUDIES AND POLICIES 
15. 
Tree and Shade Master Plan 
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as 
infrastructure to ensure trees are an integral part of the City’s planning and 
development process.  Sidewalks on street frontages should be detached from 
the curbs to allow trees to be planted on both sides of the sidewalk to provide 
thermal comfort for pedestrians and to reduce the urban heat island effect.  The 
development will provide detached sidewalks along primary and secondary 
collectors, adjacent to Neighborhood Unit entries, and adjacent to common 
open spaces with contiguous local street frontages greater than 50 feet and 15-
feet in depth.  The proposed PUD narrative includes standards for desert-
appropriate vegetation and trees strategically located to provide shade and 
visual enhancement throughout the community.  The PUD has also fostered a 
collaboration with the National Wildlife Federation to establish design guidelines 
to integrate and preserve plantings and existing trees in the development.  The 
landscaping standards in the PUD will provide significant shade for pedestrians 
and will help reduce the urban heat island effect within the development and in 
the greater Desert View area. 
 
 
16. 
Complete Streets Guiding Principles 
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding 
Principles.  The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide 
an accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such 
as bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed PUD sets forth 
standards that will improve the pedestrian environment, including landscaped 
paseos and trails, detached sidewalks, tree shade cover, and shaded open 
space and amenity areas. 
 
 
17. 
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan 
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to 
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure.  
The Development Narrative states that an extensive pedestrian network of 
walking and bicycle paths will be available for resident use in order to create a 
sustainable and inviting community.  Collector roadways in the development will 
include the construction of detached 8-foot-wide public sidewalks, including 
bicycle lanes.  Additionally, the community open spaces will be connected 
through a comprehensive system of pedestrian and bicycle trails.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 16 of 20 
 
 
18. 
Housing Phoenix 
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan.  
This plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of 
housing with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through 
increased housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes.  
Phoenix’s rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a 
need for over 163,000 new housing units.  Current shortages of housing supply 
relative to demand are a primary reason why housing costs are increasing.  The 
proposed development will provide a maximum of 1,420 units, which will be a 
mix of single-family and multifamily units.  These proposed units support the 
Housing Phoenix Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 
2030 and contributes to a variety of housing types that will address the supply 
shortage. 
 
 
19. 
Zero Waste PHX 
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a 
goal to become a zero waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 
Environmental Sustainability Goals.  One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this 
is to improve and expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.  
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to 
encourage the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and 
mixed use developments meeting certain criteria.  The Development Narrative 
states that recycling receptacles will be provided and a sustainable recycling 
program will be actively pursued and supported for all single-family 
development. 
 
 
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY 
20. 
At the time the staff report was written staff had received 82 letters in opposition 
and 6 letters in support of the proposal.   
 
Letters in opposition expressed the following concerns:  
• Current road infrastructure is at capacity.  Additional homes will increase 
traffic and decrease resident safety. 
• The preserve area needs to be maintained as is for hiking, biking, 
walking, trail running, and other outdoor activities. 
• Development will have a negative impact on the area’s natural flora and 
fauna. 
• The proposal should maintain the requirements for the Desert Character 
Overlay District. 
• Density/number of units is too high. 
• Zoning should remain as S-1. 
• Additional homes will result in water resource issues. 
• Sonoran Desert Drive should remain a scenic corridor. 
• The proposed development does not match the character of the area.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 17 of 20 
 
 
• Additional development will result in further strain on the school district. 
• These is a lack of amenities to support the development. 
 
Letters in support discussed the following items: 
• Density at 3 dwelling units per acre is reasonable for the area. 
• The proposal will provide additional housing, which is needed in the area. 
 
 
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS 
21. 
The Parks and Recreation Department provided comments indicating that the 
Department would want to purchase the parcel to the east of the development, 
but did not have a trailhead planned for the site and did not foresee the need for 
connection from Verdin at this time. 
 
 
22. 
The Street Transportation Department provided the following comments: 
 
• The developer is required to complete a Traffic Impact Study to the City 
for the development. Additionally, the developer shall submit Master 
Street Design and Phasing Plants for each Development Unit.  This is 
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3. 
 
• Public Roadways shall meet appropriate Storm Water Design Manual 
standards for wash crossings. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4. 
 
• The developer shall provide the appropriate construction for right-of-way 
within and adjacent to the development.  This is addressed in Stipulation 
No. 5. 
 
 
23. 
The Water Services Department commented that the closest water and sewer 
mains are within Cave Creek Road.  The Department stated that new water 
main extensions will be required at the time of development and particular 
pressure zones will require private booster pumps.  The Department stated that 
depending on the timing for the development, the development can either flow 
to the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant or to the Cave Creek Water 
Reclamation Plant.  The developer may also be required to upsize or provide a 
relief sewer line to portions of the existing sewer main within Cave Creek Road 
to accommodate the increased flows. 
 
 
24. 
The Floodplain Management Division of the Public Works Department has 
indicated that the parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), as 
designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).  The 
division indicated that no encroachment is allowed in the floodway without 
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis showing no rise in water surface elevation and 
increase in the special flood hazard boundaries.  The division also indicated that 
the lowest floor of all structures constructed in the SFHA shall be a minimum of

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 18 of 20 
 
 
one foot above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE).  The lowest adjacent grade to 
the structure must be a minimum of at or above the BFE.  Additionally, no 
basements are allowed in residential structures located in a SFHA.   
 
 
25. 
The Fire Department indicated that they do not anticipate any problems with the 
referenced case.  Additionally, site and buildings shall comply with the Phoenix 
Fire Code.  The current water supply is also unknown, but will be required to 
meet fire flow requirements. 
 
 
OTHER 
26. 
The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. 
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site 
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous 
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is 
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be 
conducted. Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be 
necessary based upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must 
make this determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all 
ground disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery 
and the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and 
allowed time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation 
Nos. 6 through 9. 
 
 
27. 
Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and 
ordinances.  Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.  
Other formal action such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and 
abandonments, may be required. 
 
Findings 
 
1. 
The proposed PUD is located directly adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and 
includes standards that ensure appropriate transitions from the development to 
adjacent preserve areas. 
 
 
2. 
The proposal balances the need for additional housing, while retaining and 
preserving the desert landscape throughout the development, as outlined in the 
North Land Use Plan and Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. 
 
 
3. 
The proposal includes several development standards, such as increased open 
edge conditions, increased common area, and design guidelines that exceed 
conventional Zoning Ordinance standards.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 19 of 20 
 
 
Stipulations 
 
1. 
An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills PUD reflecting the 
changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and 
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.  
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development 
Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021, as modified by the following 
stipulations: 
 
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent 
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or 
consumption;” 
 
 
2. 
The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this 
development.  No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is 
reviewed and approved by the City.  The TIS shall provide signal warrant analysis 
for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 7th Street 
and Dove Valley Road.  The developer will be responsible for all additional 
dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by the 
approved study. 
 
 
3. 
The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each 
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District 
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. 
 
 
4. 
All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water 
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings. 
 
 
5. 
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department.  All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards. 
 
 
6. 
If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
 
7. 
If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the 
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified 
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the 
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

Staff Report: Z-62-18-2 
March 9, 2022 
Page 20 of 20 
 
 
8. 
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- foot 
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials. 
 
Writer 
Julianna Pierre 
March 9, 2022 
 
Team Leader 
Samantha Keating 
 
Exhibits 
Zoning sketch map 
Aerial sketch map 
Community correspondence (111 pages) 
Verdin PUD date stamped March 3, 2022

S-1
RE-35
S-1
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
District
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
MAYO BLVD
CAVE CREEK RD
BLACK MTN PKY
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
CAREFREE HWY
SR-101
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-62-18
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
488.63 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
145, 333, 11
186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
N/A, N/A, 13
N/A
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
DATE:
10/16/2018
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
ZONING MAP
Q-9
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
PUD (333.57 a.c)
47,000
0
47,000
23,500
Feet
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Z-62-18
I
10/17/2018
10/19/2018
10/22/2018
12/01/2022

S-1
RE-35
S-1
E SONORAN DESERT DR
Desert Maintenance
Character B
Overlay District
Desert Maintenance
Character A Overlay
District
m apse rvices@ p hoe nix.go v
DOVE VALLEY RD
LONE MOUNTAIN RD
DYNAMITE BLVD
JOMAX RD
HAPPY VALLEY RD
PINNACLE PEAK RD
DEER VALLEY DR
MAYO BLVD
CAVE CREEK RD
BLACK MTN PKY
TATUM BLVD
56TH ST
64TH ST
SCOTTSDALE RD
CAREFREE HWY
SR-101
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-62-18
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
488.63 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
*   Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
S-1 DCOD, S-1, RE-35 DCOD
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD), PUD
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
145, 333, 11
186 (465), 1,000; Not to exceed 1,420 overall
*   UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
N/A, N/A, 13
N/A
Taylor Morrison/Arizona, Inc.
DATE:
10/16/2018
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 52-31, QS 52-32
QS 52-33, QS 53-32
QS 53-33, QS 54-32, QS 54-33
ZONING MAP
Q-9
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: S-1 DCOD (144.82 a.c.)
S-1 (333.57 a.c.)
RE-35 DCOD (10.24 a.c.)
TO:
PUD DCOD (Pending PUD) (155.06 a.c.)
PUD (333.57 a.c)
47,000
0
47,000
23,500
Feet
DESERT VIEW VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 2
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2018\Z-62-18 _Nov_2021_Update.mxd
Z-62-18
I
10/17/2018
10/19/2018
10/22/2018
12/01/2022

From:
Jo Ann Snyder
To:
sdemmitt@gblaw.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Case # Z62-18;GPA-DSTV-1-18-1 and ZTA5-18
Date:
Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:38:03 AM
In response to your notification letter dated 10/12—we object to the rezoning of this area to
accommodate more housing.
 
Ronald Spicer and Jo Ann Snyder Spicer
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From:
Scott Coll
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve - Taylor Morrison/Macewan480 Rezoning Proposal
Date:
Wednesday, November 07, 2018 1:57:16 PM
  Hello Desert View VPC,
Just wanted to share that I hope there will be a vote to NOT Rezone a portion of the Phoenix
Sonoran Preserve to allow for a large scale neighborhood build to be completed within its
borders. My reasons for this hope are as follows:
1) Current road infrastructure: Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd is already at capacity for
the surrounding neighborhoods that are already built and/or under construction on the Cave
Creek side and the North Valley PKWY side of the Preserve. Two New Large neighborhoods
within 8-9 miles of this proposed neighborhood, USAA (located at Happy Valley/19th
Ave/North Valley Pkwy) and Sky Crossing (also being built by Taylor Morrison and other
builders located at Deer Valley and Black Mountain Blvd) will already clog access to
roadways that would be used to access this neighborhood and the Preserve (North Valley
Pkwy, 19th Ave, 7th St, Deer Valley, Tatum Rd, Pinnacle Peak Rd, Black Mountain Blvd,
Cave Creek). I feel modifying, by expansion, the existing Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
navigating through the Preserve would drastically take away from any tranquility, and limit
even more the Natural/Organic Desert Landscape we have there now.
2) Night Sky Viewing: Would become non-existent with the increased vehicle traffic of the
new neighborhood. You'd have home-owners, and then any friends/family that visit and also
delivery traffic bringing light pollution and vehicle pollution to the Preserve area.There is also
the street lights and home ambient lighting from that many homes, approximately 1,420, that
will effect Desert Flora/Fauna and their way of life. Road noise as well from so much increase
in traffic could also cause an issue.
3) Safety: 3A: I've already observed in the last year multiple accidents at the Northbound
intersection of Cave Creek and Sonoran Desert Dr due to a backup of vehicles trying to turn
left on to Sonoran Desert Dr. I come home this way every day from work and have noticed a
substantial increase in traffic as far back as the AZ-51/Loop 101/Black Mtn Blvd interchange.
Then the same down Deer Valley or Pinnacle Peak, and then Cave Creek. Cave Creek
subsequently then backs up at Tatum due to the left lane being stopped due to a number of
vehicles turning left at Sonoran Desert Dr and terrible accidents occur due to people not
observing the slow down or being impatient. The severity of these accidents on Cave Creek,
and subsequent difficulty for First Responders to access the area, then cut off access altogether
to the Preserve and cause a massive re-route in traffic, if even possible. 
3B: Cyclists will also have more risk along Cave Creek/Sonoran Desert Dr/Dove Valley Rd
due to increased vehicle traffic with this new neighborhood. I know City of Phoenix is
working to expand bike routes across the city, but this area is vital to the cycling community
by providing easily navigable routes that connect and are, for now, easily seen by motorists
driving in these areas to prevent any accidents from occurring.
3C: Adding more people to a Preserve environment will then make the Preserve itself unsafe.
It will become subject to vandalism from littering, illegal trespassing by motorized vehicles, or
even walking/hiking on unapproved trails (trail-blazing) and ruining crucial desert life that
takes years to grow. We need to Tread Lightly (https://www.treadlightly.org/) with this
proposed neighborhood and think of the lasting effects that it could bring, not only to us and

our current daily living, but also the flora/fauna trying to live in the Preserve too.
4) Alternatives to a Neighborhood: Just because it is Private Land, doesn't mean you need to
grant them the Rezoning change to build a new neighborhood. If a Community Center was
proposed that educates persons on Desert life, and what it means to preserve this Natural
environment and improve our way of life (educational) by teaching of the past environment
that was Phoenix and the sprawling desert oasis and mountains from 100 years ago, that would
be something worth certainly entertaining for our section of the Valley. There isn't very many,
if any, of these types of facilities in our North Gateway Community that I'm aware of that aim
at educating our youth, and even ourselves, of what is around us and also what used to be
around us regarding the environment. A Desert Mountain Museum in this area would be a
welcome alternative rather than another large neighborhood decreasing our Desert Mountain
Landscape.
Hopefully I haven't ranted too long, and this letter will help aid in your decision to NOT
approve of the Rezoning of this section of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. This letter has also
been forwarded to Vice Mayor Jim Waring, Phoenix City Council District 2 Representative.
Kindest Regards,
Scott Coll
Sonoran Commons Community Member

