Attachment B - Staff Report - Z-43-21-6.pdf
Extracted text (via pymupdf)
30460 characters
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Camelback East Village Planning
Committee Meeting Date
October 5, 2021
Planning Commission Hearing Date
November 4, 2021
Request From:
R1-6 (0.27 acres) and R-5 (0.43 acres)
Request To:
R-O (0.70 acres)
Proposed Use
Professional office
Location
Southwest corner of 40th Place and Indian
School Road
Owner
Christopher Alt and Christiana Moss
Representative/Applicant
Christopher Alt, Studio Ma, Inc.
Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to stipulations
General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
Residential 15+ dwelling units per acre
Street Map
Classification
40th Place
Local Street
25-foot west half street
Indian School Road
Major Arterial
40-foot south half street
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Encourage land uses that promote the growth of entrepreneurs or new
businesses in Phoenix in appropriate locations.
The proposed development will allow for the expansion of an existing office use while
remaining consistent with the residential scale and character of the surrounding
neighborhood. Landscape setbacks and buffering vegetation will further help minimize the
impact of the portion of the structure on the adjacent single-family home to the south. By
rezoning the entirety of the site to R-O, the proposal will ensure that future development
and land uses on the site are compatible with the residential neighborhood.
$WWDFKPHQW%
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 2 of 11
STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE; LOCAL & SMALL
BUSINESS, LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Facilitate adaptive reuse of older,
underutilized properties to create mechanisms for new local and small
businesses to operate, thrive and grow.
The conversion of the southern property to an extension of the existing office use
encourages the growth of a local business that is appropriately located along a major
arterial street.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.
As stipulated, the development will provide mature shade trees along its 40th Place
frontage, as well as throughout its surface parking lot.
Applicable Plan, Overlays, and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See Background Item No. 6.
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See Background Item No. 7.
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 8.
Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 9.
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use
Zoning
On Site
Office, single-family residence
R-5, R1-6
North (Across Indian
School Road)
Restaurant, surface parking lot C-2
South
Single-family residence
R1-6
East (Across 40th
Place)
Single-family residences
R1-6
West
Restaurant
C-2
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 3 of 11
R-O (Residential Office)
Standards
Requirements
Provisions on the
Proposed site Plan
Minimum Building Setbacks
Front (East)
20 feet
19 feet (east) – Not met*
Side
(North)
(South)
10 feet
10 feet
9.5 feet (north) – Not met**
10 feet – Met
Rear
25 feet
57 feet (west) – Met
Landscaping
Minimum 3 feet wide landscape
strip around principal structure
Met
5 feet required along north side
9.5 feet (north) – Met
Lot Coverage
30%
33% - Not met*
Building Height
15 feet, plus 1 foot in height per 1
foot additional setback to a
maximum height of 25 feet
14.2 feet – Met
Parking
1 per 300 square feet net floor
area (20 spaces)
20 spaces – Met
*Site Plan modification or variance required
**Denotes existing condition on the portion of the site that will not be modified during
development.
Background/Issues/Analysis
SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to
rezone a 0.70-acre
site located on the
southwest corner of
40th Place and
Indian School Road
from 0.27 acres of
R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District)
and 0.43 acres of
R-5 (Multifamily
Residence District)
to R-O (Residential
Office – Restricted
Commercial District)
to allow an office use.
Aerial Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 4 of 11
2. The site has a General
Plan Land Use Map
designation of
Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre. The
same designation exists
on the east, west, and
south of the site. To the
north of the site, across
Indian School Road, a
Commercial General
Plan Land Use Map
designation exists.
The proposal is not
consistent with the
Residential 15+ dwelling
units per acre designation. However, as the site is under 10 acres, a General Plan
Amendment is not required.
EXISTING CONDITIONS & SURROUNDING ZONING
3. The site is currently
zoned R1-6 (Single-
Family Residence
District) and R-5
(Multifamily Residence
District). The existing
office building is located
on the northern portion
of the site, which has
the multifamily zoning
but allows professional
office use. The single-
family portion of the
property to the south will
be redeveloped to
expand the footprint of
the office building.
g
General Plan Land Use Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Zoning Map
Source: City of Phoenix Planning and Development Department
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 5 of 11
The residential
neighborhood to the
south of the site is
Zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District). To the
east, cross 40th Place, is a
professional office and more
single-family residences
zoned R1-6 (Single-Family
Residence District) and R-5
(Multifamily Residence
District) where adjacent to
Indian School Road.
