Attachment E - VPC Summary NG Rec - Z-62-18-2.pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2022-06-01)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 14294 characters
City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary 
Z-62-18-2
Date of VPC Meeting 
March 10, 2022 
Request From 
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence), S-1 DCOD (Ranch or
Farm Residence, Desert Character Overlay District), and
RE-35 DCOD (Single-Family Residence District, Desert
Character Overlay District)
Request To 
PUD DCOD, Pending PUD (Planned Unit Development, 
Desert Character Overlay District, Pending Planned Unit 
Development) and PUD (Planned Unit Development)  
Proposed Use 
Single-family residential 
Location 
Southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and 
Sonoran Desert Drive  
VPC Recommendation 
Approval, subject to stipulations, with a modification to 
Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated development 
narrative 
VPC Vote 
4-1
VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:
This item was heard concurrently with Item #4 – Z-TA-5-18-2, Item #5 – Z-75-18-2, and 
Item #6 – GPA-DSTV-18-2. 
10 persons indicated that they wished to speak. 
Julianna Pierre provided information regarding Z-TA-5-18-2, a text amendment to 
revise the applicability area and associated text for the Desert Maintenance Overlay 
District (DMOD) of the Desert Character Overlay District (DCOD).  She explained the 
permitted uses and standards for the two sub-districts in the DMOD, Sub-District A and 
Sub-District B.  She explained that the southern boundary of the DMOD aligns with the 
Northeast Outerloop Freeway alignment outlined in the Peripheral Areas C and D Plan.  
Julianna Pierre explained that applicant’s proposed modifications would remove Sub-
District A standards from the property south of Sonoran Desert Drive and west of Cave 
Creek Wash.  Additionally, the land south of Sonoran Desert Drive and east of Cave 
Creek Wash, currently in Sub-District A, would become part of Sub-District B.  She 
stated that staff’s recommendation is to only remove Sub-District A standards from an 
Attachment E

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
approximately 155.06-acre portion of the original request.  She added that the text 
amendment also includes changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the staff 
recommendation is for approval of Z-TA-5-18-2 to amend the applicability area and 
associated text for the DMOD of the DCOD as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report. 
 
Julianna Pierre explained that Z-75-18-2 is the rezoning case associated with the 
aforementioned text amendment and would remove the DCOD designation from the 
zoning districts.  She explained that the applicant proposed and staff recommended 
areas were identical to those in Z-TA-5-18-2, but the staff recommendation for Z-75-18-
2 is denial as filed, approval of the staff recommended area. 
 
Julianna Pierre explained that GPA-DSTV-1-18-2 was a request from Preserves / 
Residential 0 to 1 dwelling units per acre / Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, 
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre / Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling 
units per acre, and Preserves / Floodplain to Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre 
/ Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre and Preserves / Floodplain, with removal of 
the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay (IPO).  She explained that the IPO acted as a timing 
element to ensure growth was concentrated within the Infrastructure Limit Line (ILL), a 
guide to where the City would extend water and sewer infrastructure to support 
development.  She stated that significant investment and development has occurred 
within the boundaries of the ILL and there are opportunities to revisit the overlay and 
reassess development beyond the ILL.  She added that staff is recommending approval 
of GPA-DSTV-1-18-2. 
 
Julianna Pierre stated that Z-62-18-2 is a rezoning request of 488.63 acres at the 
southwest corner of the 24th Street alignment and Sonoran Desert Drive from S-1 
DCOD, S-1, and RE-35 DCOD to PUD DCOD (pending PUD) and PUD.  She added 
that the proposed PUD will allow single-family residential development.   
 
Julianna Pierre stated that the development is proposing a master-planned residential 
community with a maximum 1,420 units at a density of 3.0 dwelling units per acre.  
There will be a collection of single-family neighborhoods with various amenities, open 
spaces, and a pedestrian network.  She also discussed the permitted uses, connectivity 
to the adjacent Sonoran Preserve, open space, and amenities. 
 
Julianna Pierre reviewed the community input received since 2018, which included 82 
letters in opposition and 6 letters in support.  She stated that the letters in opposition 
expressed concerns regarding: road infrastructure, increased traffic, decreased resident 
safety, preserve areas not maintained for outdoor activities, negative impacts on the 
area’s natural flora and fauna, maintaining the requirements for the DCOD, density, 
number of units, water resources, Sonoran Desert Drive remaining a scenic corridor, the 
proposed development not matching the character of the area, strain on the school 
district, and lack of amenities to support the development. 
 
Julianna Pierre reviewed the staff finding and stipulations for Z-62-18-2, noting that 
Stipulation No. 1 had corrections to the PUD name and date stamped date.  She added 
that staff recommended approval, subject to stipulations. 
 
Susan Demmitt, representative with Gammage & Burnham, provided information about 
the proposed development, noting the site is a privately owned parcel adjacent to the 
Sonoran Preserve and will have only single-family homes with a maximum of 3 homes

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
per acre. She discussed the history of applicable plans that apply to the site, such as 
the DMCO, Peripheral Areas C and D Plan, and Phoenix General Plan.  She explained 
that the Verdin property was always intended to develop as residential.  She also 
discussed the eventual build out of Sonoran Desert Drive and the infrastructure 
improvements that Verdin developers will build along Sonoran Desert Drive.  She also 
noted that developers are working with the Deer Valley Unified School District. 
 