From:
Adam Grant
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
FW: Rezoning of PSP
Date:
Friday, November 09, 2018 8:00:30 AM
 
 
From: Jim Waring [mailto:Jim@JimWaring.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 1:14 PM
To: Adam Grant <adam.grant@phoenix.gov>; Brian T. Schmitt <brian.schmitt@phoenix.gov>;
Nicholas T Cappellini <nicholas.cappellini@phoenix.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Rezoning of PSP
 
 
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: hporourke@gmail.com
Date: November 8, 2018 at 8:48:11 AM MST
To: info@jimwaring.com
Subject: Rezoning of PSP
Hi!
I do NOT support the rezoning of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve to allow for the
addition of more homes.
Respectfully your constituent,
Holly O’Rourke

From:
Jean Ann Rippe
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Phoenix Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Thursday, November 08, 2018 9:29:53 AM
Good morning,
My name is Jean Ann and I am a resident of Phoenix. The Phoenix Sonoran Preserve is my
favorite place in the city to escape the craziness of daily life. I am writing you to ask you to
please NOT recommend the rezoning of the PSP. I appreciate your time and consideration.
Best regards,
Jean Ann

From:
Trudy Taylor
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Mac Ewen 480. Taylor Morrison
Date:
Tuesday, November 27, 2018 10:30:39 AM
I am most concerned with the proposed development near Sonoran Preserve
Where are these builders getting the water????
I think we are having far too many developments in the north valley
We enjoy biking and hiking from the Apache trailhead and it is most disconcerting to see the beautiful view being
marred by builders
Please save our preserves and open spaces!!!
Thank you
Trudy Taylor
Sent from my iPad

From:
Gary Kirkilas II
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Preserve Rezoning and Desert Character Overlay District
Date:
Friday, November 30, 2018 6:15:42 PM
Hello Desert View Planning Committee,
My name is Dr. Gary Kirkilas and I am a pediatrician at Phoenix Children's
Hospital. I am also a Phoenix Park Steward for the Sonoran Desert Preserve. I was
very disheartened to see that Taylor Morrison is asking to rezone 488 acres of
privately owned land from a S-1 to PUD so that they can develop a high density
housing development. It is equally disturbing that they are seeking to modify and
remove the Desert Character Overlay District for over 638 acres! As you may be
aware the Sonoran Desert Master Plan was developed by in 1998 and took over 10
years of collaborated work with the Phoenix Parks Dept and ASU to develop.  The
Master Plan called for low density housing developments and to retain the Desert
Character Overlay District.
Allowing this rezoning to pass as well as modifying/removal of the Desert
Character Overlay District will drastically change the look and feel of this beautiful
Desert Preserve. 
There are logistic concerns as well to this development. Several citizens who live in
the area are already witnessing traffic congestion along Sonoran Desert Drive and
Dove Valley Road. Adding the proposed 1400 homes to the mix will only worsen
the traffic situation even further....leaving a headache for citizens and our elect
officials to deal with once Taylor Morrisson has move on to another project.
I beg you to reconsider allowing the rezoning and removal for the Desert Character
Overlay District. Once the development begins the Desert Preserve will never look
or feel the same way again. I would be happy to discuss further or meet with you in
person. 
Most Sincerely,
Dr. Gary Kirkilas

From:
Sue Pierce
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Proposed Dense Residential Development by Taylor Morrison Along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Tuesday, December 04, 2018 12:41:58 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development by Taylor
Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive. I have many objections to this possible development
which I hope in the future we will be able to discuss in person or on the phone. However, for
now, let me begin with a discussion of traffic issues.
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave. We have one entrance into
our community and that is from Dove Valley Road. Dove Valley Road at that point goes from a
four- lane road to a two-lane road with traffic going east and west.
During each work day, Monday through Friday, rush hour traffic (7:00 am – 9:00 am and 4:30
pm – 6:30 pm approximately) causes a long line of bumper to bumper vehicles to form making
entry onto Dove Valley Road difficult and at times dangerous. We have counted as many as
100 cars in a line during those times and have both pictures and videos of this traffic to share.
The addition of a dense residential development to the east near Apache Trailhead would only
complicate the problem. The developer’s attorney noted that they have some money in the
budget to improve traffic in the immediate area around Apache Trailhead but that would have
no positive impact on roadways in our area. The extension of the 303 East from Highway 17 to
Cave Creek Road could be a solution but it is my understanding funds for that project have not
been allocated nor will be in the near future.
It is my request that you support us in opposing this development. If you would like to discuss
it in greater detail, I am available at your convenience.
Thank you,
Sue Pierce
Sue Pierce
Founder/CEO
Pierce Energy Planning
(480) 773-0035 | sue@energyplanning.org
         
 
Please consider the environment before printing.
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and
may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure.  If

you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error,
please immediately alert the sender by reply email and then delete this message and any attachments.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying, or
storage of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

From:
Blake Austin
Subject:
Apache Wash Trails - New Homes Concern
Date:
Saturday, December 15, 2018 1:41:19 PM
I am writing this email to voice my concern for the proposed plans with Taylor Morrison to
build 1400 new homes and jeopardize more of our beautiful mountain biking and hiking
community. 
Please DENY Taylor Morrison. 
Thank you,
Blake Austin
480-341-7543

From:
robertfletcher67@aim.com
To:
Council District 2 PCC; JIM@JIMWARING.COM; PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
SAVE OUR SONORAN PRESERVE
Date:
Sunday, December 16, 2018 6:27:58 AM
As a user of the Apache Wash Trailhead I would like to express my
concern regarding Taylor Morrison’s plan to construct, in a concentrated
manner, 1,400 homes on a 400+ acre parcel of land.
My concerns are the impact this would have on:
1. Traffic issues including the safety of hikers, bicyclists and walkers.  
2. The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve Masterplan
3. Water use
4. Wildlife safety
5. Flood control
 
Please do not allow the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve to deteriorate
by allowing Taylor Morrison’s plan to be implemented.
 
Best Regards,
Bob

From:
Lance Morgan
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Sonoran preserve rezoning vote
Date:
Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:58:15 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season.  On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development.  In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea.  My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway?  Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be.  You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).  
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife.  I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally.  Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly,  We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path.  We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.  
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032

From:
Lance Morgan
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran preserve
Date:
Saturday, December 29, 2018 9:54:52 AM
Good morning, I hope you have had a delightful holiday season.  On a recent visit to the
Apache wash hiking area I learned about the proposed Taylor Morrison development.  In my
opinion this is a shocking and horrible idea.  My main thought is this; where else in phoenix
can you drive down a truly scenic byway?  Once you head West off of Cave Creek road, your
taken back to a time of free open space, the way Phoenix used to be.  You really get a sense of
a peaceful easy feeling (not trying to plagiarize the eagles, but you know what I mean).  
This section of the sonoran preserve is just beautiful, with its tall saguaros, fields of jumping
cholla, vast expansive views, creeks and washes and not to mention the wildlife.  I'm afraid if
the development on the south side of the hiking area is allowed to move forward, this area
will lose more that just its visual aspects, but it will leave an indelible mark on the psyche of all
who currently visit this area.
Moreover, I have a sense that we are moving into a slower economic time, not only globally,
but perhaps locally.  Rates are rising and less people will be able to afford these potentially
expensive homes. This will not be green economic growth. We've seen this before; a large
home builder plows hundreds of acres of land, to only have it sit vacant for years because of
an economic downturn.
lastly,  We need to stand up to these deep pocket home builders who are insistent on building
these cookie cutter subdivisions, that disrupt all in their path.  We need to preserve areas like
this and not make the same bad decision as before, not only for us to enjoy, but for our
younger generations.  
that being said, I would rather make the right decision and be unpopular with the home
builders, than to make the wrong decision and be unpopular the the voting base and residents
of district 2.
I thank you in advance for making the right decision and voting no for this rezoning proposal.
Kind regards,
Lance Morgan
4230 East Danbury road
Phoenix, AZ 85032

From:
Annette Cline
To:
Kaelee Wilson; council.district2@phoenix.gov
Subject:
Housing development on Sonoran Drive
Date:
Monday, December 31, 2018 4:52:44 PM
It has come to our attention that the company Taylor Morrison is proposing to build a high 
density housing development on Sonoran Drive. We are avid hikers and lifelong Arizona 
residents. We treasure the preserves, parks and hiking trails and remain residents of the 
Valley in large part for the natural beauty and outdoor activities.We have hiked in this 
beautiful natural area. We feel that this plan puts not only the integrity of the Sonoran 
Preserve at stake but also the wildlife and quality of life of the neighboring families.
Putting in this development is morally wrong as the The Desert Preserve Master Plan called 
for low density housing within the context of Desert character overlay District. We are both 
strongly against allowing this proposed development.
Annette and Steve Cline

From:
Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Rezoning Requst MacEwan 480 Dilemma - PMPC
Date:
Monday, January 14, 2019 5:24:36 AM
Attachments:
Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemna_PMPC.pdf
Village of Desert View and Ms. Kaelee Wilson;
The Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council (PMPC), a 501-c4 nonprofit
organization charged with the protection of Phoenix Mountains Desert
Preserves writes to you in strong opposition to the proposed MacEwen 480
PUD Application dated December 22, 2018. PMPC has been a determined
voice in support of the Phoenix Mountain Preserve and the Sonoran Desert
Preserve since 1970.
 
PMPC has studied the Proposed Taylor Morrison Planned Unit Development
(PUD) to “up zone” the 488 acre Site south of the Sonoran Desert Drive
between the Cave Creek and Apache Washes and also incorporating the
smaller Mesquite Wash.
 
As the project that will set a precedent for all future development within the
Sonoran Preserve, PMPC asks that a density much closer to the S-1 and 35,000
square feet per residence be maintained. That ALL of the requirements of the
Edge Guidelines and the Desert Character Overlay District be maintained in
the development of the Master Plan. PMPC also asks that representatives
from our organization be included in the design process as the MacEwen 480
becomes designed.
 