To the west of the site is a
restaurant zoned C-2
(Intermediate Commercial
District). North of the site,
across Indian School Road,
are a restaurant and a
surface parking lot also zoned
C-2 (Intermediate
Commercial District)
The proposal to rezone the
entirety of the site, including
the portion that includes the
existing office building, to R-O
will provide an appropriate transition from the commercial uses present along Indian
School Road to the residential neighborhood on 40th Place.
4. The proposed site plan depicts an existing office building on the northern portion of
the site (labeled “Lot 1”) and the proposed expansion into the new southern parcel
(labeled “Lot 2”). Conditions on Lot 1 are not changed with this proposal, and all
development activity is proposed on the southernmost parcel. The proposal
consists of a building addition to the existing office structure, expanding the building
footprint by 3,293 square feet, new landscaping areas along 40th Place and the
new southern perimeter property line, and an expansion of the surface parking area
on the southwestern portion of the site.
Current Site Conditions
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 6 of 11
The existing building setbacks along Indian School Road and along 40th Place do
not meet the development standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance, and, as the
proposal is to simply extend the existing building, staff is not recommending general
conformance with the site plan. The building expansion will be consistent in scale
and character with the existing office building, with the same building setback along
40th Place being extended south to the new parcel. This setback area will be
planted with similar vegetation as the existing property, which also complies with
staff’s recommendation for robust tree, shrub, and groundcover plantings listed in
Stipulation No. 3. The new portion of the building will also be set back 10 feet from
the southern perimeter property line, where the property is directly adjacent to a
single-family residence. Staff recommends that this area be planted with minimum
2-inch caliper trees placed 20 feet on center to achieve a vegetative buffer area
between the project and the home to the south. This is addressed in Stipulation No.
4.
Vehicular access will be provided solely from Indian School Road to discourage
visitor circulation and parking on 40th Place. This is also recommended by staff in
Stipulation No. 2. Vehicular circulation is planned to occur in the surface parking
ting building setbacks along Indian School Road and along 40
Proposed Site Plan
Source: Studio Ma
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 7 of 11
area on the western portion of the site, where there is an existing parking area on
the northern portion, and where a new parking area will be constructed on the
southern portion. This new parking area is proposed to be constructed of
permeable paving material to aid in stormwater permeation and reduce the urban
heat island effect. To further help provide a thermally comfortable surface area,
staff is recommending that the parking area be shaded to 25 percent with minimum
2-inch caliper trees dispersed through the parking area. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 5 and only applies to the new parking area on the new southern
portion of the site.
Although no signage is currently proposed, a stipulation prohibiting internally lit
signs is recommended to help maintain the residential character of the area. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 6
5. The proposed conceptual building elevations depict a one-story office building with
a modern wood slat design consistent with the current condition of the existing
building (see Current Site Conditions exhibit on Page 5 of this staff report). The
design will be extended south to the new parcel and will be of a compatible scale to
the adjacent single-family residential neighborhood.
AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
6. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
Proposed Building Elevations
Source: Studio Ma
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 8 of 11
development process. By investing in trees and the urban forest, the city can
reduce its carbon footprint, decrease energy costs, reduce storm water runoff,
increase biodiversity, address the urban heat island effect, clean the air, and
increase property values. In addition, trees can help to create walkable streets and
vibrant pedestrian places. Staff is recommending robust tree plantings along the
southern and east landscape setbacks, as well as dispersed throughout the new
parking area. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 3, 4, and 5. Further, the
northern portion of the site where the existing building sits has been previously
landscaped to provide trees, shrubs, and live groundcover.
7. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding
Principles. The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The development shall provide
accessible pedestrian connectivity to the sidewalk on Indian School Road and
bicycle parking near the building entrance, per Stipulation Nos. 7 and 8.
8. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its bikeway system and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
The proposal incorporates requirements for bicycle parking that follows standards
set forth in the Walkable Urban Code, which is the city’s form-based zoning code
intended to enhance the pedestrian realm and encourage multi-modal
transportation. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7.
9. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance expand its recycling and other waste
diversion programs. The development will continue to utilize regular trash and
recycling collection.
COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
10. At the time this staff report was written, staff received one inquiry regarding
changing the rezoning request and one letter in opposition citing concerns with
compatibility and overflow parking in the neighborhood.
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
11. The Public Transit Department has requested that the developer provide clearly
defined, accessible pathways that connect all building entrances and exits, and
public sidewalks, and, where pedestrian paths cross drive aisles, that they be
constructed of materials that visually contrast with parking and drive aisle surfaces.
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 9 of 11
Findings
1.
The proposal will provide an appropriate transition between a major arterial street
and an established single-family neighborhood.
2.
The proposal will provide an opportunity for an existing small business located on a
major arterial street to expand in the Camelback East area and serve the
surrounding neighborhood.
3.
The proposal is compatible in scale and character with the surrounding
neighborhood and will provide an appropriate land use transition from the
commercial uses along Indian School Road
Stipulations
1.
The development shall be in general conformance with the elevations date stamped
June 25, 2021, with specific regard to the following and as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.
a.
That there be a maximum building height of one story and 15 feet.
2.
There shall be no vehicular access from 40th Place.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9.
12. The Street Transportation Department has required that all streets be constructed
with all required improvements and comply with current ADA standards. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 10.
OTHER
13. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33 feet of the discovery and the City of
Phoenix Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to
properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 11.
14. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal
actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be
required.
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 10 of 11
3.
The required landscape setback along 40th Place shall include large canopy shade
trees 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Twenty-five percent of the trees shall be minimum 4-inch
caliper and 75 percent of the trees shall be minimum 3-inch caliper. Five, five-gallon
shrubs per tree, and additional shrubs or live groundcover, shall provide minimum 75
percent live cover at maturity, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.
4.
The required landscape setback along the southern portion of the site shall be
planted with minimum 2-inch caliper shade trees placed 20 feet on center or in
equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
5.
All uncovered surface parking lot areas located within the southern 65 feet of the site
shall be landscaped with a minimum 2-inch caliper drought-tolerant shade trees.
Landscaping shall be dispersed throughout the parking area and achieve 25 percent
shade at maturity, as approved or modified by Planning and Development
Department.
6.
There shall be no internally lit signs on the site. Signage shall be approved by the
Planning and Development Department.
7.
A minimum of four bicycle parking spaces shall be provided through Inverted U
and/or artistic racks located near building entrances and installed per the
requirements of Section 1307.H. of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department. Artistic racks shall adhere to the City of
Phoenix Preferred Designs in Appendix K of the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan.
8.
Clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided to connect building
entrances and public sidewalks, using the most direct route for pedestrians, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.
9.
Where pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, they shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrast with the adjacent parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.
10.
The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with the current ADA Guidelines.
11.
In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.
Staff Report: Z-43-21-6
September 29, 2021
Page 11 of 11
Writer
Sofia Mastikhina
September 16, 2021
Team Leader
Samantha Keating
Exhibits
Sketch Map
Aerial
Site plan date stamped June 25, 2021 (1 page)
Elevations date stamped June 25, 2021 (2 pages)
Community correspondence (3 pages)
Z-SP-3-81
*
*
R-5
C-2
R1-6
R-4
C-2
C-2
R-3A
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
40TH PL
40TH ST
7TH ST
24TH ST
40TH ST
32ND ST
16TH ST
BETHANY HOME RD
NORTHERN AVE
GLENDALE AVE
CAMELBACK RD
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
THOMAS RD
MC DOWELL RD
VAN BUREN ST
WASHINGTON ST
48TH ST
56TH ST
64TH ST
SR 51
CAMELBACK EAST VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 6
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-43-21
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
0.70 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R-5, R1-6
R-O
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
18, 1
1/development
* UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
22, 2
N/A
Christopher Alt, Studio Ma, Inc
DATE:
9/8/2021
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 16-37
ZONING MAP
H-10
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R-5 ( 0.43 a.c.)
R1-6 ( 0.27 a.c.)
