Attachment C - PHO Summary - PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8).pdf

City of Phoenix — Formal (2021-11-17)

View PDF Meeting page

Extracted text (via pymupdf) 10677 characters
REPORT OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION  
Mr. Adam Stranieri, Planner III, Hearing Officer  
Bradley Wylam, Planner I, Assisting  
 
October 20, 2021 
 
ITEM NO: 4 
 
 
DISTRICT 8 
SUBJECT: 
 
 
 
Application #: 
PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8) 
Location: 
Approximately 115 feet west of the southwest corner of 2nd 
Drive and Beverly Road 
Existing Zoning:  MUA 
Acreage:  
12.79 
Request: 
1) Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding specific 
conformance with the site plan date stamped November 
24,2003. 
2) Deletion of Stipulation 2.B regarding zoning administrator 
determination regarding horse trailer storage. 
3) Deletion of Stipulation 2.D regarding landscaped areas. 
4) Deletion of Stipulation 3 regarding site plan approval for 
new development. 
5) Deletion of Stipulation 5 regarding construction of streets 
adjacent to the development. 
6) Technical corrections to Stipulations 2, 2.A and 2.C. 
Applicant: 
John Haldiman 
Owner: 
John Haldiman 
Representative: 
John Haldiman 
 
ACTIONS 
 
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer 
recommended denial as filed and approval with a modification. 
 
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The South Mountain 
Village Planning Committee heard this case on October 12, 2021 and 
recommended approval by a vote of 10-0. 
 
DISCUSSION 
 
Zach Haldiman, representative for the applicant, provided an overview of the 
request, site plan, and original rezoning case. He stated that a modification to 
Stipulation 1 regarding specific conformance to the site plan be modified to allow 
for a new single-family home on the approximately 12.79 gross acre site. He 
stated that the proposed deletion of 2.b regarding horse trailer storage applies to 
Attachment C

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 20, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8) 
Page 2 
 
conditions that are no longer relevant to the development and that any horse 
trailers stored on site are owned by the farm and in use. He stated that 
Stipulation 2.d regarding landscaped areas is difficult to accomplish for the farm 
and that any landscaping within reach of their animals would be eaten by the 
animals. He stated that Stipulation 3 regarding site plan approval for new 
development is unnecessary and that any development would be built and 
permitted per City standards. He stated that the farm would not be able to afford 
the right-of-way improvements as stipulated in Stipulation 5 and that the 
applicant requests to delete the stipulation. He stated that they are willing to 
abandon the right-of-way along Beverly Road or dedicate an easement to the 
City, but they cannot afford the improvement of the entire road. He stated that he 
had talked with different firms regarding the potential costs and that they were 
untenable for his family.  He stated that they received feedback from many 
neighbors in support of their project.  
 
Neal Haddad, Neighborhood Commission of Greater Phoenix member, stated he 
is in support of the proposal and that the Haldiman farm is an asset to the 
community. He stated that the farm provides relief in the otherwise 
overdeveloped communities that surround the farm. He stated that the programs 
at the farm help young children, those with special needs, and veterans of the 
military. He stated the South Mountain Village Planning Committee (VPC) 
recommended unanimous approval of the proposal.  
 
Adam Stranieri provided a review of the South Mountain VPC recommendation. 
He recommended that the proposed modification of Stipulation 1 regarding 
specific conformance be approved with a modification to allow the development 
to occur with general conformance, which would allow greater flexibility in the 
final design. He recommended that the proposed deletion of Stipulation 2.b be 
approved because the use referenced in that stipulation is no longer present. He 
recommended that the proposed deletion of Stipulation 2.d be approved and 
noted that the development will still be required to follow the landscaping 
standards of the MUA zoning district and noted that it is difficult for the applicant 
to maintain the additional requirements due to the animals. He recommended 
that the applicant’s request to delete Stipulation 3 be recommended for approval 
and stated the stipulation is unnecessary due to the Zoning Ordinance standards. 
He stated that the request to delete Stipulation 5 regarding construction of streets 
adjacent to the development be denied. He stated that the Street Transportation 
Department did not support the request and that the stipulation is a requirement 
for commercially zoned properties. He stated he did not have the authority to 
waive requirements to follow the City Code and other regulatory standards 
regarding developer responsibility to construct adjacent rights-of-way. 
 