See attached – Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480 Dilemma
 
Sincerely,
Patrick McMullen, PhD
PMPC President
PMPC : 12950 N. 7th St. Phoenix, AZ 85022
www.phoenixmountains.org

From:
Howard Myers
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Z‐62‐18‐2
Date:
Saturday, January 19, 2019 9:29:16 PM
Desert View Village Planning Committee members
I am writing you in reference to case Z‐62‐18‐2, The MacEwen 480 master planned
community, in the village of Desert View. It is a request for a major increase in allowed
density on 472.3  acres of land located in the Cave Creek wash flood plain and surrounded by
the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve and other undeveloped desert land.
While I do not live in Phoenix, I do live in the Sonoran desert in north Scottsdale and have
worked over 20 years with the city on their Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance
(ESLO), on their McDowell Sonoran Preserve, and on flooding issues with both the city and
the Maricopa County Flood Control District so I have a lot of experience with the desert and
development in it. The city of Scottsdale was way ahead of its time with the ESLO which
protected property with its rules on drainage and maintaining washes and also protected the
fragile desert environment by requiring all property owners to dedicate 25% to 80% of their
property to natural open space as a function of slope. That protection of the desert allows
residents to really connect with their environment and live with it instead of trying to
transform it into something else. As a result water usage is far lower because most of the land
contains natural vegetation which survives without any human interference and irrigation.
Also wildlife is protected and enjoyed by residents, again living in harmony with the
environment. Many of the county and Phoenix residents I talk to, who live in these northern
areas, wish the county and Phoenix would adopt similar regulations that wind up benefitting
both residents and the natural environment. It also makes development sustainable, even in
drought conditions like we are facing now.
So that brings us to this proposed development which is almost the exact opposite of this
philosophy. It jams so many houses into the desert that the natural environment disappears,
and then to make it worse they intend to add non native vegetation that requires a lot of water.
This development also has a major wash going through the middle of it and borders others
including the Cave Creek wash which carries a lot of water from a huge drainage to the north.
All the non-pervious surfaces will cause far more runoff from this property which will have to
be controlled. In addition, due to the density, there is no room for water to flow around the
structures which would mitigate some of the flooding issues. So drainage and flood control
will become issues with it. The same is true for wildlife. This area should have a lot of wildlife
because of the washes which are major corridors, and the Phoenix Preserve, but there is no
room for them to move though this development. The open space required in the ESLO
provides these corridors and the natural vegetation wildlife need. Scottsdale’s General Plan
also calls for the lowest possible density adjacent to the McDowell Sonoran Preserve to
maintain wildlife corridors and minimize the impact of development on the Preserve.
This development is an island in the desert, isolated by washes with only one possible access,
the Desert Sonoran Drive which will have to carry ALL of the traffic from this development.
The Desert Sonoran Drive was supposed to be a scenic drive through the desert, now it will be
a major conduit for all these homes. Also, all those cars will have to go to either Cave Creek
Road, or through the neighborhoods to the west, there are no other options. The Desert
Sonoran Drive will also have to carry all the water and waste water infrastructure, and none of

that is close, increasing the city’s expenses in servicing this development. A single point of
entry for over 1400 homes is also a huge problem. A secondary access was shown, but it also
intersects with the Desert Sonoran Drive and really comes into the development at about the
same place as the main one so any disruption in that area, or past it, isolates all the other
homes.
This is just another case of a developer trying to jam as many houses as they can on to a
property without any consideration of the impact on the environment, other residents, and the
city. A reasonable number of homes, 500 or less, would allow it to be developed in a more
responsible manner, would allow it to be in harmony with the environment instead of in
opposition to it, and would have a less negative impact on all the surrounding uses, including
the Phoenix Preserve.
I hope you will consider the impact of what is proposed and as a minimum scale it back to
something reasonable. The developer will still make plenty of money, the eventual inhabitants
of this development will enjoy their homes much more, and everyone else, who lives near it or
travels through it, will be better off.
Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Howard Myers
President of Protect Our Preserve, president of the Carriage Trails HOA, and participant in
many city boards, commissions, and citizen committees over the past 23 years including
updates to the ESLO and General Plan.
-- 
Howard Myers
Home:
Addr: 	 6631 E. Horned Owl Trail
	
Scottsdale, AZ 85266-8511
Phone:	 480-473-0109 (home)
        480-262-3502 (Cell)
E-mail:	howard.myers@cox.net
If you have any other e-mail or phone numbers for me, please use the Home 
information above instead.
None of the previous work e-mail or work phone numbers are valid anymore

From:
daniel.centilli
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Cc:
jim@jimwaring.con; northvalleymultisport@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Preserve, proposed Development
Date:
Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:15:51 PM
Attachments:
Screenshot_2019-02-19-18-52-09.png
Dear Neighbors and Teammates,
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am an airline pilot for Southwest Airlines, and a homeowner in
Desert Ridge. My wife is an MBA and a manager at Vanguard. We are well compensated and
politically active. 
 When I recently learned that there was a proposal to allow 1400 homes to be developed in the
parcel of land adjacent to the Apache Wash Trailhead at the Phoenix Sonoran Desert Preserve,
I was disgusted and angry. This is one of the last unspoiled open spaces of desert in the North
Valley. It is an area that many of my friends and neighbors use for recreation. We enjoy the
trails and bike lanes that are located along Sonoran Desert Parkway/Dove Valley. This
development will not only spoil some of the last, most beautiful desert in the north valley, but
will also lead to a dangerous increase in motor vehicle traffic along Sonoran Desert Parkway.
This segment of road is the most important uninterrupted stretch of bike infrastructure in the
north valley. It allows cyclists to connect safely from Cave Creek Road to Norterra and
Anthem. It one of the most utilized segments of bike lane infrasructure in Phoenix. I strongly
encourage you to view Strava's Heatmap, to view the evidence of this:
https://www.strava.com/heatmap#11.40/-112.05156/33.75318/hot/ride
This is a tool that allows you to see the combined activities of thousands of users of the fitness
application, Strava. Strava has been used in civil planning applications in regards to
determining where bicycling lanes are needed, and more importantly, in THIS case, where
cyclists feel SAFE riding. We, as cyclists, currently feel safe riding along Sonoran Desert
Parkway. .I am a member of North Valley Multisport, a triathlon club operating out of the
Anthem, Tramanto, Desert Ridge, and Cave Creek areas. In fact, North Valley Multisport is
actually the Adopt a Road sponsor of a significant stretch of Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert
Parkway. 
One of the primary reasons I purchased an existing home in Desert Ridge was its proximity to
the Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is different than actually building adjacent to and disturbing
the preserve itself, as I believe that this development will do. Once this is done, it can NEVER
be undone.
I strongly oppose this development. Please consider the current users and future users of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve. This is a stunningly beautiful area that should be protected for future
generations. 
I have attached several photos of this area, so that you can see for yourself the beauty of this
parcel of land. It should be preserved. 
I intend to apply both social and financial resources to opposing this development, and any
publically elected offical that supports it.

Sincerly, 
Daniel Centilli
269 267 6630
Daniel.centilli@gmail.com
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone

From:
Karyn Lupfer
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
Proposed Taylor Morrison Housing Development
Date:
Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:33:31 AM
I just heard through my hiking group that there is a possibility for yet another housing
development to be built on desert land, and as a frequent user of the Sonoran Preserve up
there, I am so disappointed with this. The sonoran preserve is a beautiful area, and should be
left alone. There is already a development going in on the west side of the preserve. Adding
another housing development will be detrimental to the area and those who enjoy it. Part of
the draw of the area off of the apache wash trailhead is that you feel like you've escaped the
city life, without having to drive for hours. Not only will the noise during construction be an
issue but once there are people living there there will be more traffic in the area, making the
dangers for bikers along Sonoran desert drive higher. More traffic means extending the awful
air quality of Phoenix up to this area too, which we prefer this area to locations within the city
because the air quality is better. And then there will be the impact on the wildlife. The
preserve is home to many, many creatures. Bulldozing the desert homes of these animals to
build homes will displace them. Where will they go? How many will have to be killed because
they start eating people's pets and suddenly this brand new neighborhood has a "coyote
problem"? Please, please, do not let this development happen. If someone wants to buy a
home at the edge of the desert, there are already plenty of existing homes by preserves. Please,
leave some nature to nature.

From:
Karen Chen
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Rezoning
Date:
Friday, February 22, 2019 3:52:40 PM
Please do not rezone allowing 1400 homes to be built right next to the Sonoran Desert Perserve.
Respectfully,
Karen Chen

From:
Mike Devito
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Taylor Morison Homes
Date:
Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:41:57 PM
Hello,
I live in by the Sonoran Desert Preserve and I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert
Preserve.
Thank you,
Mike De Vito

From:
Eric Idalski
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date:
Saturday, February 23, 2019 5:33:55 PM
To whom it may concern,
I recently found out the plans to try to rezone an area adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.  I wanted to email
you and advise I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Regards,
Eric Idalski
32706 N 18th Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85085
Sent from my iPhone

From:
Caitlin Leja
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
No houses
Date:
Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:34:50 AM
I am a resident next to the Sonoran preserve.   I am NOT in favor of 1400 houses being built next to the
preserve!!!!    It will add traffic, congestion and take away from the beauty of the desert!
Caitlin Leja, M.S, CCC-SLP

From:
Kristi Terrio
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Apache trailhead, 1400 new houses
Date:
Saturday, February 23, 2019 7:26:37 AM
Greetings,
I’m a resident of Carefree Crossings in Phoenix, 85085, and my backyard backs up to Dove Valley Rd. My family
and I utilize the Apache Wash Trailhead all year long. We are concerned over a builder-request to construct 1400
new houses directly to the East of the trailhead. This will cause issues to the already car-congested area, and will
ruin a beautiful outdoor destination for residents in North Phoenix (Sonoran Foothills, Tramonto, Desert Hills,
Anthem, Desert Ridge), Cave Creek, and North Scottsdale/Carefree.
Please contact me if you’d like to discuss this poor solution to urban growth.  Please deny the builders request.
Sincerely,
Kristi Swift
Cell: 602-628-8838
Sent from my iPad

From:
Fran W
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Saturday, February 23, 2019 8:48:50 AM
We do not want to see 1400 homes next to the Sonoran Preserve
A removal of Desert Overlay zoning would completely undermine the vision and long term
plan created in the early 1990's for this area.
We live in Terravita and find Desert Overlay to distinguish our area from others to great,
desirable preference and benefit.
Ben and Fran Wylie

From:
Lincoln Burke
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Desired Rezoning of Sonoran Desert Preserve
Date:
Sunday, February 24, 2019 8:54:20 PM
To Whom it May Concern
I am writing as a concerned resident of North Phoenix and active user of the Sonoran Desert Preserve.  It has come
to my attention that Taylor Morrison owns 500 acres south of Sonoran Desert Parkway adjacent to the the Sonoran
Desert Preserve.  It is my understanding that they are petitioning the City of Phoenix to have the area rezoned to
allow up to 1400+ homes built on the site.  I want to strongly oppose this rezoning application.
While I would love for the entire area south of Sonoran Desert Drive to remain open desert land I do understand that
there will eventually be development in this area.  My hope at this point is that I can assist in restricting the
development to only what is actually sustainable.  I see multiple levels of problems with rezoning this area for
higher density.  The first is water resources, there is no doubt that we are already stressing the existing water in the
area.  The second, and far more important to me, is the strain on the school district.  My daughters currently attend
Sonoran Foothills School.  It has only been open for three years and is already overcrowded and has lost the pre-
school program that my girls both benefited from.  Already there is a development by Taylor Morrison south of
SDD and just recently a plot of land due north of Sonoran Foothills School was purchased by Lennar.  I am unaware
of the current zoning of that plot of land but be assured I will oppose any rezoning attempt by the developer there for
higher density as well.
I appreciate your time and consideration in this matter.  Please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lincoln Burke
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad

From:
Christy Hart
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
I oppose the proposed housing development near Apache wash trailhead
Date:
Monday, February 25, 2019 10:23:51 AM
I don't want to see 1400 home right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve. 
As a mountain biker and hiker, I look forward to the pristine views around when I
am enjoying the Preserve. The enormous amount of homes would add hazard to
cyclists and hikers with the increased traffic.
Christy Hart
Executive Consultant for Rodan + Fields
Use the Solution Tool to learn what the Doctors recommend for you!
christyrhart.myrandf.com
602-819-2307

From:
Karen Severance
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Thursday, February 28, 2019 8:59:07 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
Please don’t change the zoning in the Sonoran Preserve. Our ecosystem is delicately balanced, and the denser the
zoning, the more damage will be done. Our desert wildlife and flora have already been negatively impacted, not to
mention an infrastructure already stressed beyond its capacity.
Thank you for considering the future of our beautiful preserve.
Karen Severance

TO:    
 
Phoenix City Council 
& Desert View Village Planning Committee 
FROM:   
Matthew Salenger, Head Collaborative Facilitator 
 
 
 
Living Building Challenge Sonoran Collaborative 
 
 
 
http://collaboratives.living-future.org/sonoran-collaborative/ 
DATE / TIME:  
3/2/2019 3:50 PM 
CC: 
 
 
file, AIA Arizona 
SENT VIA: 
 
email 
RE: 
 
 
Desert Preservation vs Development 
 
Dear City Council Members & Desert View VPC- 
 
Let me introduce our group: We are one of over 250 international collaboratives attempting to 
provide greater sustainability in our communities through education and assistance with the 
Living Building Challenge (LBC). The LBC is a project certification program, much like Leadership 
in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), though far more wholistic and comprehensive. The 
Sonoran Collaborative, of which I am the current Chair, is the LBC collaborative for our region.  
I am writing you today in an effort to save more of our greatest economic asset: The natural 
Sonoran Desert. It has been well documented our desert is the single largest pull for tourism. It is 
also cited as a major draw by corporations moving to our region, as our climate and close-
proximity to preserves provides their employees with a high quality of life. Therefore, I wish to 
request that you not grant a zoning change for a property surrounded by preserves, state and 
county land. I am speaking specifically about a property of 473 acres shown on the attached map. 
It has come to our attention a developer hopes to rezone this property in order to increase the 
density allowed. Currently 400-500 homes are allowed, but the zoning sought would allow 1400+ 
homes. Either density would greatly damage the surrounding preserve through souring the view, 
environmental damage through construction, and future home owners forging their own paths 
through the preserve. The larger the density, the more damage will occur.  
The LBC has 20 “imperatives” required to achieve full certification. The first imperative states: 
Projects may only be built on greyfields or brownfields: previously developed sites that are not classified 
as on or adjacent to any… sensitive ecological habitat. While it may not be the desire for these 
developers to gain LBC certification, this imperative speaks to the universal truth that we should 
not build on precious untouched native habitat. Why? Because doing so damages our own 
economic, mental, and bodily health as well as that of fragile ecosystems around us. 
The property in question is in a location that should never be developed. One look at the map 
of its location shows this to be quite obvious. Our group would recommend the following: 
1. The City of Phoenix purchase the land from the developer and designate it as part of 
the adjacent preserve.  
2. Barring #1, the City work with the State to purchase the land and designate it as part 
of the adjacent preserve. 
3. Barring #1 or #2, the City work (possibly with the State) to provide a land swap, 
where the property in question becomes part of the preserve; and the developer 
obtains an equally valuable piece of land adjacent to other existing development to 
allow that development can be contiguous and the preserve can also be contiguous. 
This will greatly reduce the impact development.  
 