TO:
R-O ( 0.70 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-43-21.mxd
Z-43-21
0.02
0
0.02
0.01
Miles
Z-SP-3-81
*
*
R-5
C-2
R1-6
R-4
C-2
C-2
R-3A
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
40TH PL
40TH ST
7TH ST
24TH ST
40TH ST
32ND ST
16TH ST
BETHANY HOME RD
NORTHERN AVE
GLENDALE AVE
CAMELBACK RD
INDIAN SCHOOL RD
THOMAS RD
MC DOWELL RD
VAN BUREN ST
WASHINGTON ST
48TH ST
56TH ST
64TH ST
SR 51
CAMELBACK EAST VILLAGE
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 6
I
APPLICANT'S NAME:
APPLICATION NO.
Z-43-21
GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
0.70 Acres
MULTIPLES PERMITTED
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus
R-5, R1-6
R-O
CONVENTIONAL OPTION
18, 1
1/development
* UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
22, 2
N/A
Christopher Alt, Studio Ma, Inc
DATE:
9/8/2021
REVISION DATES:
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
QS 16-37
ZONING MAP
H-10
REQUESTED CHANGE:
FROM: R-5 ( 0.43 a.c.)
R1-6 ( 0.27 a.c.)
TO:
R-O ( 0.70 a.c.)
Document Path: S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2021\Z-43-21.mxd
Z-43-21
0.02
0
0.02
0.01
Miles
`KR>?Q7?Á7GìƂ
È>Ƃ
Y%|FYƂ
¾Ƃ
Ƃ
'
[]ëÊè]²Ƃ
vNNvNNvNNƂ[äà][ž[æſ¿
]Ó¯Ƃ
eUaıŀƂKaƂ
ãG
\Ƃ aƂėKĤÿƂĒUUƂ eUþƂ
`KR>?Â7?ƀRƂ
ĊŞĴďƂÕÉspľƂĩpsċČēĘsāƂ
ĥčĎąƂĄŁĠīTqƂĹƂĮĢĀTƂ
őIJĈTqƂłĦTęTqżƂpŽŻƂ
a7>7>ËGGƂ
>¸\\
ŐƂ
8. b";Ƃ
%Ƃ
Mĵ:Ƃ)&d8.&Ƃ
&Ƃ
Ƃ
/Ƃr&d8.&Ƃ³Ƃ82rƂ :
8ƂĞƂ Ƃm###Ƃ
Ƃ
/Ƃ. Ƃ
ÔƂ
ML:Ƃ"İĔ´Ƃ ..':Ƃ V.Ƃ";Ƃ ,&Ƃ
éƂ
"/&cÐÑS/WƂ
mƂ
';.&Ķ8Ƃr.L b.&'Ƃ V.Ƃ
8Ƃ"įdB; , Ƃ
HƂ
ML:Ƃf"'LWƂ&,"ƂL;Ƃ ,&Ƃ
Ƃ
%$' &'' ''
'
òƂ
M":Ƃ.f 2Ƃ.fLƂ
ħƂ8/
)SƂ";Ƃ ,&bƂ
®=¨Ƃ
/Ƃ
%Ƃ
Mķ:Ƃ8 V/
WƂ
ĉƂ
Sb:Ƃ
&Ƃ;Ƃ ,
¹Ƃ Ƃ
'
%%Ƃ
/Ƃ8 V/WƂ
8ƂĪ
S:Ƃ
&Ƃ
%ßƂ
);.&Ƃ:fĿƂ/ Ƃ&dĨƂ;/ Ƃ;ġ#Ƃ/Ƃ
S:Ƃ
!'!'
"'%!''
'
%Ƃ
B.Ƃ
"Ƃ ; "WƂ)ºƂm°Ƃ,ZƂ
%#'#
'#'
'
/Ƃ" ÒM"Ƃ
`K7>?Q7?QG7?Ƃ
eQ\Ƃ
`K7>?Q7?ÏG7íƂ
eRƁƂ
#Ƃ
,'2
Ƃ Ƃ
kkkÝÇP
P
P
~ÅPÀ©P~ÆZƂ"Ŝ,
Ƃ 9Ƃ
/ Ƃ
)O-Ƃ
Ƃ $ƂļÍ Ƃ
IƂƂ
ƂƂ
4½ƂoƂ%Ƃ
"Ƃ+ƂƂƂ
3#_!