FINDINGS 
 
1) The applicant’s request for modification of Stipulation 1 is recommended 
for approval with a modification.  The modification is to provide standard

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 20, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8) 
Page 3 
 
language regarding plan conformance and to convert the requirement 
from “specific” to “general” conformance.  “Specific conformance” does not 
allow any deviation in key design elements.  The change is intended to 
allow deviation given that the proposed site plan lacks some detail 
required for plan review.  The primary change from the stipulated plan is 
the addition of a 2380 square foot second dwelling unit on the property.  
The use is permitted by the district and represents a small addition on the 
approximately 12.79 gross acre site.   
 
2) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 2.b is recommended for 
approval.  At the time the stipulation was applied, there was horse trailer 
storage on the property and a lack of clarity as to whether this was a 
permitted use in the district. The stipulation was intended to compel the 
applicant to submit for an Informal Interpretation letter from the Zoning 
Administrator to evaluate this use.  The applicant has indicated that this 
use is no longer present on this site.  If this use is resumed and there are 
continuing questions, this process is still the appropriate route to pursue a 
response from the Planning and Development Department. 
 
3) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 2.d is recommended for 
approval. The MUA zoning district has both building and landscape 
setback requirements that exceed those of the adjacent zoning districts 
and will mitigate potential impacts of the uses.  The original staff report 
stated that the intent was to promote intended character of the MUA 
zoning district. The applicant will also be required with the unique design 
guidelines of this district.  The applicant noted a unique difficulty in 
meeting this stipulation in that the animals would eat this landscaping 
making it difficult to maintain as it is stipulated to align with pastures. 
 
4) The applicant’s request to delete Stipulation 3 regarding site plan approval 
is recommended for approval.  This stipulation is unnecessary in that site 
plan approval is already required for new development per standards in 
the Zoning Ordinance.  The applicant’s request in this PHO hearing is 
itself part of the process to obtain site plan approval. 
 
5) The applicant’s request for deletion of Stipulation 5 is recommended for 
denial.  The Street Transportation Department does not support the 
deletion of this stipulation. Right of way improvements are required by the 
City of Phoenix City Code for commercially zoned properties. The original 
entitlement resulted in an increase of density and utilization of the site 
accessed by the adjacent street; therefore, street improvements are 
required. The stipulation is standard language and is not prescriptive 
regarding specific dedications which will be determined through standard 
procedures during plan review processes.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 20, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8) 
Page 4 
 
STIPULATIONS 
 
1. That THE development shall be in specific GENERAL conformance to WITH 
the site plan date stamped November 24, 2003 SEPTEMBER 17, 2021, as 
modified by the following stipulations and/or APPROVED BY the PLANNING 
AND Development Services Department. 
 
2. 
That Prior to vesting, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Occupancy, 
or other documentation to the Planning AND DEVELOPMENT Department 
to verify completion of the following improvements: 
 
 
a. 
That All areas used for parking and maneuvering of vehicles and 
trailers shall be dustproofed as approved by the PLANNING AND 
Development Services Department. 
 
 
 
b. 
That the applicant shall submit a letter and necessary documentation 
to the Zoning Administrator to determine if the storage of horse trailers 
is an allowed use in the Mixed Use Agricultural zoning district. 
 
 
 
b. 
c. 
That The applicant shall address outstanding emergency vehicle 
access and fire hydrant issues with the fire review section of the 
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. 
 
 
 
d. 
That a minimum of ten, twelve-foot by eight-foot landscaped areas 
shall be placed along the north, east, south and west property lines 
within the pastures as approved by the Development Services 
Department. These areas shall be landscaped with a minimum of two 
1.5-inch trees and appropriate shrubs from the Mixed Use Agricultural 
Plant Materials list. One plant in each of the landscaped areas shall be 
Penstemon. 
 
3. 
That any new development shall be subject to site plan approval in the 
Development Services Department. 
 
 
STREETS TRANSPORTATION 
 
 
3. 
4. 
That Right-of-way totaling 25-feet shall be dedicated for the south half of 
Beverly Road. 
 
 
4. 
5. 
That The developer shall construct all streets adjacent to the development 
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, landscaping, 
and other incidentals as per plans approved by the City.  All improvements 
shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

Planning Hearing Officer Summary of October 20, 2021 
Application PHO-1-21--Z-142-03-7(8) 
Page 5 
 
Upon request, this publication will be made available within a reasonable length of time 
through appropriate auxiliary aids or services to accommodate an individual with a 
disability. This publication may be made available through the following auxiliary aids or 
services: large print, Braille, audiotape or computer diskette. Please contact the Planning 
and Development Department, Angie Holdsworth, at voice number 602-495-5622 or TTY 
use 7-1-1.