We hope you will consider working to avoid any development at the property in question. 
Please save this preserve area.

Lastly, I would like to mention these types of “leap-frog” developments are very damaging 
and unsustainable, not only to the environment, but also to city coffers. They bring huge 
infrastructure costs that will only increase over time, bringing financial hardship to the City of 
Phoenix and the State. We would advocate for all future development to be limited within areas 
without any un-touched land in order to help assure our continued ability to thrive as a metropolis. 
In order to not over-burden our future, we need real leadership to recognize when decisions we 
make now damage our economies in the future. 
 
For more information on LBC: https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Living-
Building-Challenge-3.0-Standard.pdf  
For more information on our regional collaborative: http://collaboratives.living-
future.org/sonoran-collaborative/  
 
Thank you for your consideration. 
 
 
 
 
Matthew Salenger, AIA, coLAB studio, llc 
Co-LBCSC Facilitators and additional signees: Sonja Bochart, IIDA, LEED AP BD&C, WELL 
AP, Shepley Bulfinch; Premnath Sundharam, Global Sustainability Leader, DLR Group; Jeff 
Stanton, Smith Group; Ashley Mulhall, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, Orcutt Winslow

From:
Mike L
To:
Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC; saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
Subject:
Housing Density Change
Date:
Sunday, March 3, 2019 6:57:12 PM
Hello,
As a frequent mountain biker / hiker at Apache Wash trailhead I’ve followed with mixed
interest and dismay the encroachment of subdivisions on the surrounding areas.
Today I learned that Taylor Morrison is proposing to increase the density beyond that allowed
in the 1998 Master Plan.
Your feedback is welcomed as I educate myself  with an eye to resisting this development and
its unwelcome impacts.
Thank you,
Mike Looney 
-- 
Mike

From:
ALLENFAMTX
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Preserve S-1 Zoning
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 4:17:09 PM
Dear Planning Committee,
We are homeowners in the Stonebridge at Dynamite Mountain Ranch subdivision. Please accept this email
as notice that I do not approve or support modification of the S-1 Zoning at the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
The planners got it right the first time and I support maintain S-1 Zoning.  No hardship = No change! 
Allowing 1400 homes to be built in this area will absolutely violate the beauty of the area, the already
compromised eco-system of our desert, and the original intent of city planners.
Please save our Preserve!!!! 
Kristi & Lawrence Allen
1929 W Duane Ln, Phoenix, Az 85085
mobile: 281-658-8654

From:
Mary Caton
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 1:44:40 PM
Hello
I spend a lot of time hiking and biking in Apache Wash recreational area and think it is a bad
idea to change the zoning to allow for more density of homes. This area does not need 1400
homes near the trail head as opposed to the current 500 homes zoning. I do not support the
request from Taylor Homes to increase from 500 homes to 1400 homes. Please help protect
our natural areas from too much development and vote no to the request to rezone.
Thank you
Mary Caton

From:
flaxgulch@aol.com
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Opinion from local resident for your consideration
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 2:28:31 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
LaVonne Lindall\
6701 East Tanya Road
Cave Creek, AZ 85331

From:
Gail Martinelli
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonora Preserve
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 4:39:15 PM
As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran
Desert Preserve.  There is to much building happening in our area. Please
keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at
the MacEwan 480 zoning proposal.
Thank you,
Gail Martinelli

From:
righins mtb
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
NO to 1400 homes next to Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 9:37:07 PM
Ladies and Gentlemen
we have a lot of examples of how bad urban planning can destroy the environment and the
quality of life . We do not need to keep making the same mistake over and over. Bringing
1400 high-density  homes to be close to the Sonoran Preserve will create caos in a peaceful
area, will affect the life of several animals, will destroy the beauty of the desert and will
mislead people that buy the homes. 
There was a reason for having a "Sonoran Preserve Master Plan" and there is a reason for
allowing only low density development. Lets stick to the plan!
Home developers are only concerned with the money they make. The less infrastructure they
create the better. Thus high density is their choice. The problem is that those that build the
development do not stay there to leave in the caos they create. 
Regards
Ricardo

From:
Steve Swerid
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Zoning
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 6:33:20 AM
Hi Jim,
Again, please note
"As a resident I don't want to see 1400 homes right next to the Sonoran Desert Preserve.
Please keep the original S-1 zoning plan which only allowed low-density housing at the
MacEwan 480 zoning proposal."
Steve 
Sent from my iPhone

From:
Steve Swerid
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Zoning
Date:
Monday, March 4, 2019 6:32:07 AM
Good morning,
As a resident in Sonoran Foothills I would like to express my opinion AGAINST the high density zoning initiative.
We purchased our home in a beautiful neighbourhood with large homes and access to nature and open spaces. I
understand the need to progress however, changing from low density to high density is an ongoing trend that is
taking away from the beauty of the desert and quite frankly is reducing the value of our homes.
I don’t want to live beside apartments complexes and gas stations.
The city overbuilt and realized a crash not a decade ago and it seems like we are chasing this same animal again.
We need parks, open spaces, high end grocery stores and restaurants and not the continuous box stores and mini
strip malls offering the same old options of fast food, nail shops and pet stores.
We purchased our home because of the beautiful and discriminating neighbourhoods, pathway systems, green
spaces, privacy and security.
Please DO NOT rezone our area to high density.
Steve
Sent from my iPhone

From:
Michelle Wedsworth
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Council District 2 PCC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
Apache Wash Trailhead - Vote NO on 1400 homes
Date:
Tuesday, March 5, 2019 2:56:57 PM
Hello
My family and I are active users of the Apache Wash and are not supportive of the
Taylor Morrison request to place 1400 homes adjacent the trail head. The land is
zoned for 500 homes for a reason and we do not support it going from 500 to 1400.
Please help protect the park and those who use it and vote no to the request to
rezone.
 
Thank you for your consideration.  Michelle Wedsworth

From:
Kathy Allison
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’
Date:
Friday, March 8, 2019 6:45:59 PM
‘Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix’ 
Please don’t develop this land - it is needed to reserve our desert.  Not to mention the noise
and pollution.
Concerned citizen

From:
Deborah Moore
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Cc:
debtoon1@yahoo.com
Subject:
Sonoran desert parkway
Date:
Saturday, March 9, 2019 10:27:35 AM
I am a concerned citizen who lives near the land set aside for everyone to enjoy. If a developer builds 1,400 homes
that road will be a nightmare and the beauty will be ruined. Please stop the rezoning for development . Think of
future generations who will not know the beauty we are enjoying now .
Sincerely,
Deborah Moore
4518 East Bajada Rd
Cave Creek 85331
Sent from my iPhone

From:
nicoletti@cox.net
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
To the Desert View Planning Committee
Date:
Saturday, March 9, 2019 4:45:06 PM
Importance:
High
Hello
 
I’m a frequent Apache Wash hiker and it’s come to my attention that a home developer – Taylor
Morrison, is proposing to build 1400 homes on private land just east of the Apache Wash Trailhead.
This will require a rezoning of low-density development (500 homes) to a high density development
(1400 homes.) The Sonoran Preserve Masterplan (February 17, 1998) specifically states that
neighboring development is to be low-density.
 
I have many concerns about how this development will negatively impact the Preserve through a
high volume of traffic, noise, water usage, wildlife interruptions, flood control and many other
impacts.
 
I hope you will consider not approving the rezoning request so that the Preserve will be enjoyed as it
is meant to be.
 
Thank you.
 
Susan Nicoletti
480.419.9373
Scottsdale, 85266
nicoletti@cox.net

From:
SUZANNE RAY
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Save Our Sonoran Preserve Phoenix
Date:
Sunday, March 10, 2019 1:59:54 PM
Dear Ms. Wilson,
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application (Cases Z-62-18-2; Z-
TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2). As a resident of the Sonoran Foothills community, my quality of life
will be significantly impacted by rezoning this area to build 1400 homes with no buffer or
significant set-backs from the road or the Preserve.   I am advocating to maintain S-1 low
density residential zoning.    The integrity of the Sonoran Preserve is at stake as the Sonoran
Preserve Masterplan specifically notes a neighboring development is to be low density. 
Increasing density creates negative impacts: this parcel of land has high value with regard to
habitat and water resources; and with regard to recreation, will detract from the user
experience.  Increasing density also will increase the already present daily traffic congestion. 
As I observed with the construction of Sonoran Gate, another Taylor Morrison community
along Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove Valley Road, the litter and garbage from construction trucks
and workers was abominable.  As an endurance athlete who uses Sonoran Desert Drive/Dove
Valley Road and the Preserve daily, I fear for my safety with the dramatic increase in traffic
that will be the result of rezoning this area to allow for all this construction.
I appreciate your consideration in this matter and hope you will conclude the necessity to
maintain S-1 low density residential zoning of this precious area.
Sincerely,
Suzanne J. Ray
suzanne_squires@msn.com
1709 West Burnside Trail, Phoenix, Arizona, 85085
480-332-2943

From:
Ralph Ray
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:32:28 PM
 
I am writing in response to the MacEwan 480/Taylor Morrison application to rezone the area on the
south side of Sonoran Desert road and build over 1400 homes in this area. I, like so many of my
neighbors, moved to the Sonoran Foothills community to be near this beautiful desert, and to be
able to cycle in a safe manner without cars crossing over the bike lane to turn onto or from Sonoran
Desert or Dove Valley roads. Adding a housing community of that size, and all of the cars and traffic
congestion that would come with it will ruin this area. The traffic during rush hour now is already
bad, with cars backed up on Sonoran Desert trying to turn onto Cave Creek in the morning, and
sometimes all the way back to Jomax in the afternoon, waiting to turn from Cave Creek onto
Sonoran Desert. The original zoning plan for this area to be low density was and is still the correct
plan for this area. I am not asking for no growth, just to keep the zoning as is, and not destroy this
rare, beautiful Preserve that so many people enjoy every day.
 
I appreciate your consideration in this very important matter.
 
Ralph Ray
1709 W Burnside Trl
Phoenix, AZ 85085
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From:
jean brady
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com
Subject:
Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Friday, March 22, 2019 11:13:27 AM
I personally drive the beautiful  Sonoran Desert Drive several times a week on the way to my
sister's apartment.  The zone changing notification signs are so ridiculously placed, that it is
virtually impossible to see what they say from the road.  Even if you pulled over, which is no
easy feat, you cannot read them from the road; you need to walk through the terrain to read
what they say.   Purposeful, most definitely.  Not only are they quite a distance from the road,
they are also turned facing Cave Creek Road, rather than Sonoran Desert Drive.  Definitely
purposeful.  I have never seen these signs posted in such a way, have you?  I've seen
thousands of them, never posted so strategically placed.  Does no one check the placement of
these signs, to be sure they are actually posted and the manner in which they are placed?  
1400 homes???  Seriously??  Who is approving this?  Where will the more than 2000 cars go?
Another zoning change?  Unbelievable! 
Jean Brady
5338 E Milton Drive
Cave Creek  AZ  85331

From:
Mary Jo Hardy
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
MacEwan480 /Taylor Morrison rezoning request
Date:
Saturday, March 23, 2019 3:42:13 PM
Representatives,
My husband and I have just completed a wonderful bike ride in the Sonoran Reserve. Three days ago, we took a
beautiful hike there with friends.  We were very surprised and saddened to find out that there is a possibility that this
jewel in northern Phoenix is in danger of being changed forever.
The current zoning and Master Plan has allowed moderate development while protecting the desert environment.
This has created a wonderful area for the enjoyment of thousands of residents and visitors.
Please do not put corporate profits ahead of the natural beauty and quality of life that the Sonoran Preserve provides
to all citizens!
The Preserve was created after careful consideration and planning. Do not change that now!
Thank you.
Mary Jo Hardy
Okemos, MI
(Frequent visitor to the Phoenix area!)
Sent from my iPhone

From:
Kelly Leone
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Taylor Morrison Rezoning request
Date:
Sunday, March 24, 2019 11:19:05 AM
Dear Councilman Waring, Village Members, and Miss Wilson,
I plead with you to deny the MacEwan 480/ Taylor Morissison request for rezoning of property on the Sonoran
Parkway in North Phoenix.  When  the Preserve was created, zoning was thoughtfully and carefully designated for
nature and neighborhoods.
Approval of 947 extra homes will have an affect of more than just number of homes built.  Included in reasons to
reconsider are:
1.  Excessive amounts of traffic on Cave Creek Rd, 101 loop, I17, and Tatum Blvd.
2.  Lack of amenities to support homes and families residing in them (including grocery   stores and medical
facilities).
3.  Lack of schools, will new schools and or district be created?
4.  Sonoran Parkway will not be as biker/pedestrian friendly. Increased dangers for both.
5.  Will change the entire landscape of the Preserve. When Phoenix advertises out of state I imagine they show our
natural beauty and not rows and rows of cookie cutter homes.
6.  The impact of additional pollution from the physical building of extra homes along with the families residing in
them.
7.  Affect on the natural washes.
8. Affect on the indigenous wildlife and plants.
9.  Does Phoenix and Taylor Morrison want to look like liars, cheaters and shady operators by going against
previously planned and approved designations?
As a resident, home owner, tax payer and lover of Arizona I again ask that you deny the MacEwan/Taylor Morrison
request to rezone on Sonoran Parkway and maintain S1 and Desert Overlay Zoning.
Sincerely,
Kelly Leone
Sent from my iPad

From:
dave@cavena.net
To:
Council District 2 PCC
Cc:
PDD Desert View VPC; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Monday, March 25, 2019 9:42:51 PM
Sir:
 
We live in Tramonto. I hike in North Hills almost every weekend, and 3-4 evenings/week on my way
home from work in Tempe. This evening I finished after dark, using my headlamp the last mile or
two.  I drive to-from work via Dove Valley/Sonoran Desert highway. The desert surrounding the hills
and their great trails are quiet, calming, nice. Phoenix has done amazing things with these trails –
don’t despoil them with yet more homes we don’t need here.
 