#!Ƃ
C $C Ƃ
ŚƂ$Ƃ
Ƃ C $
Ƃ,Ƃ
IƂƂ
ƂƂ
4ƂoƂ%Ƃ
$Ƃ+ƂƂƂ
ś#_!@#!Ƃ
90Ƃ B
)Ƃ $ĝ9Ƃ,
Ƃ Ƃ
36
O
c
Ƃ
ƂƂ
ƂƂ Ƃ34ƂoƂƂ
$Ƃ+ƂƂƂ
g6_*
!#!Ƃ
99 Ƃ
ŗ@ Ƃ
ƂƂƂgƂ
4ƂĂƂƂ
ğ $Ƃ9 $Ƃ
§
ƂƂş
Ƃ =^Ƃţ61ƂƂ =lƂ
' !D@
ź@#Ƃ
Ƃ4
Ƃ
ƂƂ'Ƃ-ƂŹƂ3
Ƃ
ƂXĖ@ƂŎŕƂ2ŷ
3ƂƂ)-#Ƃ
6*ƂhƂ¤3ƂƂ!ƂŨ
#Ƃ
'0
'Ƃ9 "Ƃ
ƂƂƂõƂ
ƂIFI=Ƃ
)ƂJƂ01Ƃ)1JƂx
ƂƂ2ƂƂEƂ,Ƃ
ƂŦxƂƂ,
Ƃ *1Ƃ
zöƂ
¥ƂD
3ƂƂƂůƂ!ƂƂ
Ƃ6Ƃ÷Ƃ /Ƃ Ƃ ƂƂ
ƂƂ
Ƃ6ƂƂƂ3ƂƂƂùƂƂ
*w1ƂƂƂ
ƂƂƂƂ
Ƃ
Ƃ
ƂƂƂ±
Ö*6 O
OƂ
ƂD
øƂƂOƂƂ
ƂƂD3
ÌƂ
ƂƂ#ƂnƂ
ƂHFH=Ƃ
'ƂJƂ01Ƃ'1JƂx
ƂƂ2ƂƂEƂ,»Ƃ
ƂƂũƂƂ,ŪƂ *1Ƃ
3z#Ƃ
Ń0Ƃ
)-nƂ =Ƃ
'Ƃ-nƂ F+Ƃ54
<Ƃ
=Ƃ5<Ƃ
$Ƃ
0Ƃ
)-%Ƃ
+Ƃ5lI(<Ƃ
ĚƂó«Ƃ
×ƂêçØƂěĬƂðüĐĜƂ
$cƂ
Ƃ(Ƃ5l^(<Ƃ
2t)90Ƃĭt
ƂB"
0Ƃ
4
Ƃ5Ƃ!
}Ƃ
)-Ƃ
XƂ
'-Ƃ
"54* 2!}Ƃ
'$Ƃ u &0Ƃ
ghD5 F<Ƃ
2*@@ %Ƃ
2*
Ƃ
2!Ƃ
B3ŝÙB Ƃ
šƂ
((E5#%+<Ƃ
ñáåŌŒÞÚņűŘƂ
J(Ƃ5#<Ƃ
řƂ
(Ƃ
(Ƃ
+Ƃ
4
Ƃ
'-Ƃ
ŮƂ
)-Ƃ
¼+EōƂ
((Ƃ
+(EAƂ ( HîÛƂ
iƂ
(iƂ
¬Ƃ
$cƂ
+J%EAƂÎ(EƂ
iƂ
B' Ƃ
Ƃ
ĸƂ
0Ƃ2*
Ƃ
¡Ƃ5¥*ƂD!<Ƃ
đūŲųƂijŖŋƂăƂ
$ B
Ƃ
2t)90ƂC0C$Ƃ
'-%Ƃ
Ŕʼn
Ƃ5Ƃh¤<Ƃ
4
ƂƂDƂ!