Alex Steadman, representative with RVi, stated that the Verdin development will have 
a unique vision and design approach.  He discussed the partnership with the National 
Wildlife Federation (NWF), noting the certified wildlife habitat open space, monarch 
pledge, early childhood health outdoors nature playscape, habitat management plans, 
and homeowner habitat gardens.  He discussed the certified habitat open space areas, 
specifically the preserved habitat, re-established habitat, and maintained open space.  
He stated that the playscapes will include nature trails with education nodes, parks, 
trailheads, informative signage, and community amenities.  He also provided an 
example of the NWF landscape palette. 
 
Alex Steadman also discussed the pedestrian circulation and edge openness plans.  
He stated that the development will have an open trailhead for the public, which 
includes public parking, community gathering spaces, and access to water.  He added 
that there will be a variable edge adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve and Mesquite Wash.  
He also noted that the Verdin PUD provides parallels to the DCOD. 
 
Vice Chair Shannon Simon appreciated the thoughtful design of the development and 
stated that the project was high quality. 
 
Gary Kirkilas, a member of Save Our Sonoran Preserve, provided a presentation and 
discussed the importance of the DCOD.  He stated that the DCOD was intended to 
maintain the fragile undisturbed areas of the wildlife corridor along the Cave Creek 
Wash, a major floodway and floodplain.  He added that the Zoning Ordinance discusses 
how development in the DCOD should blend with the undisturbed desert environment 
rather than dominate it.  He added the DCOD states that the Dynamite Boulevard 
alignment acts as the southern boundary, and makes no reference to Sonoran Desert 
Drive.  He added that moving the DCOD boundary further north eliminates the purpose 
of the overlay. 
 
Patrick McMullen, President of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, 
appreciated the applicant linking the development to the Sonoran Preserve, but still had 
concerns regarding removal of the DCOD, especially when the DCOD would dictate the 
number of units permitted on the site.  He also expressed concerns regarding the width 
of the trail along the Mesquite Wash. 
 
Susanne Rothwell, a member of the Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council, stated 
that the Sonoran Collaborative assisted with writing the DCOD chapter of the Zoning 
Ordinance and there was an enormous amount of research regarding the fragile 
corridors in the area.  She requested lower density and single-story residences.  She 
added that DCOD should remain in place. 
 
Ann Wilde, a member of the public, stated that development should not affect the 
desert character.  She stated that development should occur with the DCOD in place.

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
Cynthia Weiss, a resident of Sonoran Gate, the closest residential development to 
Verdin, appreciated Verdin’s thoughtful development. 
 
Kara Nicholls, a member of the public who lives adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve, 
stated that she was excited about Verdin providing a connection to the northern and 
southern portions of the Preserve.  She appreciated the NWF collaboration and stated 
this development will aid in home ownership since homes on an acre are unobtainable 
for many. 
 
Rob Nash-Boulden, a member of the public, asked the Village Planning Committee to 
reconsider and deny the request to remove the DCOD from the site.  He stated that the 
DCOD should be retained.  He also expressed concern that the development will be 
built with no close connections to services. 
 
Robert Thompson, a member of the public, disagreed with the change in zoning. 
 
Jennifer Ruby, a member of the public, stated that Verdin will be a vibrant place for 
people to live.  She noted that the project is low density and thoughtful with accessible 
housing. 
 
Keeli Keeler, a member of the public, stated that the DCOD should remain in place and 
that the proposed number of units will change the desert character.   
 
Susan Demmitt stated that standards outlined in the DCOD have been taken into 
account and worked into the Verdin project.  She added that the land adjacent to 
Sonoran Desert Drive is expected to develop in the future and Verdin will act as a 
precedent for what’s to come. 
 
MOTION: Committee member Daniel Tome made a motion to approve Z-62-18-2, 
subject to stipulations and a modification to Stipulation No. 1, regarding an updated 
development narrative.  The motion was seconded by Vice Chair Shannon Simon. 
 
VOTE: 4-1 with Committee members Simon, Kreiger, Ricart, and Tome in favor and 
Chair Stokes in opposition. 
 
STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION & STIPULATIONS: 
The VPC recommended approval with modification.  Per the recommendation, the 
stipulations for the case are as follows. 
 
Recommended Stipulations: 
1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sendero Foothills VERDIN PUD 
reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the 
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval 
of this request.  The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the 
Development Narrative date stamped November 29, 2021 MARCH 3, 2022, as 
modified by the following stipulations: 
 
a. Page 23, Section 1.d.Accessory uses.(1): Revise to read, “permanent 
and/or temporary alcoholic beverage and/or food sales and/or 
consumption;”

City of Phoenix • Planning & Development Department 
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona  85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 
2. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this 
development.  No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study is 
reviewed and approved by the City.  The TIS shall provide signal warrant 
analysis for development access points along Sonoran Desert Drive as well as 
7th Street and Dove Valley Road.  The developer will be responsible for all 
additional dedications and/or roadway and signal improvements as identified by 
the approved study. 
 
3. The developer shall submit Master Street Design and Phasing Plans for each 
Development Unit, as required by Section 636, Planned Community District 
(PCD), of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. 
 
4. All designated public roadways shall meet the City of Phoenix Storm Water 
Design Manual Standards for wash crossings. 
 
5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, 
landscaping, and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and 
Development Department.  All improvements shall comply with all ADA 
accessibility standards. 
 
6. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall 
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the 
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to 
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval. 
 
7. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the 
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified 
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the 
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations. 
 
8. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the 
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33- 
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the 
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.