I have seen the signs up to change the zoning, creating yet another development in the middle of
this spectacular desert. We don’t need this. We locals don’t WANT it. No reason exists from
standpoints of density, space, view - it’s flat and no one will have any sort of view from their home to
write home about – yet the view from both South Hills and North Hills, as well as from the scenic
drive that is the Sonoran Desert Highway / Dove Valley Road, will be forever stained by this
repetition of the development a couple of miles west of this new proposal. Another rectangle of
walks, houses, streets plopped down in the midst of a beautiful desert landscape.
 
It’s just another scar on the land, another need for water and sewage in a pristine area.
 
The Preserve wasn’t created, nor the trails created and maintained, to just look at yet another
housing development. It was created to give us all a break from housing developments, and
remembrance of what the Valley is really about.
 
Please vote against this, and for leaving the desert as it is in and around the Preserve.
 
Regards,
 
Dave Cavena
 
dave@cavena.net
626-818-0313 (m)
626-812-0930 (o)

From:
johannes marais
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Cc:
johannam0916@gmail.com; nukemanmaximus@gmail.com; Bettina Marais
Subject:
Apache wash/Taylor Morrison
Date:
Monday, March 25, 2019 10:53:49 AM
Dear Kaelee and Colleagues: My family and I have been using the Apache wash area for hiking and mountain
biking since 2007 (prior to area being developed for recreation). We strongly feel that Taylor Morrison’s proposed
development of 1,400 high density homes in the area of the Apache wash trail will be greatly detrimental to the
ecosystem and the public who loves to use the fabulous recreational infrastructure the city of Phoenix has put in
place there. This development will add at least 1,400 cars to the SONORAN desert drive and cave creek rd that is
already heavily congested with traffic. Thanks in advance for your consideration
JJ Marais
Mobile 602-315-6079

From:
Lindsey Tillman
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Preserve My Home - Maintain S-1 Zoning
Date:
Wednesday, March 27, 2019 5:47:39 AM
Hi,
 
My name is Lindsey Tillman. I have lived in North Phoenix since I was 5. A lot has changed since
1992. I have wonderful memories growing up in Desert Hills. I remember running off and playing in
the desert washes, riding my horse on secluded desert trails, and going on desert walks with my
parents and little sister. I remember loving when it rained because our wash would flood and we
couldn’t go to school. I remember riding my horse to my elementary school. When deciding to raise
my own family, I wanted a similar childhood for my children, and this is why we choose to live in
North Phoenix.
 
We frequent the Apache Wash Trailhead and live off of Dove Valley road. We are always amazed at
the beauty that is still there despite watching the desert develop around us. I am writing this email
to ask you to NOT allow this desert to be overtaken with growth. Please preserve the quality that
makes North Phoenix a desirable and unique place to live. The vast desert views and tower saguaros
are not something someone can get in Chandler or Gilbert and why people love this area.
 
Please MAINTAIN S-1 ZONING. I do not want to see 1400 homes built on the Sonoran Desert
Preserve. 
 
Thank you for preserving my home. 
Lindsey Tillman
623-694-4088
lindseybtillman@gmail.com

From:
Diana Duran
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
MacEwen 480 Taylor Morrison"s rezoning request
Date:
Thursday, March 28, 2019 12:02:44 PM
Hello,
I am writing to you as a homeowner that lives in the Sonoran Foothills HOA off of Sonoran
Desert Drive.  I have read the 117 page Planned Unit Development Narrative and I have a
major concern about adding an additional 940 homes.
I am not opposed to the S1 Zoning which is the original zoning.  What I am opposed to is
changing the Desert Overlay Zoning and S1 Zoning.  Adding 1,420 homes will add an
additional 2,840 cars to Sonoran Desert Drive which happens to be a two lane scenic road. 
That is a lot of cars on a scenic drive.  
Sonoran Desert Drive ends at N Valley Parkway and Cave Creek Road.  The additional 940
homeowners (and I'm sure they will be multiple car owners) will be driving to N Valley
Parkway or Cave Creek Rd for shopping and schooling.  N Valley Parkway is already
crowded with the build-out of Sonoran Gate and then there will be additional homes on Dove
Valley Rd once Lennar Homes builds out.  It is difficult to turn left or right onto Dove Valley
Rd these days.
If you look at page 115 of their proposal you can see they are surrounded by Apache Wash
and Cave Creek Wash as well as having Mesquite Tank Wash roll right through this proposed
subdivision.  I can't see additional access roads being built.  It seems the only access roads to
this subdivision is Sonoran Desert Drive.  I ride my bicycle on this drive every weekend.
Please keep the original zoning and only allow 480 homes to be built and keep the Desert
Overlay designation.
Kind Regards,
Diana Duran, CMA, MBA

From:
Jill Hoffman
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Re-zoning Taylor Morrison Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Saturday, March 30, 2019 6:42:57 PM
Hello,
My name is Jill Hoffman and I am a resident of Sonoran Foothills. I would love to attend the planning 
meeting on Tuesday evening, but my son has a playoff baseball game that night and my husband is 
currently going through cancer treatment at Mayo, so he is unable to take him or attend the meeting. We are 
trying to keep the kids lives as close to normal as possible, which means missing the re-zoning meeting. 
I am very concerned about the plans Taylor Morrison has to change the current zoning for their project on 
Sonoran Desert Drive. I support a change in zoning when it supports the surrounding community, but their 
plans do not enhance our community in any way, it only adds 1400 new homes to an area not zoned or 
designed to handle that. It goes against everything that is written on the Desert View Village Planning 
Community website. The site talks about "higher densities along the Loop 101 freeway”, and about the 
"natural washes that have biking, walking, equestrian and multi use trails that provide an abundance of 
opportunities for recreation in the LOWER density areas". By approving Taylor Morrisons’ request to 
change the density zoning, you are going against everything listed on the website and what the current 
residents love about our village. To allow Taylor Morrison to also change the Desert Character Overylay, 
also changes what the plan for the village is. Why should they be exempt from the plan? It’s one thing when 
it’s in the higher density area, but this is adjacent to the Desert Preserve. Does that mean if they are 
approved for the character overlay change, I can have grass and queen palms in my front yard? There was a 
plan for a reason, so builders wouldn’t change the landscape of the beautiful desert we have here in north 
Phoenix. 
For the last 8 weeks, we have driven to Mayo on eastbound Sonoran Desert Drive 5 days a week. It is a 
gorgeous road, but very crowded, and full of people with road rage in the morning. I drive 60 mph and have 
been flipped off more times than I can count, (the speed limit is 45). It is so overcrowded, I can not imagine 
how that road can handle more traffic the way the road was planned. The road would clearly need to be 
widened, which would be against what it was meant to be, also at whose cost? The city? I sure hope not! I 
don’t want the high density neighborhood, and now I’ll probably get to help pay for their access. 
Another concern is that Sonoran Foothills School is already planning on building 4 new classrooms because 
our school is past capacity in just it's 4th year. That neighborhood will also be assigned to a high school that 
no one wants to go to, so they can open enroll elsewhere like we all do. I’m sure they would love to drive 
their kids all the way to BGHS for all their activities so that we can help BGHS's test scores. That is one of 
the biggest issues in holding us back from being a true community, we all split to 3 different high schools…
Boulder Creek, O’Connor and Pinnacle. 
The 303 exit was not planned very well either, as that lane backs up to Dixileta by 4:30 every day. It’s un-
nerving to see the scared face in your rearview mirror when a driver doesn’t expect to stop on the freeway 
going 70mph. If you continue to approve these zoning changes, it will take away our safety and from the 
amazing village that was planned. Stick to the plan and keep our desert village great!
I sincerely hope you will consider my concerns. I love our north Phoenix neighborhood and hate to see it 
destroyed by greedy builders. I have no issue with new homes, but it needs to fit within the current plan and 
the builder needs to provide the infrastructure to support the growth. 
Jill Hoffman

From:
azmitchlove
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Drive needs to remain as is
Date:
Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:29:23 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain as is.  This is the most beautiful area in North
Phoenix and the Drive is such an amazing place to ride a bike or hike off of.  Please please do
not give in to developers again.  
470 homes is too much as is.  1,400 homes will ruin our community, natural resources and the
pristine desert we all enjoy.  
Water is a major factor to consider.  AZ is running out.  I see all the wells Phoenix is digging
around town already.  Another 1400 homes right here is a huge strain.  We need to moderate
growth for a bit.  
Traffic is another major issue.   Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading.  Cave Creek
road has already seen an insane increase in traffic and accidents.  Adding these homes will
make the roads a nightmare. 
The signage is misleading and has been moved.  How long have the signs been 100 yards or
more off of the road?  I drove down Sonoran Desert Drive on Saturday to go hiking and saw
the signs are now closer to the road.  How many people do not know about the meeting or the
rezoning request because they were not going to go offroading to read the signs...that is if they
even saw them from the road.  Poor gamesmanship on the builder.  They should not get away
with these misleading tactics. 
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors
move on.  Please do not let them take advantage of the area and the city.  
Thanks 
Mitch Love
602-430-5152
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

From:
Maureen Love
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Sunday, March 31, 2019 4:11:04 PM
Sonoran Desert Drive Zoning needs to remain.
 470 homes is too much, 1,400 homes will ruin our community and natural resources. 
Water is a major factor to consider.  AZ is running out.
Traffic is another major issue.   Taylor Morrison’s study is sided and misleading.
The signage is misleading and has been moved.
Our community will be left with the consequences once Taylor Morrison and their competitors move on.
~Maureen Love.

From:
Allen Frankel
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Monday, April 1, 2019 4:40:26 PM
I am opposed to the development at the Sonoran Preserve.
Sent from my iPhone

From:
Jeff Franklin
To:
Council District 2 PCC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Save our Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Monday, April 1, 2019 5:04:17 PM
Dear Councilman Jim Waring and Desertview VPC Committee:
My name is Jeff Franklin, I live in 85387 zip code.  I support Save Our Sonoran Preserve and I
believe in the responsible and sustainable development of the desert in Arizona.  This means
maintaining existing zoning of the preserve.  Please vote no on the MacEwan 480 rezoning
request put forward by Taylor Morrison.  This rezoning negatively impacts our preserve and
will set precedent for future home builders to put in higher density housing around the
preserve.
The case numbers are as follows: Z-62-18-2; Z-TA-5-18-2; and Z-75-18-2.
Thank you, and PLEASE vote NO!
Jeff Franklin

From:
Micki
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Rezoning cases Z-62-18-2, Z-TA-5-18-2, and Z-75-18-2
Date:
Monday, April 1, 2019 2:29:46 PM
Dear Committee Members,
 
I am opposed to this request to rezone the area described as the MacEwan 480 in the above case
numbers. I own a home in Sonoran Foothills a development to the west of this proposed community.
 
Traffic is already a problem along Sonoran Desert Drive and adding 1420 homes can only make it
worse.  Sonoran Desert Drive is designated as a scenic corridor, not a primary route into and out of a
project with this kind of density.  The developers are also trying to remove the Desert Character
Overlay on this property which was originally developed to protect the character of the Sonoran
Desert with density restrictions and building codes.  Please honor the original zoning of 1 home per
acre and retain the Desert Character Overlay by not approving this request.
 