Ƃ
XƂ
)"Ƃ
)Ƃ
Ƃ
+Ƃ
âïôƂ
#Ƃ%(^Ƃ
1A{=YƂ
1A{=YƂ
1AµAFjFªƂ
*
Ƃ
Ƃ$Ƃ _ƂƂƂƂƂ5Eŏ
<Ƃ
¶(Ƃ
Ƃ+Ƃ
+ƂAƂƂ
úƂƂƂ*
Ƃ
Xy
Ƃ
(Ƃ ƂŴƂƂňDƂƂ ûƂƂƂƂ
ƂŬ6ƂƂ
u
-I=Ƃ
9VƂ-ƂHƂ
-Ƃ+HƂ
Ņ0Ƃ &-ƂÃƂ
ƂƂ
ƂƂ Ƃ
ťŸƂ
ŵܧƂƂ
^Ƃ%ƂƂ
ŭƂ!Ƃ
9 Ƃ
¢Ƃ
ƂƂ
ƂƂ Ƃ
· gƂ
4Ƃ
3zƂƂ
Ƃ Ƃĺ Ƃ
HƂƂ
Ƃ¢Ƃ
4Ƃ
w¦ŢƂƂ
C $C Ƃ
'$Ƃ
C $
Ƃ,Ƃ
IƂƂ
Ƃ¡Ƃ
4Ƃ
w¦Ƃ+Ƃ
ćƂ>G>RƂĻĆĕUƂģýƂ
"
Ƃ*!6Ƃ
ƂƂ
*!ƂƂŰ3ƂƂ
£!
O X1 Ƃ
Ƃ
ŧ
6ƂĽƂƂ
£
ƂƂ!!ƂhƂ
6*1 yƂ
@
Ŋ*@6Ƃ
1
ƂŶƂ#Ƃ
uœƂ
Š
Ƃ
|Ƃ
jƂ
jƂ
Ƃ
Ƃ
ń0Ƃ
AŤyƂ
%Z+Ƃ
Ƃ
Ä%Ƃ
!ŇZƂ
)*
)*
A
3]BPR=I9.PD bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbsb
)
NOLN3OR^D=I3
!%.PD
'('0)/+0
OLL7
!
0
&
'
23P/O=NR=LI
7=I=P:329O,23
/LI/PS3GZ,DE
LM3IP/O33I=I9
OLL7=I93293G3R,D,IJP:33TG3R,D7E,P:=I9
,IL2=`32
M,=IR323=7PZPGLLR:RLZ3F327=I=P:
.3^LI2
ZLLJMLPSZ>/D3,OP6S^N
Z=I2LZZ?,IL2=`32EVG=IVG8
.3^LI2
73I/3,SMOLM3OS^F=I3'G=I
2LLO .3^LI2
3\=PS=I9PC^D@9:SP .3^LI2
dyzzidwy
C=X,(!
P24Y(!!"
"""0
0
O5aLI=I9/,P5
0
$"%3=vgocvPdnyyqOg
!,-*.0,ywc
0
'!!%")
zidvcui
,2#$)
cgg
$"%3=wgocwPdmyyqOg
$$) I $n Nrcdi
Nnyiwo
,|pywc)%)
0!# !#%$0&0
")(3/yyqogliPi
Nnyiwo,|oywc)%)
/;O=PRLN;3O,DR
/;O=PR=,I,GLPP
")(3/yyqogliP~ii
Nnyiwo ,|oywc)%)
1 QUW0<KH-
Sno
gyduiwo
cw
ov
|uivyj
ipdicwg
ncqq ucovni zzi|yj
ni,moid [ny
ncqq
covcqqdyuuywqc
cy|cwgyni{|i
i|if
|tln
owhgovlni
dyz|olny
O3X=P=LIk
x
0
0
)
0
)+
_LI=I9
znc
i}i
0
gci
0
ucz|eidvy
13 ³
13 ³
}|}|}|}|}|³~)'³
]ZZF³
!³
$³
(³
+³
,³
/³
[:³
2³
³
?@^;]L\`LZX³
DMXM^I@?³G]5?@³
;ZX;³^a@V³i5RR³
Z\@X³^;]@@XLXG³
]ZZDLXG³@?G@³V@`5R³5X?³^I@@`³V@b5R³DR5^ILXG³
5XZ?Lo@?³
\5LX`@?³@MD^³i³^VZZ`I³`Zi@S@?³ELXL^I
³8@mZX?³
iZZ? \Z^`i;U^@5]³`m\³
iLX?Zi³5XZ?LpB?³5SeVLXeV³D]5V@
³8@mZX?³
D@X;@³5a³\]Z\@]am³RLX@
³ VLX³
?ZZ]³8@mZX?³
@lM^aLXG³^QmRLGIa^³8@mZX?³
*&+$,-#.%'/012 "3
444
() !44
r³rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrstu
v
rrrrw
x
x
³
$ y@kLz^`yLXyHy9{¢ ³
\]Z\@]dm³TOX@³
XZa@4³CkL^aLXH³9eLR?LXH³@R@h5aLZX³aZ³]@V5LX³
|}|}|}|}|}|}|}|}|}|}|}|³r¯)#%³
]ZZD³
³
N³
rrrrrrrrrrr³\]Z\@]`m³TLX@Pr³r³
³
QLh5 0 $³
^?Ah³³ .$$(³
\5\\³$ (,-.³
]BqZXLXH³<7^B³$ ³
+(,³@³L³^³]³
\
ª
³5¥"²³1, 1³
-$³$,³ (1³
¤³
³
5? *+1³
££³
+(,³@³L³^³]³
++1 X +¤ \
³
\
³7±³1, 1³
+(,³\]Z\@]cL@^³f<³
(1 .³@³<
³^¤
¤³
\
®³5±³1, 1³
<J]L^`Z\J@]³5R`³
<J]L^`L5X5³VZ^^³
(1 0³@³<
³^¤
¤³
\
®
³5±³1, 1³
>³%%³_cg=KY³W6³
a£³¨
¦³£³³
£¤¨
¤³³£
¡
³³
£ ¤
¤°³
7¤
¦³j³£³
¤³³¬
³
£¦¤©¤°¤
£
«
³
¤£
¨¦
³
°¤³§³
]@hL^LZX³
³
+³
-³
nZXLXH³
£«³
&&!-&(³
¤
³
$!*,³
£
¤ ³
1
Sofia Mastikhina
From:
Crystal DeVelis <xtalphx@msn.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, August 11, 2021 11:12 AM
To:
Sofia Mastikhina
Subject:
Zoning case Z-43-21, 4048 North 40th Place
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Completed
The above case has come to my attention as a nearby interested neighbor.
I fail to understand why the applicant is seeking an R5 designation. Is it just to match the existing
property? This is to be an office expansion and while I believe the applicant's motives are good, zoning changes