Sincerely,
Michelle Kelley
480-330-1799
 
Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From:
Ms Pat De Stefano
To:
council.district.2@phoenix.agov; jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Rezoning on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Monday, April 1, 2019 1:08:47 PM
I am writing to strongly urge all NOT to rezone the open area on Sonoran Desert Dr.  I am a
frequent hiker at Apache Wash, and rezoning and building houses in that area is totally
unnecessary, would ruin the landscape, increase traffic, and displace the animals and
reptiles that live in the open area.  The houses that have already been built are a true
eyesore to the landscape.  Please keep Arizona open and free!!  NO MORE HOMES on
Sonoran Desert Dr.
Thank you.
Patricia Kite

From:
Cassandra M Leone
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; jim@jimwaring.com; Kaelee Wilson
Subject:
Taylor Morrison Rezoning Save Our Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Tuesday, April 2, 2019 2:05:33 PM
Dear Councilman Waring, Miss Wilson, and Village Committee,
My name is Cassandra Leone and I am a longtime Cave Creek resident, Northern Arizona
University graduate with a BS in Environmental Studies, hiker, biker, and state lover. 
I would like to express my absolute disinterest in approving Taylor Morrison's rezoning
request for MacEwen 480.
This development touts itself as a premiere living space, when in reality, expanding the
already unnecessary development of Sonoran Desert Parkway will result in a slew of issues for
Cave Creek and Phoenix residents. 
Increased traffic along the Parkway, which is already affected by work rush hours, will likely
increase the amount of accidents seen in this area. I'm afraid that these accidents will come at
the cost of bikers, runners, and recreation enthusiasts - people who are utilizing one of the only
open spaces left in North Phoenix/Cave Creek to enjoy their preferred sports.
In addition to my fear of this community changing the landscape and overall beauty of the
Sonoran Desert Preserve and Apache Wash Trailhead, I'm afraid that it will also affect local
wildlife, and further accelerate our increasing global temperature. Currently, the land along
Sonoran Desert Parkway cools the moment the sun drops, and continues to be an oasis within
the concrete of cookie cutter houses along Cave Creek Road. 
I beg of you to reconsider allowing more homes to be built than already approved. As it is, the
MacEwen 480 development is detested among many desert dwellers, as our views and peace
are slowly scraped away by development. Please do not allow any further expansion in this
area. 
Sincerely,
Cassandra Leone
480-323-9694
Cassandra Marie Leone

From:
Bob Thompson
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Planned development off of Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:46:47 PM
Hi, I would like to voice my opposition to any rezoning for the planned development of the
area near the Apache Wash Trailhead.  The area today is a beautiful expanse of desert and I
feel it would be wrong to allow high density development along the Sonoran Drive corredor. I
encourage you to keep the zoning as it is today.
Thanks,
Bob
Robert E. Thompson
(M) 314-568-1314
mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com

From:
LISA GALLAGHER
To:
PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 2 PCC; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC;
Council District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; district.8@phoenix.gov
Subject:
OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING
Date:
Tuesday, April 9, 2019 4:32:09 PM
Please don't ruin my neighborhood!!  I strongly OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD
REZONING!!  I drive Sonoran Desert Parkway on a regular basis and it is so
beautiful!!  To allow developers to over develop the land adjacent to it would
be a disgrace to our desert and a complete disservice to the residents and
taxpayers of the nearby communities, out city and our state in general. 
Approving this rezoning would open the door for other developers to do the
same and before we know it the beautiful desert and the scenic drive will be
gone!  
OPPOSE the MacEwan 480 PUD REZONING!! 
Sincerely,
Lisa Gallagher
2425 W Bronco Butte Trail #1034
Phoenix, AZ 85085

From:
jean brady
To:
jim@jimwaring.com; PDD Desert View VPC; Mayor Gallego; Council District 1 PCC; Council District 3 PCC; Council
District 4; Council District 5 PCC; Council District 6 PCC; Council District 7 PCC; Council District 8 PCC
Subject:
Sonoran Preserve
Date:
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:40:27 PM
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a property along
the Sonoran Desert Drive.  
The Sonoran Desert Preserve serves as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as
to provide protection against flooding. 
There has been discussion of the need to expand Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for
access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be done at the expense of the developer
who should then have to seriously contribute to this expense.  Cave Creek Road is already unable
to handle the traffic turning onto Sonoran Desert Drive, imagine adding an additional 2500-3000
cars!
The impact of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land
would be immense; this development can only have an extremely negative impact.
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. This would open the door for every developer that follows.  
Sincerely,
Jean Brady

From:
Council District 1 PCC
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Cc:
Racelle Escolar
Subject:
FW: MacEwan 480 rezoning
Date:
Wednesday, April 17, 2019 3:28:53 PM
 
 
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
City of Phoenix
602-262-7444
 
 
From: Daniel Centilli [mailto:daniel.centilli@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 1:10 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC <council.district.1@phoenix.gov>
Subject: MacEwan 480 rezoning
 
 Dear Councilwoman Thelda Williams,
 
My name is Daniel Centilli. I am a Phoenix homeowner in Desert Ridge.
 
I am actively organizing my community in opposition to Taylor Morrison’s proposal to rezone land
along Sonoran Desert Drive. We are paying attention, and we are not happy. Expect to be hearing
from us. 
 
This letter is in regards to the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning proposal, along Sonoran Desert Drive. I
am strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal, and I hope that you will take the time to investigate
this proposal closely. The north valley community is united in opposition to this development. The
developer has asked for for the removal of ‘Desert Character Overlay’ and the removal of ‘S-1’
zoning on a parcel of land that is immediately adjacent to the Sonoran Desert Preserve. 
 
A change in zoning will result in the building of more than 1400 homes in the same 473 acre
property. This will set precedent for any future development. It does not honor the vision of the
Planners of the Sonoran Desert Preserve. It will turn Sonoran Desert Drive into a dangerous, traffic
congested thorofare. It will no longer be the scenic drive that it was intended to be. We expect to
see pedestrian and cyclist deaths. There has already been an increase in automobile accidents as
drivers lose patience with the increased traffic. The developer will not be bearing the cost of road
infrastructure. The city has no immediate plan to address the increased traffic. We we told by the
developer that the city plans to address it in the 8-10 year time frame. Not acceptable. 
 
A change in zoning degrades the more than $300 million dollar investment that the City of Phoenix
undertook to purchase preserve land. This is not good stewardship of city assets! The value of the
preserve is largely in its rural character, which is protected by “Desert Character Overlay” and ‘S-1’
zoning. What’s next is the complete intrusion of more dense development, spurred by this change,

and the precedent it will set. 
 
Can we trust you to safeguard the investment our community has made?
 
A vote in favor of this change in zoning is a vote against the quality of life in my community. Our
current zoning makes an effort to protect our quality of life, the character of the Sonoran Desert
Preserve, and the will of our community to have shared public open space. We say, “Let them build
in accordance with current zoning. No changes, no exceptions.” 
 
You as a city council member have an opportunity to do the right thing. Or not. We’re paying
attention. 
 
A yes vote for rezoning would be a signal to us that this big corporation headquartered in Scottsdale,
not Phoenix, has an unequal say in what happens in our community. We are not ok with that. We’re
looking to our representatives to represent us first. Protect our community. 
 
Please vote NO on the MacEwan 480 rezoning.
 
Thank you,
 
Daniel Centilli
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*******

From:
Council District 1 PCC
To:
Kaelee Wilson
Cc:
Racelle Escolar
Subject:
FW: MacEwen 480
Date:
Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:31:20 PM
 
 
Andrea Gaston
Council District 1 Office
City of Phoenix
602-262-7444
 
 
From: Christine Severance [mailto:tutudoc1@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Council District 1 PCC <council.district.1@phoenix.gov>
Subject:
 
Good morning.
 
I am writing to clearly state my opposition to the proposed development by Taylor Morrison of a
property named MacEwen480.
 
Reasons I oppose this include:
 
a) The proposed rezoning changes to the Desert Overlay District will open the door to urban sprawl
into this and other "State Trust Lands" that were originally created to maintain The Sonoran Desert
Preserve as a natural, archaeological, & recreational area, as well as provide protection against
flooding in the Maricopa Flood Control District.
 
b) The Taylor Morrison developer has not presented an adequate traffic study that identifies the
road improvements described in their proposal. There has been discussion of the need to expand
Sonoran Desert Drive to 3 lanes each way for access to Cave Creek Road. This traffic study should be
done at the expense of the developer so that necessary negotiations between the City of Phoenix
and Taylor Morrison can take place. The developer should plan their portion of this expense and
present it at future public meetings of the community. Cave Creek Road is already unable to contain
the change in traffic patterns, an additional 1400+ homes would overburden the roads.
 
c) The developer has not yet articulated the details of their plans about mitigation of the impact
their project will have on the Maricopa Flood Control District. The City of Phoenix should require
public presentation of the plans to protect the City from future claims from owners of present and
future owners of homes in the Flood Control District.
 
As someone who has enjoyed the Sonoran Desert Preserve for hiking and biking regularly over the
last 5 years, I am appalled at the suggested change in zoning. The preserve is meant to protect our

delicate desert ecosystem and the animals and native plants in the area. Combined with the impact
of traffic, human waste, pets, garbage, and the general encroachment onto open land, this
development can only have an extremely negative impact.  
 
Please, do not allow this re-zoning. There are other areas that can be developed that will not have an
impact on the preserve, flood zone, and current residents.
 
Thank you for your time
 
Christine Severance
*******

From:
Turner Justin
Subject:
I oppose the MacEwan 480 PUD rezoning!
Date:
Tuesday, April 23, 2019 9:56:30 PM
Hello,
My name is Justin Turner.  My wife & I and our 2 young children live in Tatum
Highlands (85331) and appreciate all that the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve offers not
only the residents of the Valley but also many visitors each year.  Our family and the
residents of Phoenix oppose the MacEwan 480 rezoning.  PLEASE VOTE NO!!  This
would negatively impact the Sonoran Desert Preserve as well as the Maricopa Flood
Control System.  In addition, I do not believe that the developer has done their due
diligence in conducting traffic and environmental impact studies for this proposed
change.  In speaking of Arizona, President Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Arizona has
a natural wonder which is in kind absolutely unparalleled throughout the rest of the
world.  I want to ask you to keep this great wonder of nature as it now is."
Save Our Sonoran Preserve speaks for me.  Thank you for your support & PLEASE
VOTE NO. 
Justin Turner C) 602-618-7883

From:
stephanie
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Sonoran preserve
Date:
Tuesday, May 14, 2019 6:35:20 PM
Hello,
As a Phoenix resident for the past eleven years I am writing to respectfully request that you
NOT allow the MacEwan 480 PUD Rezoning. Please think of the long term effects for the
environment and the increased demands for water that the project would bring to our desert
state. 
Thank you,
Stephanie Dinner

From:
hazardousheelers
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Opposition of the MacEwan 480
Date:
Tuesday, May 14, 2019 9:14:01 PM
I realize the likelyhood of someone caring what I have to say it not in my favor but I
am devastated to hear about this proposed development near Apache trail wash. I
have had my horses in Desert hills for as long as I can remember and from day one I
dreamed of living out here. I put myself through school year after year to earn my
master's degree in special education. I worked my way through the ranks in the
school district until I got my dream job with a decent salary and I finally was able to
buy a house in desert hills right next to the Sonoran desert preserve. The peace and
quiet and small town feel is everything I could have ever dreamed of. Please don't
allow some faceless sycophant to steal what I have worked years for to achieve. Not
only do I worry for myself and my family's enjoyment but as a teacher I can see the
devastation additional students will do to our Deer Valley and Cave creek's already
overwhelmed school districts. You are considering allowing these greedy money
grubbing individuals to impact our future generation's level of education. After red for
ed I would think it would be obvious that pushing students into areas already
inundated with a huge population dooms the current student base to a mediocre and
inadequate education due to overpacked classrooms. Please remember the little
people when you review this decision. Please remember the students desperate for
attention and support and the teachers who are barely hanging on as it is. Please
remember the sacrifices and endless work I put in to be able to buy my dream home
in a quiet desert location. I am hoping common decency will outweigh profit in this
case.
Thank you,
Lindsey Zvara 
Hazardousheelers@yahoo.com