are forever and this would leave the property vulnerable to future multifamily development within a single-
family neighborhood. Would it be any more difficult or costly for the applicants to have both properties zoned
R-O? That would allow their expansion but not jeopardize the neighborhood should ownership change.
Thank you for reading.
-- Crystal DeVelis
4351 E. Whitton Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85018
Reference-
Case No.: Z-43-21
Address: 4048 North 40th Place
Phoenix, AZ 85018
August 25, 2021
City of Phoenix Planning & Development Department,
Attn: Sofia Mastikhina
We are writing to you to share our concerns with case number Z-43-21. As homeowners who live
directly east of proposed expansion we are opposed to having additional commercial parcels infiltrate
our neighborhood. After attending the August 12th, 2021 neighborhood meeting we are following up
accordingly. Below are a series of our concerns.
x
The proposed plan calls for a community garden. Due to the area we feel this has safety
concerns and will attract nomadic citizens. Recently we had package theft in the middle of a
weekend day. We feel that a community garden would increase foot traffic and lead to
additional theft, possible property damage and decrease the feel of a quiet neighborhood
located in a cul-de-sac. Please reference Complaint No.: 100483610 & Incident No.:
202100001160432 with the City Prosecutor’s Office.
x
The proposed plan is inconsistent with other streets/communities in the area in which most
have one parcel of commercial zoning whereas this would create two on the west side & only
one of the east side. If allowed to rezone, we feel it would not stop there as opportunities to
continue to infiltrate the neighborhood would be allowed diminishing the community.
x
The proposed plan is removing a potential new home buyer or rental home. As housing
affordability & rental affordability continues to rise we feel that keeping the residence at 4048
40th place is best for the citizens in our community as potential future citizens.
x
The parking proposal calls for seven addition spots for a total of 20, 13 of which are existing.
During the meeting on August 12th Studio MA ownership & team members stated that they are
looking to expand 12-13 employees in the future adding to their current of 12 employees which
does not require enough parking spots for each team member. One of these parking spots is
designated handicap. The result would be parking on the street which creates issues for
services, safety issues for children in the area and contributes to the local restaurant overflow
parking that invades our neighborhood most evenings.
In closing we strongly disagree with the rezoning in our neighborhood and would like to understand
what steps to ensure our voice is heard based on the above concerns.
Amber Skoog & Matthew Reyhons
Residents of 4041 North 40th Place