From:
scott stearne
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Taylor Morrison 480 Development
Date:
Friday, May 17, 2019 3:15:03 PM
Hello, my name is Scott Stearne. I live in Cave Creek..I wanted to reach out and speak about
my opposition to the 480 rezoning request by Taylor Morrison.
Honestly I don't understand how Phoenix can even consider this zoning request. Traffic in this
North Phx area is already a growing problem and concern. Additionally, water is also a huge
concern for our entire state. I used to live in Desert Hills, and area that I'm sure you know has
serious water problems. I am having a real problem with Phoenix continuing to literally punch
holes in the ground day after day and allowing new homes to be built, seemingly with no
concerns over the water table dropping. You may know that over the past decades that the
water table has dropped almost 200 feet in certain areas. And yet, new Wells are still put in.
Now, with a new development in the Sonoran Preserve, that will put additional strains on city
water use and delivery. We should all be looking far into the future to assess the States water
needs..We just had a drought that lasted 10 years. We don't know when the next one will
happen and how long it may last. People are already claiming the drought to be over, which is
leading to more usage and less conservation. That's a serious concern for all of us. And, 1400
homes are going to use an enormous amount of a prescious limited resource.
Trash is another concern. Another 1400 homes produce huge amounts of trash, how long can
we just dump in the land fills? They don't last forever as you know.
Then we have the issue of density. 4 homes per acre is unacceptable. The preserve is s delicate
beautiful place. Let's keep it that way. Please keep the zoning to low density as the original
plan calls for. I know we can't just stop the development as a whole, I'd like to. I love open
space and it's a valuable resource for all of us to enjoy. But that resource is gradually
disappearing.
I ask you to please vote to keep 480 a low density zone. Taylor Morrison will survive, our
beautiful desert may not in the long term. I have many other concerns that can't be expressed
in an email..I'm sure you can get the idea here though.
I thank you for allowing my opinion to be considered.
Most Respectfully,
Scott Stearne
Technical Support Specialists
36721 North 25th St
Cave Creek AZ
85331
619-733-6700

1
Racelle Escolar
From:
Andrea Galyean <andreagalyean@hotmail.com>
Sent:
Saturday, July 6, 2019 4:32 PM
To:
Racelle Escolar
Subject:
MacEwen 480 PUD application
Hello: 
 
For your information and for the members of the Planning Commission, please see the attached letter for the 
position of the Arizona Mountaineering Club regarding the proposed rezoning of the MacEwen 480. The 
original letter was sent to the City Council on July 1. Complete text follows: 
 
 
July 1, 2019 
 
Phoenix Mayor and Phoenix City Council Members 
200 West Washington Street, 11th Floor 
Phoenix, Arizona 85003 
 
RE: MacEwen 480 PUD Application, third submittal Jan. 10, 2019 
 
Dear Mayor Gallego and Members of the City Council: 
 
The Arizona Mountaineering Club, a 501(c)(7) not‐for‐profit organization based in Phoenix, Arizona, is a 
recreational club focused on mountaineering and rock climbing. We provide outdoor education and 
experiences and advocate to protect climbing resources.  
 
As such, Arizona Mountaineering Club is opposed to the request by real estate development company Taylor 
Morrison that the city waive established zoning requirements in order to allow a master planned community 
of up to 1,420 houses on 472 acres bordering the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Our objection is grounded in the 
belief that the Desert Character Overlay and Preserve Edge Guidelines were put in place to avoid precisely the 
scenario being proposed, with higher density housing and related hardscape development abutting the 
Preserve.  
 
Access to outdoor recreation is a major asset and a key attraction for the City. The Overlay now in place 
maintains the natural desert character of the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve, providing a respite from the built 
environment for the good of residents, visitors, and native wildlife. 
 
All of those needs are reflected in the current regulations, which preserve those limited assets for the greater 
benefit of the City. Therefore, we ask that you maintain the Overlay and reject any proposal that does not 
conform to that Overlay. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Andrea Galyean

2
Vice President, Arizona Mountaineering Club 
4340 East Indian School Road, #21‐164 
Phoenix, Arizona 85018 
www.arizonamountaineeringclub.net 
 
copies: 
Members: City of Phoenix Planning Committee 
Members: Desert View Village Planning Committee 
Alan Stephenson, Director, City of Phoenix Planning Department 
Kaylee Wilson, City of Phoenix Planner, Village of Desert View  
Ingir Erickson, Director, City of Phoenix Parks Department 
Sara Parks, Chair, City of Phoenix Parks Board 
Gary Kirkilas, Save Our Sonoran Preserve founder

From:
Rich Mogull
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Preserve Desert Sonoran Drive
Date:
Saturday, October 26, 2019 9:33:53 AM
I am writing to express my extreme concern over the rezoning application by Taylor Morrison
on Desert Sonoran Drive. 
I am not anti-development, but all too often in Phoenix developers purchase land under the
assumption that they will not need to comply with current zoning laws. This has created an
incredible moral hazard in Phoenix that, as citizens, makes it effectively impossible for us to
make decisions on where to live with any expectations that laws and zoning will be respected
in the future. 
This situation is especially egregious since we will lose an incredible community resource not
to benefit constituents, but merely one developer that clearly never planned to worry about the
low density zoning. 
That area is entirely reasonable for development under the existing zoning. Increasing the
density and removing the look and feel requirements will permanently destroy the quality of
life of all constituents in the area and the city at large who use the preserve. 
I implore you to keep the existing zoning and respect the residents of North Phoenix and
maintain our local resources instead of allowing Taylor Morrison to run roughshod over the
city. 
Thank you,
Rich Mogull
3640 E Louise Dr
Phoenix, AZ

From:
Christopher Kowalsky
To:
Toni Duenas
Cc:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
RE: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
Date:
Friday, February 11, 2022 2:31:34 PM
Attachments:
image001.png
Toni,
In reading this it appears that they are referring to the Verdin development that is going through a
current zoning entitlement case with PDD. I am CC’ing the village planner on this email who oversees
that process in this area.
 
Julianna, please find the attached email.  
 
Thanks,
Chris
 
 
 
From: Streets P STR <streetsp@phoenix.gov> 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 2:16 PM
To: Christopher Kowalsky <chris.kowalsky@phoenix.gov>
Subject: FW: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
 
Hi Chris,
 
Is this something you can assist with?
 
 
Thank you,
Toni Dueñas
Administrative Secretary to Kini L.E. Knudson
602-262-6136
 
 
 
From: D <amddav11@gmail.com> 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 12:29 PM
To: Receptionist PKS <receptionist.pks@phoenix.gov>; Streets P STR <streetsp@phoenix.gov>
Subject: Plans for Master-Planned Community Verdin
 
Hello,
 
I’m just writing this knowing not much can be done about the never ending development of our gorgeous Sonoran
Desert…

But building on areas that used to be a preserve, building regardless of the natural, social and aesthetic value of
the land makes yet another development even more upsetting. 
 
These ugly roof-to-roof homes are just concrete monstrosities created and “designed” without any respect and
correspondence with the surrounding nature - regardless of how much the developer will try to convince everyone
of a natural and "organic" feel and preservation of native habitats. 1420 homes cannot be organic - as it will
irreversibly damage the natural beauty of the desert and create even more traffic in areas that used to offer
incredible peace and views. 
 
I truly don't understand how it's done - we see the impact already and it's so incredibly sad we don't give our land
more appreciation. One day, it'll all be gone - is there something that can be done about it today? 
 
:(

From:
PDD Zoning Adjustment
To:
Samantha Keating; Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
Date:
Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:32:01 PM
Samantha/Juliana,
 
Is Z-62-18 moving forward?  We received a comment email in the ZA mailbox. Please see
below.
 
Thank you,
Tricia Gomes, Zoning Administrator
Office: 602-262-4870  Email: tricia.gomes@phoenix.gov
City of Phoenix
► Planning & Development Department
Planning Division, Zoning Section
200 West Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
Mission: Planning, Development and Preservation for a Better Phoenix
 
 
From: MITCH LISWITH <M_LISWITH@msn.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:58 PM
To: PDD Zoning Adjustment <zoning.adjustment@phoenix.gov>
Subject: Reject Zoning Application Z-62-18
 
As a Phoenix Park Steward, I am writing to ask you to reject Zoning Application Z-62-18.  The
Sonoran Desert Preserve was created in 1998 to conserve open space from home
development. Groups worked hard to preserve the land surrounding Sonoran Desert Drive by
getting a zoning ordinance passed for a Desert Character Overlay, written to mandate low
density housing and maintain wildlife and desert view corridors along the Sonoran Preserve
Border.
 
This 480-acre parcel is known as Verdin (previously MacEwen 480). Listed in their narrative for
rezoning, "the property is uniquely situated as the only large, privately owned parcel
surrounded by the Sonoran Preserve and with access to Sonoran Desert Drive. Other parcels
surrounding MacEwen 480 are undeveloped and owned by the City, ASLD or FCD and
designated by the City as future Sonoran Preserve priorities". Rather than adhere to the
Desert Character Overlay zoning of 1 to 2 homes per acre on the land, Taylor Morrison (the
developer) wants 2 to 5 homes per acre on the entirety of the property. Over the past few
years, the developer has been trying to get the area rezoned from a low-density zone to a
high-density zone. 
 
I am asking that the Desert Character Overlay designations be adhered to.  I can't imagine the
damage to the desert that a huge subdivision right in the middle of open space would cause!

Sincerely, 
Mitchell Liswith
1638 W. Royal Palm Rd. 
Phoenix, AZ  85021

From:
Nancy Vetter
To:
PDD North Gateway VPC; PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
Proposed development by Taylor Morrison along Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Wednesday, December 1, 2021 9:33:28 PM
Dear Desert View Village Members,
I am emailing you to express my concerns regarding a proposed development  by Taylor Morrison along
Sonoran Desert Drive.  I have many objections to this possible development and would welcome the
opportunity to discuss with you but for now would like to address the traffic issues this development will
create.. 
I live in Sonoran Foothills in a community called Desert Enclave.  We have one entrance into this
community and it is from Dove Valley Road.  At that point the road goes from a four lane road to a two
lane road with traffic  heading east and west.  
During each work day, Monday through Friday during peak times  long lines of cars passing our entrance
have been observed making entering and exiting our community difficult and dangerous. Adding
additional homes off of this road will only add to the problem. 
The extension of the 303 from I 17 to Cave Creek Road could offer some relief but my understanding is
that funds have not been allocated for this extension now or in the near future.  
I would welcome your support in opposing this development.
Thank you. 
Sincerely,
Nancy Vetter    
32618 N 16th Glen    
Phoenix, Az  85085 
602-881-3273

From:
Gordon Hutchinson
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
Taylor Morrison Verdin Development
Date:
Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:50:19 AM
Julianna,
I am writing to you about the proposal to rezone 480 acres (Z-62-18-2) for development south
of Sonoran Desert Drive between 16th and 24th street alignments.
As a resident of Sonoran Gate, my concern is traffic volume along Dove Valley Rd and Sonoran
Desert Drive.  Traffic volumes appear to be increasing on these roads in both directions as an
east west throughfare between Cave Creek Road and I17.
Are traffic studies completed or planned to measure traffic volumes on these roads?  Are
there studies that project increases in traffic volume from the addition of approximately 1,400
new homes from this development?
Is this development contingent upon funding road improvements to accommodate increased
traffic volumes?  Is limiting commercial vehicle traffic to local access being considered?
Thank you,
Gordon Hutchinson

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date:
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 10:15:49 AM
 
 
From: Lora Terrill <lora.terrill@outlook.com>
Date: Monday, December 6, 2021 at 5:55 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com <jim@jimwaring.com>
Cc: Council District 2 PCC <council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2).  We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1. 
Thank you,
 
Lora Terrill
2517 E. Ridge Creek Road
Phoenix AZ 85024
*******

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Date:
Tuesday, December 7, 2021 4:18:01 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
 
From: coco whitaker <whitakercoco@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 4:17 PM
To: jim@jimwaring.com <jim@jimwaring.com>
Cc: Council District 2 PCC <council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Subject: VOTE NO on MacEwen 480
Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-Zoning (Z-62-18-2).  We love our
Sonoran Preserve and want the City of Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1. 
Thank you,
 
Coco Whitaker
3976 E Scout Pass, Phoenix, AZ 85050
 
 
*******

From:
Christine M Pedersen
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: Vote NO on MacEwen 480
Date:
Wednesday, December 8, 2021 3:33:29 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Monica Flint <monicaflint74@gmail.com>
Date: December 8, 2021 at 9:00:04 AM MST
To: jim@jimwaring.com
Subject: Vote NO on MacEwen 480

Please VOTE NO on MacEwen 480/Taylor Morrison’s request for Re-
Zoning (Z-62-18-2).  We love our Sonoran Preserve and want the City of
Phoenix to MAINTAIN the Zoning as S1. 
Thank you,
 
Monica Flint
23624 N 57th Drive
Glendale AZ 85310

From:
TIna Nuccio
To:
PDD Desert View VPC
Subject:
I support the Taylor Morrison Verdin development on Sonoran Desert Drive
Date:
Wednesday, December 8, 2021 12:00:58 PM
I am in favor the reasoning request from Taylor Morrison, for their proposed development on Sonoran Desert
Drive.  Clearly we need more housing, and the average 3 homes/acre seems reasonable and in line with the
developments around it. 
Thanks!

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Date:
Friday, December 10, 2021 7:54:24 AM
Please add to the public record.
 
From: Bob Thompson <mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com>
Date: Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 7:59 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC <council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Cc: Terri Hotmail <thereserthompson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive.
Hi, I just attended the Desert View and North Gateway Planning Committee meetings, during which
there was a presentation about a proposed development off of Sonoran Desert Drive a little bit west
of cave creek road. It used to be called the McEwing 480, but I think it’s now called Verdin.
During the presentation many mentions of Sonoran Desert Dr as a major transportation corridor
were made.
I wanted to reach out to you to express my opposition to  the development as well as any other
developments in this area. The Apache Wash area and the Sonoran Desert Preserve is a great natural
resource and wonderful recreational area.
I implore you to help preserve this area as it is without further development. With the already heavy
traffic on Sonoran Desert Drive, no additional traffic or development is welcome. I hope we could
get the designation changed for Sonoran Desert Drive so that it is no longer considered a major
transportation corridor. I’d also like the rest of the area to be changed from state trust land to
preserve.
Please let me know your thoughts on this matter
Thanks,
Bob Thompson
Mrrobertthompson@hotmail.com
3145681314
*******

From:
Sonoran Preserve
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
Message to VPC Members
Date:
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:17:25 AM
Hi Julianna,
I wanted to forward a message along with some documents to the members of both the
Desert View and North Gateway VPC regarding the MacEwan/Verdin PUD request. I
copied the message below and attached the documents. 
Thank you!
-Gary
Dear Members of the Desert View and North Gateway VPC,
 
First, thank you for your service of representing our community on the VPC. Your time and
dedication is greatly appreciated and respected!Second, since Taylor Morrison’s presentation last
month, I have been researching the multitude of concerning factors with their PUD request including
increased traffic without an existing transportation infrastructure, building next to a floodplain, and
building 1,400 homes in the middle of the desert also without an existing plan for schools and other
necessary infrastructure. Particularly, their request to remove the Desert Character
Overlay Ordinance, a written law to protect the integrity of the Sonoran Preserve, is that of upmost
concern.
 
The ordinance is clear. It very specifically states its purpose is to “provide a transition from the
preserve to areas with greater density” and should extend down to the “Dynamite Blvd alignment on
the south” in order to “maintain the fragile undisturbed areas and wildlife corridor along the Cave
Creek Wash.” These boundaries are carefully delineated based on ecosystems to ensure maximum
preservation among development.
 
It absolutely does not state anywhere that its intent is to only extend to where the Sonoran Desert
Drive may happen to be located, as Taylor Morrison’s lawyer contends as their basis for
circumventing the ordinance. This well-written ordinance is explicit and Taylor Morrison’s request
for us to remove the ordinance is not valid.
 
There is a committed force of citizens that care deeply about this, encompassing over 1,000
members of the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group and hundreds of folks from across the city that I
have spoken with in the preserve. Importantly, it also includes valued organizations and businesses
such as the City of Phoenix Desert Parks Department, hot air balloon companies, and hiking and rock
climbing groups.
 
I have attached their letters urging you to maintain the Desert Character Overlay, not only because
it’s a law, but because it’s meant to protect the Sonoran Desert Preserve - one
of our community’s greatest assets and attractions!

Thank you again for your time. Please reach out to me with any questions or comments.
-Dr.Gary Kirkilas 
Save Our Sonoran Preserve 
Saveoursonoranpreserve@gmail.com
PSPMMPC L to PRB March 28 2019…
[drive.google.com]
Hot Air Expeditions Sonoran Preserve…
[drive.google.com]
AMC letter Phoenix Preserve.pdf
[drive.google.com]
Sonoran Preserve Opposition Letter.pdf
[drive.google.com]
MacEwen.pdf
[drive.google.com]
CB_ltr_2019_cmt.docx
[docs.google.com]
Rezoning Request_MacEwan 480…
[drive.google.com]

From:
Samantha Keating
To:
David Urbinato
Cc:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
RE: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
Date:
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:20:16 PM
Attachments:
image011.png
image012.png
image013.png
image014.png
image015.png
image016.png
image017.png
image018.png
Hi David,
 
This is in reference to Z-62-18.  It is a PUD and no dates have been set for hearing.  The
latest draft of the proposal is on the PUD page. 
 
Julianna – let’s add this to the case file.
 
Thank you,
Samantha Keating
Principal Planner
Long Range Planning
Office: 602-262-6823
200 West Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85003
 
 
From: David Urbinato <david.urbinato@phoenix.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:14 PM
To: Samantha Keating <samantha.keating@phoenix.gov>
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
 
Samantha, I just saw this one pop up in the Republic. But I can’t pin it down on the rezoning staff
report webpage.
 
David Urbinato
Management Assistant II
Phoenix Planning and Development Department
602-534-3630
 
From: Michael R Angulo <michael.angulo@phoenix.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:04 PM
To: David Urbinato <david.urbinato@phoenix.gov>
Subject: FW: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
 
David,
 
Do you know what project this constituent is referring to? Thanks!

Michael Angulo
Research & Policy Director
 
desk: 602-262-4822  cell: 602-478-6347
web: Phoenix.gov  email: michael.angulo@phoenix.gov 
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor
Phoenix AZ 85003
 
How can our office better communicate?
Click HERE to respond to our short survey
 
 
 
From: Council District 5 PCC <council.district.5@phoenix.gov>
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 2:40 PM
To: Michael R Angulo <michael.angulo@phoenix.gov>
Subject: D5 Constituent public commentFW: emdist5 - Form Submission
D5 Constituent public comment regarding a development project. How shall we respond?
 
Emmanuel Gallardo-Sanidad
Constituent Services Director
Main line: (602) 262-7446  Direct line: (602) 534-9721
Web: Phoenix.gov/district5  
200 W. Washington Street, 11th Floor. Phoenix, AZ 85003

From: no-reply@phoenix.gov <no-reply@phoenix.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:14 PM
To: Council District 5 PCC <council.district.5@phoenix.gov>
Subject: emdist5 - Form Submission
 
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Development
MESSAGE : Councilmember Guardado,
Greetings. I am a supporter and a constituent. I am writing today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your opposition to
this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: 0d168e3d18554c39a6752e0d7f81c44f
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 1:14:04 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district5/email
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date:
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 9:25:28 AM
Hi Julianna,
 
Please add to the public record.
 
Thank you.
 
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov <no-reply@phoenix.gov>
Date: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 8:22 AM
To: Council District 2 PCC <council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Tina nuccio
SUBJECT : I support Verdin housing development near Sonoran Preserve
MESSAGE : Hi Jim. I want to voice my support for the proposed density of the Verdin
development. This area desperately needs more affordable housing and the area can easily
support the proposed density, given all of open space around it.
I am also a frequent biker/hiker (Apache Wash) in the area, so I do appreciate the amenities,
but know it was always intended to be developed partially.
If/when this is approved, if it is affordable enough, we will consider purchasing a home there.
Email : crn57370@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 549-8869
ADDRESS : 4450 e. Sierra sunset trail
CITY : Cave creek
STATE : Az
ZIP : 85331
Submission ID: 997d7a3ae3974fdc8684982db5123b90
Form Submission On : 1/19/2022 8:22:38 AM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2
This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.

Please handle appropriately.

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: emdist2 - Form Submission
Date:
Thursday, January 20, 2022 2:46:48 PM
Please add to the public record, thank you.
 
From: no-reply@phoenix.gov <no-reply@phoenix.gov>
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 2:28 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC <council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Subject: emdist2 - Form Submission
FROM : Kyle Mickel
SUBJECT : Sonoran Preserve Proposal
MESSAGE : Councilmember Waring,
Greetings. I am a 32-year Phoenix resident writing with concerns today after reading in the Az
Republic about the proposed development of 1400 homes near our beloved and precious
Sonoran Preserve. I wish to voice my extreme disappointment in this proposal and urge you to
oppose this large scale project which would severely impact the beauty, native vegetation,
desert wildlife and quality of life for residents who love to enjoy this truly beautiful and
remarkable area. We are very fortunate to have this grand mountain preserve in our back
yards. If you have not visited Apache Wash or any of the other magnificent hiking/biking
areas within the Sonoran Preserve lately, please re-visit this area to truly appreciate what we
have. Let's keep the amazing Preserve and its desert inhabitants alive. Please voice your
opposition to this project when it comes before Council this Spring. Thank you.
Kyle Mickel
PS: Considering our severe water shortage, this project should not move forward on that basis
alone. But there exist so many other reasons to say no to this horrible concept. I appreciate
your consideration.
Email : kylemickel4@gmail.com
AREA : 602
PHONE : 299-6147
ADDRESS : 1808 W. Orangewood Ave.
CITY : Phoenix
STATE : AZ
ZIP : 85021
Submission ID: ca17955446204320b564f8605e31035f
Form Submission On : 1/20/2022 2:28:17 PM
Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district2/contact-district-2

This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.

From:
Council District 2 PCC
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
FW: Verdin project support
Date:
Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:41:49 AM
Please add to the public record
 
From: Jennifer Ruby <jenruby@cox.net>
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:32 PM
To: Jim Waring <Jim.Waring@phoenix.gov>, Council District 2 PCC
<council.district.2@phoenix.gov>
Subject: Verdin project support
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days in the State Senate.
I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the proposed Verdin project. Northeast
Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s
additional single-family housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North
Phoenix, we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to grow
our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for this area, and the
thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be an enhancement not only for Verdin
residents but also for the greater area. I’m particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran
Desert Drive which are badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan certified by the National
Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby
2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024
*******

From:
Jennifer Ruby
To:
Julianna Pierre
Subject:
Fwd: Verdin project support
Date:
Monday, March 7, 2022 8:54:48 PM
Hi Ms. Pierre - 
I wanted to share with you my email of support for the Verdin project. I find the project’s
application materials to be very thoughtful and comprehensive. It’s rare lately to see a project
proposing only single-family detached housing...compare for example the recent projects
adjacent to where I live: Sendero Foothills and Stone Butte East, both of which include higher
density/intensity and attached product.
I believe this project will be great for North Phoenix. Thank you for your hard work getting it
to this point.
Jen Ruby
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jennifer Ruby <jenruby@cox.net>
Subject: Verdin project support
Date: March 7, 2022 at 8:32:35 PM MST
To: jim.waring@phoenix.gov, council.district.2@phoenix.gov
Hello Councilman Waring -
We’ve met a few times; I’ve been a constituent of yours going back to your days
in the State Senate. I wanted to take a few minutes to express my support for the
proposed Verdin project. Northeast Phoenix has been a wonderful place for my
family to live for decades, and I welcome Verdin’s additional single-family
housing options. With all the exciting new employment coming to North Phoenix,
we need more housing so that employees can build their lives here and continue to
grow our vibrant community. The overall low density is entirely appropriate for
this area, and the thoughtful design exhibited by the Edge Openness Plan will be
an enhancement not only for Verdin residents but also for the greater area. I’m
particularly excited about the improvements to Sonoran Desert Drive which are
badly needed and unlikely to happen without new development.
Finally, North Phoenix will be incredibly lucky to lay claim to a master plan
certified by the National Wildlife Federation. Talk about leading by example!
Please also share my support with the Village Planning Committees. Thank you
for your time,
Jen
Jennifer Ruby

2333 E Chama Drive
Phoenix 85024

From:
Ann Griffith
To:
Jim Waring; Julianna Pierre
Cc:
Council District 2 PCC
Subject:
Taylor Morrison Verdin Master Planned Community
Date:
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 10:44:41 AM
Mr. Waring & Ms. Pierre,
 
After reading the recent Valley Vibe News article about the pushback on this proposed
development from the Save Our Sonoran Preserve group, I wanted to voice a counter opinion
for consideration.
 
I absolutely support the need to preserve the beauty and natural wildlife of our Arizona
deserts…it’s what makes Arizona such a beautiful place to live.  However, I also understand the
economic importance of development to foster business development, attract the best
employers and sustain a generational workforce.
 
Our son, a recent CU graduate, relocated back to Phoenix after accepting an offer for his first
professional career position.  His home search was challenging.  After realizing he could afford
a mortgage that was comparable to the average rent, he set his sights on new home
ownership.  It was extremely difficult to find new communities that were more central to his
work and that fit the lifestyle he was looking to experience.
 
The Sonoran Desert/I-17 corridor was a target area for him due to location and proximity to
shopping, entertainment and outdoor activities.  However, what he found were thousands of
new/planned apartments.  If this community were further along and offered affordable options
for first-time buyers, it would have been a strong consideration.
 
The vision for Verdin is beautiful.  It strikes a critical balance between community and nature.
 Developers and home builders need to do more for preservation and sustainability.   Taylor
Morrison is setting a gold standard here.  As you consider future development in this area, I do
ask that you challenge your developers and home builders to exceed the standard that is being
set here.  I’d also ask that communities offer more affordable options for first time home
buyers (e.g. townhomes).
 
Sincerely,
Ann Griffith